db: Upgrade to 6.0.35
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
$ bitbake -c patch db-native
WARNING: Host distribution "Ubuntu-16.04" has not been validated with this version of the build system; you may possibly experience unexpected failures. It is recommended that you use a tested distribution.
Loading cache: 100% |#############################################################################################################| ETA: 00:00:00 Loaded 2112 entries from dependency cache.
Parsing recipes: 100% |###########################################################################################################| Time: 00:00:03 Parsing of 1584 .bb files complete (1581 cached, 3 parsed). 2113 targets, 348 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors.
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION = "1.30.0" BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "universal" TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi" MACHINE = "lightpixels" DISTRO = "poky" DISTRO_VERSION = "2.1.1" TUNE_FEATURES = "arm armv7ve vfp thumb neon vfpv4 callconvention-hard cortexa7" TARGET_FPU = "hard" meta meta-poky meta-yocto-bsp = "krogoth:d8582b7a00129175ab11f6f813552ce1a56fc7d7" meta-raspberrypi = "master:4817e2c087097c02755d6309304878e42cf61d3c" meta-qt5 = "krogoth:1ec776771f5f09c97917d3839d8140f9a7668c4a" meta-oe = "krogoth:895b25b387cae428c38990f4d2747603ee9dc92d" meta-lightpixels = "krogoth:9574f1a4f48c6d057e56e6b471dd65567102de2e"
NOTE: Preparing RunQueue
NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
ERROR: db-native-6.0.30-r0 do_patch: Command Error: 'quilt --quiltrc /media/jgueytat/Projects/LightPixels/LightPixels-OperatingSystem/build/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/etc/quiltrc push' exited with 1 Output:
Applying patch fix-parallel-build.patch
patching file Makefile.in
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1034.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file Makefile.in
Patch fix-parallel-build.patch can be reverse-applied
ERROR: db-native-6.0.30-r0 do_patch: Function failed: patch_do_patch
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /media/jgueytat/Projects/LightPixels/LightPixels-OperatingSystem/build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/db-native/6.0.30-r0/temp/log.do_patch.17684
ERROR: Task 1 (virtual:native:/media/jgueytat/Projects/LightPixels/LightPixels-OperatingSystem/poky/meta/recipes-support/db/db_6.0.30.bb, do_patch) failed with exit code '1'
***********
By applying the patches manually with the patch command it's getting better but still:
jgueytat@Happy:~/Sandbox-db/db-6.0.35$ patch -p1 < arm-thumb-mutex_db5.patch patching file src/dbinc/mutex_int.h jgueytat@Happy:~/Sandbox-db/db-6.0.35$ patch -p0 < fix-parallel-build.patch patching file dist/Makefile.in Hunk #1 succeeded at 1041 (offset 7 lines).
#######
It's seems like the patch command accepts the patch even if the offset is not respected but not the way it is done during the bitbake -c patch db-native command.
=> I thought that two set of patches were needed to respect more carefully the line numbers where the changes have to be done.
Quoted 49 lines · Julien Gueytat
Alright! I'm giving you that quickly.
Quoted 46 lines · Aníbal Limón
Quoted 4 lines · Julien Gueytat
Related to the db recipe. There are also the patches that needs to be regenerated as the same patches are applied for the two current versions. At least on Ubuntu 16.06 the same patch can't be applied anymore on the two versions as the lines where to apply the patches differs too much.
This is a quite strange, i'm wondering why can't be applied, i expect if a patch fails in configure/compile stages not at patch apply.
Could you put here the error log please?
alimon
Quoted 32 lines · Ross
Quoted 29 lines
On 28 September 2016 at 17:06, Aníbal Limón <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
@@ -18,16 +18,15 @@ RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "db3" PR = "r1"Remove this PR please.
# Note, when upgraded to 6.1.x, a patch in RPM will need to be removed to activate db 6.1 support. - -SRC_URI = "http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-${PV}.tar.gz <http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-$%7BPV%7D.tar.gz> \ +SRC_URI = "http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/db-${PV}.tar.gz <http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/db-$%7BPV%7D.tar.gz> \What is distfiles.gentoo.org <http://distfiles.gentoo.org>'s policy when db-6.0.36 is released? Could the tarball be deleted the day after we release? In general we've been either using snapshot.debian.org <http://snapshot.debian.org> or pointing directly at the yoctoproject.org <http://yoctoproject.org> source mirror for tarballs we can't rely upon over time.
Ross