Skip to contentSkip to conversation

USB hub_probe: rework ugly goto-into-compound-statement

PATCH Superseded Eugene Korenevsky 3 participants 3 messages Nov 9, 2016 – Nov 10, 2016 USB

v4 of 7 Superseded Latest is v7 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/1 USB hub_probe: rework ugly goto-into-compound-statement

Rework smelling code (goto inside compound statement). Perhaps this is legacy. Anyway such code is not appropriate for Linux kernel.

Changes since v3: fix typo
Changes since v2: extract the code to static function Changes since v1: fix spaces instead of tab, add missing 'Signed-off-by'

---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/core/hub.c +18 -17
index cbb1467..b770c8d 100644
@@ -1722,10 +1722,25 @@ static void hub_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
 	kref_put(&hub->kref, hub_release);
 }
 
+static int hub_check_descriptor_sanity(struct usb_host_interface *desc)
+{
+	/* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */
+	/*  specs is not defined, but it works */
+	if (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0 &&
+	    desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */
+	if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */
+	return usb_endpoint_is_int_in(&desc->endpoint[0].desc);
+}
+
 static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 {
 	struct usb_host_interface *desc;
-	struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *endpoint;
 	struct usb_device *hdev;
 	struct usb_hub *hub;
 
@@ -1800,25 +1815,11 @@ static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	/* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */
-	/*  specs is not defined, but it works */
-	if ((desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0) &&
-	    (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1)) {
-descriptor_error:
+	if (!hub_check_descriptor_sanity(desc)) {
 		dev_err(&intf->dev, "bad descriptor, ignoring hub\n");
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
-	/* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */
-	if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1)
-		goto descriptor_error;
-
-	endpoint = &desc->endpoint[0].desc;
-
-	/* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */
-	if (!usb_endpoint_is_int_in(endpoint))
-		goto descriptor_error;
-
 	/* We found a hub */
 	dev_info(&intf->dev, "USB hub found\n");
 
@@ -1845,7 +1846,7 @@ static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 	if (id->driver_info & HUB_QUIRK_CHECK_PORT_AUTOSUSPEND)
 		hub->quirk_check_port_auto_suspend = 1;
 
-	if (hub_configure(hub, endpoint) >= 0)
+	if (hub_configure(hub, &desc->endpoint[0].desc) >= 0)
 		return 0;
 
 	hub_disconnect(intf);
Signature · 1 line
2.10.2
#1 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 21 lines · Eugene Korenevsky

Rework smelling code (goto inside compound statement). Perhaps this is legacy. Anyway such code is not appropriate for Linux kernel.

Changes since v3: fix typo
Changes since v2: extract the code to static function Changes since v1: fix spaces instead of tab, add missing 'Signed-off-by'

---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/core/hub.c +1 -0
index cbb1467..b770c8d 100644
@@ -1722,10 +1722,25 @@ static void hub_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
        kref_put(&hub->kref, hub_release);
 }
 
+static int hub_check_descriptor_sanity(struct usb_host_interface *desc)

drivers/usb/core/hub.c static void hub_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf) · line 1735

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/usb/core/hub.c +10 -0
+{
+       /* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */
+       /*  specs is not defined, but it works */
+       if (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0 &&
+           desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1)
+               return 0;
+
+       /* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */
+       if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1)
+               return 0;

We usually return 0 as successful result, can you return kernel error number if we check the descriptor failed? Or change the return value of the function as bool type.

Quoted 56 lines
drivers/usb/core/hub.c +7 -18
+
+       /* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */
+       return usb_endpoint_is_int_in(&desc->endpoint[0].desc);
+}
+
 static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 {
        struct usb_host_interface *desc;
-       struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *endpoint;
        struct usb_device *hdev;
        struct usb_hub *hub;
 
@@ -1800,25 +1815,11 @@ static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
        }
 #endif
 
-       /* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */
-       /*  specs is not defined, but it works */
-       if ((desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0) &&
-           (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1)) {
-descriptor_error:
+       if (!hub_check_descriptor_sanity(desc)) {
                dev_err(&intf->dev, "bad descriptor, ignoring hub\n");
                return -EIO;
        }
 
-       /* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */
-       if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1)
-               goto descriptor_error;
-
-       endpoint = &desc->endpoint[0].desc;
-
-       /* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */
-       if (!usb_endpoint_is_int_in(endpoint))
-               goto descriptor_error;
-
        /* We found a hub */
        dev_info(&intf->dev, "USB hub found\n");
 
@@ -1845,7 +1846,7 @@ static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
        if (id->driver_info & HUB_QUIRK_CHECK_PORT_AUTOSUSPEND)
                hub->quirk_check_port_auto_suspend = 1;
 
-       if (hub_configure(hub, endpoint) >= 0)
+       if (hub_configure(hub, &desc->endpoint[0].desc) >= 0)
                return 0;
 
        hub_disconnect(intf);
--

2.10.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Signature · 2 lines
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
#2 lore raw
In reply to Eugene Korenevsky
Quoted 6 lines · Eugene Korenevsky

Rework smelling code (goto inside compound statement). Perhaps this is legacy. Anyway such code is not appropriate for Linux kernel.

Changes since v3: fix typo
Changes since v2: extract the code to static function Changes since v1: fix spaces instead of tab, add missing 'Signed-off-by'

changes go below the --- line, please read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for all of the details.

thanks,

greg k-h