qedr: Add support for QP verbs
Hello Ram Amrani,
The patch cecbcddf6461: "qedr: Add support for QP verbs" from Oct 10, 2016, leads to the following static checker warning:
drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/verbs.c:1494 qedr_create_qp()
warn: possible memory leak of 'qp'
drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/verbs.c
1484
1485 rc = qedr_check_qp_attrs(ibpd, dev, attrs);
1486 if (rc)
1487 return ERR_PTR(rc);
1488
1489 qp = kzalloc(sizeof(*qp), GFP_KERNEL);
1490 if (!qp)
1491 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
1492
1493 if (attrs->srq)
1494 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
You should move this in front of the allocation to avoid the memory leak.
1495
1496 DP_DEBUG(dev, QEDR_MSG_QP,
1497 "create qp: sq_cq=%p, sq_icid=%d, rq_cq=%p, rq_icid=%d\n",
1498 get_qedr_cq(attrs->send_cq),
1499 get_qedr_cq(attrs->send_cq)->icid,
1500 get_qedr_cq(attrs->recv_cq),
1501 get_qedr_cq(attrs->recv_cq)->icid);
1502
1503 qedr_set_qp_init_params(dev, qp, pd, attrs);
1504
1505 if (attrs->qp_type == IB_QPT_GSI) {
1506 if (udata) {
1507 DP_ERR(dev,
1508 "create qp: unexpected udata when creating GSI QP\n");
1509 goto err0;Ugh... GW-BASIC style numbered labels... What does goto err0 do??? Imagine if instead of function names we should use numbers like:
one(); two(); five();
Use a meaningful label names like "goto free_qp;"
1510 } 1511 return qedr_create_gsi_qp(dev, attrs, qp);
We should free qp if qedr_create_gsi_qp() fails as well.
1512 }
1513
1514 memset(&in_params, 0, sizeof(in_params));
1515
1516 if (udata) {
1517 if (!(udata && ibpd->uobject && ibpd->uobject->context))
1518 goto err0;
1519 regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html