Skip to contentSkip to conversation

4.10-rc3, firmware loading via user space helper crashes if firmware not present

PATCH Jakub Kicinski 1 participant 2 messages Jan 13, 2017 – Jan 14, 2017 Driver core

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi!

If one requests a FW which does not exist in the FS and the user space helper is used then fw_load_abort() will be called twice which leads to NULL-deref.

It will be called once in firmware_loading_store() (handling the -1 case) and then again in _request_firmware_load() because return value from fw_state_wait_timeout() was negative.

I think this is introduced in by f52cc379423d ("firmware: refactor loading status").

The simple fix would be to not "unlink" the buf by fw_load_abort() in firmware_loading_store() and always rely on firmware_loading_store().

------->8------------------------------------

(quoted diff) +0 -0

b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c index 4497d263209f..89eb9de81145 100644

drivers/base/firmware_class.c +0 -0
@@ -766,7 +770,7 @@ static ssize_t firmware_loading_store(struct device

*dev, dev_err(dev, "%s: unexpected value (%d)\n", __func__, loading);
/* fallthrough */
case -1:
- fw_load_abort(fw_priv);
+ fw_state_aborted(&fw_buf->fw_st);
break;
}
out:

-------8<------------------------------------

Or should we fix up the ret code handling in __fw_state_wait_common()?

Kuba

#1 lore raw
Quoted 32 lines · Jakub Kicinski

If one requests a FW which does not exist in the FS and the user space helper is used then fw_load_abort() will be called twice which leads to NULL-deref.

It will be called once in firmware_loading_store() (handling the -1 case) and then again in _request_firmware_load() because return value from fw_state_wait_timeout() was negative.

I think this is introduced in by f52cc379423d ("firmware: refactor loading status").

The simple fix would be to not "unlink" the buf by fw_load_abort() in firmware_loading_store() and always rely on firmware_loading_store().

------->8------------------------------------

(quoted diff) +0 -0

b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c index 4497d263209f..89eb9de81145 100644

drivers/base/firmware_class.c +1 -2
@@ -766,7 +770,7 @@ static ssize_t firmware_loading_store(struct device
 *dev, dev_err(dev, "%s: unexpected value (%d)\n", __func__, loading);
 		/* fallthrough */
 	case -1:
-		fw_load_abort(fw_priv);
+		fw_state_aborted(&fw_buf->fw_st);
 		break;
 	}
 out:
 
-------8<------------------------------------
Quoted 1 line

Or should we fix up the ret code handling in __fw_state_wait_common()?

I got this backwards, I blamed the wrong commit, it's the 5d47ec02c37e ("firmware: Correct handling of fw_state_wait() return value") in fact. It made the assumption that all errors returned from fw_state_wait_timeout() require calling the abort, while in fact abort should only be called if user mode helper didn't do anything (either it timed out or someone hit ^C).

I'm leaning towards this:

------->8------------------------------------

drivers/base/firmware_class.c +1 -1
index 4497d263209f..ce142e6b2c72 100644
@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static int _request_firmware_load(struct firmware_priv *fw_priv,
 	}
 
 	retval = fw_state_wait_timeout(&buf->fw_st, timeout);
-	if (retval < 0) {
+	if (retval == -ETIMEDOUT || retval == -ERESTARTSYS) {
 		mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
 		fw_load_abort(fw_priv);
 		mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);

-------8<------------------------------------

Unless advised otherwise I will submit this officially on Monday :)