i2c: mux: reg: use of_property_read_bool()

Use more compact of_property_read_bool() calls for the boolean properties instead of of_find_property() calls in i2c_mux_reg_probe_dt().

---
The patch is against Wolfram Sang's 'linux.git' repo's 'i2c/for-next' branch.

 drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c
===================================================================
@@ -107,9 +107,9 @@ static int i2c_mux_reg_probe_dt(struct r
 	put_device(&adapter->dev);
 
 	mux->data.n_values = of_get_child_count(np);
-	if (of_find_property(np, "little-endian", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian")) {
 		mux->data.little_endian = true;
-	} else if (of_find_property(np, "big-endian", NULL)) {
+	} else if (of_property_read_bool(np, "big-endian")) {
 		mux->data.little_endian = false;
 	} else {
 #if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN : \

@@ -122,10 +122,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_reg_probe_dt(struct r
 #error Endianness not defined?
 #endif
 	}
-	if (of_find_property(np, "write-only", NULL))
-		mux->data.write_only = true;
-	else
-		mux->data.write_only = false;
+	mux->data.write_only = of_property_read_bool(np, "write-only");
 
 	values = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
 			      sizeof(*mux->data.values) * mux->data.n_values,

Hello!

[...]

This patch seems to be lost. Ping?

MBR, Sergei

The patch arrived too late to hit the previous merge window (I had already done the pull request). I had admittedly forgotten about this patch, but the mail sits there with a "TODO" tag, so I think I would have found it when digging through stuff for this merge window.

Anyway, thanks for the reminder, and sorry for the delay.

Cheers,
Peter

Patch applied. For the next time, please use "git format-patch" to generate your patches (or rather, read and follow the latest incarnation of [1]). I fixed it up along with a couple of white-space issues this time, since I was bored and had so little for this merge window. But you generally can't expect maintainers to do this for you.

Cheers,
Peter

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.13/process/submitting-patches.html