staging: lustre: lnet: replace list_for_each with list_for_each_entry
PATCH 1/1 staging: lustre: lnet: replace list_for_each with list_for_each_entry
Replace use of the combination of list_for_each() and list_entry() with list_for_each_entry() to simplify the code and remove variables that are used only in list_for_each().
Issue found and corrected using Coccinelle script:
@r@
expression head, member, e;
type T1, T2, T3;
iterator name list_for_each, list_for_each_entry;
identifier pos, var;
@@
-T1 *pos;
...when!=pos
-list_for_each(pos, head)
+list_for_each_entry(var, head, member)
{
...when!=pos
when!=T3 *var;
-var = list_entry(pos, T2, member);
...when!=pos
}
...when!=pos
--- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c | 14 +++----------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c +3 -11
@@ -176,12 +176,9 @@ struct ksock_peer * ksocknal_find_peer_locked(struct lnet_ni *ni, struct lnet_process_id id) {struct list_head *peer_list =ksocknal_nid2peerlist (id.nid); -struct list_head *tmp;struct ksock_peer *peer; -list_for_each (tmp, peer_list) { - peer = list_entry(tmp, struct ksock_peer, ksnp_list); - +list_for_each_entry (peer, peer_list, ksnp_list) {LASSERT (!peer->ksnp_closing);if (peer->ksnp_ni != ni)
@@ -453,7 +450,6 @@ int ksocknal_add_peer(struct lnet_ni *ni, struct lnet_process_id id, __u32 ipaddr, int port) { - struct list_head *tmp; struct ksock_peer *peer;struct ksock_peer *peer2;struct ksock_route *route;
@@ -491,9 +487,7 @@ ksocknal_add_peer(struct lnet_ni *ni, struct lnet_process_id id, __u32 ipaddr, } route2 =NULL ; -list_for_each (tmp, &peer->ksnp_routes) { - route2 = list_entry(tmp, struct ksock_route, ksnr_list); - +list_for_each_entry (route2, &peer->ksnp_routes, ksnr_list) {if (route2->ksnr_ipaddr == ipaddr)break ;
@@ -1854,12 +1848,10 @@ ksocknal_query(struct lnet_ni *ni, lnet_nid_t nid, unsigned long *when) peer =ksocknal_find_peer_locked (ni, id);if (peer) { -struct list_head *tmp;struct ksock_conn *conn;int bufnob; -list_for_each (tmp, &peer->ksnp_conns) { - conn = list_entry(tmp, struct ksock_conn, ksnc_list); +list_for_each_entry (conn, &peer->ksnp_conns, ksnc_list) { bufnob = conn->ksnc_sock->sk->sk_wmem_queued;if (bufnob < conn->ksnc_tx_bufnob) {
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Quoted 25 lines · Haneen Mohammed
Replace use of the combination of
list_for_each()andlist_entry()withlist_for_each_entry()to simplify the code and remove variables that are used only inlist_for_each().
Issue found and corrected using Coccinelle script:@r@
expression head, member, e;
type T1, T2, T3;
iterator namelist_for_each,list_for_each_entry;
identifier pos, var;
@@-T1 *pos;
...when!=pos(quoted diff) +1
-1-list_for_each(pos, head) +list_for_each_entry(var, head, member){
...when!=pos
when!=T3 *var;
-var =list_entry(pos, T2, member);
...when!=pos
}
...when!=pos
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Haneen Mohammed <[email protected]>
Quoted 65 lines
--- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c | 14 +++----------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c +3
-12@@ -176,12 +176,9 @@ struct ksock_peer * ksocknal_find_peer_locked(struct lnet_ni *ni, struct lnet_process_id id) {struct list_head *peer_list =ksocknal_nid2peerlist (id.nid); -struct list_head *tmp;struct ksock_peer *peer; -list_for_each (tmp, peer_list) { - peer = list_entry(tmp, struct ksock_peer, ksnp_list); - +list_for_each_entry (peer, peer_list, ksnp_list) {LASSERT (!peer->ksnp_closing);if (peer->ksnp_ni != ni)@@ -453,7 +450,6 @@ int ksocknal_add_peer(struct lnet_ni *ni, struct lnet_process_id id, __u32 ipaddr, int port) { - struct list_head *tmp; struct ksock_peer *peer;struct ksock_peer *peer2;struct ksock_route *route;@@ -491,9 +487,7 @@ ksocknal_add_peer(struct lnet_ni *ni, struct lnet_process_id id, __u32 ipaddr, } route2 =NULL ; -list_for_each (tmp, &peer->ksnp_routes) { - route2 = list_entry(tmp, struct ksock_route, ksnr_list); - +list_for_each_entry (route2, &peer->ksnp_routes, ksnr_list) {if (route2->ksnr_ipaddr == ipaddr)break ;@@ -1854,12 +1848,10 @@ ksocknal_query(struct lnet_ni *ni, lnet_nid_t nid, unsigned long *when) peer =ksocknal_find_peer_locked (ni, id);if (peer) { -struct list_head *tmp;struct ksock_conn *conn;int bufnob; -list_for_each (tmp, &peer->ksnp_conns) { - conn = list_entry(tmp, struct ksock_conn, ksnc_list); +list_for_each_entry (conn, &peer->ksnp_conns, ksnc_list) { bufnob = conn->ksnc_sock->sk->sk_wmem_queued;if (bufnob < conn->ksnc_tx_bufnob) { --2.7.4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20170923022239.GA10771%40Haneen.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.