iio: temperature: Adding support for MLX90632
Subsystems (2)
Crt Mori
maintainerPATCH v2 1/3 iio: temperature: Adding support for MLX90632
Melexis has just released Infra Red temperature sensor MLX90632 used for contact-less temperature measurement. Driver provides basic functionality for reporting object (and ambient) temperature with support for object emissivity.
--- MAINTAINERS | 7 + drivers/iio/temperature/Kconfig | 12 + drivers/iio/temperature/Makefile | 1 + drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c | 793 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 813 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c
MAINTAINERS +7 -0
@@ -8690,6 +8690,13 @@ W: http://www.melexis.com S: Supported F: drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c +MELEXIS MLX90632 DRIVER +M: Crt Mori <[email protected]> +L: [email protected] +W: http://www.melexis.com +S: Supported +F: drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c + MELFAS MIP4 TOUCHSCREEN DRIVER M: Sangwon Jee <[email protected]> W: http://www.melfas.com
drivers/iio/temperature/Kconfig +12 -0
@@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ config MLX90614 This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be called mlx90614. +config MLX90632 + tristate "MLX90632 contact-less infrared sensor with medical accuracy" + depends on I2C + select REGMAP_I2C + help + If you say yes here you get support for the Melexis + MLX90632 contact-less infrared sensor with medical accuracy + connected with I2C. + + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will + be called mlx90632. + config TMP006 tristate "TMP006 infrared thermopile sensor" depends on I2C
drivers/iio/temperature/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HID_SENSOR_TEMP) += hid-sensor-temperature.o obj-$(CONFIG_MAXIM_THERMOCOUPLE) += maxim_thermocouple.o obj-$(CONFIG_MLX90614) += mlx90614.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MLX90632) += mlx90632.o obj-$(CONFIG_TMP006) += tmp006.o obj-$(CONFIG_TMP007) += tmp007.o obj-$(CONFIG_TSYS01) += tsys01.o
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +793 -0
793 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.15.0
Jonathan Cameron
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:31:32 +0100 Crt Mori <[email protected]> wrote:
Melexis has just released Infra Red temperature sensor MLX90632 used for contact-less temperature measurement. Driver provides basic functionality for reporting object (and ambient) temperature with support for object emissivity.
Signed-off-by Crt Mori <[email protected]>
Comments inline. Some of which were not fixed from V1.
Also note this won't compile as the sqrt patch is after it.
Jonathan
Quoted 71 lines
--- MAINTAINERS | 7 + drivers/iio/temperature/Kconfig | 12 + drivers/iio/temperature/Makefile | 1 + drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c | 793 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 813 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.cMAINTAINERS +7
-0@@ -8690,6 +8690,13 @@ W: http://www.melexis.com S: Supported F: drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c +MELEXIS MLX90632 DRIVER +M: Crt Mori <[email protected]> +L: [email protected] +W: http://www.melexis.com +S: Supported +F: drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c + MELFAS MIP4 TOUCHSCREEN DRIVER M: Sangwon Jee <[email protected]> W: http://www.melfas.comdrivers/iio/temperature/Kconfig +12
-0@@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ config MLX90614 This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be called mlx90614. +config MLX90632 + tristate "MLX90632 contact-less infrared sensor with medical accuracy" + depends on I2C + select REGMAP_I2C + help + If you say yes here you get support for the Melexis + MLX90632 contact-less infrared sensor with medical accuracy + connected with I2C. + + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will + be called mlx90632. + config TMP006 tristate "TMP006 infrared thermopile sensor" depends on I2Cdrivers/iio/temperature/Makefile +1
-0@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HID_SENSOR_TEMP) += hid-sensor-temperature.o obj-$(CONFIG_MAXIM_THERMOCOUPLE) += maxim_thermocouple.o obj-$(CONFIG_MLX90614) += mlx90614.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MLX90632) += mlx90632.o obj-$(CONFIG_TMP006) += tmp006.o obj-$(CONFIG_TMP007) += tmp007.o obj-$(CONFIG_TSYS01) += tsys01.odrivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,793 @@ +/* +* mlx90632.c - Melexis MLX90632 contactless IR temperature sensor +* +* Copyright (c) 2017 Melexis <[email protected]>
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 14
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+* +* This file is subject to the terms and conditions of version 2 of +* the GNU General Public License. See the file COPYING in the main +* directory of this archive for more details. +* +* Driver for the Melexis MLX90632 I2C 16-bit IR thermopile sensor +*/ +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
Why?
Quoted 61 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +61
-0+#include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/math64.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> + +#include <linux/iio/iio.h> +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h> + +/* Memory sections addresses */ +#define MLX90632_ADDR_RAM 0x4000/* Start address of ram */ +#define MLX90632_ADDR_EEPROM 0x2480/* Start address of user eeprom */ + +/* EEPROM addresses - used at startup */ +#define MLX90632_EE_CTRL 0x24d4/* Control register initial value */ +#define MLX90632_EE_I2C_ADDR 0x24d5/* I2C address register initial value */ +#define MLX90632_EE_VERSION 0x240b/* EEPROM version reg address */ +#define MLX90632_EE_P_R 0x240c/* P_R calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_P_G 0x240e/* P_G calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_P_T 0x2410/* P_T calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_P_O 0x2412/* P_O calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Aa 0x2414/* Aa calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ab 0x2416/* Ab calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ba 0x2418/* Ba calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Bb 0x241a/* Bb calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ca 0x241c/* Ca calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Cb 0x241e/* Cb calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Da 0x2420/* Da calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Db 0x2422/* Db calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ea 0x2424/* Ea calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Eb 0x2426/* Eb calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Fa 0x2428/* Fa calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Fb 0x242a/* Fb calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ga 0x242c/* Ga calibration register 32bit */ + +#define MLX90632_EE_Gb 0x242e/* Gb calibration register 16bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ka 0x242f/* Ka calibration register 16bit */ + +#define MLX90632_EE_Ha 0x2481/* Ha customer calib value reg 16bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Hb 0x2482/* Hb customer calib value reg 16bit */ + +/* Register addresses - volatile */ +#define MLX90632_REG_I2C_ADDR 0x3000/* Chip I2C address register */ + +/* Control register address - volatile */ +#define MLX90632_REG_CONTROL 0x3001/* Control Register address */ +#define MLX90632_CFG_PWR_MASK GENMASK(2, 1)/* PowerMode Mask */ +/* PowerModes statuses */ +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS (ctrl_val) (ctrl_val << 1) +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_HALT MLX90632_PWR_STATUS(0)/* hold */ +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_SLEEP_STEP MLX90632_PWR_STATUS(1)/* sleep step*/ +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_STEP MLX90632_PWR_STATUS(2)/* step */ +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_CONTINUOUS MLX90632_PWR_STATUS(3)/* continuous*/ + +/* Device status register - volatile */ +#define MLX90632_REG_STATUS 0x3fff/* Device status register */ +#define MLX90632_STAT_BUSY BIT(10)/* Device busy indicator */ +#define MLX90632_STAT_EE_BUSY BIT(9)/* EEPROM busy indicator */ +#define MLX90632_STAT_BRST BIT(8)/* Brown out reset indicator */
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 85
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+#define MLX90632_STAT_CYCLE_POS GENMASK(6, 2)/* Data position */ +#define MLX90632_STAT_DATA_RDY BIT(0)/* Data ready indicator */ + +/* RAM_MEAS address-es for each channel */ +#define MLX90632_RAM_1 (meas_num) (MLX90632_ADDR_RAM + 3 * meas_num) +#define MLX90632_RAM_2 (meas_num) (MLX90632_ADDR_RAM + 3 * meas_num + 1) +#define MLX90632_RAM_3 (meas_num) (MLX90632_ADDR_RAM + 3 * meas_num + 2) + +/* Magic constants */ +#define MLX90632_EEPROM_VERSION 0xff05/* EEPROM DSP version for constants */
Long comments that only just fit on the line. Better just to put them on the line above in all cases.
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 87
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +2
-0+#define MLX90632_ID_MEDICAL 0x01ff/* EEPROM Medical device id */ +#define MLX90632_ID_CONSUMER 0x02ff/* EEPROM Consumer device id */
So to go back to the very odd code below. What you are checking is that the register contains:0xff05 & 0x1ff = 0x105 vs 0xff05 & 0x2ff = 0x205.
That means from the kernel point of view that the IDs
are effectively 0x105 and 0x205 as that is what we can see..
If you want to leave them in this odd form you must explain which part is visible in the eeprom and give some justification for it.
Right now it just looks like a bug as I raised the first time I reviewed this.
Note that the datasheet I found doesn't seem to have any information on this register at all so I am only guessing at what was intended.
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 100
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +13
-0+#define MLX90632_EEPROM_WRITE_KEY 0x554C/* EEPROM write key 0x55 and 0x4c */ +#define MLX90632_RESET_CMD 0x0006/* Reset sensor (address or global) */ +#define MLX90632_REF_12 12LL/**< ResCtrlRef value of Ch 1 or Ch 2 */ +#define MLX90632_REF_3 12LL/**< ResCtrlRef value of Channel 3 */ +#define MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM 31/**< Maximum measurements in list */ + +#define TENTO3 1000LL +#define TENTO4 10000LL +#define TENTO5 100000LL +#define TENTO6 1000000LL +#define TENTO7 10000000LL +#define TENTO10 10000000000LL +#define TENTO12 1000000000000LL
I still really really don't like these... From my point of view they make the code harder to read. We only have to check they were right once so I don't think the chance of bug increases much by just using the numbers inline.
You could if you really want to do this at least use a table lookup and have
pow_10[] = { 1, 10, 100, 1000, ..)
Then we can have pow_10[3] inline which isn't quite as horrible. (still pretty horrible though)
Quoted 219 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +219
-0+ +struct mlx90632_data { +struct i2c_client *client; +struct mutex lock;/* Multiple reads for single measurement */ +struct regmap *regmap; +u16 emissivity; +}; + +static const struct regmap_range mlx90632_volatile_reg_range[] = { +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_REG_CONTROL ,MLX90632_REG_I2C_ADDR ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_REG_STATUS ,MLX90632_REG_STATUS ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_RAM_1 (0 ), +MLX90632_RAM_3 (MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM )), +}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table mlx90632_volatile_regs_tbl = { + .yes_ranges = mlx90632_volatile_reg_range, + .n_yes_ranges =ARRAY_SIZE (mlx90632_volatile_reg_range), +}; + +static const struct regmap_range mlx90632_read_reg_range[] = { +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_EE_VERSION , MLX90632_EE_Ka), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_EE_CTRL ,MLX90632_EE_I2C_ADDR ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_EE_Ha, MLX90632_EE_Hb), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_REG_CONTROL ,MLX90632_REG_I2C_ADDR ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_REG_STATUS ,MLX90632_REG_STATUS ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_RAM_1 (0 ), +MLX90632_RAM_3 (MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM )), +}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table mlx90632_readable_regs_tbl = { + .yes_ranges = mlx90632_read_reg_range, + .n_yes_ranges =ARRAY_SIZE (mlx90632_read_reg_range), +}; + +static const struct regmap_range mlx90632_no_write_reg_range[] = { +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_EE_VERSION , MLX90632_EE_Ka), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_RAM_1 (0 ), +MLX90632_RAM_3 (MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM )), +}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table mlx90632_writeable_regs_tbl = { + .no_ranges = mlx90632_no_write_reg_range, + .n_no_ranges =ARRAY_SIZE (mlx90632_no_write_reg_range), +}; + +static const struct regmap_config mlx90632_regmap = { + .reg_bits =16 , + .val_bits =16 , + + .volatile_table = &mlx90632_volatile_regs_tbl, + .rd_table = &mlx90632_readable_regs_tbl, + .wr_table = &mlx90632_writeable_regs_tbl, + + .use_single_rw = true, + .reg_format_endian =REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG , + .val_format_endian =REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG , + .cache_type =REGCACHE_RBTREE , +}; + +static s32 mlx90632_pwr_set_sleep_step (struct regmap *regmap) +{ +return regmap_update_bits (regmap,MLX90632_REG_CONTROL , +MLX90632_CFG_PWR_MASK , +MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_SLEEP_STEP ); +} + +static s32 mlx90632_pwr_continuous (struct regmap *regmap) +{ +return regmap_update_bits (regmap,MLX90632_REG_CONTROL , +MLX90632_CFG_PWR_MASK , +MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_CONTINUOUS ); +} + +/** +* mlx90632_perform_measurement - Trigger and retrieve current measurement cycle +* @*data: pointer to mlx90632_data object containing regmap information +* +* Perform a measurement and return latest measurement cycle position reported +* by sensor. This is a blocking function for 500ms, as that is default sensor +* refresh rate. +*/ +static int mlx90632_perform_measurement (struct mlx90632_data *data) +{ +int ret, tries =100 ; +unsigned int reg_status; + + ret =regmap_update_bits (data->regmap,MLX90632_REG_STATUS , +MLX90632_STAT_DATA_RDY ,0 ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +while (tries-- >0 ) { + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap,MLX90632_REG_STATUS , + ®_status); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +if (reg_status &MLX90632_STAT_DATA_RDY ) +break ; +usleep_range (10000 ,11000 ); + } + +if (tries <0 ) { +dev_err (&data->client->dev,"data not ready" ); +return -ETIMEDOUT ; + } + +return (reg_status &MLX90632_STAT_CYCLE_POS ) >>2 ; +} + +static int mlx90632_channel_new_select (int perform_ret,uint8_t *channel_new, +uint8_t *channel_old) +{ +switch (perform_ret) { +case 1 : + *channel_new =1 ; + *channel_old =2 ; +break ; +case 2 : + *channel_new =2 ; + *channel_old =1 ; +break ; +default : +return -EINVAL ; + } + +return 0 ; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_ambient_raw (struct regmap *regmap, +s16 *ambient_new_raw,s16 *ambient_old_raw) +{ +int ret; +unsigned int read_tmp; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_3 (1 ), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + *ambient_new_raw = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_3 (2 ), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + *ambient_old_raw = (s16 )read_tmp; + +return ret; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_object_raw (struct regmap *regmap, +int perform_measurement_ret, +s16 *object_new_raw,s16 *object_old_raw) +{ +int ret; +unsigned int read_tmp; +s16 read; +u8 channel =0 ; +u8 channel_old =0 ; + + ret =mlx90632_channel_new_select (perform_measurement_ret, &channel, + &channel_old); +if (ret !=0 ) +return ret; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_2 (channel), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + + read = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_1 (channel), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + *object_new_raw = (read + (s16 )read_tmp) /2 ; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_2 (channel_old), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + read = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_1 (channel_old), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + *object_old_raw = (read + (s16 )read_tmp) /2 ; + +return ret; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_all_channel (struct mlx90632_data *data, +s16 *ambient_new_raw,s16 *ambient_old_raw, +s16 *object_new_raw,s16 *object_old_raw) +{ +s32 ret, measurement; + +mutex_lock (&data->lock); + measurement =mlx90632_perform_measurement (data); +if (measurement <0 ) { + ret = measurement; + goto read_unlock; + } + ret =mlx90632_read_ambient_raw (data->regmap, ambient_new_raw, + ambient_old_raw); +if (ret <0 ) + goto read_unlock; + + ret =mlx90632_read_object_raw (data->regmap, measurement, + object_new_raw, object_old_raw); +read_unlock: +mutex_unlock (&data->lock); +return ret; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_ee_register (struct regmap *regmap,u16 reg_lsb, +s32 *reg_value) +{ +s32 ret; +unsigned int read; +__le32 value; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap, reg_lsb, &read);
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 329
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + + value =cpu_to_le32 (read); + + ret =regmap_read (regmap, reg_lsb +1 , &read); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + + value = (cpu_to_le32 (read) <<16 ) | (value &0xffff );
No. This is horrible as I stated before. You have two 16 bit values and you know which is the high byte and which the low. You can simply combine them in cpu endiannenss. *reg_value = (highword) << 16 | lowword;
This works what ever your endiannes..
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 331
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +2
-0+ + *reg_value =le32_to_cpu (value);
blank line here please.
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +5
-0+return 0 ; +} + +static s64 mlx90632_preprocess_temp_amb (s16 ambient_new_raw, +s16 ambient_old_raw,s16 Gb)
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 346
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+{ +s64 VR_Ta, kGb, tmp; + + kGb = ((s64 )Gb *TENTO3 ) >>10ULL ; + VR_Ta = (s64 )ambient_old_raw *TENTO6 + + kGb *div64_s64 (((s64 )ambient_new_raw *TENTO3 ), + (MLX90632_REF_3 )); + tmp =div64_s64 ( +div64_s64 (((s64 )ambient_new_raw *TENTO12 ), + (MLX90632_REF_3 )), VR_Ta);
Odd alignment...
Quoted 201 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +201
-0+return div64_s64 (tmp <<19ULL ,TENTO3 ); +} + +static s64 mlx90632_preprocess_temp_obj (s16 object_new_raw,s16 object_old_raw, +s16 ambient_new_raw, +s16 ambient_old_raw,s16 Ka) +{ +s64 VR_IR , kKa, tmp; + + kKa = ((s64 )Ka *TENTO3 ) >>10ULL ; +VR_IR = (s64 )ambient_old_raw *TENTO6 + + kKa *div64_s64 (((s64 )ambient_new_raw *TENTO3 ), + (MLX90632_REF_3 )); + tmp =div64_s64 ( +div64_s64 (((s64)((object_new_raw + object_old_raw) /2 ) + *TENTO12 ), (MLX90632_REF_12 )),VR_IR ); +return div64_s64 ((tmp <<19ULL ),TENTO3 ); +} + +static s32 mlx90632_calc_temp_ambient (s16 ambient_new_raw,s16 ambient_old_raw, +s32 P_T ,s32 P_R ,s32 P_G ,s32 P_O , +s16 Gb) +{ +s64 Asub, Bsub, Ablock, Bblock, Cblock,AMB , sum; + +AMB =mlx90632_preprocess_temp_amb (ambient_new_raw, ambient_old_raw, + Gb); + Asub = ((s64 )P_T *TENTO10 ) >>44ULL ; + Bsub =AMB - (((s64 )P_R *TENTO3 ) >>8ULL ); + Ablock = Asub * (Bsub * Bsub); + Bblock = (div64_s64 (Bsub *TENTO7 ,P_G )) <<20ULL ; + Cblock = ((s64 )P_O *TENTO10 ) >>8ULL ; + + sum =div64_s64 (Ablock,TENTO6 ) + Bblock + Cblock; + +return div64_s64 (sum,TENTO7 ); +} + +static s32 mlx90632_calc_temp_object_iteration (s32 prev_object_temp,s64 object, +s64 TAdut,s32 Fa,s32 Fb, +s32 Ga,s16 Ha,s16 Hb, +u16 emissivity) +{ +s64 calcedKsTO, calcedKsTA, ir_Alpha, TAdut4, Alpha_corr; +s64 Ha_customer, Hb_customer; + + Ha_customer = ((s64 )Ha *TENTO6 ) >>14ULL ; + Hb_customer = ((s64 )Hb *100 ) >>10ULL ; + + calcedKsTO = ((s64)((s64 )Ga * (prev_object_temp -25 *TENTO3 ) + *TENTO3 )) >>36LL ; + calcedKsTA = ((s64)(Fb * (TAdut -25 *TENTO6 ))) >>36LL ; + Alpha_corr =div64_s64 ((((s64)(Fa *TENTO10 ) >>46LL ) * Ha_customer), +TENTO3 ); + Alpha_corr *= ((s64)(1 *TENTO6 + calcedKsTO + calcedKsTA)); + Alpha_corr = emissivity *div64_s64 (Alpha_corr,TENTO5 ); + Alpha_corr =div64_s64 (Alpha_corr,TENTO3 ); + ir_Alpha =div64_s64 ((s64 )object *TENTO7 , Alpha_corr); + TAdut4 = (div64_s64 (TAdut,TENTO4 ) +27315 ) * + (div64_s64 (TAdut,TENTO4 ) +27315 ) * + (div64_s64 (TAdut,TENTO4 ) +27315 ) * + (div64_s64 (TAdut,TENTO4 ) +27315 ); + +return (int_sqrt64 (int_sqrt64 (ir_Alpha *TENTO12 + TAdut4)) + -27315 - Hb_customer) *10 ; +} + +static s32 mlx90632_calc_temp_object (s64 object,s64 ambient,s32 Ea,s32 Eb, +s32 Fa,s32 Fb,s32 Ga,s16 Ha,s16 Hb, +u16 tmp_emi) +{ +s64 kTA, kTA0, TAdut; +s64 temp =25000 ; +s8 i; + + kTA = (Ea *TENTO3 ) >>16LL ; + kTA0 = (Eb *TENTO3 ) >>8LL ; + TAdut =div64_s64 (((ambient - kTA0) *TENTO6 ), kTA) +25 *TENTO6 ; + +/* Iterations of calculation as described in datasheet */ +for (i =0 ; i <5 ; ++i) { + temp =mlx90632_calc_temp_object_iteration (temp, object, TAdut, + Fa, Fb, Ga, Ha, Hb, + tmp_emi); + } +return temp; +} + +static int mlx90632_calc_object_dsp105 (struct mlx90632_data *data,int *val) +{ +s32 ret; +s32 Ea, Eb, Fa, Fb, Ga; +unsigned int read_tmp; +s16 Ha, Hb, Gb, Ka; +s16 ambient_new_raw, ambient_old_raw, object_new_raw, object_old_raw; +s64 object, ambient; + + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Ea, &Ea); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Eb, &Eb); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Fa, &Fa); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Fb, &Fb); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Ga, &Ga); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Ha, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Ha = (s16 )read_tmp; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Hb, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Hb = (s16 )read_tmp; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Gb, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Gb = (s16 )read_tmp; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Ka, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Ka = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =mlx90632_read_all_channel (data, + &ambient_new_raw, &ambient_old_raw, + &object_new_raw, &object_old_raw); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + + ambient =mlx90632_preprocess_temp_amb (ambient_new_raw, + ambient_old_raw, Gb); + object =mlx90632_preprocess_temp_obj (object_new_raw, + object_old_raw, + ambient_new_raw, + ambient_old_raw, Ka); + + *val =mlx90632_calc_temp_object (object, ambient, Ea, Eb, Fa, Fb, Ga, + Ha, Hb, data->emissivity); +return 0 ; +} + +static int mlx90632_calc_ambient_dsp105 (struct mlx90632_data *data,int *val) +{ +s32 ret; +unsigned int read_tmp; +s32 PT ,PR ,PG ,PO ; +s16 Gb; +s16 ambient_new_raw, ambient_old_raw; + + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap,MLX90632_EE_P_R , &PR ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap,MLX90632_EE_P_G , &PG ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap,MLX90632_EE_P_T , &PT ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap,MLX90632_EE_P_O , &PO ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Gb, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Gb = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =mlx90632_read_ambient_raw (data->regmap, &ambient_new_raw, + &ambient_old_raw); + *val =mlx90632_calc_temp_ambient (ambient_new_raw, ambient_old_raw, +PT ,PR ,PG ,PO , Gb); +return ret; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_raw (struct iio_dev *indio_dev, +struct iio_chan_spec const *channel,int *val, +int *val2,long mask) +{ +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); +int ret; + +switch (mask) { +case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED : +switch (channel->channel2) { +case IIO_MOD_TEMP_AMBIENT : + ret =mlx90632_calc_ambient_dsp105 (data, val); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +return IIO_VAL_INT ; +case IIO_MOD_TEMP_OBJECT : + ret =mlx90632_calc_object_dsp105 (data, val); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +return IIO_VAL_INT ; +default : +return -EINVAL ;
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 557
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+ } +case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBEMISSIVITY : +if (data->emissivity ==1000 ) { + *val =1 ; + *val2 =0 ; + }else { + *val =0 ; + *val2 = data->emissivity; + } +return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO ;
So emmissivty = 900 translates to val2 = 900.
With IIO_VAL_INTO_PLUS_NANO this is
0.000000900 which is not what you want.
I raised this in v1.
Quoted 36 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +36
-0+ +default : +return -EINVAL ; + } +} + +static int mlx90632_write_raw (struct iio_dev *indio_dev, +struct iio_chan_spec const *channel,int val, +int val2,long mask) +{ +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +switch (mask) { +case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBEMISSIVITY : +if (val <0 || val2 <0 || val >1 || + (val ==1 && val2 !=0 )) +return -EINVAL ; + data->emissivity = val *1000 + val2 /1000 ; +return 0 ; +default : +return -EINVAL ; + } +} + +static const struct iio_chan_spec mlx90632_channels[] = { + { + .type =IIO_TEMP , + .modified =1 , + .channel2 =IIO_MOD_TEMP_AMBIENT , + .info_mask_separate =BIT (IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED ), + }, + { + .type =IIO_TEMP , + .modified =1 , + .channel2 =IIO_MOD_TEMP_OBJECT , + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) |
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 603
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+ BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBEMISSIVITY), + }, +}; + +static const struct iio_info mlx90632_info = { + .read_raw = mlx90632_read_raw, + .write_raw = mlx90632_write_raw, +}; + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
General kernel thing these days is not to do this for PM as the config options are a mess, but instead mark them as __maybe_unused and let the compiler drop them if they are unused.
Quoted 46 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +46
-0+static int mlx90632_sleep (struct mlx90632_data *data) +{ +dev_dbg (&data->client->dev,"Requesting sleep" ); +return mlx90632_pwr_set_sleep_step (data->regmap); +} + +static int mlx90632_wakeup (struct mlx90632_data *data) +{ +dev_dbg (&data->client->dev,"Requesting wake-up" ); +return mlx90632_pwr_continuous (data->regmap); +} +#endif + +static int mlx90632_probe (struct i2c_client *client, +const struct i2c_device_id *id) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev; +struct mlx90632_data *mlx90632; +struct regmap *regmap; +int ret; +unsigned int read; + + indio_dev =devm_iio_device_alloc (&client->dev,sizeof (*mlx90632)); +if (!indio_dev) { +dev_err (&client->dev,"Failed to allocate device" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + + regmap =devm_regmap_init_i2c (client, &mlx90632_regmap); +if (IS_ERR (regmap)) { + ret =PTR_ERR (regmap); +dev_err (&client->dev,"Failed to allocate regmap: %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } + + mlx90632 =iio_priv (indio_dev); +i2c_set_clientdata (client, indio_dev); + mlx90632->client = client; + mlx90632->regmap = regmap; + +mutex_init (&mlx90632->lock); +mlx90632_wakeup (mlx90632); + + indio_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev; + indio_dev->name = id->name; + indio_dev->modes =INDIO_DIRECT_MODE ;
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 659
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+ indio_dev->info = &mlx90632_info; + indio_dev->channels = mlx90632_channels; + indio_dev->num_channels =ARRAY_SIZE (mlx90632_channels); + + ret =regmap_read (mlx90632->regmap,MLX90632_EE_VERSION , &read); +if (ret <0 ) { +dev_err (&client->dev,"read of version failed: %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } +if (read == (MLX90632_EEPROM_VERSION &MLX90632_ID_MEDICAL )) {
These still make no sense - you are taking the bitwise and of two values that only overlap by a couple of bits. Unless this register is some weird hash of the two this looks to be wrong.
If this is really the case a comment explaining how these two values are combined and why it makes any sense at all is needed. You have a mask that mostly doesn't seem to overlap with the thing being masked.
Quoted 67 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +67
-0+dev_dbg (&client->dev, +"Detected Medical EEPROM calibration %x" , read); + }else if (read == (MLX90632_EEPROM_VERSION &MLX90632_ID_CONSUMER )) { +dev_dbg (&client->dev, +"Detected Consumer EEPROM calibration %x" , read); + }else { +dev_err (&client->dev, +"Chip EEPROM version mismatch %x (expected %x)" , + read,MLX90632_EEPROM_VERSION ); +return -EPROTONOSUPPORT ; + } + + mlx90632->emissivity =1000 ; + +return iio_device_register (indio_dev); +} + +static int mlx90632_remove (struct i2c_client *client) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (client); +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +iio_device_unregister (indio_dev); + +pm_runtime_disable (&client->dev); +if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended (&client->dev)) +mlx90632_sleep (data); +pm_runtime_set_suspended (&client->dev); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct i2c_device_id mlx90632_id[] = { + {"mlx90632" ,0 }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (i2c, mlx90632_id); + +static const struct of_device_id mlx90632_of_match[] = { + { .compatible ="melexis,mlx90632" }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, mlx90632_of_match); + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP +static int mlx90632_pm_suspend (struct device *dev) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (to_i2c_client (dev)); +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +regcache_sync (data->regmap); + +if (pm_runtime_active (dev)) +return mlx90632_sleep (data); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int mlx90632_pm_resume (struct device *dev) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (to_i2c_client (dev)); +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); +int err; + +regcache_mark_dirty (data->regmap); +regcache_cache_only (data->regmap, false); + err =regcache_sync (data->regmap);
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 736
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+if (err <0 ) { +dev_err (dev,"Failed to sync regmap registers: %d\n" , err); +return err; + } + + err =mlx90632_wakeup (data); +if (err <0 ) +return err; + +pm_runtime_disable (dev);
I'd like to see a comment on this 'dance'. Given you have just done a pm resume I don't immediately see why you need a set_active...
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +16
-0+pm_runtime_set_active (dev); +pm_runtime_enable (dev); + +return 0 ; +} +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +static int mlx90632_pm_runtime_suspend (struct device *dev) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (to_i2c_client (dev)); +struct mlx90632_data *mlx90632 =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +regcache_sync (mlx90632->regmap); + +return mlx90632_sleep (mlx90632);
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 762
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+} + +static int mlx90632_pm_runtime_resume (struct device *dev) +{ +s32 ret; +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (to_i2c_client (dev)); +struct mlx90632_data *mlx90632 =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +regcache_mark_dirty (mlx90632->regmap); +regcache_cache_only (mlx90632->regmap, false);
This all seems a little odd in the resume path. We never put the device into cache_only that I can see so why are we coming out of it?
Quoted 31 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +31
-0+ ret =regcache_sync (mlx90632->regmap); +if (ret <0 ) { +dev_err (dev,"Failed to sync regmap registers: %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } + +return mlx90632_wakeup (mlx90632); +} +#endif + +static const struct dev_pm_ops mlx90632_pm_ops = { + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(mlx90632_pm_suspend, mlx90632_pm_resume) +SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS (mlx90632_pm_runtime_suspend, + mlx90632_pm_runtime_resume,NULL ) +}; + +static struct i2c_driver mlx90632_driver = { + .driver = { + .name ="mlx90632" , + .of_match_table = mlx90632_of_match, + .pm = &mlx90632_pm_ops, + }, + .probe = mlx90632_probe, + .remove = mlx90632_remove, + .id_table = mlx90632_id, +}; +module_i2c_driver (mlx90632_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Crt Mori <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("Melexis MLX90632 contactless Infra Red temperature sensor driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL v2" );
Quoted 8 lines · On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 19:35:03 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:31:32 +0100 Crt Mori <[email protected]> wrote:
Melexis has just released Infra Red temperature sensor MLX90632 used for contact-less temperature measurement. Driver provides basic functionality for reporting object (and ambient) temperature with support for object emissivity.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Crt Mori <[email protected]>Comments inline. Some of which were not fixed from V1.
Also note this won't compile as the sqrt patch is after it.
Doh and I didn't review latest version...
Jonathan
Quoted 938 lines
Jonathan
Quoted 71 lines
--- MAINTAINERS | 7 + drivers/iio/temperature/Kconfig | 12 + drivers/iio/temperature/Makefile | 1 + drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c | 793 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 813 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.cMAINTAINERS +7
-0@@ -8690,6 +8690,13 @@ W: http://www.melexis.com S: Supported F: drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c +MELEXIS MLX90632 DRIVER +M: Crt Mori <[email protected]> +L: [email protected] +W: http://www.melexis.com +S: Supported +F: drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c + MELFAS MIP4 TOUCHSCREEN DRIVER M: Sangwon Jee <[email protected]> W: http://www.melfas.comdrivers/iio/temperature/Kconfig +12
-0@@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ config MLX90614 This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be called mlx90614. +config MLX90632 + tristate "MLX90632 contact-less infrared sensor with medical accuracy" + depends on I2C + select REGMAP_I2C + help + If you say yes here you get support for the Melexis + MLX90632 contact-less infrared sensor with medical accuracy + connected with I2C. + + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will + be called mlx90632. + config TMP006 tristate "TMP006 infrared thermopile sensor" depends on I2Cdrivers/iio/temperature/Makefile +1
-0@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HID_SENSOR_TEMP) += hid-sensor-temperature.o obj-$(CONFIG_MAXIM_THERMOCOUPLE) += maxim_thermocouple.o obj-$(CONFIG_MLX90614) += mlx90614.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MLX90632) += mlx90632.o obj-$(CONFIG_TMP006) += tmp006.o obj-$(CONFIG_TMP007) += tmp007.o obj-$(CONFIG_TSYS01) += tsys01.odrivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,793 @@ +/* +* mlx90632.c - Melexis MLX90632 contactless IR temperature sensor +* +* Copyright (c) 2017 Melexis <[email protected]> drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 14
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+* +* This file is subject to the terms and conditions of version 2 of +* the GNU General Public License. See the file COPYING in the main +* directory of this archive for more details. +* +* Driver for the Melexis MLX90632 I2C 16-bit IR thermopile sensor +*/ +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> Why?
Quoted 61 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +61
-0+#include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/math64.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> + +#include <linux/iio/iio.h> +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h> + +/* Memory sections addresses */ +#define MLX90632_ADDR_RAM 0x4000/* Start address of ram */ +#define MLX90632_ADDR_EEPROM 0x2480/* Start address of user eeprom */ + +/* EEPROM addresses - used at startup */ +#define MLX90632_EE_CTRL 0x24d4/* Control register initial value */ +#define MLX90632_EE_I2C_ADDR 0x24d5/* I2C address register initial value */ +#define MLX90632_EE_VERSION 0x240b/* EEPROM version reg address */ +#define MLX90632_EE_P_R 0x240c/* P_R calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_P_G 0x240e/* P_G calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_P_T 0x2410/* P_T calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_P_O 0x2412/* P_O calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Aa 0x2414/* Aa calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ab 0x2416/* Ab calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ba 0x2418/* Ba calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Bb 0x241a/* Bb calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ca 0x241c/* Ca calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Cb 0x241e/* Cb calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Da 0x2420/* Da calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Db 0x2422/* Db calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ea 0x2424/* Ea calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Eb 0x2426/* Eb calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Fa 0x2428/* Fa calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Fb 0x242a/* Fb calibration register 32bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ga 0x242c/* Ga calibration register 32bit */ + +#define MLX90632_EE_Gb 0x242e/* Gb calibration register 16bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Ka 0x242f/* Ka calibration register 16bit */ + +#define MLX90632_EE_Ha 0x2481/* Ha customer calib value reg 16bit */ +#define MLX90632_EE_Hb 0x2482/* Hb customer calib value reg 16bit */ + +/* Register addresses - volatile */ +#define MLX90632_REG_I2C_ADDR 0x3000/* Chip I2C address register */ + +/* Control register address - volatile */ +#define MLX90632_REG_CONTROL 0x3001/* Control Register address */ +#define MLX90632_CFG_PWR_MASK GENMASK(2, 1)/* PowerMode Mask */ +/* PowerModes statuses */ +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS (ctrl_val) (ctrl_val << 1) +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_HALT MLX90632_PWR_STATUS(0)/* hold */ +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_SLEEP_STEP MLX90632_PWR_STATUS(1)/* sleep step*/ +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_STEP MLX90632_PWR_STATUS(2)/* step */ +#define MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_CONTINUOUS MLX90632_PWR_STATUS(3)/* continuous*/ + +/* Device status register - volatile */ +#define MLX90632_REG_STATUS 0x3fff/* Device status register */ +#define MLX90632_STAT_BUSY BIT(10)/* Device busy indicator */ +#define MLX90632_STAT_EE_BUSY BIT(9)/* EEPROM busy indicator */ +#define MLX90632_STAT_BRST BIT(8)/* Brown out reset indicator */ drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 85
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+#define MLX90632_STAT_CYCLE_POS GENMASK(6, 2)/* Data position */ +#define MLX90632_STAT_DATA_RDY BIT(0)/* Data ready indicator */ + +/* RAM_MEAS address-es for each channel */ +#define MLX90632_RAM_1 (meas_num) (MLX90632_ADDR_RAM + 3 * meas_num) +#define MLX90632_RAM_2 (meas_num) (MLX90632_ADDR_RAM + 3 * meas_num + 1) +#define MLX90632_RAM_3 (meas_num) (MLX90632_ADDR_RAM + 3 * meas_num + 2) + +/* Magic constants */ +#define MLX90632_EEPROM_VERSION 0xff05/* EEPROM DSP version for constants */ Long comments that only just fit on the line. Better just to put them on the line above in all cases.
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 87
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +2
-0+#define MLX90632_ID_MEDICAL 0x01ff/* EEPROM Medical device id */ +#define MLX90632_ID_CONSUMER 0x02ff/* EEPROM Consumer device id */ So to go back to the very odd code below. What you are checking is that the register contains:
0xff05&0x1ff=0x105vs0xff05&0x2ff=0x205.
That means from the kernel point of view that the IDs
are effectively0x105and0x205as that is what we can see..If you want to leave them in this odd form you must explain which part is visible in the eeprom and give some justification for it.
Right now it just looks like a bug as I raised the first time I reviewed this.Note that the datasheet I found doesn't seem to have any information on this register at all so I am only guessing at what was intended.
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 100
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +13
-0+#define MLX90632_EEPROM_WRITE_KEY 0x554C/* EEPROM write key 0x55 and 0x4c */ +#define MLX90632_RESET_CMD 0x0006/* Reset sensor (address or global) */ +#define MLX90632_REF_12 12LL/**< ResCtrlRef value of Ch 1 or Ch 2 */ +#define MLX90632_REF_3 12LL/**< ResCtrlRef value of Channel 3 */ +#define MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM 31/**< Maximum measurements in list */ + +#define TENTO3 1000LL +#define TENTO4 10000LL +#define TENTO5 100000LL +#define TENTO6 1000000LL +#define TENTO7 10000000LL +#define TENTO10 10000000000LL +#define TENTO12 1000000000000LLI still really really don't like these... From my point of view they make the code harder to read. We only have to check they were right once so I don't think the chance of bug increases much by just using the numbers inline.
You could if you really want to do this at least use a table lookup and have
pow_10[] = { 1, 10, 100, 1000, ..)Then we can have pow_10[3] inline which isn't quite as horrible. (still pretty horrible though)
Quoted 219 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +219
-0+ +struct mlx90632_data { +struct i2c_client *client; +struct mutex lock;/* Multiple reads for single measurement */ +struct regmap *regmap; +u16 emissivity; +}; + +static const struct regmap_range mlx90632_volatile_reg_range[] = { +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_REG_CONTROL ,MLX90632_REG_I2C_ADDR ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_REG_STATUS ,MLX90632_REG_STATUS ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_RAM_1 (0 ), +MLX90632_RAM_3 (MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM )), +}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table mlx90632_volatile_regs_tbl = { + .yes_ranges = mlx90632_volatile_reg_range, + .n_yes_ranges =ARRAY_SIZE (mlx90632_volatile_reg_range), +}; + +static const struct regmap_range mlx90632_read_reg_range[] = { +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_EE_VERSION , MLX90632_EE_Ka), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_EE_CTRL ,MLX90632_EE_I2C_ADDR ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_EE_Ha, MLX90632_EE_Hb), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_REG_CONTROL ,MLX90632_REG_I2C_ADDR ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_REG_STATUS ,MLX90632_REG_STATUS ), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_RAM_1 (0 ), +MLX90632_RAM_3 (MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM )), +}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table mlx90632_readable_regs_tbl = { + .yes_ranges = mlx90632_read_reg_range, + .n_yes_ranges =ARRAY_SIZE (mlx90632_read_reg_range), +}; + +static const struct regmap_range mlx90632_no_write_reg_range[] = { +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_EE_VERSION , MLX90632_EE_Ka), +regmap_reg_range (MLX90632_RAM_1 (0 ), +MLX90632_RAM_3 (MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM )), +}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table mlx90632_writeable_regs_tbl = { + .no_ranges = mlx90632_no_write_reg_range, + .n_no_ranges =ARRAY_SIZE (mlx90632_no_write_reg_range), +}; + +static const struct regmap_config mlx90632_regmap = { + .reg_bits =16 , + .val_bits =16 , + + .volatile_table = &mlx90632_volatile_regs_tbl, + .rd_table = &mlx90632_readable_regs_tbl, + .wr_table = &mlx90632_writeable_regs_tbl, + + .use_single_rw = true, + .reg_format_endian =REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG , + .val_format_endian =REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG , + .cache_type =REGCACHE_RBTREE , +}; + +static s32 mlx90632_pwr_set_sleep_step (struct regmap *regmap) +{ +return regmap_update_bits (regmap,MLX90632_REG_CONTROL , +MLX90632_CFG_PWR_MASK , +MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_SLEEP_STEP ); +} + +static s32 mlx90632_pwr_continuous (struct regmap *regmap) +{ +return regmap_update_bits (regmap,MLX90632_REG_CONTROL , +MLX90632_CFG_PWR_MASK , +MLX90632_PWR_STATUS_CONTINUOUS ); +} + +/** +* mlx90632_perform_measurement - Trigger and retrieve current measurement cycle +* @*data: pointer to mlx90632_data object containing regmap information +* +* Perform a measurement and return latest measurement cycle position reported +* by sensor. This is a blocking function for 500ms, as that is default sensor +* refresh rate. +*/ +static int mlx90632_perform_measurement (struct mlx90632_data *data) +{ +int ret, tries =100 ; +unsigned int reg_status; + + ret =regmap_update_bits (data->regmap,MLX90632_REG_STATUS , +MLX90632_STAT_DATA_RDY ,0 ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +while (tries-- >0 ) { + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap,MLX90632_REG_STATUS , + ®_status); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +if (reg_status &MLX90632_STAT_DATA_RDY ) +break ; +usleep_range (10000 ,11000 ); + } + +if (tries <0 ) { +dev_err (&data->client->dev,"data not ready" ); +return -ETIMEDOUT ; + } + +return (reg_status &MLX90632_STAT_CYCLE_POS ) >>2 ; +} + +static int mlx90632_channel_new_select (int perform_ret,uint8_t *channel_new, +uint8_t *channel_old) +{ +switch (perform_ret) { +case 1 : + *channel_new =1 ; + *channel_old =2 ; +break ; +case 2 : + *channel_new =2 ; + *channel_old =1 ; +break ; +default : +return -EINVAL ; + } + +return 0 ; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_ambient_raw (struct regmap *regmap, +s16 *ambient_new_raw,s16 *ambient_old_raw) +{ +int ret; +unsigned int read_tmp; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_3 (1 ), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + *ambient_new_raw = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_3 (2 ), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + *ambient_old_raw = (s16 )read_tmp; + +return ret; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_object_raw (struct regmap *regmap, +int perform_measurement_ret, +s16 *object_new_raw,s16 *object_old_raw) +{ +int ret; +unsigned int read_tmp; +s16 read; +u8 channel =0 ; +u8 channel_old =0 ; + + ret =mlx90632_channel_new_select (perform_measurement_ret, &channel, + &channel_old); +if (ret !=0 ) +return ret; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_2 (channel), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + + read = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_1 (channel), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + *object_new_raw = (read + (s16 )read_tmp) /2 ; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_2 (channel_old), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + read = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap,MLX90632_RAM_1 (channel_old), &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + *object_old_raw = (read + (s16 )read_tmp) /2 ; + +return ret; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_all_channel (struct mlx90632_data *data, +s16 *ambient_new_raw,s16 *ambient_old_raw, +s16 *object_new_raw,s16 *object_old_raw) +{ +s32 ret, measurement; + +mutex_lock (&data->lock); + measurement =mlx90632_perform_measurement (data); +if (measurement <0 ) { + ret = measurement; + goto read_unlock; + } + ret =mlx90632_read_ambient_raw (data->regmap, ambient_new_raw, + ambient_old_raw); +if (ret <0 ) + goto read_unlock; + + ret =mlx90632_read_object_raw (data->regmap, measurement, + object_new_raw, object_old_raw); +read_unlock: +mutex_unlock (&data->lock); +return ret; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_ee_register (struct regmap *regmap,u16 reg_lsb, +s32 *reg_value) +{ +s32 ret; +unsigned int read; +__le32 value; + + ret =regmap_read (regmap, reg_lsb, &read);drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 329
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + + value =cpu_to_le32 (read); + + ret =regmap_read (regmap, reg_lsb +1 , &read); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + + value = (cpu_to_le32 (read) <<16 ) | (value &0xffff );No. This is horrible as I stated before. You have two 16 bit values and you know which is the high byte and which the low. You can simply combine them in cpu endiannenss.
*reg_value= (highword) << 16 | lowword;This works what ever your endiannes..
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 331
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +2
-0+ + *reg_value =le32_to_cpu (value);blank line here please.
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +5
-0+return 0 ; +} + +static s64 mlx90632_preprocess_temp_amb (s16 ambient_new_raw, +s16 ambient_old_raw,s16 Gb)drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 346
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+{ +s64 VR_Ta, kGb, tmp; + + kGb = ((s64 )Gb *TENTO3 ) >>10ULL ; + VR_Ta = (s64 )ambient_old_raw *TENTO6 + + kGb *div64_s64 (((s64 )ambient_new_raw *TENTO3 ), + (MLX90632_REF_3 )); + tmp =div64_s64 ( +div64_s64 (((s64 )ambient_new_raw *TENTO12 ), + (MLX90632_REF_3 )), VR_Ta);Odd alignment...
Quoted 201 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +201
-0+return div64_s64 (tmp <<19ULL ,TENTO3 ); +} + +static s64 mlx90632_preprocess_temp_obj (s16 object_new_raw,s16 object_old_raw, +s16 ambient_new_raw, +s16 ambient_old_raw,s16 Ka) +{ +s64 VR_IR , kKa, tmp; + + kKa = ((s64 )Ka *TENTO3 ) >>10ULL ; +VR_IR = (s64 )ambient_old_raw *TENTO6 + + kKa *div64_s64 (((s64 )ambient_new_raw *TENTO3 ), + (MLX90632_REF_3 )); + tmp =div64_s64 ( +div64_s64 (((s64)((object_new_raw + object_old_raw) /2 ) + *TENTO12 ), (MLX90632_REF_12 )),VR_IR ); +return div64_s64 ((tmp <<19ULL ),TENTO3 ); +} + +static s32 mlx90632_calc_temp_ambient (s16 ambient_new_raw,s16 ambient_old_raw, +s32 P_T ,s32 P_R ,s32 P_G ,s32 P_O , +s16 Gb) +{ +s64 Asub, Bsub, Ablock, Bblock, Cblock,AMB , sum; + +AMB =mlx90632_preprocess_temp_amb (ambient_new_raw, ambient_old_raw, + Gb); + Asub = ((s64 )P_T *TENTO10 ) >>44ULL ; + Bsub =AMB - (((s64 )P_R *TENTO3 ) >>8ULL ); + Ablock = Asub * (Bsub * Bsub); + Bblock = (div64_s64 (Bsub *TENTO7 ,P_G )) <<20ULL ; + Cblock = ((s64 )P_O *TENTO10 ) >>8ULL ; + + sum =div64_s64 (Ablock,TENTO6 ) + Bblock + Cblock; + +return div64_s64 (sum,TENTO7 ); +} + +static s32 mlx90632_calc_temp_object_iteration (s32 prev_object_temp,s64 object, +s64 TAdut,s32 Fa,s32 Fb, +s32 Ga,s16 Ha,s16 Hb, +u16 emissivity) +{ +s64 calcedKsTO, calcedKsTA, ir_Alpha, TAdut4, Alpha_corr; +s64 Ha_customer, Hb_customer; + + Ha_customer = ((s64 )Ha *TENTO6 ) >>14ULL ; + Hb_customer = ((s64 )Hb *100 ) >>10ULL ; + + calcedKsTO = ((s64)((s64 )Ga * (prev_object_temp -25 *TENTO3 ) + *TENTO3 )) >>36LL ; + calcedKsTA = ((s64)(Fb * (TAdut -25 *TENTO6 ))) >>36LL ; + Alpha_corr =div64_s64 ((((s64)(Fa *TENTO10 ) >>46LL ) * Ha_customer), +TENTO3 ); + Alpha_corr *= ((s64)(1 *TENTO6 + calcedKsTO + calcedKsTA)); + Alpha_corr = emissivity *div64_s64 (Alpha_corr,TENTO5 ); + Alpha_corr =div64_s64 (Alpha_corr,TENTO3 ); + ir_Alpha =div64_s64 ((s64 )object *TENTO7 , Alpha_corr); + TAdut4 = (div64_s64 (TAdut,TENTO4 ) +27315 ) * + (div64_s64 (TAdut,TENTO4 ) +27315 ) * + (div64_s64 (TAdut,TENTO4 ) +27315 ) * + (div64_s64 (TAdut,TENTO4 ) +27315 ); + +return (int_sqrt64 (int_sqrt64 (ir_Alpha *TENTO12 + TAdut4)) + -27315 - Hb_customer) *10 ; +} + +static s32 mlx90632_calc_temp_object (s64 object,s64 ambient,s32 Ea,s32 Eb, +s32 Fa,s32 Fb,s32 Ga,s16 Ha,s16 Hb, +u16 tmp_emi) +{ +s64 kTA, kTA0, TAdut; +s64 temp =25000 ; +s8 i; + + kTA = (Ea *TENTO3 ) >>16LL ; + kTA0 = (Eb *TENTO3 ) >>8LL ; + TAdut =div64_s64 (((ambient - kTA0) *TENTO6 ), kTA) +25 *TENTO6 ; + +/* Iterations of calculation as described in datasheet */ +for (i =0 ; i <5 ; ++i) { + temp =mlx90632_calc_temp_object_iteration (temp, object, TAdut, + Fa, Fb, Ga, Ha, Hb, + tmp_emi); + } +return temp; +} + +static int mlx90632_calc_object_dsp105 (struct mlx90632_data *data,int *val) +{ +s32 ret; +s32 Ea, Eb, Fa, Fb, Ga; +unsigned int read_tmp; +s16 Ha, Hb, Gb, Ka; +s16 ambient_new_raw, ambient_old_raw, object_new_raw, object_old_raw; +s64 object, ambient; + + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Ea, &Ea); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Eb, &Eb); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Fa, &Fa); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Fb, &Fb); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Ga, &Ga); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Ha, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Ha = (s16 )read_tmp; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Hb, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Hb = (s16 )read_tmp; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Gb, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Gb = (s16 )read_tmp; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Ka, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Ka = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =mlx90632_read_all_channel (data, + &ambient_new_raw, &ambient_old_raw, + &object_new_raw, &object_old_raw); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + + ambient =mlx90632_preprocess_temp_amb (ambient_new_raw, + ambient_old_raw, Gb); + object =mlx90632_preprocess_temp_obj (object_new_raw, + object_old_raw, + ambient_new_raw, + ambient_old_raw, Ka); + + *val =mlx90632_calc_temp_object (object, ambient, Ea, Eb, Fa, Fb, Ga, + Ha, Hb, data->emissivity); +return 0 ; +} + +static int mlx90632_calc_ambient_dsp105 (struct mlx90632_data *data,int *val) +{ +s32 ret; +unsigned int read_tmp; +s32 PT ,PR ,PG ,PO ; +s16 Gb; +s16 ambient_new_raw, ambient_old_raw; + + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap,MLX90632_EE_P_R , &PR ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap,MLX90632_EE_P_G , &PG ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap,MLX90632_EE_P_T , &PT ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =mlx90632_read_ee_register (data->regmap,MLX90632_EE_P_O , &PO ); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + ret =regmap_read (data->regmap, MLX90632_EE_Gb, &read_tmp); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + Gb = (s16 )read_tmp; + + ret =mlx90632_read_ambient_raw (data->regmap, &ambient_new_raw, + &ambient_old_raw); + *val =mlx90632_calc_temp_ambient (ambient_new_raw, ambient_old_raw, +PT ,PR ,PG ,PO , Gb); +return ret; +} + +static int mlx90632_read_raw (struct iio_dev *indio_dev, +struct iio_chan_spec const *channel,int *val, +int *val2,long mask) +{ +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); +int ret; + +switch (mask) { +case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED : +switch (channel->channel2) { +case IIO_MOD_TEMP_AMBIENT : + ret =mlx90632_calc_ambient_dsp105 (data, val); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +return IIO_VAL_INT ; +case IIO_MOD_TEMP_OBJECT : + ret =mlx90632_calc_object_dsp105 (data, val); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +return IIO_VAL_INT ; +default : +return -EINVAL ;drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 557
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+ } +case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBEMISSIVITY : +if (data->emissivity ==1000 ) { + *val =1 ; + *val2 =0 ; + }else { + *val =0 ; + *val2 = data->emissivity; + } +return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO ;So emmissivty = 900 translates to val2 = 900.
WithIIO_VAL_INTO_PLUS_NANOthis is
0.000000900 which is not what you want.
I raised this in v1.Quoted 36 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +36
-0+ +default : +return -EINVAL ; + } +} + +static int mlx90632_write_raw (struct iio_dev *indio_dev, +struct iio_chan_spec const *channel,int val, +int val2,long mask) +{ +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +switch (mask) { +case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBEMISSIVITY : +if (val <0 || val2 <0 || val >1 || + (val ==1 && val2 !=0 )) +return -EINVAL ; + data->emissivity = val *1000 + val2 /1000 ; +return 0 ; +default : +return -EINVAL ; + } +} + +static const struct iio_chan_spec mlx90632_channels[] = { + { + .type =IIO_TEMP , + .modified =1 , + .channel2 =IIO_MOD_TEMP_AMBIENT , + .info_mask_separate =BIT (IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED ), + }, + { + .type =IIO_TEMP , + .modified =1 , + .channel2 =IIO_MOD_TEMP_OBJECT , + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) |drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 603
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+ BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBEMISSIVITY), + }, +}; + +static const struct iio_info mlx90632_info = { + .read_raw = mlx90632_read_raw, + .write_raw = mlx90632_write_raw, +}; + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM General kernel thing these days is not to do this for PM as the config options are a mess, but instead mark them as
__maybe_unusedand let the compiler drop them if they are unused.Quoted 46 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +46
-0+static int mlx90632_sleep (struct mlx90632_data *data) +{ +dev_dbg (&data->client->dev,"Requesting sleep" ); +return mlx90632_pwr_set_sleep_step (data->regmap); +} + +static int mlx90632_wakeup (struct mlx90632_data *data) +{ +dev_dbg (&data->client->dev,"Requesting wake-up" ); +return mlx90632_pwr_continuous (data->regmap); +} +#endif + +static int mlx90632_probe (struct i2c_client *client, +const struct i2c_device_id *id) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev; +struct mlx90632_data *mlx90632; +struct regmap *regmap; +int ret; +unsigned int read; + + indio_dev =devm_iio_device_alloc (&client->dev,sizeof (*mlx90632)); +if (!indio_dev) { +dev_err (&client->dev,"Failed to allocate device" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + + regmap =devm_regmap_init_i2c (client, &mlx90632_regmap); +if (IS_ERR (regmap)) { + ret =PTR_ERR (regmap); +dev_err (&client->dev,"Failed to allocate regmap: %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } + + mlx90632 =iio_priv (indio_dev); +i2c_set_clientdata (client, indio_dev); + mlx90632->client = client; + mlx90632->regmap = regmap; + +mutex_init (&mlx90632->lock); +mlx90632_wakeup (mlx90632); + + indio_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev; + indio_dev->name = id->name; + indio_dev->modes =INDIO_DIRECT_MODE ;drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 659
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+ indio_dev->info = &mlx90632_info; + indio_dev->channels = mlx90632_channels; + indio_dev->num_channels =ARRAY_SIZE (mlx90632_channels); + + ret =regmap_read (mlx90632->regmap,MLX90632_EE_VERSION , &read); +if (ret <0 ) { +dev_err (&client->dev,"read of version failed: %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } +if (read == (MLX90632_EEPROM_VERSION &MLX90632_ID_MEDICAL )) {These still make no sense - you are taking the bitwise and of two values that only overlap by a couple of bits. Unless this register is some weird hash of the two this looks to be wrong.
If this is really the case a comment explaining how these two values are combined and why it makes any sense at all is needed. You have a mask that mostly doesn't seem to overlap with the thing being masked.
Quoted 67 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +67
-0+dev_dbg (&client->dev, +"Detected Medical EEPROM calibration %x" , read); + }else if (read == (MLX90632_EEPROM_VERSION &MLX90632_ID_CONSUMER )) { +dev_dbg (&client->dev, +"Detected Consumer EEPROM calibration %x" , read); + }else { +dev_err (&client->dev, +"Chip EEPROM version mismatch %x (expected %x)" , + read,MLX90632_EEPROM_VERSION ); +return -EPROTONOSUPPORT ; + } + + mlx90632->emissivity =1000 ; + +return iio_device_register (indio_dev); +} + +static int mlx90632_remove (struct i2c_client *client) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (client); +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +iio_device_unregister (indio_dev); + +pm_runtime_disable (&client->dev); +if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended (&client->dev)) +mlx90632_sleep (data); +pm_runtime_set_suspended (&client->dev); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct i2c_device_id mlx90632_id[] = { + {"mlx90632" ,0 }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (i2c, mlx90632_id); + +static const struct of_device_id mlx90632_of_match[] = { + { .compatible ="melexis,mlx90632" }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, mlx90632_of_match); + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP +static int mlx90632_pm_suspend (struct device *dev) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (to_i2c_client (dev)); +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +regcache_sync (data->regmap); + +if (pm_runtime_active (dev)) +return mlx90632_sleep (data); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int mlx90632_pm_resume (struct device *dev) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (to_i2c_client (dev)); +struct mlx90632_data *data =iio_priv (indio_dev); +int err; + +regcache_mark_dirty (data->regmap); +regcache_cache_only (data->regmap, false); + err =regcache_sync (data->regmap);drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 736
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+if (err <0 ) { +dev_err (dev,"Failed to sync regmap registers: %d\n" , err); +return err; + } + + err =mlx90632_wakeup (data); +if (err <0 ) +return err; + +pm_runtime_disable (dev);I'd like to see a comment on this 'dance'. Given you have just done a pm resume I don't immediately see why you need a
set_active...Quoted 16 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +16
-0+pm_runtime_set_active (dev); +pm_runtime_enable (dev); + +return 0 ; +} +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +static int mlx90632_pm_runtime_suspend (struct device *dev) +{ +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (to_i2c_client (dev)); +struct mlx90632_data *mlx90632 =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +regcache_sync (mlx90632->regmap); + +return mlx90632_sleep (mlx90632);drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 762
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+} + +static int mlx90632_pm_runtime_resume (struct device *dev) +{ +s32 ret; +struct iio_dev *indio_dev =i2c_get_clientdata (to_i2c_client (dev)); +struct mlx90632_data *mlx90632 =iio_priv (indio_dev); + +regcache_mark_dirty (mlx90632->regmap); +regcache_cache_only (mlx90632->regmap, false);This all seems a little odd in the resume path. We never put the device into
cache_onlythat I can see so why are we coming out of it?Quoted 21 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +21
-0+ ret =regcache_sync (mlx90632->regmap); +if (ret <0 ) { +dev_err (dev,"Failed to sync regmap registers: %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } + +return mlx90632_wakeup (mlx90632); +} +#endif + +static const struct dev_pm_ops mlx90632_pm_ops = { + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(mlx90632_pm_suspend, mlx90632_pm_resume) +SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS (mlx90632_pm_runtime_suspend, + mlx90632_pm_runtime_resume,NULL ) +}; + +static struct i2c_driver mlx90632_driver = { + .driver = { + .name ="mlx90632" , + .of_match_table = mlx90632_of_match, + .pm = &mlx90632_pm_ops,drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c line 793
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c new file +10
-0+ }, + .probe = mlx90632_probe, + .remove = mlx90632_remove, + .id_table = mlx90632_id, +}; +module_i2c_driver (mlx90632_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Crt Mori <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("Melexis MLX90632 contactless Infra Red temperature sensor driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL v2" );--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html