image.bbclass: Add additional bb.debug to help track 12304
PATCH 1/1 image.bbclass: Add additional bb.debug to help track 12304
We actually caught the ext4 size issue in the wild with the debug output in the oe_mkext234fs() code, but it did not help. What that showed was that the get_rootfs_size was returning a default size of 8192, where as the actual rootfs was more like 10572, thus too large to fit in the created sparse file.
This additional temporary debug code should help us determine where the failure might be.
More debug for
[YOCTO #12304]
--- meta/classes/image.bbclass | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
meta/classes/image.bbclass +24 -4
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ python () { # # Compute the rootfs size # -def get_rootfs_size(d): +def get_rootfs_size(d, force_size=0): import subprocess rootfs_alignment = int(d.getVar('IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT'))
@@ -531,24 +531,35 @@ def get_rootfs_size(d): initramfs_fstypes = d.getVar('INITRAMFS_FSTYPES') or '' initramfs_maxsize = d.getVar('INITRAMFS_MAXSIZE') - output = subprocess.check_output(['du', '-ks', + if (force_size != 0): + size_kb = force_size + else: + output = subprocess.check_output(['du', '-ks', d.getVar('IMAGE_ROOTFS')]) - size_kb = int(output.split()[0]) + size_kb = int(output.split()[0]) + base_size = size_kb * overhead_factor - base_size = max(base_size, rootfs_req_size) + rootfs_extra_space + bb.debug(1, '%f = %d * %f' % (base_size, size_kb, overhead_factor)) + base_size2 = max(base_size, rootfs_req_size) + rootfs_extra_space + bb.debug(1, '%f = max(%f, %d)[%f] + %d' % (base_size2, base_size, rootfs_req_size, max(base_size, rootfs_req_size), overhead_factor)) + base_size = base_size2 if base_size != int(base_size): base_size = int(base_size + 1) else: base_size = int(base_size) + bb.debug(1, '%f = int(%f)' % (base_size, base_size2)) + base_size_saved = base_size base_size += rootfs_alignment - 1 base_size -= base_size % rootfs_alignment + bb.debug(1, '%d = aligned(%d)' % (base_size, base_size_saved)) # Do not check image size of the debugfs image. This is not supposed # to be deployed, etc. so it doesn't make sense to limit the size # of the debug. if (d.getVar('IMAGE_BUILDING_DEBUGFS') or "") == "true": + bb.debug(1, 'returning debugfs size %d' % (base_size)) return base_size # Check the rootfs size against IMAGE_ROOTFS_MAXSIZE (if set)
@@ -566,6 +577,8 @@ def get_rootfs_size(d): (base_size, initramfs_maxsize_int)) bb.error("You can set INITRAMFS_MAXSIZE a larger value. Usually, it should") bb.fatal("be less than 1/2 of ram size, or you may fail to boot it.\n") + + bb.debug(1, 'returning %d' % (base_size)) return base_size python set_image_size () {
@@ -574,6 +587,13 @@ python set_image_size () { d.setVarFlag('ROOTFS_SIZE', 'export', '1') } +do_testsize[nostamp] = "1" +python do_testsize() { + sz = get_rootfs_size(d, 10572) + bb.warn('size is %d' % sz) +} +addtask do_testsize + # # Create symlinks to the newly created image #
Signature · 1 line
2.13.6
Quoted 8 lines · Saul Wold
We actually caught the ext4 size issue in the wild with the debug output in the
oe_mkext234fs()code, but it did not help. What that showed was that theget_rootfs_sizewas returning a default size of 8192, where as the actual rootfs was more like 10572, thus too large to fit in the created sparse file.This additional temporary debug code should help us determine where the failure might be.
It might also be useful to save away the output of "ls -lR" for the rootfs dir as seen by both get_rootfs_size() and oe_mkext234fs(), so that it the apparent size is changing between the times these two functions run we'll get some clues as to why.
Quoted 91 lines
More debug for
[YOCTO #12304]Signed-off-by Saul Wold <[email protected]>--- meta/classes/image.bbclass | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)meta/classes/image.bbclass +24
-5@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ python () { # # Compute the rootfs size # -def get_rootfs_size(d): +def get_rootfs_size(d, force_size=0): import subprocess rootfs_alignment = int(d.getVar('IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT'))@@ -531,24 +531,35 @@ def get_rootfs_size(d): initramfs_fstypes = d.getVar('INITRAMFS_FSTYPES') or '' initramfs_maxsize = d.getVar('INITRAMFS_MAXSIZE') - output = subprocess.check_output(['du', '-ks', + if (force_size != 0): + size_kb = force_size + else: + output = subprocess.check_output(['du', '-ks', d.getVar('IMAGE_ROOTFS')]) - size_kb = int(output.split()[0]) + size_kb = int(output.split()[0]) + base_size = size_kb * overhead_factor - base_size = max(base_size, rootfs_req_size) + rootfs_extra_space + bb.debug(1, '%f = %d * %f' % (base_size, size_kb, overhead_factor)) + base_size2 = max(base_size, rootfs_req_size) + rootfs_extra_space + bb.debug(1, '%f = max(%f, %d)[%f] + %d' % (base_size2, base_size, rootfs_req_size, max(base_size, rootfs_req_size), overhead_factor)) + base_size = base_size2 if base_size != int(base_size): base_size = int(base_size + 1) else: base_size = int(base_size) + bb.debug(1, '%f = int(%f)' % (base_size, base_size2)) + base_size_saved = base_size base_size += rootfs_alignment - 1 base_size -= base_size % rootfs_alignment + bb.debug(1, '%d = aligned(%d)' % (base_size, base_size_saved)) # Do not check image size of the debugfs image. This is not supposed # to be deployed, etc. so it doesn't make sense to limit the size # of the debug. if (d.getVar('IMAGE_BUILDING_DEBUGFS') or "") == "true": + bb.debug(1, 'returning debugfs size %d' % (base_size)) return base_size # Check the rootfs size against IMAGE_ROOTFS_MAXSIZE (if set)@@ -566,6 +577,8 @@ def get_rootfs_size(d): (base_size, initramfs_maxsize_int)) bb.error("You can set INITRAMFS_MAXSIZE a larger value. Usually, it should") bb.fatal("be less than 1/2 of ram size, or you may fail to boot it.\n") + + bb.debug(1, 'returning %d' % (base_size)) return base_size python set_image_size () {@@ -574,6 +587,13 @@ python set_image_size () { d.setVarFlag('ROOTFS_SIZE', 'export', '1') } +do_testsize[nostamp] = "1" +python do_testsize() { + sz = get_rootfs_size(d, 10572) + bb.warn('size is %d' % sz) +} +addtask do_testsize + # # Create symlinks to the newly created image # --2.13.6
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core