Skip to contentSkip to conversation

s5p-mfc: use MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS to identify last buffers in decoder capture queue

bug report Dan Carpenter 3 participants 7 messages Jan 23, 2018 – Jan 25, 2018 Media (V4L/DVB)

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello Andrzej Hajda,

The patch 4d0b0ed63660: "[media] s5p-mfc: use MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS to identify last buffers in decoder capture queue" from Oct 7, 2015, leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c:658 vidioc_dqbuf()
	error: buffer overflow 'ctx->dst_bufs' 32 user_rl = '0-u32max'

drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c

   635  /* Dequeue a buffer */
   636  static int vidioc_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
   637  {
   638          const struct v4l2_event ev = {
   639                  .type = V4L2_EVENT_EOS
   640          };
   641          struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx = fh_to_ctx(priv);
   642          int ret;
   643  
   644          if (ctx->state == MFCINST_ERROR) {
   645                  mfc_err_limited("Call on DQBUF after unrecoverable error\n");
   646                  return -EIO;
   647          }
   648  
   649          switch (buf->type) {
   650          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
   651                  return vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_src, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   652          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE:
   653                  ret = vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_dst, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   654                  if (ret)
   655                          return ret;
   656  
   657                  if (ctx->state == MFCINST_FINISHED &&
   658                      (ctx->dst_bufs[buf->index].flags & MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS))
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^

Smatch is complaining that "buf->index" is not capped. So far as I can see this is true. I would have expected it to be checked in check_array_args() or video_usercopy() but I couldn't find the check.

   659                          v4l2_event_queue_fh(&ctx->fh, &ev);
   660                  return 0;
   661          default:
   662                  return -EINVAL;
   663          }
   664  }

regards,
dan carpenter

#1 lore raw
Quoted 35 lines · Dan Carpenter

Hello Andrzej Hajda,

The patch 4d0b0ed63660: "[media] s5p-mfc: use MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS to identify last buffers in decoder capture queue" from Oct 7, 2015, leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c:658 vidioc_dqbuf()
	error: buffer overflow 'ctx->dst_bufs' 32 user_rl = '0-u32max'

drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c

   635  /* Dequeue a buffer */
   636  static int vidioc_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
   637  {
   638          const struct v4l2_event ev = {
   639                  .type = V4L2_EVENT_EOS
   640          };
   641          struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx = fh_to_ctx(priv);
   642          int ret;
   643  
   644          if (ctx->state == MFCINST_ERROR) {
   645                  mfc_err_limited("Call on DQBUF after unrecoverable error\n");
   646                  return -EIO;
   647          }
   648  
   649          switch (buf->type) {
   650          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
   651                  return vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_src, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   652          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE:
   653                  ret = vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_dst, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   654                  if (ret)
   655                          return ret;
   656  
   657                  if (ctx->state == MFCINST_FINISHED &&
   658                      (ctx->dst_bufs[buf->index].flags & MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS))
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^
Quoted 3 lines

Smatch is complaining that "buf->index" is not capped. So far as I can see this is true. I would have expected it to be checked in check_array_args() or video_usercopy() but I couldn't find the check.

I did not work in V4L2 area for long time, so I could be wrong, but I hope the code is correct, below my explanation.
User provides only type, memory and reserved fields in buf, other fields are filled by vb2_dqbuf (line 653) core function, ie index field is copied from buffer which was queued by qbuf.
And vidioc_qbuf calls vb2_qbuf, which calls vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf, which checks index bounds [1].

So I suppose this code is correct.
Btw, I have also looked at other drivers and it looks omap driver handles it incorrectly, ie it uses index field provided by user - possible memory leak. CC Hans and Mauro, since there is no driver maintainer of OMAP.

Btw2, is it possible to check in smatch which fields of passed struct given callback can read or fill ? For example here API restrict dqbuf callback to read only three fields of buf, and fill the others.

[1]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c#L165
[2]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c#L1520

Regards
Andrzej

Quoted 14 lines
   659                          v4l2_event_queue_fh(&ctx->fh, &ev);
   660                  return 0;
   661          default:
   662                  return -EINVAL;
   663          }
   664  }

regards,
dan carpenter

#2 lore raw
Quoted 48 lines · Andrzej Hajda
Quoted 35 lines · Dan Carpenter

Hello Andrzej Hajda,

The patch 4d0b0ed63660: "[media] s5p-mfc: use MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS to identify last buffers in decoder capture queue" from Oct 7, 2015, leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c:658 vidioc_dqbuf()
	error: buffer overflow 'ctx->dst_bufs' 32 user_rl = '0-u32max'

drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c

   635  /* Dequeue a buffer */
   636  static int vidioc_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
   637  {
   638          const struct v4l2_event ev = {
   639                  .type = V4L2_EVENT_EOS
   640          };
   641          struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx = fh_to_ctx(priv);
   642          int ret;
   643  
   644          if (ctx->state == MFCINST_ERROR) {
   645                  mfc_err_limited("Call on DQBUF after unrecoverable error\n");
   646                  return -EIO;
   647          }
   648  
   649          switch (buf->type) {
   650          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
   651                  return vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_src, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   652          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE:
   653                  ret = vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_dst, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   654                  if (ret)
   655                          return ret;
   656  
   657                  if (ctx->state == MFCINST_FINISHED &&
   658                      (ctx->dst_bufs[buf->index].flags & MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS))
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^
Quoted 3 lines

Smatch is complaining that "buf->index" is not capped. So far as I can see this is true. I would have expected it to be checked in check_array_args() or video_usercopy() but I couldn't find the check.

I did not work in V4L2 area for long time, so I could be wrong, but I hope the code is correct, below my explanation.
User provides only type, memory and reserved fields in buf, other fields are filled by vb2_dqbuf (line 653) core function, ie index field is copied from buffer which was queued by qbuf.
And vidioc_qbuf calls vb2_qbuf, which calls vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf, which checks index bounds [1].

Quoted 5 lines

So I suppose this code is correct.
Btw, I have also looked at other drivers and it looks omap driver handles it incorrectly, ie it uses index field provided by user - possible memory leak. CC Hans and Mauro, since there is no driver maintainer of OMAP.

Ouch, vidioc_dqbuf in drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c is really, really bad code. I'm not sure how it could ever work to be honest. For one, b->index should be returned by the driver, not set by userspace.

Luckily this driver is almost never used anymore.

Mauro, Laurent, I wonder if we just should use this reason to move this driver to staging for one kernel release and then delete it. Rather than trying to fix this crappy code.

Regards,

Hans

Quoted 27 lines

Btw2, is it possible to check in smatch which fields of passed struct given callback can read or fill ? For example here API restrict dqbuf callback to read only three fields of buf, and fill the others.

[1]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c#L165
[2]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c#L1520

Regards
Andrzej

Quoted 14 lines
   659                          v4l2_event_queue_fh(&ctx->fh, &ev);
   660                  return 0;
   661          default:
   662                  return -EINVAL;
   663          }
   664  }

regards,
dan carpenter

#3 lore raw
In reply to Andrzej Hajda
Quoted 58 lines · Andrzej Hajda
Quoted 35 lines · Dan Carpenter

Hello Andrzej Hajda,

The patch 4d0b0ed63660: "[media] s5p-mfc: use MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS to identify last buffers in decoder capture queue" from Oct 7, 2015, leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c:658 vidioc_dqbuf()
	error: buffer overflow 'ctx->dst_bufs' 32 user_rl = '0-u32max'

drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c

   635  /* Dequeue a buffer */
   636  static int vidioc_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
   637  {
   638          const struct v4l2_event ev = {
   639                  .type = V4L2_EVENT_EOS
   640          };
   641          struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx = fh_to_ctx(priv);
   642          int ret;
   643  
   644          if (ctx->state == MFCINST_ERROR) {
   645                  mfc_err_limited("Call on DQBUF after unrecoverable error\n");
   646                  return -EIO;
   647          }
   648  
   649          switch (buf->type) {
   650          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
   651                  return vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_src, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   652          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE:
   653                  ret = vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_dst, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   654                  if (ret)
   655                          return ret;
   656  
   657                  if (ctx->state == MFCINST_FINISHED &&
   658                      (ctx->dst_bufs[buf->index].flags & MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS))
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^
Quoted 3 lines

Smatch is complaining that "buf->index" is not capped. So far as I can see this is true. I would have expected it to be checked in check_array_args() or video_usercopy() but I couldn't find the check.

I did not work in V4L2 area for long time, so I could be wrong, but I hope the code is correct, below my explanation.
User provides only type, memory and reserved fields in buf, other fields are filled by vb2_dqbuf (line 653) core function, ie index field is copied from buffer which was queued by qbuf.
And vidioc_qbuf calls vb2_qbuf, which calls vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf, which checks index bounds [1].

So I suppose this code is correct.
Btw, I have also looked at other drivers and it looks omap driver handles it incorrectly, ie it uses index field provided by user - possible memory leak. CC Hans and Mauro, since there is no driver maintainer of OMAP.

Btw2, is it possible to check in smatch which fields of passed struct given callback can read or fill ? For example here API restrict dqbuf callback to read only three fields of buf, and fill the others.

Quoted 7 lines

[1]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c#L165
[2]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c#L1520

Regards
Andrzej

Smatch does track the feilds... Smatch sees that buf->index is capped in vidioc_qbuf() but it still complains that buf->index gets set by the user in the ioctl and not checked before we use it vb2_dqbuf(). The call tree looks like this:

--> video_usercopy()

    Copies _IOC_SIZE(cmd) bytes to parg.  The _IOC_SIZE() is
    sizeof(struct v4l2_buffer) so all the feilds are reset.  Smatch
    doesn't track how many bytes the users controls, it just marks
    everything in *parg as tainted but it doesn't matter in this case
    since all the feilds are set.
    video_usercopy() calls err = func(file, cmd, parg);

    --> __video_do_ioctl()
        calls info->u.func(ops, file, fh, arg);

        --> v4l_dqbuf()
            calls ops->vidioc_dqbuf(file, fh, p);

            --> vidioc_dqbuf()
                uses unchecked buf->index

Ah... Hm. Is it the call to vb2_core_dqbuf() which limits buf->index? I don't see a path from vb2_core_dqbuf() to vb2_qbuf() but I may have missed it.

regards,
dan carpenter

#4 lore raw
Quoted 89 lines · Dan Carpenter
Quoted 58 lines · Andrzej Hajda
Quoted 35 lines · Dan Carpenter

Hello Andrzej Hajda,

The patch 4d0b0ed63660: "[media] s5p-mfc: use MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS to identify last buffers in decoder capture queue" from Oct 7, 2015, leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c:658 vidioc_dqbuf()
	error: buffer overflow 'ctx->dst_bufs' 32 user_rl = '0-u32max'

drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c

   635  /* Dequeue a buffer */
   636  static int vidioc_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
   637  {
   638          const struct v4l2_event ev = {
   639                  .type = V4L2_EVENT_EOS
   640          };
   641          struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx = fh_to_ctx(priv);
   642          int ret;
   643  
   644          if (ctx->state == MFCINST_ERROR) {
   645                  mfc_err_limited("Call on DQBUF after unrecoverable error\n");
   646                  return -EIO;
   647          }
   648  
   649          switch (buf->type) {
   650          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
   651                  return vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_src, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   652          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE:
   653                  ret = vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_dst, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   654                  if (ret)
   655                          return ret;
   656  
   657                  if (ctx->state == MFCINST_FINISHED &&
   658                      (ctx->dst_bufs[buf->index].flags & MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS))
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^
Quoted 3 lines

Smatch is complaining that "buf->index" is not capped. So far as I can see this is true. I would have expected it to be checked in check_array_args() or video_usercopy() but I couldn't find the check.

I did not work in V4L2 area for long time, so I could be wrong, but I hope the code is correct, below my explanation.
User provides only type, memory and reserved fields in buf, other fields are filled by vb2_dqbuf (line 653) core function, ie index field is copied from buffer which was queued by qbuf.
And vidioc_qbuf calls vb2_qbuf, which calls vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf, which checks index bounds [1].

So I suppose this code is correct.
Btw, I have also looked at other drivers and it looks omap driver handles it incorrectly, ie it uses index field provided by user - possible memory leak. CC Hans and Mauro, since there is no driver maintainer of OMAP.

Btw2, is it possible to check in smatch which fields of passed struct given callback can read or fill ? For example here API restrict dqbuf callback to read only three fields of buf, and fill the others.

Quoted 7 lines

[1]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c#L165
[2]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c#L1520

Regards
Andrzej

Smatch does track the feilds... Smatch sees that buf->index is capped in vidioc_qbuf() but it still complains that buf->index gets set by the user in the ioctl and not checked before we use it vb2_dqbuf(). The call tree looks like this:

--> video_usercopy()

    Copies _IOC_SIZE(cmd) bytes to parg.  The _IOC_SIZE() is
    sizeof(struct v4l2_buffer) so all the feilds are reset.  Smatch
    doesn't track how many bytes the users controls, it just marks
    everything in *parg as tainted but it doesn't matter in this case
    since all the feilds are set.
    video_usercopy() calls err = func(file, cmd, parg);

    --> __video_do_ioctl()
        calls info->u.func(ops, file, fh, arg);

        --> v4l_dqbuf()
            calls ops->vidioc_dqbuf(file, fh, p);

            --> vidioc_dqbuf()
                uses unchecked buf->index
Quoted 3 lines

Ah... Hm. Is it the call to vb2_core_dqbuf() which limits buf->index? I don't see a path from vb2_core_dqbuf() to vb2_qbuf() but I may have missed it.

The __fill_v4l2_buffer() function in videobuf2-v4l2.c is called by vb2_core_dqbuf(). And that __fill_v4l2_buffer() overwrited the index field: b->index = vb->index;

So after the vb2_dqbuf call the buf->index field is correct and bounded.

Regards,

Hans

#5 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Hans Verkuil
Quoted 3 lines

Ah... Hm. Is it the call to vb2_core_dqbuf() which limits buf->index? I don't see a path from vb2_core_dqbuf() to vb2_qbuf() but I may have missed it.

The __fill_v4l2_buffer() function in videobuf2-v4l2.c is called by vb2_core_dqbuf(). And that __fill_v4l2_buffer() overwrited the index field: b->index = vb->index;

So after the vb2_dqbuf call the buf->index field is correct and bounded.

Ah.. I get it. Thanks.

regards,
dan carpenter

#6 lore raw
In reply to Dan Carpenter
Quoted 71 lines · Dan Carpenter
Quoted 57 lines · Andrzej Hajda
Quoted 35 lines · Dan Carpenter

Hello Andrzej Hajda,

The patch 4d0b0ed63660: "[media] s5p-mfc: use MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS to identify last buffers in decoder capture queue" from Oct 7, 2015, leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c:658 vidioc_dqbuf()
	error: buffer overflow 'ctx->dst_bufs' 32 user_rl = '0-u32max'

drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c

   635  /* Dequeue a buffer */
   636  static int vidioc_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
   637  {
   638          const struct v4l2_event ev = {
   639                  .type = V4L2_EVENT_EOS
   640          };
   641          struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx = fh_to_ctx(priv);
   642          int ret;
   643  
   644          if (ctx->state == MFCINST_ERROR) {
   645                  mfc_err_limited("Call on DQBUF after unrecoverable error\n");
   646                  return -EIO;
   647          }
   648  
   649          switch (buf->type) {
   650          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
   651                  return vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_src, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   652          case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE:
   653                  ret = vb2_dqbuf(&ctx->vq_dst, buf, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
   654                  if (ret)
   655                          return ret;
   656  
   657                  if (ctx->state == MFCINST_FINISHED &&
   658                      (ctx->dst_bufs[buf->index].flags & MFC_BUF_FLAG_EOS))
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^
Quoted 3 lines

Smatch is complaining that "buf->index" is not capped. So far as I can see this is true. I would have expected it to be checked in check_array_args() or video_usercopy() but I couldn't find the check.

I did not work in V4L2 area for long time, so I could be wrong, but I hope the code is correct, below my explanation.
User provides only type, memory and reserved fields in buf, other fields are filled by vb2_dqbuf (line 653) core function, ie index field is copied from buffer which was queued by qbuf.
And vidioc_qbuf calls vb2_qbuf, which calls vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf, which checks index bounds [1].

So I suppose this code is correct.
Btw, I have also looked at other drivers and it looks omap driver handles it incorrectly, ie it uses index field provided by user - possible memory leak. CC Hans and Mauro, since there is no driver maintainer of OMAP.

Btw2, is it possible to check in smatch which fields of passed struct given callback can read or fill ? For example here API restrict dqbuf callback to read only three fields of buf, and fill the others.

Quoted 7 lines

[1]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c#L165
[2]:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c#L1520

Regards
Andrzej

Smatch does track the feilds... Smatch sees that buf->index is capped in vidioc_qbuf() but it still complains that buf->index gets set by the user in the ioctl and not checked before we use it vb2_dqbuf(). The call tree looks like this:

--> video_usercopy()

Quoted 14 lines
    Copies _IOC_SIZE(cmd) bytes to parg.  The _IOC_SIZE() is
    sizeof(struct v4l2_buffer) so all the feilds are reset.  Smatch
    doesn't track how many bytes the users controls, it just marks
    everything in *parg as tainted but it doesn't matter in this case
    since all the feilds are set.
    video_usercopy() calls err = func(file, cmd, parg);

    --> __video_do_ioctl()
        calls info->u.func(ops, file, fh, arg);

        --> v4l_dqbuf()
            calls ops->vidioc_dqbuf(file, fh, p);

            --> vidioc_dqbuf()

In our case s5p_mfc_dec.c:vidioc_dqbuf

Quoted 1 line
                uses unchecked buf->index

No, it uses only buf->type (it is correct usage), then calls vb2_dqbuf(which should fill index and other fields with proper values), and then uses .index.

Quoted 1 line

Ah... Hm. Is it the call to vb2_core_dqbuf() which limits buf->index?

No, buf->index is bound checked at buffer queuing:
s5p_mfc_dec.c:vidioc_qbuf
    vb2_qbuf
        vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf

Quoted 2 lines

I don't see a path from vb2_core_dqbuf() to vb2_qbuf() but I may have missed it.

It is reverse:
s5p_mfc_dec.c:vidioc_dqbuf
    vb2_dqbuf
        vb2_core_dqbuf

Regards
Andrzej

Quoted 7 lines

regards,
dan carpenter