net/ipv6: Add support for ONLINK flag
Subsystems (3)
v2 cover net/ipv6: Add support for ONLINK flag
Add support for RTNH_F_ONLINK with ipv6 routes.
First patch moves existing gateway validation into helper. The onlink flag requires a different set of checks and the existing validation makes ip6_route_info_create long enough.
Second patch makes the table id and lookup flag an option to ip6_nh_lookup_table. onlink check needs to verify the gateway without the RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag and PBR with VRF means the table id can vary between the table the route is inserted and the VRF the egress device is enslaved to.
Third patch adds support for RTNH_F_ONLINK.
I have a set of test cases in a format based on the framework Ido and Jiri are working on. Once that goes in I will adapt the script and submit.
v2
- removed table id check. Too constraining for PBR with VRF use cases
David Ahern (3):
net/ipv6: Move gateway validation into helper net/ipv6: Add flags and table id to ip6_nh_lookup_table net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag
net/ipv6/route.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
PATCH v2 1/3 net/ipv6: Move gateway validation into helper
Move existing code to validate nexthop into a helper. Follow on patch adds support for nexthops marked with onlink, and this helper keeps the complexity of ip6_route_info_create in check.
--- net/ipv6/route.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
net/ipv6/route.c +49 -36
@@ -2469,6 +2469,54 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_nh_lookup_table(struct net *net,return rt; } +static int ip6_route_check_nh (struct net *net, +struct fib6_config *cfg, +struct net_device **_dev, +struct inet6_dev **idev) +{ +const struct in6_addr *gw_addr = &cfg->fc_gateway; +struct net_device *dev = _dev ? *_dev :NULL ; +struct rt6_info *grt =NULL ; +int err = -EHOSTUNREACH ; + +if (cfg->fc_table) { + grt =ip6_nh_lookup_table (net, cfg, gw_addr); +if (grt) { +if (grt->rt6i_flags &RTF_GATEWAY || + (dev && dev != grt->dst.dev)) { +ip6_rt_put (grt); + grt =NULL ; + } + } + } + +if (!grt) + grt =rt6_lookup (net, gw_addr,NULL , cfg->fc_ifindex,1 ); + +if (!grt) + goto out; + +if (dev) { +if (dev != grt->dst.dev) { +ip6_rt_put (grt); + goto out; + } + }else { + *_dev = dev = grt->dst.dev; + *idev = grt->rt6i_idev; +dev_hold (dev); +in6_dev_hold (grt->rt6i_idev); + } + +if (!(grt->rt6i_flags &RTF_GATEWAY )) + err =0 ; + +ip6_rt_put (grt); + +out: +return err; +} +static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create (struct fib6_config *cfg,struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) {
@@ -2664,8 +2712,6 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg, rt->rt6i_gateway = *gw_addr;if (gwa_type != (IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL |IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST )) { -struct rt6_info *grt =NULL ; -/* IPv6 strictly inhibits using not link-local addresses as nexthop address. Otherwise, router will not able to send redirects.
@@ -2682,40 +2728,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg, goto out; } -if (cfg->fc_table) { - grt =ip6_nh_lookup_table (net, cfg, gw_addr); - -if (grt) { -if (grt->rt6i_flags &RTF_GATEWAY || - (dev && dev != grt->dst.dev)) { -ip6_rt_put (grt); - grt =NULL ; - } - } - } - -if (!grt) - grt =rt6_lookup (net, gw_addr,NULL , - cfg->fc_ifindex,1 ); - - err = -EHOSTUNREACH ; -if (!grt) - goto out; -if (dev) { -if (dev != grt->dst.dev) { -ip6_rt_put (grt); - goto out; - } - }else { - dev = grt->dst.dev; - idev = grt->rt6i_idev; -dev_hold (dev); -in6_dev_hold (grt->rt6i_idev); - } -if (!(grt->rt6i_flags &RTF_GATEWAY )) - err =0 ; -ip6_rt_put (grt); - + err =ip6_route_check_nh (net, cfg, &dev, &idev);if (err) goto out; }
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
PATCH v2 2/3 net/ipv6: Add flags and table id to ip6_nh_lookup_table
In reply to David Ahernonlink verification needs to do a lookup in potentially different table than the table in fib6_config and without the RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag. Change ip6_nh_lookup_table to take table id and flags as input arguments. Both verifications want to ignore link state, so add that flag can stay in the lookup helper.
--- net/ipv6/route.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
net/ipv6/route.c +8 -4
@@ -2440,7 +2440,8 @@ static int ip6_convert_metrics(struct mx6_config *mxc,static struct rt6_info *ip6_nh_lookup_table (struct net *net,struct fib6_config *cfg, -const struct in6_addr *gw_addr) +const struct in6_addr *gw_addr, +u32 tbid,int flags) {struct flowi6 fl6 = { .flowi6_oif = cfg->fc_ifindex,
@@ -2449,15 +2450,15 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_nh_lookup_table(struct net *net, };struct fib6_table *table;struct rt6_info *rt; -int flags =RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE |RT6_LOOKUP_F_IGNORE_LINKSTATE ; - table =fib6_get_table (net, cfg->fc_table); + table =fib6_get_table (net, tbid);if (!table)return NULL ;if (!ipv6_addr_any (&cfg->fc_prefsrc)) flags |=RT6_LOOKUP_F_HAS_SADDR ; + flags |=RT6_LOOKUP_F_IGNORE_LINKSTATE ; rt =ip6_pol_route (net, table, cfg->fc_ifindex, &fl6, flags);/* if table lookup failed, fall back to full lookup */
@@ -2480,7 +2481,10 @@ static int ip6_route_check_nh(struct net *net,int err = -EHOSTUNREACH ;if (cfg->fc_table) { - grt =ip6_nh_lookup_table (net, cfg, gw_addr); +int flags =RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE ; + + grt =ip6_nh_lookup_table (net, cfg, gw_addr, + cfg->fc_table, flags);if (grt) {if (grt->rt6i_flags &RTF_GATEWAY || (dev && dev != grt->dst.dev)) {
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
PATCH v2 3/3 net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag
In reply to David AhernSimilar to IPv4 allow routes to be added with the RTNH_F_ONLINK flag. The onlink option requires a gateway and a nexthop device. Any unicast gateway is allowed (including IPv4 mapped addresses and unresolved ones) as long as the gateway is not a local address and if it resolves it must match the given device.
--- net/ipv6/route.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
net/ipv6/route.c +50 -1
@@ -2470,6 +2470,31 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_nh_lookup_table(struct net *net,return rt; } +static int ip6_route_check_nh_onlink (struct net *net, +struct fib6_config *cfg, +struct net_device *dev, +struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) +{ +u32 tbid =l3mdev_fib_table (dev) ? :RT_TABLE_LOCAL ; +const struct in6_addr *gw_addr = &cfg->fc_gateway; +u32 flags =RTF_LOCAL |RTF_ANYCAST |RTF_REJECT ; +struct rt6_info *grt; +int err; + + err =0 ; + grt =ip6_nh_lookup_table (net, cfg, gw_addr, tbid,0 ); +if (grt) { +if (grt->rt6i_flags & flags || dev != grt->dst.dev) { +NL_SET_ERR_MSG (extack,"Nexthop has invalid gateway" ); + err = -EINVAL ; + } + +ip6_rt_put (grt); + } + +return err; +} + static int ip6_route_check_nh(struct net *net, struct fib6_config *cfg, struct net_device **_dev,
@@ -2572,6 +2597,21 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,if (cfg->fc_metric ==0 ) cfg->fc_metric =IP6_RT_PRIO_USER ; +if (cfg->fc_flags &RTNH_F_ONLINK ) { +if (!dev) { +NL_SET_ERR_MSG (extack, +"Nexthop device required for onlink" ); + err = -ENODEV ; + goto out; + } + +if (!(dev->flags &IFF_UP )) { +NL_SET_ERR_MSG (extack,"Nexthop device is not up" ); + err = -ENETDOWN ; + goto out; + } + } + err = -ENOBUFS ;if (cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh && !(cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh->nlmsg_flags &NLM_F_CREATE )) {
@@ -2732,7 +2772,12 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg, goto out; } - err =ip6_route_check_nh (net, cfg, &dev, &idev); +if (cfg->fc_flags &RTNH_F_ONLINK ) { + err =ip6_route_check_nh_onlink (net, cfg, dev, + extack); + }else { + err =ip6_route_check_nh (net, cfg, &dev, &idev); + }if (err) goto out; }
@@ -2768,6 +2813,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_LOCAL |RTF_ANYCAST )) && !netif_carrier_ok (dev)) rt->rt6i_nh_flags |=RTNH_F_LINKDOWN ; + rt->rt6i_nh_flags |= (cfg->fc_flags &RTNH_F_ONLINK ); rt->dst.dev = dev; rt->rt6i_idev = idev; rt->rt6i_table = table;
@@ -3837,6 +3883,8 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,if (rtm->rtm_flags &RTM_F_CLONED ) cfg->fc_flags |=RTF_CACHE ; + cfg->fc_flags |= (rtm->rtm_flags &RTNH_F_ONLINK ); + cfg->fc_nlinfo.portid =NETLINK_CB (skb).portid; cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh = nlh; cfg->fc_nlinfo.nl_net =sock_net (skb->sk);
@@ -4242,6 +4290,7 @@ static int rt6_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt, goto nla_put_failure; } + *flags |= (rt->rt6i_nh_flags &RTNH_F_ONLINK );if (rt->rt6i_nh_flags &RTNH_F_OFFLOAD ) *flags |=RTNH_F_OFFLOAD ;
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
David Miller
maintainerFrom: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:55:06 -0800
Quoted 12 lines
Add support for
RTNH_F_ONLINKwith ipv6 routes.First patch moves existing gateway validation into helper. The onlink flag requires a different set of checks and the existing validation makes
ip6_route_info_createlong enough.Second patch makes the table id and lookup flag an option to
ip6_nh_lookup_table. onlink check needs to verify the gateway without theRT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACEflag and PBR with VRF means the table id can vary between the table the route is inserted and the VRF the egress device is enslaved to.
Quoted 8 lines
Third patch adds support for
RTNH_F_ONLINK.I have a set of test cases in a format based on the framework Ido and Jiri are working on. Once that goes in I will adapt the script and submit.
v2
- removed table id check. Too constraining for PBR with VRF use cases
Series applied, thanks David.