RDMA uverbs fixes for 4.16
cover RDMA uverbs fixes for 4.16
Hi,
The following four patches fix failures found during our regression testing.
Thanks
Leon Romanovsky (4):
RDMA/restrack: Increment CQ restrack object before committing RDMA/uverbs: Fix bad unlock balance in ib_uverbs_close_xrcd RDMA/uverbs: Fix circular locking dependency RDMA/uverbs: Sanitize user entered port numbers prior to access it
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.16.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH 1/4 RDMA/restrack: Increment CQ restrack object before committing
In reply to a message not in the archiveFrom: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Once the uobj is committed it is immediately possible another thread could destroy it, which worst case, can result in a use-after-free of the restrack objects.
--- drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c +3 -3
@@ -1030,14 +1030,14 @@ static struct ib_ucq_object *create_cq(struct ib_uverbs_file *file, resp.response_length = offsetof(typeof (resp ), response_length) +sizeof (resp.response_length); + cq->res.type =RDMA_RESTRACK_CQ ; +rdma_restrack_add (&cq->res); + ret =cb (file, obj, &resp, ucore, context);if (ret) goto err_cb;uobj_alloc_commit (&obj->uobject); - cq->res.type =RDMA_RESTRACK_CQ ; -rdma_restrack_add (&cq->res); -return obj; err_cb:
Signature · 6 lines
2.16.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH 2/4 RDMA/uverbs: Fix bad unlock balance in ib_uverbs_close_xrcd
In reply to a message not in the archiveFrom: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
The attempt to call ib_uverbs_close_xrcd() without calling to ib_uverbs_open_xrcd() will produce the following warning.
The design of RDMA/core ensures that destroy operation is atomic and doesn't need to be protected with lock.
=====================================
WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
4.15.0+ #87 Not tainted
-------------------------------------
syzkaller223405/269 is trying to release lock (&uverbs_dev->xrcd_tree_mutex) at:
[<00000000b8703372>] ib_uverbs_close_xrcd+0x195/0x1f0
but there are no more locks to release!
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by syzkaller223405/269:
#0: (&uverbs_dev->disassociate_srcu){....}, at: [<000000005af3b960>] ib_uverbs_write+0x265/0xef0
stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 269 Comm: syzkaller223405 Not tainted 4.15.0+ #87 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xde/0x164 ? dma_virt_map_sg+0x22c/0x22c ? ib_uverbs_write+0x265/0xef0 ? console_unlock+0x502/0xbd0 ? ib_uverbs_close_xrcd+0x195/0x1f0 print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0x131/0x160 lock_release+0x59d/0x1100 ? ib_uverbs_close_xrcd+0x195/0x1f0 ? lock_acquire+0x440/0x440 ? lock_acquire+0x440/0x440 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x88/0x670 ? wait_for_completion+0x4c0/0x4c0 ? rdma_lookup_get_uobject+0x145/0x2f0 ib_uverbs_close_xrcd+0x195/0x1f0 ? ib_uverbs_open_xrcd+0xdd0/0xdd0 ib_uverbs_write+0x7f9/0xef0 ? cyc2ns_read_end+0x10/0x10 ? ib_uverbs_open_xrcd+0xdd0/0xdd0 ? uverbs_devnode+0x110/0x110 ? cyc2ns_read_end+0x10/0x10 ? cyc2ns_read_end+0x10/0x10 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x200 __vfs_write+0x10d/0x700 ? uverbs_devnode+0x110/0x110 ? kernel_read+0x170/0x170 ? __fget+0x358/0x5d0 ? security_file_permission+0x93/0x260 vfs_write+0x1b0/0x550 SyS_write+0xc7/0x1a0 ? SyS_read+0x1a0/0x1a0 ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b RIP: 0033:0x4335c9
--- drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c +1 -3
@@ -603,10 +603,8 @@ ssize_t ib_uverbs_close_xrcd(struct ib_uverbs_file *file, uobj =uobj_get_write (uobj_get_type (xrcd), cmd.xrcd_handle, file->ucontext); -if (IS_ERR (uobj)) { -mutex_unlock (&file->device->xrcd_tree_mutex); +if (IS_ERR (uobj))return PTR_ERR (uobj); - } ret =uobj_remove_commit (uobj);return ret ?: in_len;
Signature · 6 lines
2.16.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH 3/4 RDMA/uverbs: Fix circular locking dependency
In reply to a message not in the archiveFrom: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Avoid circular locking dependency by calling to uobj_alloc_commit() outside of xrcd_tree_mutex lock.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.15.0+ #87 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syzkaller401056/269 is trying to acquire lock:
(&uverbs_dev->xrcd_tree_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000006c12d2cd>] uverbs_free_xrcd+0xd2/0x360
but task is already holding lock:
(&ucontext->uobjects_lock){+.+.}, at: [<00000000da010f09>] uverbs_cleanup_ucontext+0x168/0x730
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&ucontext->uobjects_lock){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock+0x111/0x1720
rdma_alloc_commit_uobject+0x22c/0x600
ib_uverbs_open_xrcd+0x61a/0xdd0
ib_uverbs_write+0x7f9/0xef0
__vfs_write+0x10d/0x700
vfs_write+0x1b0/0x550
SyS_write+0xc7/0x1a0
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b-> #0 (&uverbs_dev->xrcd_tree_mutex){+.+.}:
lock_acquire+0x19d/0x440
__mutex_lock+0x111/0x1720
uverbs_free_xrcd+0xd2/0x360
remove_commit_idr_uobject+0x6d/0x110
uverbs_cleanup_ucontext+0x2f0/0x730
ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext.constprop.3+0x52/0x120
ib_uverbs_close+0xf2/0x570
__fput+0x2cd/0x8d0
task_work_run+0xec/0x1d0
do_exit+0x6a1/0x1520
do_group_exit+0xe8/0x380
SyS_exit_group+0x1e/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8bother info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ucontext->uobjects_lock);
lock(&uverbs_dev->xrcd_tree_mutex);
lock(&ucontext->uobjects_lock); lock(&uverbs_dev->xrcd_tree_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syzkaller401056/269:
#0: (&file->cleanup_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000c9f0c252>] ib_uverbs_close+0xac/0x570
#1: (&ucontext->cleanup_rwsem){++++}, at: [<00000000b6994d49>] uverbs_cleanup_ucontext+0xf6/0x730
#2: (&ucontext->uobjects_lock){+.+.}, at: [<00000000da010f09>] uverbs_cleanup_ucontext+0x168/0x730stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 269 Comm: syzkaller401056 Not tainted 4.15.0+ #87 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xde/0x164 ? dma_virt_map_sg+0x22c/0x22c ? uverbs_cleanup_ucontext+0x168/0x730 ? console_unlock+0x502/0xbd0 print_circular_bug.isra.24+0x35e/0x396 ? print_circular_bug_header+0x12e/0x12e ? find_usage_backwards+0x30/0x30 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b validate_chain.isra.28+0x25d1/0x40c0 ? check_usage+0xb70/0xb70 ? graph_lock+0x160/0x160 ? find_usage_backwards+0x30/0x30 ? cyc2ns_read_end+0x10/0x10 ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280 ? __lock_acquire+0x93d/0x1630 __lock_acquire+0x93d/0x1630 lock_acquire+0x19d/0x440 ? uverbs_free_xrcd+0xd2/0x360 __mutex_lock+0x111/0x1720 ? uverbs_free_xrcd+0xd2/0x360 ? uverbs_free_xrcd+0xd2/0x360 ? __mutex_lock+0x828/0x1720 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1550/0x1550 ? uverbs_cleanup_ucontext+0x168/0x730 ? __lock_acquire+0x9a9/0x1630 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1550/0x1550 ? uverbs_cleanup_ucontext+0xf6/0x730 ? lock_contended+0x11a0/0x11a0 ? uverbs_free_xrcd+0xd2/0x360 uverbs_free_xrcd+0xd2/0x360 remove_commit_idr_uobject+0x6d/0x110 uverbs_cleanup_ucontext+0x2f0/0x730 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x200 ? uverbs_close_fd+0x1c0/0x1c0 ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext.constprop.3+0x52/0x120 ib_uverbs_close+0xf2/0x570 ? ib_uverbs_remove_one+0xb50/0xb50 ? ib_uverbs_remove_one+0xb50/0xb50 __fput+0x2cd/0x8d0 task_work_run+0xec/0x1d0 do_exit+0x6a1/0x1520 ? fsnotify_first_mark+0x220/0x220 ? exit_notify+0x9f0/0x9f0 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x5/0x8b ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x5/0x8b ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c ? time_hardirqs_on+0x27/0x670 ? time_hardirqs_off+0x27/0x490 ? syscall_return_slowpath+0x6c/0x460 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x5/0x8b do_group_exit+0xe8/0x380 SyS_exit_group+0x1e/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b RIP: 0033:0x431ce9
--- drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c +2 -1
@@ -562,9 +562,10 @@ ssize_t ib_uverbs_open_xrcd(struct ib_uverbs_file *file,if (f.file)fdput (f); +mutex_unlock (&file->device->xrcd_tree_mutex); +uobj_alloc_commit (&obj->uobject); -mutex_unlock (&file->device->xrcd_tree_mutex);return in_len; err_copy:
Signature · 6 lines
2.16.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH 4/4 RDMA/uverbs: Sanitize user entered port numbers prior to access it
In reply to a message not in the archiveFrom: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in copy_ah_attr_from_uverbs+0x6f2/0x8c0
Read of size 4 at addr ffff88006476a198 by task syzkaller697701/265
CPU: 0 PID: 265 Comm: syzkaller697701 Not tainted 4.15.0+ #90
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xde/0x164
? dma_virt_map_sg+0x22c/0x22c
? show_regs_print_info+0x17/0x17
? lock_contended+0x11a0/0x11a0
print_address_description+0x83/0x3e0
kasan_report+0x18c/0x4b0
? copy_ah_attr_from_uverbs+0x6f2/0x8c0
? copy_ah_attr_from_uverbs+0x6f2/0x8c0
? lookup_get_idr_uobject+0x120/0x200
? copy_ah_attr_from_uverbs+0x6f2/0x8c0
copy_ah_attr_from_uverbs+0x6f2/0x8c0
? modify_qp+0xd0e/0x1350
modify_qp+0xd0e/0x1350
ib_uverbs_modify_qp+0xf9/0x170
? ib_uverbs_query_qp+0xa70/0xa70
ib_uverbs_write+0x7f9/0xef0
? attach_entity_load_avg+0x8b0/0x8b0
? ib_uverbs_query_qp+0xa70/0xa70
? uverbs_devnode+0x110/0x110
? cyc2ns_read_end+0x10/0x10
? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280
? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x200
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
? time_hardirqs_on+0x27/0x670
__vfs_write+0x10d/0x700
? uverbs_devnode+0x110/0x110
? kernel_read+0x170/0x170
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
? finish_task_switch+0x1bd/0x7a0
? finish_task_switch+0x194/0x7a0
? prandom_u32_state+0xe/0x180
? rcu_read_unlock+0x80/0x80
? security_file_permission+0x93/0x260
vfs_write+0x1b0/0x550
SyS_write+0xc7/0x1a0
? SyS_read+0x1a0/0x1a0
? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b
RIP: 0033:0x433c29
RSP: 002b:00007ffcf2be82a8 EFLAGS: 00000217
Allocated by task 62:
kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0
kmem_cache_alloc+0x141/0x480
dup_fd+0x101/0xcc0
copy_process.part.62+0x166f/0x4390
_do_fork+0x1cb/0xe90
kernel_thread+0x34/0x40
call_usermodehelper_exec_work+0x112/0x260
process_one_work+0x929/0x1aa0
worker_thread+0x5c6/0x12a0
kthread+0x346/0x510
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
Freed by task 259:
kasan_slab_free+0x71/0xc0
kmem_cache_free+0xf3/0x4c0
put_files_struct+0x225/0x2c0
exit_files+0x88/0xc0
do_exit+0x67c/0x1520
do_group_exit+0xe8/0x380
SyS_exit_group+0x1e/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88006476a000
which belongs to the cache files_cache of size 832
The buggy address is located 408 bytes inside of
832-byte region [ffff88006476a000, ffff88006476a340)
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffffea000191da80 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
flags: 0x4000000000008100(slab|head)
raw: 4000000000008100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000100080008
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000100000001 ffff88006bcf7a80 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff88006476a080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff88006476a100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
>ffff88006476a180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^
ffff88006476a200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff88006476a280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
==================================================================--- drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c +8 -1
@@ -1970,8 +1970,15 @@ static int modify_qp(struct ib_uverbs_file *file, goto release_qp; } +if ((cmd->base.attr_mask &IB_QP_AV ) && + !rdma_is_port_valid (qp->device, cmd->base.dest.port_num)) { + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto release_qp; + } +if ((cmd->base.attr_mask &IB_QP_ALT_PATH ) && - !rdma_is_port_valid (qp->device, cmd->base.alt_port_num)) { + (!rdma_is_port_valid (qp->device, cmd->base.alt_port_num) || + !rdma_is_port_valid (qp->device, cmd->base.alt_dest.port_num))) { ret = -EINVAL ; goto release_qp; }
Signature · 6 lines
2.16.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jason Gunthorpe
AppliedQuoted 5 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Hi,
The following four patches fix failures found during our regression testing.
Quoted 7 lines
Thanks
Leon Romanovsky (4):
RDMA/restrack: Increment CQ restrack object before committing RDMA/uverbs: Fix bad unlock balance inib_uverbs_close_xrcdRDMA/uverbs: Fix circular locking dependency RDMA/uverbs: Sanitize user entered port numbers prior to access it
I applied all of these to for-rc, thanks
Jasno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html