Skip to contentSkip to conversation

regulator: don't try to use DT information without CONFIG_OF

PATCH In review Arnd Bergmann 2 participants 2 messages Mar 6, 2018 – Mar 7, 2018 Voltage and current regulator framework

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 regulator: don't try to use DT information without CONFIG_OF

The coupled regulator support requires CONFIG_OF today, otherwise we get a link error:

drivers/regulator/core.o: In function `regulator_fill_coupling_array':
core.c:(.text+0x3e44): undefined reference to of_parse_coupled_regulator' drivers/regulator/core.o: In function regulator_register':
core.c:(.text+0x5eb4): undefined reference to of_get_n_coupled' core.c:(.text+0x5f08): undefined reference to of_check_coupling_data'

This changes the affected functions to return success when CONFIG_OF is disabled, which should result in the same behavior as before.

Fixes cf6fc8064766 ("regulator: core: Resolve coupled regulators")
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/regulator/core.c +9 -1
index dedf737a2bad..dbc3381105fb 100644
@@ -4351,6 +4351,9 @@ static int regulator_register_fill_coupling_array(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct regulator_dev *rdev = dev_to_rdev(dev);
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
+		return 0;
+
 	if (regulator_fill_coupling_array(rdev))
 		rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve coupling\n");
 
@@ -4359,7 +4362,12 @@ static int regulator_register_fill_coupling_array(struct device *dev,
 
 static int regulator_resolve_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
-	int n_phandles = of_get_n_coupled(rdev);
+	int n_phandles;
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
+		return 0;
+
+	n_phandles = of_get_n_coupled(rdev);
 
 	if (n_phandles + 1 > MAX_COUPLED) {
 		rdev_err(rdev, "too many regulators coupled\n");
Signature · 1 line
2.9.0
maintainer
#1 lore raw

Applied "regulator: don't try to use DT information without CONFIG_OF" to the regulator tree

The patch

regulator: don't try to use DT information without CONFIG_OF

has been applied to the regulator tree at

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Quoted 1 line

From 30f00f4897a093bb2b0308caab7855d6b75e9e1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 13:33:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: don't try to use DT information without CONFIG_OF

The coupled regulator support requires CONFIG_OF today, otherwise we get a link error:

drivers/regulator/core.o: In function `regulator_fill_coupling_array':
core.c:(.text+0x3e44): undefined reference to of_parse_coupled_regulator' drivers/regulator/core.o: In function regulator_register':
core.c:(.text+0x5eb4): undefined reference to of_get_n_coupled' core.c:(.text+0x5f08): undefined reference to of_check_coupling_data'

This changes the affected functions to return success when CONFIG_OF is disabled, which should result in the same behavior as before.

Fixes cf6fc8064766 ("regulator: core: Resolve coupled regulators")
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/regulator/core.c +9 -1
index d68244ad9423..e685f8b94acf 100644
@@ -4345,6 +4345,9 @@ static int regulator_register_fill_coupling_array(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct regulator_dev *rdev = dev_to_rdev(dev);
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
+		return 0;
+
 	if (regulator_fill_coupling_array(rdev))
 		rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve coupling\n");
 
@@ -4353,7 +4356,12 @@ static int regulator_register_fill_coupling_array(struct device *dev,
 
 static int regulator_resolve_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
-	int n_phandles = of_get_n_coupled(rdev);
+	int n_phandles;
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
+		return 0;
+
+	n_phandles = of_get_n_coupled(rdev);
 
 	if (n_phandles + 1 > MAX_COUPLED) {
 		rdev_err(rdev, "too many regulators coupled\n");
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2