trace when adding memory to an offline nod
Subsystems (3)
Hi guys,
while testing memhotplug, I spotted the following trace:
=====
linux kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 64 at ./include/linux/gfp.h:467 vmemmap_alloc_block+0x4e/0xc9 linux kernel: Modules linked in: fuse(E) nf_log_ipv6(E) nf_log_ipv4(E) nf_log_common(E) xt_LOG(E) xt_limit(E) xt_pkttype(E) iscsi_ibft(E) iscsi_boot_sysfs(E) ip6t_REJECT(E) xt_tcpudp(E) nf_conntrack_ipv6(E) nf_defrag_ipv6(E) ip6table_raw(E) ipt_REJECT(E) iptable_raw(E) xt_CT(E) iptable_filter(E) ip6table_mangle(E) nf_conntrack_netbios_ns(E) nf_conntrack_broadcast(E) nf_conntrack_ipv4(E) nf_defrag_ipv4(E) ip_tables(E) xt_conntrack(E) nf_conntrack(E) ip6table_filter(E) ip6_tables(E) x_tables(E) bochs_drm(E) ttm(E) drm_kms_helper(E) drm(E) syscopyarea(E) sysfillrect(E) sysimgblt(E) fb_sys_fops(E) pcspkr(E) ppdev(E) i2c_piix4(E) joydev(E) parport_pc(E) parport(E) btrfs(E) libcrc32c(E) xor(E) zstd_decompress(E) zstd_compress(E) xxhash(E) raid6_pq(E) sr_mod(E) cdrom(E) sd_mod(E) ata_generic(E) ata_piix(E) linux kernel: ahci(E) libahci(E) floppy(E) serio_raw(E) libata(E) button(E) sg(E) dm_multipath(E) dm_mod(E) scsi_dh_rdac(E) scsi_dh_emc(E) scsi_dh_alua(E) scsi_mod(E) autofs4(E) linux kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 64 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Tainted: G W E 4.17.0-rc5-next-20180517-1-default+ #66 linux kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 linux kernel: Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn linux kernel: RIP: 0010:vmemmap_alloc_block+0x4e/0xc9 linux kernel: Code: fb ff 8d 69 01 75 07 65 8b 1d 9d cb 93 7e 81 fb ff 03 00 00 76 02 0f 0b 48 63 c3 48 0f a3 05 c8 b1 b4 00 0f 92 c0 84 c0 75 02 <0f> 0b 31 c9 89 da 89 ee bf c0 06 40 01 e8 0f d1 ad ff 48 85 c0 74 linux kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffc90000d03bf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 linux kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000008 linux kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 00000000000001ff linux kernel: RBP: 0000000000000009 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffc90000d03ae8 linux kernel: R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffea0006000000 linux kernel: R13: ffffea0005e00000 R14: ffffea0006000000 R15: 0000000000000001 linux kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88013fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 linux kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 linux kernel: CR2: 00007fa92a698018 CR3: 00000001184ce000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 linux kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 linux kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 linux kernel: Call Trace: linux kernel: vmemmap_populate+0xf2/0x2ae linux kernel: sparse_mem_map_populate+0x28/0x35 linux kernel: sparse_add_one_section+0x4c/0x187 linux kernel: __add_pages+0xe7/0x1a0 linux kernel: add_pages+0x16/0x70 linux kernel: add_memory_resource+0xa3/0x1d0 linux kernel: add_memory+0xe4/0x110 linux kernel: acpi_memory_device_add+0x134/0x2e0 linux kernel: acpi_bus_attach+0xd9/0x190 linux kernel: acpi_bus_scan+0x37/0x70 linux kernel: acpi_device_hotplug+0x389/0x4e0 linux kernel: acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1a/0x30 linux kernel: process_one_work+0x146/0x340 linux kernel: worker_thread+0x47/0x3e0 linux kernel: kthread+0xf5/0x130 linux kernel: ? max_active_store+0x60/0x60 linux kernel: ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10 linux kernel: ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 linux kernel: ---[ end trace 2e2241f4e2f2f018 ]---
====
This happens when adding memory to a node that is currently offline.
add_memory_resource()
{
...
new_node = !node_online(nid);
if (new_node) {
pgdat = hotadd_new_pgdat(nid, start);
ret = -ENOMEM;
if (!pgdat)
goto error;
}
ret = arch_add_memory(nid, start, size, NULL, true);
node_set_online(nid);
...
}arch_add_memory() ends up in vmemmap_populate()->vmemmap_alloc_block_buf()->vmemmap_alloc_block() vmemmap_alloc_block() calls alloc_pages_node()->__alloc_pages_node().
In __alloc_pages_node(), we have a check to see if the node where we are requesting memory is onlined.
static inline struct page *__alloc_pages_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
{
VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid));
...
}But it is not, since we online the node after the call to arch_add_memory().
After thinking a while, I thought about 3 ways to go:
1) In case the memory is offlined, after allocating it, we can set some of its field to a "magic" value.
Something like:
pgdat->node_present_pages = (-1UL)
or
pgdat->nr_zones = -1
And later on, in __alloc_pages_node(), we can check for the magic value, and if it is set we do not check for VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid))
2) Move node_set_online() above arch_add_memory. Although I think we cannot really do that. I guess we could collide with someone seeing that we are online, when we are not 100%.
3) Live with it?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Oscar Salvador
Michal Hocko
reviewerQuoted 6 lines · Oscar Salvador
Hi guys,
while testing memhotplug, I spotted the following trace:
=====
linux kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 64 at./include/linux/gfp.h:467vmemmap_alloc_block+0x4e/0xc9
This warning is too loud and not really helpful. We are doing
gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL|__GFP_NOWARN; page = alloc_pages_node(node, gfp_mask, order);
so we do not really insist on the allocation succeeding on the requested node (it is more a hint which node is the best one but we can fallback to any other node). Moreover we do explicitly do not care about allocation warnings by __GFP_NOWARN. So maybe we want to soften the warning like this?
include/linux/gfp.h +1 -1
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static inline struct page * __alloc_pages_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) { VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES); -VM_WARN_ON (!node_online (nid)); +VM_WARN_ON ((gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE) && !node_online (nid));return __alloc_pages (gfp_mask, order, nid); }
Signature · 2 lines
Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Michal Hocko
reviewerQuoted 13 lines · Michal Hocko
Quoted 6 lines · Oscar Salvador
Hi guys,
while testing memhotplug, I spotted the following trace:
=====
linux kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 64 at./include/linux/gfp.h:467vmemmap_alloc_block+0x4e/0xc9This warning is too loud and not really helpful. We are doing
gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL|__GFP_NOWARN; page = alloc_pages_node(node, gfp_mask, order);
Quoted 6 lines
so we do not really insist on the allocation succeeding on the requested node (it is more a hint which node is the best one but we can fallback to any other node). Moreover we do explicitly do not care about allocation warnings by
__GFP_NOWARN. So maybe we want to soften the warning like this?
The patch with the full changelog
Oscar Salvador
Tested-byQuoted 103 lines · Michal Hocko
Quoted 13 lines · Michal Hocko
Quoted 6 lines · Oscar Salvador
Hi guys,
while testing memhotplug, I spotted the following trace:
=====
linux kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 64 at./include/linux/gfp.h:467vmemmap_alloc_block+0x4e/0xc9This warning is too loud and not really helpful. We are doing
gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL|__GFP_NOWARN; page = alloc_pages_node(node, gfp_mask, order);Quoted 6 lines
so we do not really insist on the allocation succeeding on the requested node (it is more a hint which node is the best one but we can fallback to any other node). Moreover we do explicitly do not care about allocation warnings by
__GFP_NOWARN. So maybe we want to soften the warning like this?The patch with the full changelog
From
13a168ec3b84561abc201bd116ad53af343928c0Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:38:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mm: do not warn on offline nodes unless the specific node is
explicitly requestedOscar has noticed that we splat
linux kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 64 at./include/linux/gfp.h:467vmemmap_alloc_block+0x4e/0xc9[...]linux kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 64 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Tainted: G W E 4.17.0-rc5-next-20180517-1-default+ #66 linux kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 linux kernel: Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn linux kernel: RIP: 0010:vmemmap_alloc_block+0x4e/0xc9 linux kernel: Code: fb ff 8d 69 01 75 07 65 8b 1d 9d cb 93 7e 81 fb ff 03 00 00 76 02 0f 0b 48 63 c3 48 0f a3 05 c8 b1 b4 00 0f 92 c0 84 c0 75 02 <0f> 0b 31 c9 89 da 89 ee bf c0 06 40 01 e8 0f d1 ad ff 48 85 c0 74 linux kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffc90000d03bf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 linux kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000008 linux kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 00000000000001ff linux kernel: RBP: 0000000000000009 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffc90000d03ae8 linux kernel: R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffea0006000000 linux kernel: R13: ffffea0005e00000 R14: ffffea0006000000 R15: 0000000000000001 linux kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88013fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 linux kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 linux kernel: CR2: 00007fa92a698018 CR3: 00000001184ce000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 linux kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 linux kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 linux kernel: Call Trace: linux kernel: vmemmap_populate+0xf2/0x2ae linux kernel: sparse_mem_map_populate+0x28/0x35 linux kernel: sparse_add_one_section+0x4c/0x187 linux kernel: __add_pages+0xe7/0x1a0 linux kernel: add_pages+0x16/0x70 linux kernel: add_memory_resource+0xa3/0x1d0 linux kernel: add_memory+0xe4/0x110 linux kernel: acpi_memory_device_add+0x134/0x2e0 linux kernel: acpi_bus_attach+0xd9/0x190 linux kernel: acpi_bus_scan+0x37/0x70 linux kernel: acpi_device_hotplug+0x389/0x4e0 linux kernel: acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1a/0x30 linux kernel: process_one_work+0x146/0x340 linux kernel: worker_thread+0x47/0x3e0 linux kernel: kthread+0xf5/0x130 linux kernel: ? max_active_store+0x60/0x60 linux kernel: ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10 linux kernel: ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 linux kernel: ---[ end trace 2e2241f4e2f2f018 ]---====
when adding memory to a node that is currently offline.
The
VM_WARN_ONis just too loud without a good reason. In this particular case we are doing
alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL|__GFP_NOWARN, order)so we do not insist on allocating from the given node (it is more a hint) so we can fall back to any other populated node and moreover we explicitly ask to not warn for the allocation failure.
Soften the warning only to cases when somebody asks for the given node explicitly by
__GFP_THISNODE.Signed-off-by Michal Hocko <[email protected]>--- include/linux/gfp.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)include/linux/gfp.h +1
-1@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static inline struct page * __alloc_pages_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) { VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES); -VM_WARN_ON (!node_online (nid)); +VM_WARN_ON ((gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE) && !node_online (nid));return __alloc_pages (gfp_mask, order, nid); }Signature · 2 lines
2.17.0 --
For what is worth it:
Michal Hocko
reviewerOn Wed 23-05-18 11:19:14, Oscar Salvador wrote:
[...]
Quoted 3 lines
For what is worth it:
Tested-by Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
Thanks for testing. I will repost with the other issue you have noticed.
Signature · 2 lines
Michal Hocko SUSE Labs