staging:rtl8192u: [0/10] Coding style changes.
All coding style changes, but the second [2/10] is a bit more hairy then most. The original code combined two typedef declarations into one with both the structure and a pointer to the structure defined. I've totally removed the pointer to the structure type since it uses Hungarian notation, which the coding standard isn't keen on.
As a result of this there are changes in code from the type:
PStructType *ppname;
to:
struct StructType **ppname;
To keep the diff simple I've kept the current nameing of "ppname", which again is Hungarian notation. I'll leave that for a future patch.
jwhitmore
PATCH 1/10 staging:rtl8192u: remove typedef of enumeration TR_SELECT - Style
To clear a checkpatch issue removed the typedef of the enumeration TR_SELECT this should not impact runtime code as it's only a coding style change.
--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 10 +++++----- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h +2 -2
@@ -2391,7 +2391,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx_DELBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb);void TsInitAddBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTX_TS_RECORD pTS,u8 Policy,u8 bOverwritePending);void TsInitDelBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee, -PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,TR_SELECT TxRxSelect); +PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect);void BaSetupTimeOut (struct timer_list *t);void TxBaInactTimeout (struct timer_list *t);void RxBaInactTimeout (struct timer_list *t);
@@ -2402,7 +2402,7 @@ bool GetTs(PTS_COMMON_INFO *ppTS, u8 *Addr, u8 TID, - TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0 + enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0 bool bAddNewTs );void TSInitialize (struct ieee80211_device *ieee);
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c +5 -5
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ieee80211_ADDBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *Dst, P *function: construct DELBA frame * input: u8* dst //DELBA frame's destination * PBA_RECORD pBA //BA_RECORD entry which stores the necessary information for BA - * TR_SELECT TxRxSelect //TX RX direction + * enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect //TX RX direction * u16 ReasonCode //status code. * output: none * return: sk_buff* skb //return constructed skb to xmit
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ieee80211_DELBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *dst, PBA_RECORD pBA, - TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, + enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, u16 ReasonCode ) {
@@ -290,14 +290,14 @@ static void ieee80211_send_ADDBARsp(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *dst,*function: send ADDBARSP frame out * input: u8* dst //DELBA frame's destination * PBA_RECORD pBA //BA_RECORD entry which stores the necessary information for BA -* TR_SELECT TxRxSelect //TX or RX +* enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect //TX or RX * u16 ReasonCode //DEL ReasonCode * output: none * notice: If any possible, please hide pBA in ieee. And temporarily use Manage Queue as softmac_mgmt_xmit() usually does ********************************************************************************************************************/ static void ieee80211_send_DELBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,u8 *dst, -PBA_RECORD pBA,TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, +PBA_RECORD pBA,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect,u16 ReasonCode) {struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ TsInitAddBA( }void -TsInitDelBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) +TsInitDelBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) {if (TxRxSelect ==TX_DIR ) {PTX_TS_RECORD pTxTs = (PTX_TS_RECORD )pTsCommonInfo;
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +2 -2
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@#define TCLAS_NUM 4/* This define the Tx/Rx directions */ -typedef enum _TR_SELECT { +enum TR_SELECT {TX_DIR =0 ,RX_DIR =1 , -}TR_SELECT , *PTR_SELECT ; +}; typedef struct _TS_COMMON_INFO { struct list_head List;
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +3 -3
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void AdmitTS(struct ieee80211_device *ieee,static PTS_COMMON_INFO SearchAdmitTRStream (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,u8 *Addr,u8 TID , -TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) +enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) {//DIRECTION_VALUE dir; u8 dir;
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ bool GetTs(PTS_COMMON_INFO *ppTS, u8 *Addr, u8 TID, - TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0 + enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0 bool bAddNewTs ) {
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ bool GetTs( }static void RemoveTsEntry (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTS_COMMON_INFO pTs, -TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) +enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) {//u32 flags = 0; unsigned long flags =0 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH 01/10] staging:rtl8192u: remove typedef of enumeration TR_SELECT - Style
Quoted 25 lines · John Whitmore
To clear a checkpatch issue removed the typedef of the enumeration
TR_SELECTthis should not impact runtime code as it's only a coding style change.Signed-off-by John Whitmore <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 10 +++++----- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h +1
-1@@ -2391,7 +2391,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx_DELBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb);void TsInitAddBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTX_TS_RECORD pTS,u8 Policy,u8 bOverwritePending);void TsInitDelBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee, -PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,TR_SELECT TxRxSelect); +PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect);void BaSetupTimeOut (struct timer_list *t);void TxBaInactTimeout (struct timer_list *t);void RxBaInactTimeout (struct timer_list *t);
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h bool GetTs( · line 2405
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h +1
-1@@ -2402,7 +2402,7 @@ bool GetTs(PTS_COMMON_INFO *ppTS, u8 *Addr, u8 TID, - TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0 + enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0
This really should be "enum tr_select", right? No ALL CAPS variable types please.
thanks,
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 01/10] staging:rtl8192u: remove typedef of enumeration TR_SELECT - Style
Quoted 26 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 25 lines · John Whitmore
To clear a checkpatch issue removed the typedef of the enumeration
TR_SELECTthis should not impact runtime code as it's only a coding style change.Signed-off-by John Whitmore <[email protected]>--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 10 +++++----- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h +1
-1@@ -2391,7 +2391,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx_DELBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb);void TsInitAddBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTX_TS_RECORD pTS,u8 Policy,u8 bOverwritePending);void TsInitDelBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee, -PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,TR_SELECT TxRxSelect); +PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect);void BaSetupTimeOut (struct timer_list *t);void TxBaInactTimeout (struct timer_list *t);void RxBaInactTimeout (struct timer_list *t);@@ -2402,7 +2402,7 @@ bool GetTs(
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h bool GetTs( · line 2405
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h +1
-1PTS_COMMON_INFO *ppTS, u8 *Addr, u8 TID, - TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0 + enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0This really should be "enum
tr_select", right? No ALL CAPS variable types please.
Absolutely, I was trying to make small changes, not doing too much in a single patch. I know there's a happy medium somewhere. I'll fix that up and resend series again.
Cheers
John
PATCH 2/10 staging:rtl8192u: remove typedef of struct TS_COMMON_INFO - Style
In reply to John WhitmoreTo clear a checkpatch issue removed the typedef of the structure TS_COMMON_INFO.
This change removes the previous declaration, which defined two types, both TS_COMMON_INFO and a pointer type PTS_COMMON_INFO:
typedef struct _TS_COMMON_INFO {
...
} TS_COMMON_INFO, *PTS_COMMON_INFO;The pointer type has been completely removed from the code, as:
"(so-called Hungarian notation) is brain damaged" according to the coding standard.
--- .../staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h | 4 ++-- .../staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_rx.c | 4 ++-- .../staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c | 4 ++-- .../rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 10 ++++---- .../staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 8 +++---- .../rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 24 +++++++++---------- 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h +2 -2
@@ -2391,7 +2391,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx_DELBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb);void TsInitAddBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTX_TS_RECORD pTS,u8 Policy,u8 bOverwritePending);void TsInitDelBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee, -PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect); +struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect);void BaSetupTimeOut (struct timer_list *t);void TxBaInactTimeout (struct timer_list *t);void RxBaInactTimeout (struct timer_list *t);
@@ -2399,7 +2399,7 @@ void ResetBaEntry(PBA_RECORD pBA);//function in TS.c bool GetTs( struct ieee80211_device *ieee, - PTS_COMMON_INFO *ppTS, + struct TS_COMMON_INFO **ppTS, u8 *Addr, u8 TID, enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_rx.c +2 -2
@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb,//IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_REORDER,"%s(): QOS ENABLE AND RECEIVE QOS DATA , we will get Ts, tid:%d\n",__func__, tid); if(GetTs( ieee, - (PTS_COMMON_INFO *) &pRxTS, + (struct TS_COMMON_INFO **) &pRxTS, hdr->addr2, Frame_QoSTID((u8 *)(skb->data)), RX_DIR,
@@ -1266,7 +1266,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb, {TID =Frame_QoSTID (skb->data); SeqNum =WLAN_GET_SEQ_SEQ (sc); -GetTs (ieee,(PTS_COMMON_INFO *) &pTS,hdr->addr2,TID ,RX_DIR ,true); +GetTs (ieee,(struct TS_COMMON_INFO **) &pTS,hdr->addr2,TID ,RX_DIR ,true);if (TID !=0 &&TID !=3 ) { ieee->bis_any_nonbepkts = true;
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c +2 -2
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static void ieee80211_tx_query_agg_cap(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, }if (pHTInfo->bCurrentAMPDUEnable) { -if (!GetTs (ieee, (PTS_COMMON_INFO *)(&pTxTs), hdr->addr1, skb->priority,TX_DIR , true)) +if (!GetTs (ieee, (struct TS_COMMON_INFO **)(&pTxTs), hdr->addr1, skb->priority,TX_DIR , true)) {printk ("===>can't get TS\n" );return ;
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static void ieee80211_query_seqnum(struct ieee80211_device *ieee,if (IsQoSDataFrame (skb->data))//we deal qos data only {PTX_TS_RECORD pTS =NULL ; -if (!GetTs (ieee, (PTS_COMMON_INFO *)(&pTS), dst, skb->priority,TX_DIR , true)) +if (!GetTs (ieee, (struct TS_COMMON_INFO **)(&pTS), dst, skb->priority,TX_DIR , true)) {return ; }
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c +5 -5
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx_ADDBAReq(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb)// If there is no matched TS, reject the ADDBA request. if (!GetTs( ieee, - (PTS_COMMON_INFO *)(&pTS), + (struct TS_COMMON_INFO **)(&pTS), dst, (u8)(pBaParamSet->field.TID), RX_DIR,
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx_ADDBARsp(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb)// if (!GetTs( ieee, - (PTS_COMMON_INFO *)(&pTS), + (struct TS_COMMON_INFO **)(&pTS), dst, (u8)(pBaParamSet->field.TID), TX_DIR,
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx_DELBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb) if (!GetTs( ieee, - (PTS_COMMON_INFO *)&pRxTs, + (struct TS_COMMON_INFO **)&pRxTs, dst, (u8)pDelBaParamSet->field.TID, RX_DIR,
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ int ieee80211_rx_DELBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb) if (!GetTs( ieee, - (PTS_COMMON_INFO *)&pTxTs, + (struct TS_COMMON_INFO **)&pTxTs, dst, (u8)pDelBaParamSet->field.TID, TX_DIR,
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ TsInitAddBA( }void -TsInitDelBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) +TsInitDelBA (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) {if (TxRxSelect ==TX_DIR ) {PTX_TS_RECORD pTxTs = (PTX_TS_RECORD )pTsCommonInfo;
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +4 -4
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ enum TR_SELECT { RX_DIR = 1, }; -typedef struct _TS_COMMON_INFO { +struct TS_COMMON_INFO {struct list_head List;struct timer_list SetupTimer;struct timer_list InactTimer;
@@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ typedef struct _TS_COMMON_INFO {QOS_TCLAS TClass[TCLAS_NUM ];u8 TClasProc;u8 TClasNum; -}TS_COMMON_INFO , *PTS_COMMON_INFO ; +}; typedef struct _TX_TS_RECORD { - TS_COMMON_INFO TsCommonInfo; + struct TS_COMMON_INFO TsCommonInfo; u16 TxCurSeq; BA_RECORD TxPendingBARecord; /* For BA Originator */ BA_RECORD TxAdmittedBARecord; /* For BA Originator */
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ typedef struct _TX_TS_RECORD { }TX_TS_RECORD , *PTX_TS_RECORD ; typedef struct _RX_TS_RECORD { - TS_COMMON_INFO TsCommonInfo; + struct TS_COMMON_INFO TsCommonInfo; u16 RxIndicateSeq; u16 RxTimeoutIndicateSeq; struct list_head RxPendingPktList;
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +12 -12
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void TsAddBaProcess(struct timer_list *t) } -static void ResetTsCommonInfo (PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo) +static void ResetTsCommonInfo (struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo) {eth_zero_addr (pTsCommonInfo->Addr);memset (&pTsCommonInfo->TSpec,0 ,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY ));
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void TSInitialize(struct ieee80211_device *ieee) }static void AdmitTS (struct ieee80211_device *ieee, -PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,u32 InactTime) +struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo,u32 InactTime) {del_timer_sync (&pTsCommonInfo->SetupTimer);del_timer_sync (&pTsCommonInfo->InactTimer);
@@ -202,15 +202,15 @@ static void AdmitTS(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, } -static PTS_COMMON_INFO SearchAdmitTRStream (struct ieee80211_device *ieee, -u8 *Addr,u8 TID , -enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) +static struct TS_COMMON_INFO *SearchAdmitTRStream (struct ieee80211_device *ieee, +u8 *Addr,u8 TID , +enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) {//DIRECTION_VALUE dir; u8 dir;bool search_dir[4 ] = {0 };struct list_head *psearch_list;//FIXME -PTS_COMMON_INFO pRet =NULL ; +struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pRet =NULL ;if (ieee->iw_mode ==IW_MODE_MASTER ) {//ap mode if (TxRxSelect ==TX_DIR ) { search_dir[DIR_DOWN ] = true;
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static PTS_COMMON_INFO SearchAdmitTRStream(struct ieee80211_device *ieee,return NULL ; } -static void MakeTSEntry (PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo,u8 *Addr, +static void MakeTSEntry (struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo,u8 *Addr,PTSPEC_BODY pTSPEC,PQOS_TCLAS pTCLAS,u8 TCLAS_Num,u8 TCLAS_Proc) {
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static void MakeTSEntry(PTS_COMMON_INFO pTsCommonInfo, u8 *Addr, bool GetTs( struct ieee80211_device *ieee, - PTS_COMMON_INFO *ppTS, + struct TS_COMMON_INFO **ppTS, u8 *Addr, u8 TID, enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect, //Rx:1, Tx:0
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ bool GetTs( ((TxRxSelect==TX_DIR )?DIR_UP :DIR_DOWN );IEEE80211_DEBUG (IEEE80211_DL_TS ,"to add Ts\n" );if (!list_empty (pUnusedList)) { - (*ppTS) =list_entry (pUnusedList->next,TS_COMMON_INFO , List); + (*ppTS) = list_entry(pUnusedList->next, struct TS_COMMON_INFO, List);list_del_init (&(*ppTS)->List);if (TxRxSelect==TX_DIR ) {PTX_TS_RECORD tmp =container_of (*ppTS,TX_TS_RECORD , TsCommonInfo);
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ bool GetTs( } } -static void RemoveTsEntry (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,PTS_COMMON_INFO pTs, +static void RemoveTsEntry (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTs,enum TR_SELECT TxRxSelect) {//u32 flags = 0;
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static void RemoveTsEntry(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, PTS_COMMON_INFO pTs,void RemovePeerTS (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,u8 *Addr) { -PTS_COMMON_INFO pTS, pTmpTS; +struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTS, *pTmpTS;printk ("===========>RemovePeerTS,%pM\n" , Addr);list_for_each_entry_safe (pTS, pTmpTS, &ieee->Tx_TS_Pending_List, List) {
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ void RemovePeerTS(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *Addr)void RemoveAllTS (struct ieee80211_device *ieee) { -PTS_COMMON_INFO pTS, pTmpTS; +struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTS, *pTmpTS;list_for_each_entry_safe (pTS, pTmpTS, &ieee->Tx_TS_Pending_List, List) {RemoveTsEntry (ieee, pTS,TX_DIR );
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH 02/10] staging:rtl8192u: remove typedef of struct TS_COMMON_INFO - Style
Quoted 10 lines · John Whitmore
To clear a checkpatch issue removed the typedef of the structure
TS_COMMON_INFO.This change removes the previous declaration, which defined two types, both
TS_COMMON_INFOand a pointer typePTS_COMMON_INFO:typedef struct _TS_COMMON_INFO { ... } TS_COMMON_INFO, *PTS_COMMON_INFO;
Same here, this should be "struct ts_common_info", not TS_COMMON_INFO.
Can you fix both of these issues up and resend the series?
thanks,
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 02/10] staging:rtl8192u: remove typedef of struct TS_COMMON_INFO - Style
Quoted 7 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 6 lines · John Whitmore
To clear a checkpatch issue removed the typedef of the structure
TS_COMMON_INFO.This change removes the previous declaration, which defined two types, both
TS_COMMON_INFOand a pointer typePTS_COMMON_INFO:
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
typedef struct _TS_COMMON_INFO { ... } TS_COMMON_INFO, *PTS_COMMON_INFO;Same here, this should be "struct
ts_common_info", notTS_COMMON_INFO.Can you fix both of these issues up and resend the series?
No problem, I'll fix up the series and resend.
John
PATCH 3/10 staging:rtl8192u: Rename List > list - Coding style
In reply to John WhitmoreIn struct TS_COMMON_INFO rename the member List to list. This clears the checkpatch issue concerning CamelCase naming of variables.
--- .../staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 2 +- .../rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 64 +++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +1 -1
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ enum TR_SELECT { };struct TS_COMMON_INFO { -struct list_head List; +struct list_head list;struct timer_list SetupTimer;struct timer_list InactTimer;u8 Addr[6 ];
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +32 -32
143 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
PATCH 4/10 staging:rtl8192u: rename SetupTimer > setup_timer - Style
In reply to John WhitmoreRename the struct TS_COMMON_INFO member SetupTimer to setup_timer. This clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase variable names.
--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 2 +- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +1 -1
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ enum TR_SELECT {struct TS_COMMON_INFO {struct list_head list; -struct timer_list SetupTimer; +struct timer_list setup_timer;struct timer_list InactTimer;u8 Addr[6 ];TSPEC_BODY TSpec;
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +4 -4
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ void TSInitialize(struct ieee80211_device *ieee) pTxTS->num = count;// The timers for the operation of Traffic Stream and Block Ack. // DLS related timer will be add here in the future!! -timer_setup (&pTxTS->TsCommonInfo.SetupTimer, TsSetupTimeOut, +timer_setup (&pTxTS->TsCommonInfo.setup_timer, TsSetupTimeOut,0 );timer_setup (&pTxTS->TsCommonInfo.InactTimer, TsInactTimeout,0 );
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void TSInitialize(struct ieee80211_device *ieee)for (count =0 ; count <TOTAL_TS_NUM ; count++) { pRxTS->num = count;INIT_LIST_HEAD (&pRxTS->RxPendingPktList); -timer_setup (&pRxTS->TsCommonInfo.SetupTimer, TsSetupTimeOut, +timer_setup (&pRxTS->TsCommonInfo.setup_timer, TsSetupTimeOut,0 );timer_setup (&pRxTS->TsCommonInfo.InactTimer, TsInactTimeout,0 );
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ void TSInitialize(struct ieee80211_device *ieee)static void AdmitTS (struct ieee80211_device *ieee,struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo,u32 InactTime) { -del_timer_sync (&pTsCommonInfo->SetupTimer); +del_timer_sync (&pTsCommonInfo->setup_timer);del_timer_sync (&pTsCommonInfo->InactTimer);if (InactTime!=0 )
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static void RemoveTsEntry(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct TS_COMMON_INFO * {//u32 flags = 0; unsigned long flags =0 ; -del_timer_sync (&pTs->SetupTimer); +del_timer_sync (&pTs->setup_timer);del_timer_sync (&pTs->InactTimer);TsInitDelBA (ieee, pTs, TxRxSelect);
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
PATCH 5/10 staging:rtl8192u: Rename InactTimer > inact_timer - Style
In reply to John WhitmoreRename the struct TS_COMMON_INFO member InactTimer to inact_timer. This change clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase naming. The change should not have any impact on runtime execution.
--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 2 +- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +1 -1
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ enum TR_SELECT {struct TS_COMMON_INFO {struct list_head list;struct timer_list setup_timer; -struct timer_list InactTimer; +struct timer_list inact_timer;u8 Addr[6 ];TSPEC_BODY TSpec;QOS_TCLAS TClass[TCLAS_NUM ];
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +5 -5
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ void TSInitialize(struct ieee80211_device *ieee)// DLS related timer will be add here in the future!! timer_setup (&pTxTS->TsCommonInfo.setup_timer, TsSetupTimeOut,0 ); -timer_setup (&pTxTS->TsCommonInfo.InactTimer, TsInactTimeout, +timer_setup (&pTxTS->TsCommonInfo.inact_timer, TsInactTimeout,0 );timer_setup (&pTxTS->TsAddBaTimer, TsAddBaProcess,0 ); timer_setup(&pTxTS->TxPendingBARecord.Timer, BaSetupTimeOut,
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void TSInitialize(struct ieee80211_device *ieee)INIT_LIST_HEAD (&pRxTS->RxPendingPktList);timer_setup (&pRxTS->TsCommonInfo.setup_timer, TsSetupTimeOut,0 ); -timer_setup (&pRxTS->TsCommonInfo.InactTimer, TsInactTimeout, +timer_setup (&pRxTS->TsCommonInfo.inact_timer, TsInactTimeout,0 );timer_setup (&pRxTS->RxAdmittedBARecord.Timer, RxBaInactTimeout,0 );
@@ -194,10 +194,10 @@ static void AdmitTS(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo, u32 InactTime) {del_timer_sync (&pTsCommonInfo->setup_timer); -del_timer_sync (&pTsCommonInfo->InactTimer); +del_timer_sync (&pTsCommonInfo->inact_timer);if (InactTime!=0 ) -mod_timer (&pTsCommonInfo->InactTimer, +mod_timer (&pTsCommonInfo->inact_timer, jiffies +msecs_to_jiffies (InactTime)); }
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static void RemoveTsEntry(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct TS_COMMON_INFO *//u32 flags = 0; unsigned long flags =0 ;del_timer_sync (&pTs->setup_timer); -del_timer_sync (&pTs->InactTimer); +del_timer_sync (&pTs->inact_timer);TsInitDelBA (ieee, pTs, TxRxSelect);if (TxRxSelect ==RX_DIR ) {
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
PATCH 6/10 staging:rtl8192u: Rename Addr > addr - Style
In reply to John WhitmoreRename the TX_COMMON_INFO structure's member Addr to addr. This change clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase naming. This is a coding style change only and should not impact runtime execution.
--- .../staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 10 +++++----- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 2 +- .../staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 14 +++++++------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c +5 -5
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ TsInitAddBA(ActivateBAEntry (ieee, pBA,BA_SETUP_TIMEOUT ); -ieee80211_send_ADDBAReq (ieee, pTS->TsCommonInfo.Addr, pBA); +ieee80211_send_ADDBAReq (ieee, pTS->TsCommonInfo.addr, pBA); }void
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ TsInitDelBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo,if (TxTsDeleteBA (ieee, pTxTs))ieee80211_send_DELBA ( ieee, - pTsCommonInfo->Addr, + pTsCommonInfo->addr, (pTxTs->TxAdmittedBARecord.bValid)?(&pTxTs->TxAdmittedBARecord):(&pTxTs->TxPendingBARecord), TxRxSelect,DELBA_REASON_END_BA );
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ TsInitDelBA(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo,if (RxTsDeleteBA (ieee, pRxTs))ieee80211_send_DELBA ( ieee, - pTsCommonInfo->Addr, + pTsCommonInfo->addr, &pRxTs->RxAdmittedBARecord, TxRxSelect,DELBA_REASON_END_BA );
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ void TxBaInactTimeout(struct timer_list *t)TxTsDeleteBA (ieee, pTxTs);ieee80211_send_DELBA ( ieee, - pTxTs->TsCommonInfo.Addr, + pTxTs->TsCommonInfo.addr, &pTxTs->TxAdmittedBARecord,TX_DIR ,DELBA_REASON_TIMEOUT );
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ void RxBaInactTimeout(struct timer_list *t)RxTsDeleteBA (ieee, pRxTs);ieee80211_send_DELBA ( ieee, - pRxTs->TsCommonInfo.Addr, + pRxTs->TsCommonInfo.addr, &pRxTs->RxAdmittedBARecord,RX_DIR ,DELBA_REASON_TIMEOUT );
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +1 -1
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct TS_COMMON_INFO {struct list_head list;struct timer_list setup_timer;struct timer_list inact_timer; -u8 Addr[6 ]; +u8 addr[6 ];TSPEC_BODY TSpec;QOS_TCLAS TClass[TCLAS_NUM ];u8 TClasProc;
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +7 -7
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void TsAddBaProcess(struct timer_list *t)static void ResetTsCommonInfo (struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo) { -eth_zero_addr (pTsCommonInfo->Addr); +eth_zero_addr (pTsCommonInfo->addr);memset (&pTsCommonInfo->TSpec,0 ,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY ));memset (&pTsCommonInfo->TClass,0 ,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )*TCLAS_NUM ); pTsCommonInfo->TClasProc =0 ;
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static struct TS_COMMON_INFO *SearchAdmitTRStream(struct ieee80211_device *ieee,continue ;list_for_each_entry (pRet, psearch_list, list){// IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_TS, "ADD:%pM, TID:%d, dir:%d\n", pRet->Addr, pRet->TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucTSID, pRet->TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucDirection); -if (memcmp (pRet->Addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) +if (memcmp (pRet->addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 )if (pRet->TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucTSID ==TID )if (pRet->TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucDirection == dir) {// printk("Bingo! got it\n");
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static void MakeTSEntry(struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo, u8 *Addr,if (pTsCommonInfo ==NULL )return ; -memcpy (pTsCommonInfo->Addr, Addr,6 ); +memcpy (pTsCommonInfo->addr, Addr,6 );if (pTSPEC !=NULL )memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->TSpec)), (u8 *)pTSPEC,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY ));
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ void RemovePeerTS(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *Addr)printk ("===========>RemovePeerTS,%pM\n" , Addr);list_for_each_entry_safe (pTS, pTmpTS, &ieee->Tx_TS_Pending_List, list) { -if (memcmp (pTS->Addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) { +if (memcmp (pTS->addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) {RemoveTsEntry (ieee, pTS,TX_DIR );list_del_init (&pTS->list);list_add_tail (&pTS->list, &ieee->Tx_TS_Unused_List);
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ void RemovePeerTS(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *Addr) }list_for_each_entry_safe (pTS, pTmpTS, &ieee->Tx_TS_Admit_List, list) { -if (memcmp (pTS->Addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) { +if (memcmp (pTS->addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) {printk ("====>remove Tx_TS_admin_list\n" );RemoveTsEntry (ieee, pTS,TX_DIR );list_del_init (&pTS->list);
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ void RemovePeerTS(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *Addr) }list_for_each_entry_safe (pTS, pTmpTS, &ieee->Rx_TS_Pending_List, list) { -if (memcmp (pTS->Addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) { +if (memcmp (pTS->addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) {RemoveTsEntry (ieee, pTS,RX_DIR );list_del_init (&pTS->list);list_add_tail (&pTS->list, &ieee->Rx_TS_Unused_List);
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ void RemovePeerTS(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *Addr) }list_for_each_entry_safe (pTS, pTmpTS, &ieee->Rx_TS_Admit_List, list) { -if (memcmp (pTS->Addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) { +if (memcmp (pTS->addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) {RemoveTsEntry (ieee, pTS,RX_DIR );list_del_init (&pTS->list);list_add_tail (&pTS->list, &ieee->Rx_TS_Unused_List);
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
PATCH 7/10 staging:rtl8192u: Rename TSpec > t_spec - Style
In reply to John WhitmoreRename the TS_COMMON_INFO structure's member TSpec to t_spec. This change clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase naming of variables. There should be no impact on runtime execution.
--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 2 +- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_BAProc.c +1 -1
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ TsInitAddBA( pBA->DialogToken++;// DialogToken: Only keep the latest dialog token pBA->BaParamSet.field.AMSDU_Support =0 ;// Do not support A-MSDU with A-MPDU now!! pBA->BaParamSet.field.BAPolicy = Policy;// Policy: Delayed or Immediate - pBA->BaParamSet.field.TID = pTS->TsCommonInfo.TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucTSID;// TID + pBA->BaParamSet.field.TID = pTS->TsCommonInfo.t_spec.f.TSInfo.field.ucTSID;// TID // BufferSize: This need to be set according to A-MPDU vector pBA->BaParamSet.field.BufferSize =32 ;// BufferSize: This need to be set according to A-MPDU vector pBA->BaTimeoutValue =0 ;// Timeout value: Set 0 to disable Timer
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +1 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct TS_COMMON_INFO {struct timer_list setup_timer;struct timer_list inact_timer;u8 addr[6 ]; -TSPEC_BODY TSpec; +TSPEC_BODY t_spec;QOS_TCLAS TClass[TCLAS_NUM ];u8 TClasProc;u8 TClasNum;
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +4 -4
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void TsAddBaProcess(struct timer_list *t)static void ResetTsCommonInfo (struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo) {eth_zero_addr (pTsCommonInfo->addr); -memset (&pTsCommonInfo->TSpec,0 ,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY )); +memset (&pTsCommonInfo->t_spec,0 ,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY ));memset (&pTsCommonInfo->TClass,0 ,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )*TCLAS_NUM ); pTsCommonInfo->TClasProc =0 ; pTsCommonInfo->TClasNum =0 ;
@@ -248,8 +248,8 @@ static struct TS_COMMON_INFO *SearchAdmitTRStream(struct ieee80211_device *ieee,list_for_each_entry (pRet, psearch_list, list){// IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_TS, "ADD:%pM, TID:%d, dir:%d\n", pRet->Addr, pRet->TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucTSID, pRet->TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucDirection); if (memcmp (pRet->addr, Addr,6 ) ==0 ) -if (pRet->TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucTSID ==TID ) -if (pRet->TSpec.f.TSInfo.field.ucDirection == dir) { +if (pRet->t_spec.f.TSInfo.field.ucTSID ==TID ) +if (pRet->t_spec.f.TSInfo.field.ucDirection == dir) {// printk("Bingo! got it\n"); break ; }
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static void MakeTSEntry(struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo, u8 *Addr,memcpy (pTsCommonInfo->addr, Addr,6 );if (pTSPEC !=NULL ) -memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->TSpec)), (u8 *)pTSPEC,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY )); +memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->t_spec)), (u8 *)pTSPEC,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY ));for (count =0 ; count < TCLAS_Num; count++)memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->TClass[count])), (u8 *)pTCLAS,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS ));
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
PATCH 8/10 staging:rtl8192u: Rename TClass > t_class - Style
In reply to John WhitmoreRename the struct TS_COMMON_INFO member variable from TClass to t_class. This change clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase Variable names. There should be no impact on runtime execution.
--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 2 +- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +1 -1
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ struct TS_COMMON_INFO {struct timer_list inact_timer;u8 addr[6 ];TSPEC_BODY t_spec; -QOS_TCLAS TClass[TCLAS_NUM ]; +QOS_TCLAS t_class[TCLAS_NUM ];u8 TClasProc;u8 TClasNum; };
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +2 -2
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void ResetTsCommonInfo(struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo) {eth_zero_addr (pTsCommonInfo->addr);memset (&pTsCommonInfo->t_spec,0 ,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY )); -memset (&pTsCommonInfo->TClass,0 ,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )*TCLAS_NUM ); +memset (&pTsCommonInfo->t_class,0 ,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )*TCLAS_NUM ); pTsCommonInfo->TClasProc =0 ; pTsCommonInfo->TClasNum =0 ; }
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static void MakeTSEntry(struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo, u8 *Addr,memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->t_spec)), (u8 *)pTSPEC,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY ));for (count =0 ; count < TCLAS_Num; count++) -memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->TClass[count])), (u8 *)pTCLAS,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )); +memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->t_class[count])), (u8 *)pTCLAS,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )); pTsCommonInfo->TClasProc = TCLAS_Proc; pTsCommonInfo->TClasNum = TCLAS_Num;
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
PATCH 9/10 staging:trl8192u: Rename TClasProc > t_clas_proc - Style
In reply to John WhitmoreRename the struct TS_COMMON_INFO member variable TClasProc to t_clas_proc. This change clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase variable names. There should be no impact on runtime execution.
--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 2 +- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +1 -1
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct TS_COMMON_INFO {u8 addr[6 ];TSPEC_BODY t_spec;QOS_TCLAS t_class[TCLAS_NUM ]; -u8 TClasProc; +u8 t_clas_proc;u8 TClasNum; };
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +2 -2
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void ResetTsCommonInfo(struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo)eth_zero_addr (pTsCommonInfo->addr);memset (&pTsCommonInfo->t_spec,0 ,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY ));memset (&pTsCommonInfo->t_class,0 ,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )*TCLAS_NUM ); - pTsCommonInfo->TClasProc =0 ; + pTsCommonInfo->t_clas_proc =0 ; pTsCommonInfo->TClasNum =0 ; }
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static void MakeTSEntry(struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo, u8 *Addr,for (count =0 ; count < TCLAS_Num; count++)memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->t_class[count])), (u8 *)pTCLAS,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )); - pTsCommonInfo->TClasProc = TCLAS_Proc; + pTsCommonInfo->t_clas_proc = TCLAS_Proc; pTsCommonInfo->TClasNum = TCLAS_Num; }
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
PATCH 10/10 staging:rtl8192u: Rename TClasNum > t_clas_num - Style
In reply to John WhitmoreRename the struct TS_COMMON_INFO member variable TClasNum to t_clas_num. This change clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase naming. There should be no impact on runtime execution.
--- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 2 +- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h +1 -1
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct TS_COMMON_INFO {TSPEC_BODY t_spec;QOS_TCLAS t_class[TCLAS_NUM ];u8 t_clas_proc; -u8 TClasNum; +u8 t_clas_num; }; typedef struct _TX_TS_RECORD {
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TSProc.c +2 -2
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void ResetTsCommonInfo(struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo)memset (&pTsCommonInfo->t_spec,0 ,sizeof (TSPEC_BODY ));memset (&pTsCommonInfo->t_class,0 ,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )*TCLAS_NUM ); pTsCommonInfo->t_clas_proc =0 ; - pTsCommonInfo->TClasNum =0 ; + pTsCommonInfo->t_clas_num =0 ; }static void ResetTxTsEntry (PTX_TS_RECORD pTS)
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static void MakeTSEntry(struct TS_COMMON_INFO *pTsCommonInfo, u8 *Addr,memcpy ((u8 *)(&(pTsCommonInfo->t_class[count])), (u8 *)pTCLAS,sizeof (QOS_TCLAS )); pTsCommonInfo->t_clas_proc = TCLAS_Proc; - pTsCommonInfo->TClasNum = TCLAS_Num; + pTsCommonInfo->t_clas_num = TCLAS_Num; }
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · John Whitmore
All coding style changes, but the second [2/10] is a bit more hairy then most. The original code combined two typedef declarations into one with both the structure and a pointer to the structure defined. I've totally removed the pointer to the structure type since it uses Hungarian notation, which the coding standard isn't keen on.
Quoted 7 lines
As a result of this there are changes in code from the type:
PStructType *ppname;
to:
struct StructType **ppname;To keep the diff simple I've kept the current nameing of "ppname", which again is Hungarian notation. I'll leave that for a future patch.
Nit, your subject should look like:
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] staging:rtl8192u: Coding style changes.
What are you using to generate this email? git format-patch --cover-letter should generate it with a correct subject line prefix, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Quoted 15 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 6 lines · John Whitmore
All coding style changes, but the second [2/10] is a bit more hairy then most. The original code combined two typedef declarations into one with both the structure and a pointer to the structure defined. I've totally removed the pointer to the structure type since it uses Hungarian notation, which the coding standard isn't keen on.
Quoted 7 lines
As a result of this there are changes in code from the type:
PStructType *ppname;
to:
struct StructType **ppname;To keep the diff simple I've kept the current nameing of "ppname", which again is Hungarian notation. I'll leave that for a future patch.
Quoted 8 lines
Nit, your subject should look like:
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] staging:rtl8192u: Coding style changes.
What are you using to generate this email? git format-patch --cover-letter should generate it with a correct subject line prefix, right?
Oops! I was using "git send-email --compose" didn't realise that option was included in format-patch. I'll use that format-patch option in future.
John