Skip to contentSkip to conversation

drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_int_process_v9: Use true and false for boolean values

PATCH In review Gustavo A. R. Silva 2 participants 2 messages Aug 5, 2018 – Aug 7, 2018

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_int_process_v9: Use true and false for boolean values

Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false instead of an integer value.

This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_int_process_v9.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_int_process_v9.c +2 -2
index f836897..42e92e3 100644
@@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ static bool event_interrupt_isr_v9(struct kfd_dev *dev,
 	vmid = SOC15_VMID_FROM_IH_ENTRY(ih_ring_entry);
 	if (vmid < dev->vm_info.first_vmid_kfd ||
 	    vmid > dev->vm_info.last_vmid_kfd)
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 
 	/* If there is no valid PASID, it's likely a firmware bug */
 	pasid = SOC15_PASID_FROM_IH_ENTRY(ih_ring_entry);
 	if (WARN_ONCE(pasid == 0, "FW bug: No PASID in KFD interrupt"))
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 
 	source_id = SOC15_SOURCE_ID_FROM_IH_ENTRY(ih_ring_entry);
 	client_id = SOC15_CLIENT_ID_FROM_IH_ENTRY(ih_ring_entry);
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false instead of an integer value.

This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.

Also add Felix for his awareness.

Thanks,
Ray

Quoted 30 lines
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_int_process_v9.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_int_process_v9.c +2 -2
index f836897..42e92e3 100644
@@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ static bool event_interrupt_isr_v9(struct kfd_dev *dev,
 	vmid = SOC15_VMID_FROM_IH_ENTRY(ih_ring_entry);
 	if (vmid < dev->vm_info.first_vmid_kfd ||
 	    vmid > dev->vm_info.last_vmid_kfd)
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 
 	/* If there is no valid PASID, it's likely a firmware bug */
 	pasid = SOC15_PASID_FROM_IH_ENTRY(ih_ring_entry);
 	if (WARN_ONCE(pasid == 0, "FW bug: No PASID in KFD interrupt"))
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 
 	source_id = SOC15_SOURCE_ID_FROM_IH_ENTRY(ih_ring_entry);
 	client_id = SOC15_CLIENT_ID_FROM_IH_ENTRY(ih_ring_entry);
Signature · 6 lines
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx