mmc: meson-mx-sdio: mark expected switch fall-through
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 mmc: meson-mx-sdio: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch")
--- drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c +1 -1
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void meson_mx_mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)switch (ios->power_mode) {case MMC_POWER_OFF : vdd =0 ; -/* fall-through: */ +/* fall through */ case MMC_POWER_UP :if (!IS_ERR (mmc->supply.vmmc)) { host->error = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc,
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Quoted 9 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
Quoted 20 lines
--- drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c +1
-2@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void meson_mx_mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)switch (ios->power_mode) {case MMC_POWER_OFF : vdd =0 ; -/* fall-through: */ +/* fall through */ case MMC_POWER_UP :if (!IS_ERR (mmc->supply.vmmc)) { host->error = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, --2.7.4
Quoted 10 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
thank you for taking care of this!
Regards
Martin
Hi Martin,
Quoted 10 lines · Martin Blumenstingl
Quoted 8 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>thank you for taking care of this!
Glad to help. :)
Thanks
--
Gustavo