Skip to contentSkip to conversation

gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs

PATCH Applied Gustavo A. R. Silva 2 participants 2 messages Oct 5, 2018

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the " --v-- fall through --v-- " comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364476 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364477 ("Missing break in switch")

---
 drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c +2 -2
index bc20855..c0cbee0 100644
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static unsigned cmd_loop(unsigned numbytes, struct inbuf_t *inbuf)
 				cs->respdata[0] = 0;
 				break;
 			}
-			/* --v-- fall through --v-- */
+			/* fall through */
 		case '\r':
 			/* end of message line, pass to response handler */
 			if (cbytes >= MAX_RESP_SIZE) {
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static unsigned cmd_loop(unsigned numbytes, struct inbuf_t *inbuf)
 				goto exit;
 			}
 			/* quoted or not in DLE mode: treat as regular data */
-			/* --v-- fall through --v-- */
+			/* fall through */
 		default:
 			/* append to line buffer if possible */
 			if (cbytes < MAX_RESP_SIZE)
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
maintainer Applied
#1 lore raw

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:29:09 +0200

Quoted 10 lines

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the " --v-- fall through --v-- " comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364476 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364477 ("Missing break in switch")

Applied.