gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the " --v-- fall through --v-- " comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364476 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364477 ("Missing break in switch")
--- drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c +2 -2
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static unsigned cmd_loop(unsigned numbytes, struct inbuf_t *inbuf) cs->respdata[0 ] =0 ;break ; } -/* --v-- fall through --v-- */ +/* fall through */ case '\r' :/* end of message line, pass to response handler */ if (cbytes >=MAX_RESP_SIZE ) {
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static unsigned cmd_loop(unsigned numbytes, struct inbuf_t *inbuf) goto exit; }/* quoted or not in DLE mode: treat as regular data */ -/* --v-- fall through --v-- */ +/* fall through */ default :/* append to line buffer if possible */ if (cbytes <MAX_RESP_SIZE )
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:29:09 +0200
Quoted 10 lines
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the " --v-- fall through --v-- " comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364476 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364477 ("Missing break in switch")Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Applied.