syscalls/ptrace05: skip internally used signals
PATCH 1/1 syscalls/ptrace05: skip internally used signals
Some signals may be internally used by the C library. Do not attempt to test these.
Signed-off-by Steve Muckle <[email protected]>
--- testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c +3 -0
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)for (signum = start_signum; signum <= end_signum; signum++) { +if (signum >= __SIGRTMIN && signum <SIGRTMIN ) +continue ; +switch (child =fork ()) {case -1 :tst_brkm (TBROK |TERRNO ,NULL ,"fork() failed" );
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1.568.g152ad8e336-goog
Cyril Hrubis
AppliedPATCH 1/1 syscalls/ptrace05: skip internally used signals
Hi!
Quoted 10 lines
Signed-off-by Steve Muckle <[email protected]>--- testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c +0
-0
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c int main(int argc, char **argv) · line 75
Quoted 5 lines
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c +2
-0@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)for (signum = start_signum; signum <= end_signum; signum++) { +if (signum >= __SIGRTMIN && signum <SIGRTMIN ) +continue ;
I'm a bit worried about using the libc internal __SIGRTMIN but I doubt that we can get this information elsewhere.
Applied, thanks.
Signature · 2 lines
Cyril Hrubis [email protected]