remove old GCC version implementation
PATCH 1/1 remove old GCC version implementation
GCC 4.6 is the minimum supported now.
--- scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
scripts/mod/file2alias.c +1 -5
@@ -83,11 +83,7 @@ extern struct devtable *__start___devtable[], *__stop___devtable[];#endif /* __MACH__ */ #if !defined(__used) -# if __GNUC__ ==3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ <3 -# define __used __attribute__((__unused__)) -# else -# define __used __attribute__((__used__)) -# endif +#define __used __attribute__((__used__))#endif /* Define a variable f that holds the value of field f of struct devid
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
Quoted 14 lines · Mathieu Malaterre
GCC 4.6 is the minimum supported now.
Signed-off-by Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>--- scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)scripts/mod/file2alias.c +0
-0@@ -83,11 +83,7 @@ extern struct devtable *__start___devtable[], *__stop___devtable[];#endif /* __MACH__ */
scripts/mod/file2alias.c extern struct devtable *__start___devtable[], *__stop___devtable[]; · line 88
Quoted 10 lines
scripts/mod/file2alias.c +1
-5#if !defined(__used) -# if __GNUC__ ==3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ <3 -# define __used __attribute__((__unused__)) -# else -# define __used __attribute__((__used__)) -# endif +#define __used __attribute__((__used__))#endif
By the way, is it possible that scripts/ and similar stuff uses
directly include/linux/compiler_attributes.h (whenever it hits
mainline, see https://github.com/ojeda/linux/blob/compiler-attributes/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
)? It is a header that does not depend on anything, so it could easily
be shared; and would avoid having to maintain two sets of attributes.
Let me know, I can take a look at it if you think it is a good idea.
Cheers,
Miguel
Quoted 29 lines · Miguel Ojeda
Quoted 14 lines · Mathieu Malaterre
GCC 4.6 is the minimum supported now.
Signed-off-by Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>--- scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)scripts/mod/file2alias.c +0
-0@@ -83,11 +83,7 @@ extern struct devtable *__start___devtable[], *__stop___devtable[];#endif /* __MACH__ */ scripts/mod/file2alias.c extern struct devtable *__start___devtable[], *__stop___devtable[]; · line 88
Quoted 10 lines
scripts/mod/file2alias.c +1
-5#if !defined(__used) -# if __GNUC__ ==3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ <3 -# define __used __attribute__((__unused__)) -# else -# define __used __attribute__((__used__)) -# endif +#define __used __attribute__((__used__))#endif Acked-by Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Quoted 6 lines
By the way, is it possible that
scripts/and similar stuff uses
directlyinclude/linux/compiler_attributes.h(whenever it hits
mainline, see https://github.com/ojeda/linux/blob/compiler-attributes/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
)? It is a header that does not depend on anything, so it could easily
be shared; and would avoid having to maintain two sets of attributes.
Let me know, I can take a look at it if you think it is a good idea.
No.
I want to share a header file between kernel and host-tools only when we need to do so.
In this case, it is wrong to use the linker magic for the host tool if you look at the so ugly #if defined(__MACH__) part.
Quoted 2 lines
Cheers,
Miguel
Signature · 2 lines
Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
Quoted 10 lines · Masahiro Yamada
Quoted 7 lines · Miguel Ojeda
By the way, is it possible that
scripts/and similar stuff uses
directlyinclude/linux/compiler_attributes.h(whenever it hits
mainline, see https://github.com/ojeda/linux/blob/compiler-attributes/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
)? It is a header that does not depend on anything, so it could easily
be shared; and would avoid having to maintain two sets of attributes.
Let me know, I can take a look at it if you think it is a good idea.
Landed a couple of weeks ago.
Quoted 6 lines
No.
I want to share a header file between kernel and host-tools only when we need to do so.In this case, it is wrong to use the linker magic for the host tool if you look at the so ugly #if
defined(__MACH__)part.
Do you mean this line?
#define SECTION(name) __attribute__((section("__TEXT, " #name)))I would say having exceptions is fine, i.e. the idea was to reduce "duplicated" definitions. In this case, the #define has a different name and style, so I would say it is clear.
Anyway, if the policy is not sharing headers at all, that is fine!
Cheers,
Miguel
Quoted 13 lines · Mathieu Malaterre
GCC 4.6 is the minimum supported now.
Signed-off-by Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>--- scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)scripts/mod/file2alias.c +0
-0
scripts/mod/file2alias.c extern struct devtable *__start___devtable[], *__stop___devtable[]; · line 87
Quoted 10 lines
scripts/mod/file2alias.c +1
-5@@ -83,11 +83,7 @@ extern struct devtable *__start___devtable[], *__stop___devtable[];#endif /* __MACH__ */ #if !defined(__used) -# if __GNUC__ ==3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ <3 -# define __used __attribute__((__unused__)) -# else -# define __used __attribute__((__used__)) -# endif +#define __used __attribute__((__used__))#endif
Superseded by:
Quoted 4 lines
scripts/mod/file2alias.c +0
-1/* Define a variable f that holds the value of field f of struct devid -- 2.11.0