4.20.0-rc3 nouveau/Quadro P2000 Mobile: runpm causing ACPI errors, lockups
So a new thinkpad:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP107GLM [Quadro P2000 Mobile] (rev a1)
Hangs whenever I try to poke at the card. It starts happily enough with
[ 3.971515] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971553] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971721] pci 0000:01:00.0: optimus capabilities: enabled, status dynamic power, hda bios codec supported [ 3.971726] VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP handle [ 3.971727] nouveau: detected PR support, will not use DSM [ 3.971745] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007) [ 3.971923] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GP107 (137000a1) [ 4.009875] PM: Image not found (code -22) [ 4.135752] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: VRAM: 4096 MiB [ 4.135753] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: GART: 536870912 MiB [ 4.135754] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'A' not found [ 4.135755] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'L' not found [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: TMDS table version 2.0 [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB version 4.1 [ 4.135757] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 00: 02800f76 04600020 [ 4.135758] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 01: 02011f62 00020010 [ 4.135759] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 02: 01022f46 04600010 [ 4.135760] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 03: 01033f56 04600020 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 00: 00020047 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 01: 00010161 [ 4.135762] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 02: 00001246 [ 4.135763] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 03: 00002346 [ 4.508355] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [ 4.508355] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [ 4.509812] [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes [ 4.510144] [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 2
Although that type mismatch is a bit worrying. And I'm not sure what prints PM: Image not found.
But after a short while it gets pretty busy:
[ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917084] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917108] acpi device:00: Failed to change power state to D0 [ 52.969287] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 52.969289] pci_raw_set_power_state: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 52.969291] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.029514] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.041027] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.041035] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.053008] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3
And then kernel proceeds to throw up errors at random places, e.g.
[ 67.021892] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021895] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021897] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021900] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021927] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021928] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021932] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021934] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.024463] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 99.980625] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Error sending STATISTICS_CMD: time out after 2000ms.
followed by soft lockups and sometimes hard lockups in places like attempts to walk skb lists.
Adding runpm=0 does away with this issue.
The specific test was with noaccel=1 - it does not seem to change things for me.
I poked at the ACPI method NVPO and yes it does actually seem to execute a while loop waiting for some register to become 0. Which I guess never happens? Because card is in a low power state and so reads return ffffffff maybe?
X isn't happy even with runpm=0 but that might be a different issue - I thought runpm=0 might be an easier place to start debugging things given there are logs of the failure.
Using 4.20.0-rc3 right now.
Userspace bits are from fedora 29:
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.15-6.fc29.x86_64
firmware is pretty recent:
linux-firmware-20181008-88.gitc6b6265d.fc29.noarch
More hints for debugging would be appreciated. If anyone wants me to play with a different kernel tree, let me know.
Signature · 5 lines
MST _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20181126221005-mutt-send-email-mst-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
+linux-acpi
Hi Michael,
Quoted 33 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
So a new thinkpad:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP107GLM [Quadro P2000 Mobile] (rev a1)Hangs whenever I try to poke at the card. It starts happily enough with
[ 3.971515] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971553] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971721] pci 0000:01:00.0: optimus capabilities: enabled, status dynamic power, hda bios codec supported [ 3.971726] VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP handle [ 3.971727] nouveau: detected PR support, will not use DSM [ 3.971745] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007) [ 3.971923] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GP107 (137000a1) [ 4.009875] PM: Image not found (code -22) [ 4.135752] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: VRAM: 4096 MiB [ 4.135753] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: GART: 536870912 MiB [ 4.135754] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'A' not found [ 4.135755] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'L' not found [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: TMDS table version 2.0 [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB version 4.1 [ 4.135757] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 00: 02800f76 04600020 [ 4.135758] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 01: 02011f62 00020010 [ 4.135759] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 02: 01022f46 04600010 [ 4.135760] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 03: 01033f56 04600020 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 00: 00020047 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 01: 00010161 [ 4.135762] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 02: 00001246 [ 4.135763] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 03: 00002346 [ 4.508355] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [ 4.508355] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [ 4.509812] [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes [ 4.510144] [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 2
Quoted 2 lines
Although that type mismatch is a bit worrying. And I'm not sure what prints PM: Image not found.
That is fine, it just says it cannot find a hibernation image from swap device. I guess you have resume=... in the kernel command line.
Quoted 9 lines
But after a short while it gets pretty busy:
[ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917084] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917108] acpi device:00: Failed to change power state to D0
Here it seems to fail to turn on the power resource for the device.
Quoted 27 lines
[ 52.969287] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 52.969289] pci_raw_set_power_state: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 52.969291] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.029514] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.041027] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.041035] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.053008] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3And then kernel proceeds to throw up errors at random places, e.g.
[ 67.021892] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021895] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021897] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021900] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021927] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021928] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021932] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021934] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.024463] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 99.980625] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Error sending STATISTICS_CMD: time out after 2000ms.followed by soft lockups and sometimes hard lockups in places like attempts to walk skb lists.
Adding runpm=0 does away with this issue.
Quoted 7 lines
The specific test was with noaccel=1 - it does not seem to change things for me.
I poked at the ACPI method NVPO and yes it does actually seem to execute a while loop waiting for some register to become 0. Which I guess never happens? Because card is in a low power state and so reads return ffffffff maybe?
Yes, it could be the case.
Quoted 9 lines
X isn't happy even with runpm=0 but that might be a different issue - I thought runpm=0 might be an easier place to start debugging things given there are logs of the failure.
Using 4.20.0-rc3 right now.
Userspace bits are from fedora 29:
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.15-6.fc29.x86_64
Quoted 6 lines
firmware is pretty recent:
linux-firmware-20181008-88.gitc6b6265d.fc29.noarchMore hints for debugging would be appreciated. If anyone wants me to play with a different kernel tree, let me know.
Can you share full dmesg and acpidump of the system? I would like to check the power resource methods.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20181127093650.GP2296-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Quoted 15 lines · Mika Westerberg
+linux-acpi
Hi Michael,
Quoted 10 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
So a new thinkpad:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP107GLM [Quadro P2000 Mobile] (rev a1)Hangs whenever I try to poke at the card. It starts happily enough with
[ 3.971515] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971553] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971721] pci 0000:01:00.0: optimus capabilities: enabled, status dynamic power, hda bios codec supported [ 3.971726] VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP handle [ 3.971727] nouveau: detected PR support, will not use DSM
BTW this is also a bit strange. It says it will not use DSM - but did it maybe use DSM previously? The ACPI Warning seems to indicate that it did ...
And just to complete the picture here's the _DSM from ACPI:
Method (_DSM, 4, Serialized) // _DSM: Device-Specific Method
{
If ((Arg0 == ToUUID ("3e5b41c6-eb1d-4260-9d15-c71fbadae414")))
{
Switch (ToInteger (Arg2))
{
Case (Zero)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (0x0001E7FF)
}
}
Case (One)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
If (((S0ID == One) && (OSYS < 0x07DF)))
{
If (((DerefOf (Arg3 [Zero]) & 0xFF) == One))
{
\GUAM (One)
}
Local0 = (DerefOf (Arg3 [One]) & 0xFF)
If ((Local0 == Zero))
{
\GUAM (Zero)
}
}
If ((DerefOf (Arg3 [Zero]) == Zero))
{
Local0 = CLID /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CLID */
If ((0x80000000 & Local0))
{
CLID &= 0x0F
GLID (CLID)
}
}
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x02)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x03)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x04)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x05)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x06)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x07)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
IBTT = (DerefOf (Arg3 [Zero]) & 0xFF)
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x08)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
IPSC = (DerefOf (Arg3 [Zero]) & 0xFF)
If ((DerefOf (Arg3 [One]) & 0xFF))
{
IPAT = (DerefOf (Arg3 [One]) & 0xFF)
IPAT--
}
IBIA = ((DerefOf (Arg3 [0x02]) >> 0x04) & 0x07)
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x09)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (One)
}
}
Case (0x0A)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Local0 = (LIDS << 0x08)
Local0 += 0x0100
Return (Local0)
}
}
Case (0x0D)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Local0 = ((DerefOf (Arg3 [0x03]) << 0x18) | (DerefOf (
Arg3 [0x02]) << 0x10))
Local0 &= 0xEFFF0000
Local0 &= (DerefOf (DBTB [IBTT]) << 0x10)
Local0 |= IBTT
Return (Local0)
}
}
Case (0x0E)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Local0 = IPSC /* \IPSC */
Local0 |= (IPAT << 0x08)
Local0 += 0x0100
Local0 |= (LIDS << 0x10)
Local0 += 0x00010000
Local0 |= (IBIA << 0x14)
Return (Local0)
}
}
Case (0x0F)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Local0 = GIVD /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.GIVD */
Local0 ^= One
Local0 |= (GMFN << One)
Local0 |= 0x1800
Local0 |= (IDMS << 0x11)
Local0 |= (DerefOf (DerefOf (CDCT [HVCO]) [CDVL]) <<
0x15)
Return (Local0)
}
}
Case (0x10)
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Name (KSVP, Package (0x02)
{
0x80000000,
0x8000
})
KSVP [Zero] = KSV0 /* \KSV0 */
KSVP [One] = KSV1 /* \KSV1 */
Return (KSVP) /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM.KSVP */
}
}
}
}
Return (Buffer (One)
{
0x00 // .
})
}I am not sure what makes it think that Arg3 is a buffer and not a package: IIRC Index (decoded C-style here as []) can apply to either.
Am I maybe misunderstanding the warning?
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 23 lines
[ 3.971745] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007) [ 3.971923] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GP107 (137000a1) [ 4.009875] PM: Image not found (code -22) [ 4.135752] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: VRAM: 4096 MiB [ 4.135753] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: GART: 536870912 MiB [ 4.135754] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'A' not found [ 4.135755] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'L' not found [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: TMDS table version 2.0 [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB version 4.1 [ 4.135757] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 00: 02800f76 04600020 [ 4.135758] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 01: 02011f62 00020010 [ 4.135759] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 02: 01022f46 04600010 [ 4.135760] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 03: 01033f56 04600020 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 00: 00020047 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 01: 00010161 [ 4.135762] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 02: 00001246 [ 4.135763] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 03: 00002346 [ 4.508355] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [ 4.508355] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [ 4.509812] [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes [ 4.510144] [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 2Quoted 2 lines
Although that type mismatch is a bit worrying. And I'm not sure what prints PM: Image not found.
That is fine, it just says it cannot find a hibernation image from swap device. I guess you have resume=... in the kernel command line.
Quoted 3 lines
But after a short while it gets pretty busy:
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 6 lines
[ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917084] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917108] acpi device:00: Failed to change power state to D0Here it seems to fail to turn on the power resource for the device.
Quoted 21 lines
[ 52.969287] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 52.969289] pci_raw_set_power_state: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 52.969291] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.029514] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.041027] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.041035] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.053008] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3And then kernel proceeds to throw up errors at random places, e.g.
[ 67.021892] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021895] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021897] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021900] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021927] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021928] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021932] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021934] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.024463] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 99.980625] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Error sending STATISTICS_CMD: time out after 2000ms.
BTW this one might indicate that somehow iwlwifi got powered down too somehow. It's at
00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9560 [Jefferson Peak] (rev 10)
so really shouldn't be affected, but go figure. If driver really is getting all-ones from the device, it just might try to poke at a wrong b:d.f by mistake maybe ...
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 5 lines
followed by soft lockups and sometimes hard lockups in places like attempts to walk skb lists.
Adding runpm=0 does away with this issue.
Quoted 7 lines
The specific test was with noaccel=1 - it does not seem to change things for me.
I poked at the ACPI method NVPO and yes it does actually seem to execute a while loop waiting for some register to become 0. Which I guess never happens? Because card is in a low power state and so reads return ffffffff maybe?
Yes, it could be the case.
Quoted 12 lines
X isn't happy even with runpm=0 but that might be a different issue - I thought runpm=0 might be an easier place to start debugging things given there are logs of the failure.
Using 4.20.0-rc3 right now.
Userspace bits are from fedora 29:
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.15-6.fc29.x86_64firmware is pretty recent:
linux-firmware-20181008-88.gitc6b6265d.fc29.noarch
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
More hints for debugging would be appreciated. If anyone wants me to play with a different kernel tree, let me know.
Can you share full dmesg and acpidump of the system? I would like to check the power resource methods.
Pls find it as an attachment here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108873
If you like I can send it to you directly too -
spamming the list with it isn't helpful I guess?
Signature · 5 lines
MST _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20181127212550-mutt-send-email-mst-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Quoted 25 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 15 lines · Mika Westerberg
+linux-acpi
Hi Michael,
Quoted 10 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
So a new thinkpad:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP107GLM [Quadro P2000 Mobile] (rev a1)Hangs whenever I try to poke at the card. It starts happily enough with
[ 3.971515] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971553] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971721] pci 0000:01:00.0: optimus capabilities: enabled, status dynamic power, hda bios codec supported [ 3.971726] VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP handle [ 3.971727] nouveau: detected PR support, will not use DSMBTW this is also a bit strange. It says it will not use DSM - but did it maybe use DSM previously? The ACPI Warning seems to indicate that it did ...
And just to complete the picture here's the
_DSMfrom ACPI:Method (
_DSM, 4, Serialized) //_DSM: Device-Specific Method {
...
Quoted 8 lines
}I am not sure what makes it think that Arg3 is a buffer and not a package: IIRC Index (decoded C-style here as []) can apply to either.
Am I maybe misunderstanding the warning?
It looks like coming from the nouveau driver (assuming I'm reading it right).
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c::nouveau_optimus_dsm()
union acpi_object argv4 = {
.buffer.type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER,
.buffer.length = 4,
.buffer.pointer = args_buff
};
...
obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &nouveau_op_dsm_muid, 0x00000100,
func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);It passes ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER but ACPI spec _DSM expects package.
Quoted 63 lines
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 23 lines
[ 3.971745] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007) [ 3.971923] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GP107 (137000a1) [ 4.009875] PM: Image not found (code -22) [ 4.135752] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: VRAM: 4096 MiB [ 4.135753] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: GART: 536870912 MiB [ 4.135754] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'A' not found [ 4.135755] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'L' not found [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: TMDS table version 2.0 [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB version 4.1 [ 4.135757] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 00: 02800f76 04600020 [ 4.135758] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 01: 02011f62 00020010 [ 4.135759] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 02: 01022f46 04600010 [ 4.135760] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 03: 01033f56 04600020 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 00: 00020047 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 01: 00010161 [ 4.135762] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 02: 00001246 [ 4.135763] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 03: 00002346 [ 4.508355] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [ 4.508355] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [ 4.509812] [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes [ 4.510144] [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 2Quoted 2 lines
Although that type mismatch is a bit worrying. And I'm not sure what prints PM: Image not found.
That is fine, it just says it cannot find a hibernation image from swap device. I guess you have resume=... in the kernel command line.
Quoted 3 lines
But after a short while it gets pretty busy:
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 6 lines
[ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917084] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917108] acpi device:00: Failed to change power state to D0Here it seems to fail to turn on the power resource for the device.
Quoted 21 lines
[ 52.969287] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 52.969289] pci_raw_set_power_state: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 52.969291] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.029514] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.041027] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.041035] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.053008] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3And then kernel proceeds to throw up errors at random places, e.g.
[ 67.021892] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021895] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021897] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021900] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021927] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021928] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021932] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021934] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.024463] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 99.980625] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Error sending STATISTICS_CMD: time out after 2000ms.
Quoted 8 lines
BTW this one might indicate that somehow iwlwifi got powered down too somehow. It's at
00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9560 [Jefferson Peak] (rev 10)
so really shouldn't be affected, but go figure. If driver really is getting all-ones from the device, it just might try to poke at a wrong b:d.f by mistake maybe ...
Or it the power resource is shared by wifi as well.
Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 5 lines
followed by soft lockups and sometimes hard lockups in places like attempts to walk skb lists.
Adding runpm=0 does away with this issue.
Quoted 7 lines
The specific test was with noaccel=1 - it does not seem to change things for me.
I poked at the ACPI method NVPO and yes it does actually seem to execute a while loop waiting for some register to become 0. Which I guess never happens? Because card is in a low power state and so reads return ffffffff maybe?
Yes, it could be the case.
Quoted 15 lines
X isn't happy even with runpm=0 but that might be a different issue - I thought runpm=0 might be an easier place to start debugging things given there are logs of the failure.
Using 4.20.0-rc3 right now.
Userspace bits are from fedora 29:
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.15-6.fc29.x86_64firmware is pretty recent:
linux-firmware-20181008-88.gitc6b6265d.fc29.noarchMore hints for debugging would be appreciated. If anyone wants me to play with a different kernel tree, let me know.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Can you share full dmesg and acpidump of the system? I would like to check the power resource methods.
Pls find it as an attachment here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108873If you like I can send it to you directly too -
spamming the list with it isn't helpful I guess?
No need to send, I can read it from the bugzilla just fine. Can you attach acpidump there as well?
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20181128110857.GW2296-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Quoted 54 lines · Mika Westerberg
Quoted 25 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 15 lines · Mika Westerberg
+linux-acpi
Hi Michael,
Quoted 10 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
So a new thinkpad:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP107GLM [Quadro P2000 Mobile] (rev a1)Hangs whenever I try to poke at the card. It starts happily enough with
[ 3.971515] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971553] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971721] pci 0000:01:00.0: optimus capabilities: enabled, status dynamic power, hda bios codec supported [ 3.971726] VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP handle [ 3.971727] nouveau: detected PR support, will not use DSMBTW this is also a bit strange. It says it will not use DSM - but did it maybe use DSM previously? The ACPI Warning seems to indicate that it did ...
And just to complete the picture here's the
_DSMfrom ACPI:Method (
_DSM, 4, Serialized) //_DSM: Device-Specific Method {...
Quoted 8 lines
}I am not sure what makes it think that Arg3 is a buffer and not a package: IIRC Index (decoded C-style here as []) can apply to either.
Am I maybe misunderstanding the warning?
It looks like coming from the nouveau driver (assuming I'm reading it right).
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c::nouveau_optimus_dsm()
union acpi_object argv4 = { .buffer.type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, .buffer.length = 4, .buffer.pointer = args_buff }; ... obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &nouveau_op_dsm_muid, 0x00000100, func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
Quoted 1 line
It passes
ACPI_TYPE_BUFFERbut ACPI spec_DSMexpects package.
Yea all this is weird, in particular I wonder why does everyone using dsm insists on saying Arg4
when they actually mean Arg3. ACPI numbers arguments from 0.
So it's a bit ugly, and maybe worth fixing but unlikely to be an actual issue simply because we end up not using DSM in the end.
Poking at the probing code in nouveau_pr3_present, I started to wonder:
should I try to hack it to disable d3cold and pr3 and see what happens?
Quoted 66 lines
Quoted 66 lines
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 23 lines
[ 3.971745] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007) [ 3.971923] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GP107 (137000a1) [ 4.009875] PM: Image not found (code -22) [ 4.135752] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: VRAM: 4096 MiB [ 4.135753] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: GART: 536870912 MiB [ 4.135754] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'A' not found [ 4.135755] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BIT table 'L' not found [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: TMDS table version 2.0 [ 4.135756] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB version 4.1 [ 4.135757] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 00: 02800f76 04600020 [ 4.135758] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 01: 02011f62 00020010 [ 4.135759] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 02: 01022f46 04600010 [ 4.135760] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 03: 01033f56 04600020 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 00: 00020047 [ 4.135761] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 01: 00010161 [ 4.135762] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 02: 00001246 [ 4.135763] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 03: 00002346 [ 4.508355] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [ 4.508355] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [ 4.509812] [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes [ 4.510144] [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 2Quoted 2 lines
Although that type mismatch is a bit worrying. And I'm not sure what prints PM: Image not found.
That is fine, it just says it cannot find a hibernation image from swap device. I guess you have resume=... in the kernel command line.
Quoted 3 lines
But after a short while it gets pretty busy:
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 6 lines
[ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917084] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917108] acpi device:00: Failed to change power state to D0Here it seems to fail to turn on the power resource for the device.
Quoted 21 lines
[ 52.969287] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 52.969289] pci_raw_set_power_state: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 52.969291] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.029514] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.041027] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3 [ 53.041035] video LNXVIDEO:00: Cannot transition to power state D0 for parent in (unknown) [ 53.053008] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3And then kernel proceeds to throw up errors at random places, e.g.
[ 67.021892] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021895] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021897] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021900] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021927] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021928] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021932] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.021934] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 67.024463] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 99.980625] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Error sending STATISTICS_CMD: time out after 2000ms.BTW this one might indicate that somehow iwlwifi got powered down too somehow. It's at
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9560 [Jefferson Peak] (rev 10)
so really shouldn't be affected, but go figure. If driver really is getting all-ones from the device, it just might try to poke at a wrong b:d.f by mistake maybe ...
Or it the power resource is shared by wifi as well.
Is there a way to find out through e.g. sysfs?
Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 33 lines
Quoted 5 lines
followed by soft lockups and sometimes hard lockups in places like attempts to walk skb lists.
Adding runpm=0 does away with this issue.
Quoted 7 lines
The specific test was with noaccel=1 - it does not seem to change things for me.
I poked at the ACPI method NVPO and yes it does actually seem to execute a while loop waiting for some register to become 0. Which I guess never happens? Because card is in a low power state and so reads return ffffffff maybe?
Yes, it could be the case.
Quoted 9 lines
X isn't happy even with runpm=0 but that might be a different issue - I thought runpm=0 might be an easier place to start debugging things given there are logs of the failure.
Using 4.20.0-rc3 right now.
Userspace bits are from fedora 29:
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.15-6.fc29.x86_64Quoted 6 lines
firmware is pretty recent:
linux-firmware-20181008-88.gitc6b6265d.fc29.noarchMore hints for debugging would be appreciated. If anyone wants me to play with a different kernel tree, let me know.
Can you share full dmesg and acpidump of the system? I would like to check the power resource methods.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Pls find it as an attachment here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108873If you like I can send it to you directly too -
spamming the list with it isn't helpful I guess?No need to send, I can read it from the bugzilla just fine. Can you attach acpidump there as well?
Done. lspci -x too just in case.
Signature · 5 lines
MST _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20181128093527-mutt-send-email-mst-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Quoted 6 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Yea all this is weird, in particular I wonder why does everyone using dsm insists on saying Arg4
when they actually mean Arg3. ACPI numbers arguments from 0.So it's a bit ugly, and maybe worth fixing but unlikely to be an actual issue simply because we end up not using DSM in the end.
I agree.
Quoted 3 lines
Poking at the probing code in
nouveau_pr3_present, I started to wonder:
should I try to hack it to disable d3cold and pr3 and see what happens?
I guess it is worth a try. You can do it from sysfs for the graphics PCI device there is an attribute d3cold_allowed that controls this.
[snip]
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9560 [Jefferson Peak] (rev 10)
so really shouldn't be affected, but go figure. If driver really is getting all-ones from the device, it just might try to poke at a wrong b:d.f by mistake maybe ...
Or it the power resource is shared by wifi as well.
Is there a way to find out through e.g. sysfs?
It is not shared, I checked from the acpidump you provided. Possibly the infinite loop in AML when executing NVPO method have some effect on this.
[snip]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
No need to send, I can read it from the bugzilla just fine. Can you attach acpidump there as well?
Done. lspci -x too just in case.
Looking at the dmesg:
[ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917084] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516)
So what happens here is that Linux turns off power resource \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00 by calling its _OFF method (happens when the root port is runtime suspended). This ends up calling \_SB.PCI0.PGON which calls \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO.
The last method looks like this:
Method (NVPO, 0, NotSerialized)
{
While ((\_SB.PCI0.P0LS < 0x03))
{
Sleep (One)
}So basically it polls P0LS register infinitely if the returned value is less than 3. I suspect this is the issue and it then makes the other like wifi to fail to execute its methods.
P0LS comes from this operation region:
OperationRegion (OPG0, SystemMemory, (XBAS + 0x8000), 0x1000)
Field (OPG0, AnyAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
{
...
Offset (0x216),
P0LS, 4,This is some host bridge register but not sure which because XBAS value cannot be determined from the acpidump.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20181128155544.GD2296-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Quoted 10 lines · Mika Westerberg
Quoted 6 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Yea all this is weird, in particular I wonder why does everyone using dsm insists on saying Arg4
when they actually mean Arg3. ACPI numbers arguments from 0.So it's a bit ugly, and maybe worth fixing but unlikely to be an actual issue simply because we end up not using DSM in the end.
I agree.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Poking at the probing code in
nouveau_pr3_present, I started to wonder:
should I try to hack it to disable d3cold and pr3 and see what happens?I guess it is worth a try. You can do it from sysfs for the graphics PCI device there is an attribute
d3cold_allowedthat controls this.[snip]
But probably too late by time nouveau is up at boot?
Quoted 56 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9560 [Jefferson Peak] (rev 10)
so really shouldn't be affected, but go figure. If driver really is getting all-ones from the device, it just might try to poke at a wrong b:d.f by mistake maybe ...
Or it the power resource is shared by wifi as well.
Is there a way to find out through e.g. sysfs?
It is not shared, I checked from the acpidump you provided. Possibly the infinite loop in AML when executing NVPO method have some effect on this.
[snip]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
No need to send, I can read it from the bugzilla just fine. Can you attach acpidump there as well?
Done. lspci -x too just in case.
Looking at the dmesg:
[ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917084] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516)So what happens here is that Linux turns off power resource \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00 by calling its
_OFFmethod (happens when the root port is runtime suspended). This ends up calling \_SB.PCI0.PGON which calls \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO.The last method looks like this:
Method (NVPO, 0, NotSerialized) { While ((\_SB.PCI0.P0LS < 0x03)) { Sleep (One) }So basically it polls P0LS register infinitely if the returned value is less than 3. I suspect this is the issue and it then makes the other like wifi to fail to execute its methods.
P0LS comes from this operation region:
OperationRegion (OPG0, SystemMemory, (XBAS + 0x8000), 0x1000) Field (OPG0, AnyAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { ... Offset (0x216), P0LS, 4,
Quoted 2 lines
This is some host bridge register but not sure which because XBAS value cannot be determined from the acpidump.
Oh I think XBAS is in SSDT4:
OperationRegion (SANV, SystemMemory, 0x4FBF7018, 0x01F4)
Field (SANV, AnyAcc, Lock, Preserve)
{
ASLB, 32,
IMON, 8,
IGDS, 8,
IBTT, 8,
IPAT, 8,
IPSC, 8,
IBIA, 8,
ISSC, 8,
IDMS, 8,
IF1E, 8,
HVCO, 8,
GSMI, 8,
PAVP, 8,
CADL, 8,
CSTE, 16,
NSTE, 16,
NDID, 8,
DID1, 32,
DID2, 32,
DID3, 32,
DID4, 32,
DID5, 32,
DID6, 32,
DID7, 32,
DID8, 32,
DID9, 32,
DIDA, 32,
DIDB, 32,
DIDC, 32,
DIDD, 32,
DIDE, 32,
DIDF, 32,
DIDX, 32,
NXD1, 32,
NXD2, 32,
NXD3, 32,
NXD4, 32,
NXD5, 32,
NXD6, 32,
NXD7, 32,
NXD8, 32,
NXDX, 32,
LIDS, 8,
KSV0, 32,
KSV1, 8,
BRTL, 8,
ALSE, 8,
ALAF, 8,
LLOW, 8,
LHIH, 8,
ALFP, 8,
IPTP, 8,
EDPV, 8,
SGMD, 8,
SGFL, 8,
SGGP, 8,
HRE0, 8,
HRG0, 32,
HRA0, 8,
PWE0, 8,
PWG0, 32,
PWA0, 8,
P1GP, 8,
HRE1, 8,
HRG1, 32,
HRA1, 8,
PWE1, 8,
PWG1, 32,
PWA1, 8,
P2GP, 8,
HRE2, 8,
HRG2, 32,
HRA2, 8,
PWE2, 8,
PWG2, 32,
PWA2, 8,
DLPW, 16,
DLHR, 16,
EECP, 8,
XBAS, 32,
GBAS, 16,
NVGA, 32,
NVHA, 32,
AMDA, 32,
LTRX, 8,
OBFX, 8,
LTRY, 8,
OBFY, 8,
LTRZ, 8,
OBFZ, 8,
LTRW, 8,
OBFA, 8,
SMSL, 16,
SNSL, 16,
P0UB, 8,
P1UB, 8,
P2UB, 8,
P3UB, 8,
PCSL, 8,
PBGE, 8,
M64B, 64,
M64L, 64,
CPEX, 32,
EEC1, 8,
EEC2, 8,
SBN0, 8,
SBN1, 8,
SBN2, 8,
M32B, 32,
M32L, 32,
P0WK, 32,
P1WK, 32,
P2WK, 32,
VTDS, 8,
VTB1, 32,
VTB2, 32,
VTB3, 32,
VE1V, 16,
VE2V, 16,
SBN3, 8,
P3GP, 8,
HRE3, 8,
HRG3, 32,
HRA3, 8,
PWE3, 8,
PWG3, 32,
PWA3, 8,
P3WK, 32,
EEC3, 8,
RPIN, 8,
RPBA, 32,
Offset (0x1F4)
}If my math is correct, this is offset 1456 bits, ie 0xb6 bytes, and so 0x4fbf70ce
XBAS + 0x8000 is 0x4fbff0ce ?
cat /proc/iomem shows that this is
4ee5f000-4fca0fff : ACPI Non-volatile Storage
Signature · 5 lines
MST _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20181128111312-mutt-send-email-mst-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
this was already debugged and there is no point in searching inside the Firmware. It's not a firmware bug or anything.
The proper fix is to do something inside Nouveau so that we don't upset the device and being able to runtime resume it again.
The initial thing we do inside Nouveau to cause those issues is to run that so called "DEVINIT" script inside the vbios to initialize the GPU, problem is, it changes something on the PCIe configuration so that the GPU isn't able to runtime resume anymore. I am in contact with Nvidia about that issue and hopefully we get the proper answers. When I was digging into that myself I was able to make the situation more stable by setting the PCIE link speed to the boot defaults, but that was still pretty unstable.
Anyway, because the binary driver fails here as well (through bumblebee and so on) there isn't much of reverse engineering we can do besides guessing and trying it on literally every hardware until it works.
We also have an upstream bug for this issue:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156341
Quoted 229 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 10 lines · Mika Westerberg
Quoted 6 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Yea all this is weird, in particular I wonder why does everyone using dsm insists on saying Arg4
when they actually mean Arg3. ACPI numbers arguments from 0.So it's a bit ugly, and maybe worth fixing but unlikely to be an actual issue simply because we end up not using DSM in the end.
I agree.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Poking at the probing code in
nouveau_pr3_present, I started to wonder:
should I try to hack it to disable d3cold and pr3 and see what happens?I guess it is worth a try. You can do it from sysfs for the graphics PCI device there is an attribute
d3cold_allowedthat controls this.[snip]
But probably too late by time nouveau is up at boot?
Quoted 56 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9560 [Jefferson Peak] (rev 10)
so really shouldn't be affected, but go figure. If driver really is getting all-ones from the device, it just might try to poke at a wrong b:d.f by mistake maybe ...
Or it the power resource is shared by wifi as well.
Is there a way to find out through e.g. sysfs?
It is not shared, I checked from the acpidump you provided. Possibly the infinite loop in AML when executing NVPO method have some effect on this.
[snip]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
No need to send, I can read it from the bugzilla just fine. Can you attach acpidump there as well?
Done. lspci -x too just in case.
Looking at the dmesg:
[ 52.917009] No Local Variables are initialized for Method [NVPO] [ 52.917011] No Arguments are initialized for method [NVPO] [ 52.917012] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917063] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PGON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516) [ 52.917084] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON, AE_AML_LOOP_TIMEOUT (20181003/psparse-516)So what happens here is that Linux turns off power resource \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00 by calling its
_OFFmethod (happens when the root port is runtime suspended). This ends up calling \_SB.PCI0.PGON which calls \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.NVPO.The last method looks like this:
Method (NVPO, 0, NotSerialized) { While ((\_SB.PCI0.P0LS < 0x03)) { Sleep (One) }So basically it polls P0LS register infinitely if the returned value is less than 3. I suspect this is the issue and it then makes the other like wifi to fail to execute its methods.
P0LS comes from this operation region:
OperationRegion (OPG0, SystemMemory, (XBAS + 0x8000), 0x1000) Field (OPG0, AnyAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { ... Offset (0x216), P0LS, 4,Quoted 2 lines
This is some host bridge register but not sure which because XBAS value cannot be determined from the acpidump.
Oh I think XBAS is in SSDT4:
OperationRegion (SANV, SystemMemory, 0x4FBF7018, 0x01F4) Field (SANV, AnyAcc, Lock, Preserve) { ASLB, 32, IMON, 8, IGDS, 8, IBTT, 8, IPAT, 8, IPSC, 8, IBIA, 8, ISSC, 8, IDMS, 8, IF1E, 8, HVCO, 8, GSMI, 8, PAVP, 8, CADL, 8, CSTE, 16, NSTE, 16, NDID, 8, DID1, 32, DID2, 32, DID3, 32, DID4, 32, DID5, 32, DID6, 32, DID7, 32, DID8, 32, DID9, 32, DIDA, 32, DIDB, 32, DIDC, 32, DIDD, 32, DIDE, 32, DIDF, 32, DIDX, 32, NXD1, 32, NXD2, 32, NXD3, 32, NXD4, 32, NXD5, 32, NXD6, 32, NXD7, 32, NXD8, 32, NXDX, 32, LIDS, 8, KSV0, 32, KSV1, 8, BRTL, 8, ALSE, 8, ALAF, 8, LLOW, 8, LHIH, 8, ALFP, 8, IPTP, 8, EDPV, 8, SGMD, 8, SGFL, 8, SGGP, 8, HRE0, 8, HRG0, 32, HRA0, 8, PWE0, 8, PWG0, 32, PWA0, 8, P1GP, 8, HRE1, 8, HRG1, 32, HRA1, 8, PWE1, 8, PWG1, 32, PWA1, 8, P2GP, 8, HRE2, 8, HRG2, 32, HRA2, 8, PWE2, 8, PWG2, 32, PWA2, 8, DLPW, 16, DLHR, 16, EECP, 8, XBAS, 32, GBAS, 16, NVGA, 32, NVHA, 32, AMDA, 32, LTRX, 8, OBFX, 8, LTRY, 8, OBFY, 8, LTRZ, 8, OBFZ, 8, LTRW, 8, OBFA, 8, SMSL, 16, SNSL, 16, P0UB, 8, P1UB, 8, P2UB, 8, P3UB, 8, PCSL, 8, PBGE, 8, M64B, 64, M64L, 64, CPEX, 32, EEC1, 8, EEC2, 8, SBN0, 8, SBN1, 8, SBN2, 8, M32B, 32, M32L, 32, P0WK, 32, P1WK, 32, P2WK, 32, VTDS, 8, VTB1, 32, VTB2, 32, VTB3, 32, VE1V, 16, VE2V, 16, SBN3, 8, P3GP, 8, HRE3, 8, HRG3, 32, HRA3, 8, PWE3, 8, PWG3, 32, PWA3, 8, P3WK, 32, EEC3, 8, RPIN, 8, RPBA, 32, Offset (0x1F4) }If my math is correct, this is offset 1456 bits, ie
0xb6bytes, and so0x4fbf70ceXBAS +
0x8000is0x4fbff0ce?cat
/proc/iomemshows that this is
4ee5f000-4fca0fff : ACPI Non-volatile Storage
Quoted 6 lines
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CACO55tuzDgTb2g_ebhm7+A=UjEEDoM09-b5X_7fkznkFjJGiag-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Quoted 15 lines · Karol Herbst
this was already debugged and there is no point in searching inside the Firmware. It's not a firmware bug or anything.
The proper fix is to do something inside Nouveau so that we don't upset the device and being able to runtime resume it again.
The initial thing we do inside Nouveau to cause those issues is to run that so called "DEVINIT" script inside the vbios to initialize the GPU, problem is, it changes something on the PCIe configuration so that the GPU isn't able to runtime resume anymore. I am in contact with Nvidia about that issue and hopefully we get the proper answers. When I was digging into that myself I was able to make the situation more stable by setting the PCIE link speed to the boot defaults, but that was still pretty unstable.
Quoted 7 lines
Anyway, because the binary driver fails here as well (through bumblebee and so on) there isn't much of reverse engineering we can do besides guessing and trying it on literally every hardware until it works.
We also have an upstream bug for this issue:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156341
If you like I can probably dump the pcie registers on card and/or the pcie port under windows. The card works there :) Let me know.
Signature · 5 lines
MST _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
Quoted 25 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 15 lines · Karol Herbst
this was already debugged and there is no point in searching inside the Firmware. It's not a firmware bug or anything.
The proper fix is to do something inside Nouveau so that we don't upset the device and being able to runtime resume it again.
The initial thing we do inside Nouveau to cause those issues is to run that so called "DEVINIT" script inside the vbios to initialize the GPU, problem is, it changes something on the PCIe configuration so that the GPU isn't able to runtime resume anymore. I am in contact with Nvidia about that issue and hopefully we get the proper answers. When I was digging into that myself I was able to make the situation more stable by setting the PCIE link speed to the boot defaults, but that was still pretty unstable.
Quoted 7 lines
Anyway, because the binary driver fails here as well (through bumblebee and so on) there isn't much of reverse engineering we can do besides guessing and trying it on literally every hardware until it works.
We also have an upstream bug for this issue:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156341
Quoted 6 lines
If you like I can probably dump the pcie registers on card and/or the pcie port under windows. The card works there :) Let me know.
--
MST
the problem is, we would need to know the registers right before suspending the GPU. If someone would be able to trace all PCIe register read and writes for the entire suspending/resume process, that would be very helpful.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CACO55tutwu+46dmhy7RuqRHSBorundx3ZcgDZCqSwvxN+JU4-g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Quoted 30 lines · Karol Herbst
Quoted 29 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 15 lines · Karol Herbst
this was already debugged and there is no point in searching inside the Firmware. It's not a firmware bug or anything.
The proper fix is to do something inside Nouveau so that we don't upset the device and being able to runtime resume it again.
The initial thing we do inside Nouveau to cause those issues is to run that so called "DEVINIT" script inside the vbios to initialize the GPU, problem is, it changes something on the PCIe configuration so that the GPU isn't able to runtime resume anymore. I am in contact with Nvidia about that issue and hopefully we get the proper answers. When I was digging into that myself I was able to make the situation more stable by setting the PCIE link speed to the boot defaults, but that was still pretty unstable.
Quoted 7 lines
Anyway, because the binary driver fails here as well (through bumblebee and so on) there isn't much of reverse engineering we can do besides guessing and trying it on literally every hardware until it works.
We also have an upstream bug for this issue:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156341If you like I can probably dump the pcie registers on card and/or the pcie port under windows. The card works there :) Let me know.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
--
MSTthe problem is, we would need to know the registers right before suspending the GPU. If someone would be able to trace all PCIe register read and writes for the entire suspending/resume process, that would be very helpful.
Well I can pass the card to a VM, and trace it on the hypervisor, that isn't a problem. A tricky thing is the ACPI tables, would need to somehow know which ones are relevant to pass them to guest ... ideas on that?
Signature · 5 lines
MST _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20181129115629-mutt-send-email-mst-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
yeah... I don't think that's gonna work that nicely. Anyway, you probably need to allow the VM to access all of ACPI in order to runtime suspend the GPU and on newer laptops the vbios is retrieved via ACPI as well. It would be probably better if there is a way to trace all that on a machine running windows directly.
Quoted 41 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 30 lines · Karol Herbst
Quoted 29 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 15 lines · Karol Herbst
this was already debugged and there is no point in searching inside the Firmware. It's not a firmware bug or anything.
The proper fix is to do something inside Nouveau so that we don't upset the device and being able to runtime resume it again.
The initial thing we do inside Nouveau to cause those issues is to run that so called "DEVINIT" script inside the vbios to initialize the GPU, problem is, it changes something on the PCIe configuration so that the GPU isn't able to runtime resume anymore. I am in contact with Nvidia about that issue and hopefully we get the proper answers. When I was digging into that myself I was able to make the situation more stable by setting the PCIE link speed to the boot defaults, but that was still pretty unstable.
Quoted 7 lines
Anyway, because the binary driver fails here as well (through bumblebee and so on) there isn't much of reverse engineering we can do besides guessing and trying it on literally every hardware until it works.
We also have an upstream bug for this issue:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156341If you like I can probably dump the pcie registers on card and/or the pcie port under windows. The card works there :) Let me know.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
--
MSTthe problem is, we would need to know the registers right before suspending the GPU. If someone would be able to trace all PCIe register read and writes for the entire suspending/resume process, that would be very helpful.
Quoted 7 lines
Well I can pass the card to a VM, and trace it on the hypervisor, that isn't a problem. A tricky thing is the ACPI tables, would need to somehow know which ones are relevant to pass them to guest ... ideas on that?
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau