ipv4: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerability
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ipv4: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerability
vr.vifi is indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:
net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1616 ipmr_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue 'mrt->vif_table' [r] (local cap) net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1690 ipmr_compat_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue 'mrt->vif_table' [r] (local cap)
Fix this by sanitizing vr.vifi before using it to index mrt->vif_table'
Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be completed with a dependent load/store [1].
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152449131114778&w=2
--- net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
net/ipv4/ipmr.c +4 -0
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@#include <net/nexthop.h> #include <net/switchdev.h> +#include <linux/nospec.h> +struct ipmr_rule {struct fib_rule common; };
@@ -1612,6 +1614,7 @@ int ipmr_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, void __user *arg)return -EFAULT ;if (vr.vifi >= mrt->maxvif)return -EINVAL ; + vr.vifi =array_index_nospec (vr.vifi, mrt->maxvif);read_lock (&mrt_lock); vif = &mrt->vif_table[vr.vifi];if (VIF_EXISTS (mrt, vr.vifi)) {
@@ -1686,6 +1689,7 @@ int ipmr_compat_ioctl(struct sock *sk, unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg)return -EFAULT ;if (vr.vifi >= mrt->maxvif)return -EINVAL ; + vr.vifi =array_index_nospec (vr.vifi, mrt->maxvif);read_lock (&mrt_lock); vif = &mrt->vif_table[vr.vifi];if (VIF_EXISTS (mrt, vr.vifi)) {
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
David Miller
maintainerFrom: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:41:24 -0600
Quoted 10 lines
vr.vifi is indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:
net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1616ipmr_ioctl()warn: potential spectre issue 'mrt->vif_table' [r] (local cap)net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1690ipmr_compat_ioctl()warn: potential spectre issue 'mrt->vif_table' [r] (local cap)Fix this by sanitizing vr.vifi before using it to index
mrt->vif_table'
Quoted 8 lines
Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be completed with a dependent load/store [1].
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152449131114778&w=2
Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Applied and queued up for -stable.
Please do not CC: stable for networking bug fixes, thank you.
Quoted 8 lines · David Miller
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>Applied and queued up for -stable.
Please do not CC: stable for networking bug fixes, thank you.
OK. I've got it.
Thanks
--
Gustavo