Clang build error in drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
Subsystems (2)
Hi all,
After commit 4fd22c13ad44 ("scsi: smartpqi: add ofa support"), an arm allyesconfig build with Clang fails with the following warning/error:
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c:7473:2: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof ((sg_count)) *' (aka 'unsigned int *') and 'uint64_t *' (aka 'unsigned long long *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
do_div(sg_count, chunk_size);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: note: expanded from macro 'do_div'
(void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c:7473:2: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'u32 *' (aka 'unsigned int *') to parameter of type 'uint64_t *' (aka 'unsigned long long *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
do_div(sg_count, chunk_size);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/div64.h:239:22: note: expanded from macro 'do_div'
__rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^~~~
./arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:33:45: note: passing argument to parameter 'n' here
static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
^
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c:7473:2: warning: shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
do_div(sg_count, chunk_size);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/div64.h:235:25: note: expanded from macro 'do_div'
} else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^ ~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: expanded from macro 'likely'
# define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
^According to include/asm-generic/div64.h, the first parameter of do_div must be a 64-bit number, meaning the below diff would properly fix it.
However, I am not sure if there are any unintended consequences of this change, hence reaching out before sending it in. If you have a more preferred way of fixing it, please do so.
Thank you,
Nathan
==========================================================================================
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c +1 -1
@@ -7460,7 +7460,7 @@ static void pqi_ofa_ctrl_unquiesce(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info)static int pqi_ofa_alloc_mem (struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,u32 total_size,u32 chunk_size) { -u32 sg_count; +u64 sg_count;u32 size;int i;struct pqi_sg_descriptor *mem_descriptor =NULL ;
Quoted 47 lines · Nathan Chancellor
Hi all,
After commit
4fd22c13ad44("scsi: smartpqi: add ofa support"), an arm allyesconfig build with Clang fails with the following warning/error:
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c:7473:2: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof ((sg_count)) *' (aka 'unsigned int *') and 'uint64_t*' (aka 'unsigned long long *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]do_div(sg_count, chunk_size); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: note: expanded from macro 'do_div' (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c:7473:2: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'u32 *' (aka 'unsigned int *') to parameter of type 'uint64_t *' (aka 'unsigned long long *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types] do_div(sg_count, chunk_size); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/asm-generic/div64.h:239:22: note: expanded from macro 'do_div' __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \ ^~~~ ./arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:33:45: note: passing argument to parameter 'n' here static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base) ^ drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c:7473:2: warning: shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] do_div(sg_count, chunk_size); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/asm-generic/div64.h:235:25: note: expanded from macro 'do_div' } else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \ ^ ~~ ./include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: expanded from macro 'likely' # define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1) ^According to
include/asm-generic/div64.h, the first parameter ofdo_divmust be a 64-bit number, meaning the below diff would properly fix it.However, I am not sure if there are any unintended consequences of this change, hence reaching out before sending it in. If you have a more preferred way of fixing it, please do so.
Thank you,
Nathan==========================================================================================
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c +0
-0
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c static void pqi_ofa_ctrl_unquiesce(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info) · line 7466
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c +1
-1@@ -7460,7 +7460,7 @@ static void pqi_ofa_ctrl_unquiesce(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info)static int pqi_ofa_alloc_mem (struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,u32 total_size,u32 chunk_size) { -u32 sg_count; +u64 sg_count;u32 size;int i;struct pqi_sg_descriptor *mem_descriptor =NULL ;
Ugh disregard, I just looked at the SCSI tree and saw this was fixed already:
Should have looked at it before sending, sorry for the noise! Nathan