Skip to contentSkip to conversation

block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

PATCH In review Gustavo A. R. Silva 3 participants 5 messages Jan 23, 2019 – Mar 18, 2019

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3093:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3120:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:856:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough

---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/rsxx/core.c          | 1 +
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h +1 -1
index 000a2f4c0e92..f070f7200fc0 100644
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static inline void __drbd_chk_io_error_(struct drbd_device *device,
 				_drbd_set_state(_NS(device, disk, D_INCONSISTENT), CS_HARD, NULL);
 			break;
 		}
-		/* NOTE fall through for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */
+		/* fall through - for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */
 	case EP_DETACH:
 	case EP_CALL_HELPER:
 		/* Remember whether we saw a READ or WRITE error.
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c +2 -2
index c7ad88d91a09..74350663443f 100644
@@ -3094,7 +3094,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
 			rv =  1;
 			break;
 		}
-		/* Else fall through to one of the other strategies... */
+		/* Else fall through - to one of the other strategies... */
 	case ASB_DISCARD_OLDER_PRI:
 		if (self == 0 && peer == 1) {
 			rv = 1;
@@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
 		}
 		if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG)
 			break;
-		/* else: fall through */
+		/* else, fall through */
 	case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG:
 		if	(ch_self < ch_peer)
 			rv = -1;
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c +1 -1
index 643a04af213b..3809c7e6be8c 100644
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ int __req_mod(struct drbd_request *req, enum drbd_req_event what,
 			} /* else: FIXME can this happen? */
 			break;
 		}
-		/* else, fall through to BARRIER_ACKED */
+		/* else, fall through - to BARRIER_ACKED */
 
 	case BARRIER_ACKED:
 		/* barrier ack for READ requests does not make sense */
drivers/block/rsxx/core.c +1 -0
index 0cf4509d575c..898d522e8338 100644
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static void card_state_change(struct rsxx_cardinfo *card,
 		 * Fall through so the DMA devices can be attached and
 		 * the user can attempt to pull off their data.
 		 */
+		/* fall through */
 	case CARD_STATE_GOOD:
 		st = rsxx_get_card_size8(card, &card->size8);
 		if (st)
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw

Looks good.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:45 PM
To: Philipp Reisner; Lars Ellenberg; Jens Axboe; Joshua Morris; Philip Kelleher
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Gustavo A. R. Silva
Subject: [PATCH] block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3093:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3120:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:856:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough

---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/rsxx/core.c          | 1 +

 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h +0 -0
index 000a2f4c0e92..f070f7200fc0 100644
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static inline void __drbd_chk_io_error_(struct drbd_device *device,

                                 _drbd_set_state(_NS(device, disk, D_INCONSISTENT), CS_HARD, NULL); break;
                 }
-               /* NOTE fall through for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */ +               /* fall through - for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */ case EP_DETACH:
         case EP_CALL_HELPER:
                 /* Remember whether we saw a READ or WRITE error.

drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c +0 -0
index c7ad88d91a09..74350663443f 100644
@@ -3094,7 +3094,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold

                         rv =  1;
                         break;
                 }
-               /* Else fall through to one of the other strategies... */
+               /* Else fall through - to one of the other strategies... */
         case ASB_DISCARD_OLDER_PRI:
                 if (self == 0 && peer == 1) {
                         rv = 1;
@@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold }
                 if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG)
                         break;
-               /* else: fall through */
+               /* else, fall through */
         case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG:
                 if      (ch_self < ch_peer)
                         rv = -1;

drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c +0 -0
index 643a04af213b..3809c7e6be8c 100644
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ int __req_mod(struct drbd_request *req, enum drbd_req_event what,

                         } /* else: FIXME can this happen? */ break;
                 }
-               /* else, fall through to BARRIER_ACKED */
+               /* else, fall through - to BARRIER_ACKED */

         case BARRIER_ACKED:
                 /* barrier ack for READ requests does not make sense */

drivers/block/rsxx/core.c +0 -0
index 0cf4509d575c..898d522e8338 100644
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static void card_state_change(struct rsxx_cardinfo *card,

                  * Fall through so the DMA devices can be attached and
                  * the user can attempt to pull off their data. */
+               /* fall through */
         case CARD_STATE_GOOD:
                 st = rsxx_get_card_size8(card, &card->size8); if (st)

Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Acked-by on v1 1/1
#2 lore raw
In reply to Gustavo A. R. Silva
Quoted 8 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough

Quoted 8 lines
---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/rsxx/core.c          | 1 +
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Hi Gustavo,

as also discussed with Lars in person, obviously OK for the DRBD part.

Best, rck

#3 lore raw
Quoted 18 lines · Roland Kammerer
Quoted 8 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough

Quoted 8 lines
---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/rsxx/core.c          | 1 +
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Quoted 6 lines

Hi Gustavo,

as also discussed with Lars in person, obviously OK for the DRBD part.

Thank you, Roland.

Friendly ping:

Who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

#4 lore raw

Hi,

If no one cares, I'll add this to my tree for 5.2

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Quoted 38 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
Quoted 18 lines · Roland Kammerer
Quoted 8 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough

Quoted 8 lines
---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/block/rsxx/core.c          | 1 +
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Quoted 6 lines

Hi Gustavo,

as also discussed with Lars in person, obviously OK for the DRBD part.

Thank you, Roland.

Friendly ping:

Who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo