KVM: selftests: Compile code with warnings enabled
PATCH 1/1 KVM: selftests: Compile code with warnings enabled
So far the KVM selftests are compiled without any compiler warnings enabled. That's quite bad, since we miss a lot of possible bugs this way. Let's enable at least "-Wall" and some other useful warning flags now.
---
This patch fixes most of the warnings in the x86 code already - but for some warnings, I was not quite sure (e.g. about the need for the kvm_get_supported_cpuid_entry(1) in some tests), so I did not touch that code yet. I also did not check aarch64 yet. I'd be glad if someone who knows these parts of the code could have a look at the warnings there.
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 4 +++- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c | 6 +++++- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 3 --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 4 +--- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/platform_info_test.c | 1 - tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/smm_test.c | 3 +-- .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test.c | 5 +---- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c | 5 ++--- 9 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +3 -1
@@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ LIBKVM += $(LIBKVM_$(UNAME_M)) INSTALL_HDR_PATH = $(top_srcdir)/usr LINUX_HDR_PATH = $(INSTALL_HDR_PATH)/include/ LINUX_TOOL_INCLUDE = $(top_srcdir)/tools/include -CFLAGS += -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -fno-stack-protector -fno-PIE -I$(LINUX_TOOL_INCLUDE) -I$(LINUX_HDR_PATH) -Iinclude -I$(<D) -Iinclude/$(UNAME_M) -I.. +CFLAGS += -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wuninitialized -O2 -g -std=gnu99 \ + -fno-stack-protector -fno-PIE -I$(LINUX_TOOL_INCLUDE) \ + -I$(LINUX_HDR_PATH) -Iinclude -I$(<D) -Iinclude/$(UNAME_M) -I.. no-pie-option := $(call try-run, echo 'int main() { return 0; }' | \ $(CC) -Werror $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(CC_OPTION_CFLAGS) -no-pie -x c - -o "$$TMP", -no-pie)
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c +5 -1
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static void *vcpu_worker(void *data)while (!READ_ONCE (host_quit)) {/* Let the guest dirty the random pages */ ret =_vcpu_run (vm,VCPU_ID ); +TEST_ASSERT (ret ==0 ,"vcpu_run failed: %d\n" , ret);if (get_ucall (vm,VCPU_ID , &uc) ==UCALL_SYNC ) { pages_count +=TEST_PAGES_PER_LOOP ;generate_random_array (guest_array,TEST_PAGES_PER_LOOP );
@@ -426,8 +427,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])unsigned long interval =TEST_HOST_LOOP_INTERVAL ;bool mode_selected = false;uint64_t phys_offset =0 ; -unsigned int mode, host_ipa_limit; +unsigned int mode;int opt, i; +#ifdef __aarch64__ +unsigned int host_ipa_limit; +#endif #ifdef USE_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG if (!kvm_check_cap (KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT )) {
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c +0 -3
@@ -135,7 +135,6 @@ struct kvm_vm *_vm_create(enum vm_guest_mode mode, uint64_t phy_pages, int perm, unsigned long type) {struct kvm_vm *vm; -int kvm_fd; vm =calloc (1 ,sizeof (*vm));TEST_ASSERT (vm !=NULL ,"Insufficient Memory" );
@@ -556,7 +555,6 @@ void vm_userspace_mem_region_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t flags) {int ret; -unsigned long pmem_size =0 ;struct userspace_mem_region *region;size_t huge_page_size =KVM_UTIL_PGS_PER_HUGEPG * vm->page_size;
@@ -1302,7 +1300,6 @@ void vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_sregs *sregs)int _vcpu_sregs_set (struct kvm_vm *vm,uint32_t vcpuid,struct kvm_sregs *sregs) {struct vcpu *vcpu =vcpu_find (vm, vcpuid); -int ret;TEST_ASSERT (vcpu !=NULL ,"vcpu not found, vcpuid: %u" , vcpuid);
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c +1 -3
@@ -229,8 +229,6 @@ void sregs_dump(FILE *stream, struct kvm_sregs *sregs,void virt_pgd_alloc (struct kvm_vm *vm,uint32_t pgd_memslot) { -int rc; -TEST_ASSERT (vm->mode ==VM_MODE_P52V48_4K ,"Attempt to use " "unknown or unsupported guest mode, mode: 0x%x" , vm->mode);
@@ -549,7 +547,6 @@ vm_paddr_t addr_gva2gpa(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_vaddr_t gva)struct pageDirectoryPointerEntry *pdpe;struct pageDirectoryEntry *pde;struct pageTableEntry *pte; -void *hva;TEST_ASSERT (vm->mode ==VM_MODE_P52V48_4K ,"Attempt to use " "unknown or unsupported guest mode, mode: 0x%x" , vm->mode);
@@ -582,6 +579,7 @@ vm_paddr_t addr_gva2gpa(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_vaddr_t gva) unmapped_gva:TEST_ASSERT (false,"No mapping for vm virtual address, " "gva: 0x%lx" , gva); +exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); } static void kvm_setup_gdt(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_dtable *dt, int gdt_memslot,
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test.c +1 -0
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])while (1 ) { rc =_vcpu_run (vm,VCPU_ID ); +TEST_ASSERT (rc ==0 ,"vcpu_run failed: %d\n" , rc); TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO, "Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n", run->exit_reason,
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/platform_info_test.c +0 -1
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ static void test_msr_platform_info_disabled(struct kvm_vm *vm)int main (int argc,char *argv[]) {struct kvm_vm *vm; -struct kvm_run *state;int rv;uint64_t msr_platform_info;
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/smm_test.c +1 -2
@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ void guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages)int main (int argc,char *argv[]) { -struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages =NULL ;vm_vaddr_t vmx_pages_gva =0 ;struct kvm_regs regs;
@@ -115,7 +114,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])vcpu_set_msr (vm,VCPU_ID ,MSR_IA32_SMBASE ,SMRAM_GPA );if (kvm_check_cap (KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE )) { - vmx_pages =vcpu_alloc_vmx (vm, &vmx_pages_gva); +vcpu_alloc_vmx (vm, &vmx_pages_gva);vcpu_args_set (vm,VCPU_ID ,1 , vmx_pages_gva); }else {printf ("will skip SMM test with VMX enabled\n" );
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test.c +1 -4
@@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages) {#define L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE 64unsigned long l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE ]; -uint32_t control; -uintptr_t save_cr3;GUEST_ASSERT (prepare_for_vmx_operation (vmx_pages));GUEST_ASSERT (load_vmcs (vmx_pages));
@@ -55,7 +53,6 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages)int main (int argc,char *argv[]) { -struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages;vm_vaddr_t vmx_pages_gva;struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry =kvm_get_supported_cpuid_entry (1 );
@@ -68,7 +65,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])vcpu_set_cpuid (vm,VCPU_ID ,kvm_get_supported_cpuid ());/* Allocate VMX pages and shared descriptors (vmx_pages). */ - vmx_pages =vcpu_alloc_vmx (vm, &vmx_pages_gva); +vcpu_alloc_vmx (vm, &vmx_pages_gva);vcpu_args_set (vm,VCPU_ID ,1 , vmx_pages_gva);for (;;) {
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c +2 -3
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages)GUEST_DONE (); } -void report (int64_t val) +static void report (int64_t val) {printf ("IA32_TSC_ADJUST is %ld (%lld * TSC_ADJUST_VALUE + %lld).\n" , val, val /TSC_ADJUST_VALUE , val %TSC_ADJUST_VALUE );
@@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ void report(int64_t val)int main (int argc,char *argv[]) { -struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages;vm_vaddr_t vmx_pages_gva;struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry =kvm_get_supported_cpuid_entry (1 );
@@ -142,7 +141,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])vcpu_set_cpuid (vm,VCPU_ID ,kvm_get_supported_cpuid ());/* Allocate VMX pages and shared descriptors (vmx_pages). */ - vmx_pages =vcpu_alloc_vmx (vm, &vmx_pages_gva); +vcpu_alloc_vmx (vm, &vmx_pages_gva);vcpu_args_set (vm,VCPU_ID ,1 , vmx_pages_gva);for (;;) {
Signature · 1 line
2.21.0
Hi, Thomas,
Quoted 10 lines · Thomas Huth
So far the KVM selftests are compiled without any compiler warnings enabled. That's quite bad, since we miss a lot of possible bugs this way. Let's enable at least "-Wall" and some other useful warning flags now.
Signed-off-by Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>---
This patch fixes most of the warnings in the x86 code already - but for some warnings, I was not quite sure (e.g. about the need for thekvm_get_supported_cpuid_entry(1)in some tests), so I did not touch
If you mean the two calls in state_test and evmcs_test I would agree they should be dropped directly.
Just to mention that the patch may not apply cleanly to kvm/queue now probably because the dirty-log-test.c touchup recently, so may need a rebase. Otherwise it looks nice at least to me to have these checks.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Quoted 8 lines · Peter Xu
Hi, Thomas,
Quoted 5 lines · Thomas Huth
So far the KVM selftests are compiled without any compiler warnings enabled. That's quite bad, since we miss a lot of possible bugs this way. Let's enable at least "-Wall" and some other useful warning flags now.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>---
This patch fixes most of the warnings in the x86 code already - but for some warnings, I was not quite sure (e.g. about the need for thekvm_get_supported_cpuid_entry(1)in some tests), so I did not touchIf you mean the two calls in
state_testandevmcs_testI would agree they should be dropped directly.
Yes, that were the once I had in mind. I'll drop them in v2.
Quoted 3 lines
Just to mention that the patch may not apply cleanly to kvm/queue now probably because the
dirty-log-test.ctouchup recently, so may need a rebase. Otherwise it looks nice at least to me to have these checks.
Ok, thanks for the hint, I'll rebase and send a v2.
Thomas