Skip to contentSkip to conversation

at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()

PATCH In review Bartosz Golaszewski 2 participants 5 messages May 20, 2019 – May 28, 2019

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v2 cover at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>

Now that we have a resource managed version of i2c_new_dummy_device(), use it in at24.

v1 -> v2:
- i2c_new_dummy_device() returns ERR_PTR(), not NULL so check the value correctly
- remove the no longer needed i2c_unregister_device() in error path

Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
eeprom: at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()
eeprom: at24: drop unnecessary label

 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 75 ++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.21.0
#1 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/2 eeprom: at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>

Now that it's upstream, use the resource managed version of i2c_new_dummy_device().

---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 38 +++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +9 -29
index 63aa541c9608..bdeec0777029 100644
@@ -507,14 +507,6 @@ static const struct at24_chip_data *at24_get_chip_data(struct device *dev)
 	return cdata;
 }
 
-static void at24_remove_dummy_clients(struct at24_data *at24)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 1; i < at24->num_addresses; i++)
-		i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i].client);
-}
-
 static int at24_make_dummy_client(struct at24_data *at24, unsigned int index,
 				  struct regmap_config *regmap_config)
 {
@@ -527,18 +519,14 @@ static int at24_make_dummy_client(struct at24_data *at24, unsigned int index,
 	dev = &base_client->dev;
 	addr = base_client->addr + index;
 
-	dummy_client = i2c_new_dummy(base_client->adapter,
-				     base_client->addr + index);
-	if (!dummy_client) {
-		dev_err(dev, "address 0x%02x unavailable\n", addr);
-		return -EADDRINUSE;
-	}
+	dummy_client = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(dev, base_client->adapter,
+						 base_client->addr + index);
+	if (IS_ERR(dummy_client))
+		return PTR_ERR(dummy_client);
 
 	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(dummy_client, regmap_config);
-	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
-		i2c_unregister_device(dummy_client);
+	if (IS_ERR(regmap))
 		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
-	}
 
 	at24->client[index].client = dummy_client;
 	at24->client[index].regmap = regmap;
@@ -693,10 +681,8 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	/* use dummy devices for multiple-address chips */
 	for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++) {
 		err = at24_make_dummy_client(at24, i, &regmap_config);
-		if (err) {
-			at24_remove_dummy_clients(at24);
+		if (err)
 			return err;
-		}
 	}
 
 	i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
@@ -713,7 +699,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	pm_runtime_idle(dev);
 	if (err) {
 		err = -ENODEV;
-		goto err_clients;
+		goto err_runtime_pm;
 	}
 
 	nvmem_config.name = dev_name(dev);
@@ -733,7 +719,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	at24->nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(dev, &nvmem_config);
 	if (IS_ERR(at24->nvmem)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(at24->nvmem);
-		goto err_clients;
+		goto err_runtime_pm;
 	}
 
 	dev_info(dev, "%u byte %s EEPROM, %s, %u bytes/write\n",
@@ -742,8 +728,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 	return 0;
 
-err_clients:
-	at24_remove_dummy_clients(at24);
+err_runtime_pm:
 	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
 
 	return err;
@@ -751,11 +736,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
-	struct at24_data *at24;
-
-	at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
-
-	at24_remove_dummy_clients(at24);
 	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
 	pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
 
Signature · 1 line
2.21.0
#4 lore raw

PATCH v2 2/2 eeprom: at24: drop unnecessary label

In reply to Bartosz Golaszewski

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>

If we move the nvmem registration above the pm enable calls and the test read, we can drop the error label and make the code more readable as there's now only a single place where we must call pm_runtime_disable() in error path.

---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +18 -25
index bdeec0777029..ba8e73812644 100644
@@ -685,23 +685,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 			return err;
 	}
 
-	i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
-
-	/* enable runtime pm */
-	pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
-	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-
-	/*
-	 * Perform a one-byte test read to verify that the
-	 * chip is functional.
-	 */
-	err = at24_read(at24, 0, &test_byte, 1);
-	pm_runtime_idle(dev);
-	if (err) {
-		err = -ENODEV;
-		goto err_runtime_pm;
-	}
-
 	nvmem_config.name = dev_name(dev);
 	nvmem_config.dev = dev;
 	nvmem_config.read_only = !writable;
@@ -717,9 +700,24 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	nvmem_config.size = byte_len;
 
 	at24->nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(dev, &nvmem_config);
-	if (IS_ERR(at24->nvmem)) {
-		err = PTR_ERR(at24->nvmem);
-		goto err_runtime_pm;
+	if (IS_ERR(at24->nvmem))
+		return PTR_ERR(at24->nvmem);
+
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
+
+	/* enable runtime pm */
+	pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+
+	/*
+	 * Perform a one-byte test read to verify that the
+	 * chip is functional.
+	 */
+	err = at24_read(at24, 0, &test_byte, 1);
+	pm_runtime_idle(dev);
+	if (err) {
+		pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
 	dev_info(dev, "%u byte %s EEPROM, %s, %u bytes/write\n",
@@ -727,11 +725,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 		 writable ? "writable" : "read-only", at24->write_max);
 
 	return 0;
-
-err_runtime_pm:
-	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
-
-	return err;
 }
 
 static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
Signature · 1 line
2.21.0
author Applied
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] eeprom: at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()

pon., 20 maj 2019 o 15:08 Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> napisał(a):

Quoted 7 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
Quoted 5 lines

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>

Now that it's upstream, use the resource managed version of i2c_new_dummy_device().

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line

Looks good now (not tested, though):

Thanks!

Applied.

Bart