generic/059: also test that the file's mtime and ctime are updated
PATCH 2/2 generic/059: also test that the file's mtime and ctime are updated
From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Test as well that hole punch operations that affect a single file block also update the file's mtime and ctime.
This is motivated by a bug a found in btrfs which is fixed by the following patch for the linux kernel:
"Btrfs: add missing inode version, ctime and mtime updates when
punching hole"
--- tests/generic/059 | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
tests/generic/059 +18 -0
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ # # Btrfs: add missing inode update when punching hole # +# Also test the mtime and ctime properties of the file change after punching +# holes with ranges that operate only on a single block of the file. +# seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq"
@@ -68,6 +71,13 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo # fsync log. sync +# Sleep for 1 second, because we want to check that the next punch operations we +# do update the file's mtime and ctime. +sleep 1 + +mtime_before=$(stat -c %Y $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) +ctime_before=$(stat -c %Z $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) + # Punch a hole in our file. This small range affects only 1 page. # This made the btrfs hole punching implementation write only some zeroes in # one page, but it did not update the btrfs inode fields used to determine if
@@ -94,5 +104,13 @@ _flakey_drop_and_remount echo "File content after:" od -t x1 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo +mtime_after=$(stat -c %Y $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) +ctime_after=$(stat -c %Z $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) + +[ $mtime_after -gt $mtime_before ] || \ + echo "mtime did not increase (before: $mtime_before after: $mtime_after" +[ $ctime_after -gt $ctime_before ] || \ + echo "ctime did not increase (before: $ctime_before after: $mtime_after" + status=0 exit
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
Quoted 31 lines · On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:06:24PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Test as well that hole punch operations that affect a single file block also update the file's mtime and ctime.
This is motivated by a bug a found in btrfs which is fixed by the following patch for the linux kernel:
"Btrfs: add missing inode version, ctime and mtime updates when
punching hole"Signed-off-by Filipe Manana <[email protected]>--- tests/generic/059 | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)tests/generic/059 +3
-0@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ # # Btrfs: add missing inode update when punching hole # +# Also test the mtime and ctime properties of the file change after punching +# holes with ranges that operate only on a single block of the file. +# seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq"
tests/generic/059 $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo · line 76
Quoted 6 lines
tests/generic/059 +3
-0@@ -68,6 +71,13 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo # fsync log. sync +# Sleep for 1 second, because we want to check that the next punch operations we +# do update the file's mtime and ctime. +sleep 1
Is this supposed to be after recording the initial c/mtime? i.e. moving it after c/mtime_before?
Thanks,
Eryu
Quoted 24 lines
tests/generic/059 +12
-0+ +mtime_before=$(stat -c %Y $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) +ctime_before=$(stat -c %Z $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) + # Punch a hole in our file. This small range affects only 1 page. # This made the btrfs hole punching implementation write only some zeroes in # one page, but it did not update the btrfs inode fields used to determine if@@ -94,5 +104,13 @@ _flakey_drop_and_remount echo "File content after:" od -t x1 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo +mtime_after=$(stat -c %Y $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) +ctime_after=$(stat -c %Z $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) + +[ $mtime_after -gt $mtime_before ] || \ + echo "mtime did not increase (before: $mtime_before after: $mtime_after" +[ $ctime_after -gt $ctime_before ] || \ + echo "ctime did not increase (before: $ctime_before after: $mtime_after" + status=0 exitSignature · 1 line
2.11.0
Quoted 36 lines · Eryu Guan
Quoted 34 lines · On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:06:24PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Test as well that hole punch operations that affect a single file block also update the file's mtime and ctime.
This is motivated by a bug a found in btrfs which is fixed by the following patch for the linux kernel:
"Btrfs: add missing inode version, ctime and mtime updates when
punching hole"Signed-off-by Filipe Manana <[email protected]>--- tests/generic/059 | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)tests/generic/059 +3
-0@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ # # Btrfs: add missing inode update when punching hole # +# Also test the mtime and ctime properties of the file change after punching +# holes with ranges that operate only on a single block of the file. +# seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq"@@ -68,6 +71,13 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo # fsync log. sync
Quoted 6 lines
tests/generic/059 $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo · line 76
Quoted 3 lines
tests/generic/059 +3
-0+# Sleep for 1 second, because we want to check that the next punch operations we +# do update the file's mtime and ctime. +sleep 1Is this supposed to be after recording the initial c/mtime? i.e. moving it after c/mtime_before?
Either way is fine. Capturing the times right before or right after the sleep, gives the same values as nothing changed the file.
Btw, I had noticed the other day that the second "echo" has $mtime_after instead of $ctime_after (copy-paste mistake). Do you want me to send a v2 fixing that typo, or you can do it yourself when you pick the patch?
Thanks.
Quoted 28 lines
Thanks,
EryuQuoted 24 lines
tests/generic/059 +12
-1+ +mtime_before=$(stat -c %Y $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) +ctime_before=$(stat -c %Z $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) + # Punch a hole in our file. This small range affects only 1 page. # This made the btrfs hole punching implementation write only some zeroes in # one page, but it did not update the btrfs inode fields used to determine if@@ -94,5 +104,13 @@ _flakey_drop_and_remount echo "File content after:" od -t x1 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo +mtime_after=$(stat -c %Y $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) +ctime_after=$(stat -c %Z $SCRATCH_MNT/foo) + +[ $mtime_after -gt $mtime_before ] || \ + echo "mtime did not increase (before: $mtime_before after: $mtime_after" +[ $ctime_after -gt $ctime_before ] || \ + echo "ctime did not increase (before: $ctime_before after: $mtime_after" + status=0 exit --2.11.0
Quoted 44 lines · Filipe Manana
Quoted 36 lines · Eryu Guan
Quoted 34 lines · On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:06:24PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Test as well that hole punch operations that affect a single file block also update the file's mtime and ctime.
This is motivated by a bug a found in btrfs which is fixed by the following patch for the linux kernel:
"Btrfs: add missing inode version, ctime and mtime updates when
punching hole"Signed-off-by Filipe Manana <[email protected]>--- tests/generic/059 | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)tests/generic/059 +3
-0@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ # # Btrfs: add missing inode update when punching hole # +# Also test the mtime and ctime properties of the file change after punching +# holes with ranges that operate only on a single block of the file. +# seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq"@@ -68,6 +71,13 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo # fsync log. syncQuoted 6 lines
tests/generic/059 $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo · line 76
Quoted 3 lines
tests/generic/059 +3
-0+# Sleep for 1 second, because we want to check that the next punch operations we +# do update the file's mtime and ctime. +sleep 1Is this supposed to be after recording the initial c/mtime? i.e. moving it after c/mtime_before?
Quoted 2 lines
Either way is fine. Capturing the times right before or right after the sleep, gives the same values as nothing changed the file.
Ah, you're right.
Quoted 5 lines
Btw, I had noticed the other day that the second "echo" has $mtime_after instead of $ctime_after (copy-paste mistake). Do you want me to send a v2 fixing that typo, or you can do it yourself when you pick the patch?
I can fix it on commit, thanks for pointing it out!
Thanks,
Eryu