tomoyo: common: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerability
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 tomoyo: common: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerability
profile is controlled by user-space via /sys/kernel/security/tomoyo/profile, hence leading to a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:
security/tomoyo/common.c:498 tomoyo_assign_profile() warn: potential spectre issue 'ns->profile_ptr' [r] (local cap)
security/tomoyo/common.c:499 tomoyo_assign_profile() warn: possible spectre second half. 'ptr' security/tomoyo/common.c:505 tomoyo_assign_profile() warn: possible spectre second half. 'ptr' security/tomoyo/common.c:523 tomoyo_assign_profile() warn: possible spectre second half. 'ptr'
Fix this by sanitizing profile before using it to index ns->profile_ptr
Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be completed with a dependent load/store [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
--- security/tomoyo/common.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
security/tomoyo/common.c +4 -1
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@#include <linux/uaccess.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/security.h> +#include <linux/nospec.h> #include "common.h" /* String table for operation mode. */
@@ -488,13 +489,15 @@ static void tomoyo_print_number_union(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head,* Returns pointer to "struct tomoyo_profile" on success, NULL otherwise. */ static struct tomoyo_profile *tomoyo_assign_profile -(struct tomoyo_policy_namespace *ns,const unsigned int profile) +(struct tomoyo_policy_namespace *ns,unsigned int profile) {struct tomoyo_profile *ptr;struct tomoyo_profile *entry;if (profile >=TOMOYO_MAX_PROFILES )return NULL ; + profile =array_index_nospec (profile,TOMOYO_MAX_PROFILES ); + ptr = ns->profile_ptr[profile];if (ptr)return ptr;
Signature · 1 line
2.22.0
Tetsuo Handa
maintainerHello.
Thanks for a patch, but I have a question.
Quoted 1 line · Gustavo A. R. Silva
profile is controlled by user-space via
/sys/kernel/security/tomoyo/profile,
It is true that "profile" value is given from user-space, and it will be true that speculative execution would access "ns->profile_ptr[profile]" before whether "profile >= TOMOYO_MAX_PROFILES" is true is concluded. But
Quoted 2 lines
hence leading to a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
which memory address is vulnerable to Spectre variant 1 attack? How can an attacker gain information from memory speculatively accessed by "ns->profile_ptr[profile]" ? Where is the memory access which corresponds to "arr2->data[index2]" demonstrated at
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html ?
Since I'm not familiar with Spectre/Meltdown problem, this patch sounds as if "Oh, let's suppress Smatch warning". I want to know whether this problem is real and this patch is worth keeping [email protected] ...
Quoted 8 lines
security/tomoyo/common.c +1
-1@@ -488,13 +489,15 @@ static void tomoyo_print_number_union(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head,* Returns pointer to "struct tomoyo_profile" on success, NULL otherwise. */ static struct tomoyo_profile *tomoyo_assign_profile -(struct tomoyo_policy_namespace *ns,const unsigned int profile) +(struct tomoyo_policy_namespace *ns,unsigned int profile) {
security/tomoyo/common.c static void tomoyo_print_number_union(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head, · line 503
Quoted 10 lines
security/tomoyo/common.c +2
-0struct tomoyo_profile *ptr;struct tomoyo_profile *entry;if (profile >=TOMOYO_MAX_PROFILES )return NULL ; + profile =array_index_nospec (profile,TOMOYO_MAX_PROFILES ); + ptr = ns->profile_ptr[profile];if (ptr)return ptr;
By the way, since /sys/kernel/security/tomoyo/profile is writable by only explicitly whitelisted domains/programs (&& by only root user by default), I think that it is OK to treat this "profile" value as trusted.