Skip to contentSkip to conversation

audit: Report suspicious O_CREAT usage

PATCH Superseded Kees Cook 4 participants 9 messages Sep 25, 2019 – Oct 1, 2019

Subsystems (2)

v1 of 3 Superseded Latest is v3 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Kees Cook

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 audit: Report suspicious O_CREAT usage

This renames the very specific audit_log_link_denied() to audit_log_path_denied() and adds the AUDIT_* type as an argument. This allows for the creation of the new AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT that can be used to report the fifo/regular file creation restrictions that were introduced in commit 30aba6656f61 ("namei: allow restricted O_CREAT of FIFOs and regular files"). Without this change, discovering that the restriction is enabled can be very challenging:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+jJMxvkqjXHy3DnV5MVhFTL2RUhg0WQ-XVFW3ngDQOdkFq0PA@mail.gmail.com

---
This is not a complete fix because reporting was broken in commit 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context")
which specifically goes against the intention of these records: they should _always_ be reported. If auditing isn't enabled, they should be ratelimited.

Instead of using audit, should this just go back to using pr_ratelimited()?

---
 fs/namei.c                 |  7 +++++--
 include/linux/audit.h      |  5 +++--
 include/uapi/linux/audit.h |  1 +
 kernel/audit.c             | 11 ++++++-----
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
fs/namei.c +5 -2
index 671c3c1a3425..0e60f81e1d5a 100644
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static inline int may_follow_link(struct nameidata *nd)
 		return -ECHILD;
 
 	audit_inode(nd->name, nd->stack[0].link.dentry, 0);
-	audit_log_link_denied("follow_link");
+	audit_log_path_denied(AUDIT_ANOM_LINK, "follow_link");
 	return -EACCES;
 }
 
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ static int may_linkat(struct path *link)
 	if (safe_hardlink_source(inode) || inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
 		return 0;
 
-	audit_log_link_denied("linkat");
+	audit_log_path_denied(AUDIT_ANOM_LINK, "linkat");
 	return -EPERM;
 }
 
@@ -1031,6 +1031,9 @@ static int may_create_in_sticky(struct dentry * const dir,
 	    (dir->d_inode->i_mode & 0020 &&
 	     ((sysctl_protected_fifos >= 2 && S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode)) ||
 	      (sysctl_protected_regular >= 2 && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))))) {
+		audit_log_path_denied(AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT,
+				      S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode) ? "fifo"
+							      : "regular");
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 	return 0;
include/linux/audit.h +3 -2
index aee3dc9eb378..b3715e2ee1c5 100644
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ extern void		    audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab,
 					     const struct path *path);
 extern void		    audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab,
 					  char *key);
-extern void		    audit_log_link_denied(const char *operation);
+extern void		    audit_log_path_denied(int type,
+						  const char *operation);
 extern void		    audit_log_lost(const char *message);
 
 extern int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab);
@@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ static inline void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab,
 { }
 static inline void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
 { }
-static inline void audit_log_link_denied(const char *string)
+static inline void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *string);
 { }
 static inline int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 {
include/uapi/linux/audit.h +1 -0
index c89c6495983d..3ad935527177 100644
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@
 #define AUDIT_ANOM_PROMISCUOUS      1700 /* Device changed promiscuous mode */
 #define AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND            1701 /* Process ended abnormally */
 #define AUDIT_ANOM_LINK		    1702 /* Suspicious use of file links */
+#define AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT	    1703 /* Suspicious file creation */
 #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA	    1800 /* Data integrity verification */
 #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA    1801 /* Metadata integrity verification */
 #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS	    1802 /* Integrity enable status */
kernel/audit.c +6 -5
index da8dc0db5bd3..ed7402ac81b6 100644
@@ -2155,18 +2155,19 @@ void audit_log_task_info(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_task_info);
 
 /**
- * audit_log_link_denied - report a link restriction denial
- * @operation: specific link operation
+ * audit_log_path_denied - report a path restriction denial
+ * @type: audit message type (AUDIT_ANOM_LINK, AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT, etc)
+ * @operation: specific operation name
  */
-void audit_log_link_denied(const char *operation)
+void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *operation)
 {
 	struct audit_buffer *ab;
 
 	if (!audit_enabled || audit_dummy_context())
 		return;
 
-	/* Generate AUDIT_ANOM_LINK with subject, operation, outcome. */
-	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_ANOM_LINK);
+	/* Generate log with subject, operation, outcome. */
+	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, type);
 	if (!ab)
 		return;
 	audit_log_format(ab, "op=%s", operation);
Signature · 5 lines
2.17.1


-- 
Kees Cook
#1 lore raw
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

Hi Kees,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3 next-20190924]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kees-Cook/audit-Report-suspicious-O_CREAT-usage/20190926-050423
config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-13) 7.4.0
reproduce:

        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

In file included from include/linux/fsnotify.h:16:0,

                    from fs///attr.c:15:
>> include/linux/audit.h:222:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
    { }
    ^
   include/linux/audit.h:221:20: warning: 'audit_log_path_denied' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]
    static inline void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *string);
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +222 include/linux/audit.h

b48345aafb2038 Richard Guy Briggs 2019-05-10  187  
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  188  #else /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  189  static inline __printf(4, 5)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  190  void audit_log(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask, int type,
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  191  	       const char *fmt, ...)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  192  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  193  static inline struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx,
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  194  						   gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  195  {
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  196  	return NULL;
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  197  }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  198  static inline __printf(2, 3)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  199  void audit_log_format(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *fmt, ...)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  200  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  201  static inline void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  202  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  203  static inline void audit_log_n_hex(struct audit_buffer *ab,
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  204  				   const unsigned char *buf, size_t len)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  205  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  206  static inline void audit_log_n_string(struct audit_buffer *ab,
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  207  				      const char *buf, size_t n)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  208  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  209  static inline void  audit_log_n_untrustedstring(struct audit_buffer *ab,
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  210  						const char *string, size_t n)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  211  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  212  static inline void audit_log_untrustedstring(struct audit_buffer *ab,
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  213  					     const char *string)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  214  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  215  static inline void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab,
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  216  				    const char *prefix,
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  217  				    const struct path *path)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  218  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  219  static inline void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  220  { }
21e61058cf0f22 Kees Cook          2019-09-25  221  static inline void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *string);
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13 @222  { }
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  223  static inline int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  224  {
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  225  	return 0;
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  226  }
2a1fe215e7300c Paul Moore         2018-11-26  227  static inline void audit_log_task_info(struct audit_buffer *ab)
96368701e1c890 Paul Moore         2016-01-13  228  { }

4b7d248b3a1de4 Richard Guy Briggs 2019-01-22 229

:::::: The code at line 222 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 96368701e1c89057bbf39222e965161c68a85b4b audit: force seccomp event logging to honor the audit_enabled flag

:::::: TO: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
:::::: CC: Paul Moore <[email protected]>

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation

#2 lore raw
In reply to Kees Cook
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

Hi Kees,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3 next-20190924]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kees-Cook/audit-Report-suspicious-O_CREAT-usage/20190926-050423
config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-13) 7.4.0
reproduce:

        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

In file included from include/linux/fsnotify.h:16:0,

                    from fs/namei.c:25:
   include/linux/audit.h:222:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
    { }
    ^
   In file included from include/linux/fsnotify.h:16:0,
                    from fs/namei.c:25:
>> include/linux/audit.h:221:20: warning: 'audit_log_path_denied' used but never defined
    static inline void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *string);
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +/audit_log_path_denied +221 include/linux/audit.h

187
188 #else /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
189 static inline __printf(4, 5)
190 void audit_log(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask, int type,
191 const char *fmt, ...)
192 { }
193 static inline struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx,
194 gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
195 {
196 return NULL;
197 }
198 static inline __printf(2, 3)
199 void audit_log_format(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *fmt, ...)
200 { }
201 static inline void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
202 { }
203 static inline void audit_log_n_hex(struct audit_buffer *ab,
204 const unsigned char *buf, size_t len)
205 { }
206 static inline void audit_log_n_string(struct audit_buffer *ab,
207 const char *buf, size_t n)
208 { }
209 static inline void audit_log_n_untrustedstring(struct audit_buffer *ab,
210 const char *string, size_t n)
211 { }
212 static inline void audit_log_untrustedstring(struct audit_buffer *ab,
213 const char *string)
214 { }
215 static inline void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab,
216 const char *prefix,
217 const struct path *path)
218 { }
219 static inline void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
220 { }

 > 221	static inline void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *string);
 > 222	{ }

223 static inline int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
224 {
225 return 0;
226 }
227 static inline void audit_log_task_info(struct audit_buffer *ab)
228 { }
229

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation

author
#3 lore raw
In reply to Kees Cook
Quoted 75 lines · Kees Cook

This renames the very specific audit_log_link_denied() to audit_log_path_denied() and adds the AUDIT_* type as an argument. This allows for the creation of the new AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT that can be used to report the fifo/regular file creation restrictions that were introduced in commit 30aba6656f61 ("namei: allow restricted O_CREAT of FIFOs and regular files"). Without this change, discovering that the restriction is enabled can be very challenging:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+jJMxvkqjXHy3DnV5MVhFTL2RUhg0WQ-XVFW3ngDQOdkFq0PA@mail.gmail.com

---
This is not a complete fix because reporting was broken in commit 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context")
which specifically goes against the intention of these records: they should _always_ be reported. If auditing isn't enabled, they should be ratelimited.

Instead of using audit, should this just go back to using pr_ratelimited()?

---
 fs/namei.c                 |  7 +++++--
 include/linux/audit.h      |  5 +++--
 include/uapi/linux/audit.h |  1 +
 kernel/audit.c             | 11 ++++++-----
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
fs/namei.c +5 -2
index 671c3c1a3425..0e60f81e1d5a 100644
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static inline int may_follow_link(struct nameidata *nd)
 		return -ECHILD;
 
 	audit_inode(nd->name, nd->stack[0].link.dentry, 0);
-	audit_log_link_denied("follow_link");
+	audit_log_path_denied(AUDIT_ANOM_LINK, "follow_link");
 	return -EACCES;
 }
 
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ static int may_linkat(struct path *link)
 	if (safe_hardlink_source(inode) || inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
 		return 0;
 
-	audit_log_link_denied("linkat");
+	audit_log_path_denied(AUDIT_ANOM_LINK, "linkat");
 	return -EPERM;
 }
 
@@ -1031,6 +1031,9 @@ static int may_create_in_sticky(struct dentry * const dir,
 	    (dir->d_inode->i_mode & 0020 &&
 	     ((sysctl_protected_fifos >= 2 && S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode)) ||
 	      (sysctl_protected_regular >= 2 && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))))) {
+		audit_log_path_denied(AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT,
+				      S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode) ? "fifo"
+							      : "regular");
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 	return 0;
include/linux/audit.h +2 -1
index aee3dc9eb378..b3715e2ee1c5 100644
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ extern void		    audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab,
 					     const struct path *path);
 extern void		    audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab,
 					  char *key);
-extern void		    audit_log_link_denied(const char *operation);
+extern void		    audit_log_path_denied(int type,
+						  const char *operation);
 extern void		    audit_log_lost(const char *message);
 
 extern int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab);

include/linux/audit.h static inline void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab, · line 221

Quoted 5 lines
include/linux/audit.h +1 -1
@@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ static inline void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab,
 { }
 static inline void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
 { }
-static inline void audit_log_link_denied(const char *string)
+static inline void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *string);

Oops, typo above (should be no trailing ";"). Thanks 0day-bot! I didn't build without CONFIG_AUDIT. :)

-Kees

Quoted 50 lines
include/linux/audit.h +0 -0
 { }
 static inline int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 {
include/uapi/linux/audit.h +1 -0
index c89c6495983d..3ad935527177 100644
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@
 #define AUDIT_ANOM_PROMISCUOUS      1700 /* Device changed promiscuous mode */
 #define AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND            1701 /* Process ended abnormally */
 #define AUDIT_ANOM_LINK		    1702 /* Suspicious use of file links */
+#define AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT	    1703 /* Suspicious file creation */
 #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA	    1800 /* Data integrity verification */
 #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA    1801 /* Metadata integrity verification */
 #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS	    1802 /* Integrity enable status */
kernel/audit.c +6 -5
index da8dc0db5bd3..ed7402ac81b6 100644
@@ -2155,18 +2155,19 @@ void audit_log_task_info(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_task_info);
 
 /**
- * audit_log_link_denied - report a link restriction denial
- * @operation: specific link operation
+ * audit_log_path_denied - report a path restriction denial
+ * @type: audit message type (AUDIT_ANOM_LINK, AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT, etc)
+ * @operation: specific operation name
  */
-void audit_log_link_denied(const char *operation)
+void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *operation)
 {
 	struct audit_buffer *ab;
 
 	if (!audit_enabled || audit_dummy_context())
 		return;
 
-	/* Generate AUDIT_ANOM_LINK with subject, operation, outcome. */
-	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_ANOM_LINK);
+	/* Generate log with subject, operation, outcome. */
+	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, type);
 	if (!ab)
 		return;
 	audit_log_format(ab, "op=%s", operation);
Signature · 5 lines
2.17.1


-- 
Kees Cook
Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
maintainer
#4 lore raw
In reply to Kees Cook
Quoted 20 lines · Kees Cook

This renames the very specific audit_log_link_denied() to audit_log_path_denied() and adds the AUDIT_* type as an argument. This allows for the creation of the new AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT that can be used to report the fifo/regular file creation restrictions that were introduced in commit 30aba6656f61 ("namei: allow restricted O_CREAT of FIFOs and regular files"). Without this change, discovering that the restriction is enabled can be very challenging:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+jJMxvkqjXHy3DnV5MVhFTL2RUhg0WQ-XVFW3ngDQOdkFq0PA@mail.gmail.com

---
This is not a complete fix because reporting was broken in commit 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context")
which specifically goes against the intention of these records: they should _always_ be reported. If auditing isn't enabled, they should be ratelimited.

Quoted 2 lines

Instead of using audit, should this just go back to using pr_ratelimited()?

I'm going to ignore the rename and other aspects of this patch for the moment so we can focus on the topic of if/when/how these records should be emitted by the kernel.

Unfortunately, people tend to get very upset if audit emits *any* records when they haven't explicitly enabled audit, the significance of the record doesn't seem to matter, which is why you see patches like 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context"). We could consider converting some records to printk()s, rate-limited or not, but we need to balance this with the various security certifications which audit was created to satisfy. In some cases a printk() isn't sufficient.

Steve is probably the only one who really keeps track of the various auditing requirements of the different security certifications; what say you Steve on this issue with ANOM_CREAT records?

Signature · 2 lines
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
#5 lore raw
Quoted 37 lines · EDT Paul Moore
Quoted 20 lines · Kees Cook

This renames the very specific audit_log_link_denied() to audit_log_path_denied() and adds the AUDIT_* type as an argument. This allows for the creation of the new AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT that can be used to report the fifo/regular file creation restrictions that were introduced in commit 30aba6656f61 ("namei: allow restricted O_CREAT of FIFOs and regular files"). Without this change, discovering that the restriction is enabled can be very challenging:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+jJMxvkqjXHy3DnV5MVhFTL2RUhg0WQ-XVFW3ngDQO
[email protected]

---
This is not a complete fix because reporting was broken in commit 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context")
which specifically goes against the intention of these records: they should _always_ be reported. If auditing isn't enabled, they should be ratelimited.

Quoted 2 lines

Instead of using audit, should this just go back to using pr_ratelimited()?

I'm going to ignore the rename and other aspects of this patch for the moment so we can focus on the topic of if/when/how these records should be emitted by the kernel.

Unfortunately, people tend to get very upset if audit emits *any* records when they haven't explicitly enabled audit, the significance of the record doesn't seem to matter, which is why you see patches like 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context"). We could consider converting some records to printk()s, rate-limited or not, but we need to balance this with the various security certifications which audit was created to satisfy. In some cases a printk() isn't sufficient.

Quoted 3 lines

Steve is probably the only one who really keeps track of the various auditing requirements of the different security certifications; what say you Steve on this issue with ANOM_CREAT records?

Common Criteria and other security standards I track do not call out for anomoly detection. So, there are no requirements on this. That said, we do have other anomaly detections because they give early warning that something strange is happening. I think adding this event is a nice improvement as long as it obeys audit_enabled before emitting an event - for example, look at the AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND event.

-Steve

author
#6 lore raw
Quoted 42 lines · Steve Grubb
Quoted 37 lines · EDT Paul Moore
Quoted 20 lines · Kees Cook

This renames the very specific audit_log_link_denied() to audit_log_path_denied() and adds the AUDIT_* type as an argument. This allows for the creation of the new AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT that can be used to report the fifo/regular file creation restrictions that were introduced in commit 30aba6656f61 ("namei: allow restricted O_CREAT of FIFOs and regular files"). Without this change, discovering that the restriction is enabled can be very challenging:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+jJMxvkqjXHy3DnV5MVhFTL2RUhg0WQ-XVFW3ngDQO
[email protected]

---
This is not a complete fix because reporting was broken in commit 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context")
which specifically goes against the intention of these records: they should _always_ be reported. If auditing isn't enabled, they should be ratelimited.

Quoted 2 lines

Instead of using audit, should this just go back to using pr_ratelimited()?

I'm going to ignore the rename and other aspects of this patch for the moment so we can focus on the topic of if/when/how these records should be emitted by the kernel.

Unfortunately, people tend to get very upset if audit emits *any* records when they haven't explicitly enabled audit, the significance of the record doesn't seem to matter, which is why you see patches like 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context"). We could consider converting some records to printk()s, rate-limited or not, but we need to balance this with the various security certifications which audit was created to satisfy. In some cases a printk() isn't sufficient.

Quoted 3 lines

Steve is probably the only one who really keeps track of the various auditing requirements of the different security certifications; what say you Steve on this issue with ANOM_CREAT records?

Quoted 6 lines

Common Criteria and other security standards I track do not call out for anomoly detection. So, there are no requirements on this. That said, we do have other anomaly detections because they give early warning that something strange is happening. I think adding this event is a nice improvement as long as it obeys audit_enabled before emitting an event - for example, look at the AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND event.

Okay, so the patch is good as-is? (The "report things always" issue I will deal with separately. For now I'd just like to gain this anomaly detection corner case...)

Paul, what do you see as next steps here?

Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
maintainer
#7 lore raw
Quoted 50 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 42 lines · Steve Grubb
Quoted 37 lines · EDT Paul Moore
Quoted 20 lines · Kees Cook

This renames the very specific audit_log_link_denied() to audit_log_path_denied() and adds the AUDIT_* type as an argument. This allows for the creation of the new AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT that can be used to report the fifo/regular file creation restrictions that were introduced in commit 30aba6656f61 ("namei: allow restricted O_CREAT of FIFOs and regular files"). Without this change, discovering that the restriction is enabled can be very challenging:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+jJMxvkqjXHy3DnV5MVhFTL2RUhg0WQ-XVFW3ngDQO
[email protected]

---
This is not a complete fix because reporting was broken in commit 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context")
which specifically goes against the intention of these records: they should _always_ be reported. If auditing isn't enabled, they should be ratelimited.

Quoted 2 lines

Instead of using audit, should this just go back to using pr_ratelimited()?

I'm going to ignore the rename and other aspects of this patch for the moment so we can focus on the topic of if/when/how these records should be emitted by the kernel.

Unfortunately, people tend to get very upset if audit emits *any* records when they haven't explicitly enabled audit, the significance of the record doesn't seem to matter, which is why you see patches like 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context"). We could consider converting some records to printk()s, rate-limited or not, but we need to balance this with the various security certifications which audit was created to satisfy. In some cases a printk() isn't sufficient.

Quoted 3 lines

Steve is probably the only one who really keeps track of the various auditing requirements of the different security certifications; what say you Steve on this issue with ANOM_CREAT records?

Quoted 6 lines

Common Criteria and other security standards I track do not call out for anomoly detection. So, there are no requirements on this. That said, we do have other anomaly detections because they give early warning that something strange is happening. I think adding this event is a nice improvement as long as it obeys audit_enabled before emitting an event - for example, look at the AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND event.

Quoted 5 lines

Okay, so the patch is good as-is? (The "report things always" issue I will deal with separately. For now I'd just like to gain this anomaly detection corner case...)

Paul, what do you see as next steps here?

I'll reply back on the original post so I can more easily comment on the details of patch.

Signature · 2 lines
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
maintainer
#8 lore raw
In reply to Kees Cook
Quoted 28 lines · Kees Cook

This renames the very specific audit_log_link_denied() to audit_log_path_denied() and adds the AUDIT_* type as an argument. This allows for the creation of the new AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT that can be used to report the fifo/regular file creation restrictions that were introduced in commit 30aba6656f61 ("namei: allow restricted O_CREAT of FIFOs and regular files"). Without this change, discovering that the restriction is enabled can be very challenging:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+jJMxvkqjXHy3DnV5MVhFTL2RUhg0WQ-XVFW3ngDQOdkFq0PA@mail.gmail.com

---
This is not a complete fix because reporting was broken in commit 15564ff0a16e ("audit: make ANOM_LINK obey audit_enabled and audit_dummy_context")
which specifically goes against the intention of these records: they should _always_ be reported. If auditing isn't enabled, they should be ratelimited.

Instead of using audit, should this just go back to using pr_ratelimited()?

---
 fs/namei.c                 |  7 +++++--
 include/linux/audit.h      |  5 +++--
 include/uapi/linux/audit.h |  1 +
 kernel/audit.c             | 11 ++++++-----
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

...

fs/namei.c static int may_create_in_sticky(struct dentry * const dir, · line 1037

Quoted 12 lines
fs/namei.c +3 -0
index 671c3c1a3425..0e60f81e1d5a 100644
@@ -1031,6 +1031,9 @@ static int may_create_in_sticky(struct dentry * const dir,
            (dir->d_inode->i_mode & 0020 &&
             ((sysctl_protected_fifos >= 2 && S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode)) ||
              (sysctl_protected_regular >= 2 && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))))) {
+               audit_log_path_denied(AUDIT_ANOM_CREAT,
+                                     S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode) ? "fifo"
+                                                             : "regular");
                return -EACCES;

Other callers typically pass an operation value more closely tied to the syscall/function name, and that somewhat makes sense since the syscall/function name is often verb-ish. The code above, while helpful in the sense that it distinguishes between types of inodes, it doesn't give much indication about the "operation" which failed. I'm open to suggestions, but something like "sticky_create_fifo" seems more consistent which current usage. Thoughts?

include/linux/audit.h static inline void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab, · line 222

Quoted 11 lines
include/linux/audit.h +1 -1
index aee3dc9eb378..b3715e2ee1c5 100644
@@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ static inline void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab,
 { }
 static inline void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
 { }
-static inline void audit_log_link_denied(const char *string)
+static inline void audit_log_path_denied(int type, const char *string);
 { }

I probably wouldn't make you respin just for this, but since you may need to respin this anyway, you might as well fix the above.

Signature · 2 lines
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com