KVM: nVMX: Use SET_MSR_OR_WARN() to simplify failure logging
PATCH 1/1 KVM: nVMX: Use SET_MSR_OR_WARN() to simplify failure logging
commit 458151f65b4d ("KVM: nVMX: Use kvm_set_msr to load IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL on VM-Exit") introduced the SET_MSR_OR_WARN() macro to WARN when kvm_set_msr() fails. Replace other occurences of this pattern with the macro to remove the need of printing on failure.
--- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +2 -10
@@ -928,12 +928,8 @@ static u32 nested_vmx_load_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u32 count) __func__, i, e.index, e.reserved); goto fail; } -if (kvm_set_msr (vcpu, e.index, e.value)) { -pr_debug_ratelimited ( -"%s cannot write MSR (%u, 0x%x, 0x%llx)\n" , - __func__, i, e.index, e.value); +if (SET_MSR_OR_WARN (vcpu, e.index, e.value)) goto fail; - } }return 0 ; fail:
@@ -4175,12 +4171,8 @@ static void nested_vmx_restore_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) goto vmabort; } -if (kvm_set_msr (vcpu, h.index, h.value)) { -pr_debug_ratelimited ( -"%s WRMSR failed (%u, 0x%x, 0x%llx)\n" , - __func__, j, h.index, h.value); +if (SET_MSR_OR_WARN (vcpu, h.index, h.value)) goto vmabort; - } } }
Signature · 1 line
2.24.0.432.g9d3f5f5b63-goog
Quoted 29 lines · Oliver Upton
commit
458151f65b4d("KVM: nVMX: Usekvm_set_msrto loadIA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRLon VM-Exit") introduced theSET_MSR_OR_WARN()macro to WARN whenkvm_set_msr()fails. Replace other occurences of this pattern with the macro to remove the need of printing on failure.Signed-off-by Oliver Upton <[email protected]>--- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +1
-5@@ -928,12 +928,8 @@ static u32 nested_vmx_load_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u32 count) __func__, i, e.index, e.reserved); goto fail; } -if (kvm_set_msr (vcpu, e.index, e.value)) { -pr_debug_ratelimited ( -"%s cannot write MSR (%u, 0x%x, 0x%llx)\n" , - __func__, i, e.index, e.value); +if (SET_MSR_OR_WARN (vcpu, e.index, e.value)) goto fail; - } }return 0 ; fail:
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c static void nested_vmx_restore_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) · line 4174
Quoted 8 lines
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +1
-4@@ -4175,12 +4171,8 @@ static void nested_vmx_restore_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) goto vmabort; } -if (kvm_set_msr (vcpu, h.index, h.value)) { -pr_debug_ratelimited ( -"%s WRMSR failed (%u, 0x%x, 0x%llx)\n" , - __func__, j, h.index, h.value); +if (SET_MSR_OR_WARN (vcpu, h.index, h.value))
A few comments on commit 458151f65b4d, which I obviously waited to long too review :-)
I find the WARN part of SET_MSR_OR_WARN() to be misleading. For me, WARN means exactly that, an actual on WARN or WARN_ON, which has different implications, especially when running with KERN_PANIC_ON_WARN.
I also don't like incorporating SET_MSR in the macro as it's not obvious what action will be taken without looking at the macro itself. IMO the code is more readable if only the print is macrofied, e.g.:
if (kvm_set_msr(vcpu, h.index, h.value) NVMX_LOG_WRMSR_ERROR(h.index, h.value);
As for the original code, arguably it *should* do a full WARN and not simply log the error, as kvm_set_msr() should never fail if VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL was exposed to L1, unlike the above two cases where KVM is processing an L1-controlled MSR list, e.g.:
if (vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL) WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, vmcs12->host_ia32_perf_global_ctrl));
Back to this patch, this isn't simply consolidating code, it's promoting L1-controlled messages from pr_debug() to pr_warn().
What if you add a patch to remove SET_MSR_OR_WARN() and instead manually do the WARN_ON_ONCE() as above, and then introduce a new macro to consolidate the pr_debug_ratelimited() stuff in this patch?
Quoted 8 lines
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +0
-1goto vmabort; - } } }Signature · 1 line
2.24.0.432.g9d3f5f5b63-goog
Paolo Bonzini
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Sean Christopherson
As for the original code, arguably it *should* do a full WARN and not simply log the error, as
kvm_set_msr()should never fail ifVM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRLwas exposed to L1, unlike the above two cases where KVM is processing an L1-controlled MSR list, e.g.:if (vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL) WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, vmcs12->host_ia32_perf_global_ctrl));
Quoted 6 lines
Back to this patch, this isn't simply consolidating code, it's promoting L1-controlled messages from
pr_debug()topr_warn().What if you add a patch to remove
SET_MSR_OR_WARN()and instead manually do theWARN_ON_ONCE()as above, and then introduce a new macro to consolidate thepr_debug_ratelimited()stuff in this patch?
Should go without saying (Sean is a Certified Reviewer according to MAINTAINERS :)) but I agree.
Paolo
Quoted 10 lines · Paolo Bonzini
Quoted 9 lines · Sean Christopherson
As for the original code, arguably it *should* do a full WARN and not simply log the error, as
kvm_set_msr()should never fail ifVM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRLwas exposed to L1, unlike the above two cases where KVM is processing an L1-controlled MSR list, e.g.:if (vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL) WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, vmcs12->host_ia32_perf_global_ctrl));
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Back to this patch, this isn't simply consolidating code, it's promoting L1-controlled messages from
pr_debug()topr_warn().What if you add a patch to remove
SET_MSR_OR_WARN()and instead manually do theWARN_ON_ONCE()as above, and then introduce a new macro to consolidate thepr_debug_ratelimited()stuff in this patch?
Sean,
Thank you for the detailed review of this patch (as well as the last one that I snuck past you :-P). I'm in complete agreement with your sentiments, a follow-up is in order. I'll get that out soon.
Quoted 4 lines
Should go without saying (Sean is a Certified Reviewer according to
MAINTAINERS:)) but I agree.Paolo
Sean has been a great help in providing detailed reviews -- well deserving of the designation! Thank you for pinging this thread, Paolo.
--
Best,
Oliver