dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
--- drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c +1 -1
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ struct tegra_adma {const struct tegra_adma_chip_data *cdata;/* Last member of the structure */ -struct tegra_adma_chan channels[0 ]; +struct tegra_adma_chan channels[]; };static inline void tdma_write (struct tegra_adma *tdma,u32 reg,u32 val)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.0
Quoted 15 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; };By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Quoted 6 lines
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
Applied, thanks
Signature · 1 line
~Vinod