l2tp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 l2tp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
Lastly, fix the following checkpatch warning:
CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'
#50: FILE: net/l2tp/l2tp_core.h:119:
+ uint8_t priv[]; /* private data */
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
--- net/l2tp/l2tp_core.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
net/l2tp/l2tp_core.h +1 -1
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct l2tp_session {void (*recv_skb)(struct l2tp_session *session,struct sk_buff *skb,int data_len);void (*session_close)(struct l2tp_session *session);void (*show)(struct seq_file *m,void *priv); -uint8_t priv[0 ];/* private data */ +u8 priv[];/* private data */ };/* Describes the tunnel. It contains info to track all the associated
Signature · 1 line
2.25.0
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 07:30:45 -0600
Quoted 27 lines
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; };By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
Lastly, fix the following checkpatch warning:
CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'
#50: FILE:net/l2tp/l2tp_core.h:119:(quoted diff) +1
-0+ uint8_t priv[]; /* private data */
Quoted 7 lines
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit76497732932f("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Applied.