Skip to contentSkip to conversation

admtek: adm8211.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

PATCH In review Gustavo A. R. Silva 2 participants 2 messages Mar 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 admtek: adm8211.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

---
 drivers/net/wireless/admtek/adm8211.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/net/wireless/admtek/adm8211.h +1 -1
index 2c55c629de28..095625ecb8ff 100644
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ struct adm8211_eeprom {
 	u8	lpf_cutoff[14];		/* 0x62 */
 	u8	lnags_threshold[14];	/* 0x70 */
 	__le16	checksum;		/* 0x7E */
-	u8	cis_data[0];		/* 0x80, 384 bytes */
+	u8	cis_data[];		/* 0x80, 384 bytes */
 } __packed;
 
 struct adm8211_priv {
Signature · 1 line
2.23.0
#1 lore raw

Re: [PATCH][next] adm80211: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

Quoted 22 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

Quoted 7 lines

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

98d13639e695 adm80211: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

Signature · 3 lines
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11448169/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches