mm/hmm/test: add self tests for HMM
Subsystems (5)
v8 cover mm/hmm/test: add self tests for HMM
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Changes v7 -> v8:
Rebased to Jason's rdma/hmm tree, plus Jason's 6 patch series
"Small hmm_range_fault() cleanups".
Applied a number of changes from Jason's comments.
Changes v6 -> v7:
Rebased to linux-5.6.0-rc6
Reverted back to just using mmu_interval_notifier_insert() and making
this series only introduce HMM self tests.
Changes v5 -> v6:
Rebased to linux-5.5.0-rc6
Refactored mmu interval notifier patches Converted nouveau to use the new mmu interval notifier API
Changes v4 -> v5:
Added mmu interval notifier insert/remove/update callable from the
invalidate() callback
Updated HMM tests to use the new core interval notifier API
Changes v1 -> v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]
Ralph Campbell (3):
mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftests
MAINTAINERS | 3 + include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h | 59 ++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 12 + lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/test_hmm.c | 1177 +++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 3 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/config | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c | 1353 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 16 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh | 97 ++ 11 files changed, 2724 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h create mode 100644 lib/test_hmm.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v8 1/3 mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
This driver is for testing device private memory migration and devices which use hmm_range_fault() to access system memory via device page tables.
--- include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h | 59 ++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 12 + lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/test_hmm.c | 1177 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 1249 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h create mode 100644 lib/test_hmm.c
include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h new file +59 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */ +/* +* This is a module to test the HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management) API +* of the kernel. It allows a userspace program to expose its entire address +* space through the HMM test module device file. +*/ +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_HMM_DMIRROR_H +#define _UAPI_LINUX_HMM_DMIRROR_H + +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/ioctl.h> + +/* +* Structure to pass to the HMM test driver to mimic a device accessing +* system memory and ZONE_DEVICE private memory through device page tables. +* +* @addr: (in) user address the device will read/write +* @ptr: (in) user address where device data is copied to/from +* @npages: (in) number of pages to read/write +* @cpages: (out) number of pages copied +* @faults: (out) number of device page faults seen +*/ +struct hmm_dmirror_cmd { +__u64 addr; +__u64 ptr; +__u64 npages; +__u64 cpages; +__u64 faults; +}; + +/* Expose the address space of the calling process through hmm device file */ +#define HMM_DMIRROR_READ _IOWR('H', 0x00, struct hmm_dmirror_cmd) +#define HMM_DMIRROR_WRITE _IOWR('H', 0x01, struct hmm_dmirror_cmd) +#define HMM_DMIRROR_MIGRATE _IOWR('H', 0x02, struct hmm_dmirror_cmd) +#define HMM_DMIRROR_SNAPSHOT _IOWR('H', 0x03, struct hmm_dmirror_cmd) + +/* +* Values returned in hmm_dmirror_cmd.ptr for HMM_DMIRROR_SNAPSHOT. +* HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_ERROR: no valid mirror PTE for this page +* HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_NONE: unpopulated PTE or PTE with no access +* HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_READ: read-only PTE +* HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_WRITE: read/write PTE +* HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_ZERO: special read-only zero page +* HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_DEV_PRIVATE_LOCAL: Migrated device private page on the +* device the ioctl() is made +* HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_DEV_PRIVATE_REMOTE: Migrated device private page on some +* other device +*/ +enum { +HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_ERROR =0xFF , +HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_NONE =0x00 , +HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_READ =0x01 , +HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_WRITE =0x02 , +HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_ZERO =0x10 , +HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_DEV_PRIVATE_LOCAL =0x20 , +HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_DEV_PRIVATE_REMOTE =0x30 , +}; + +#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_HMM_DMIRROR_H */
lib/Kconfig.debug +12 -0
@@ -2162,6 +2162,18 @@ config TEST_MEMINIT If unsure, say N. +config TEST_HMM + tristate "Test HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management)" + depends on DEVICE_PRIVATE + select HMM_MIRROR + select MMU_NOTIFIER + help + This is a pseudo device driver solely for testing HMM. + Say M here if you want to build the HMM test module. + Doing so will allow you to run tools/testing/selftest/vm/hmm-tests. + + If unsure, say N. + endif # RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU config MEMTEST
lib/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_OBJAGG) += test_objagg.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_STACKINIT) += test_stackinit.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_BLACKHOLE_DEV) += test_blackhole_dev.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MEMINIT) += test_meminit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_HMM) += test_hmm.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch/
lib/test_hmm.c new file +1177 -0
1,177 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v8 2/3 mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
In reply to Ralph CampbellAdd some basic stand alone self tests for HMM.
The test program and shell scripts use the test_hmm.ko driver to exercise HMM functionality in the kernel.
--- tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 3 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/config | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c | 1353 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 16 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh | 97 ++ 6 files changed, 1472 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh
tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore +1 -0
@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ virtual_address_range gup_benchmark va_128TBswitch map_fixed_noreplace +hmm-tests
tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile +3 -0
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ CFLAGS = -Wall -I ../../../../usr/include $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) LDLIBS = -lrt TEST_GEN_FILES = compaction_test TEST_GEN_FILES += gup_benchmark +TEST_GEN_FILES += hmm-tests TEST_GEN_FILES += hugepage-mmap TEST_GEN_FILES += hugepage-shm TEST_GEN_FILES += map_hugetlb
@@ -31,6 +32,8 @@ TEST_FILES := test_vmalloc.sh KSFT_KHDR_INSTALL := 1 include ../lib.mk +$(OUTPUT)/hmm-tests: LDLIBS += -lhugetlbfs -lpthread + $(OUTPUT)/userfaultfd: LDLIBS += -lpthread $(OUTPUT)/mlock-random-test: LDLIBS += -lcap
tools/testing/selftests/vm/config +2 -0
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=y CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=m +CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE=y +CONFIG_TEST_HMM=y
tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c new file +1353 -0
1,353 lines not on this page · raw message
tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests +16 -0
@@ -270,4 +270,20 @@ else exitcode=1 fi +echo "------------------------------------" +echo "running HMM smoke test" +echo "------------------------------------" +./test_hmm.sh smoke +ret_val=$? + +if [ $ret_val -eq 0 ]; then + echo "[PASS]" +elif [ $ret_val -eq $ksft_skip ]; then + echo "[SKIP]" + exitcode=$ksft_skip +else + echo "[FAIL]" + exitcode=1 +fi + exit $exitcode
tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh new file +97 -0
97 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v8 3/3 MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftests
In reply to Ralph CampbellAdd files for HMM selftests.
--- MAINTAINERS | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
MAINTAINERS +3 -0
@@ -7610,7 +7610,10 @@ L: [email protected] S: Maintained F: mm/hmm* F: include/linux/hmm* +F: include/uapi/linux/test_hmm* F: Documentation/vm/hmm.rst +F: lib/test_hmm* +F: tools/testing/selftests/vm/*hmm* HOST AP DRIVER M: Jouni Malinen <[email protected]>
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Quoted 26 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Changes v7 -> v8:
Rebased to Jason's rdma/hmm tree, plus Jason's 6 patch series
"Smallhmm_range_fault()cleanups".
Applied a number of changes from Jason's comments.Changes v6 -> v7:
Rebased to linux-5.6.0-rc6
Reverted back to just usingmmu_interval_notifier_insert()and making
this series only introduce HMM self tests.Changes v5 -> v6:
Rebased to linux-5.5.0-rc6
Refactored mmu interval notifier patches Converted nouveau to use the new mmu interval notifier APIChanges v4 -> v5:
Added mmu interval notifier insert/remove/update callable from the
invalidate()callback
Updated HMM tests to use the new core interval notifier APIChanges v1 -> v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]
Quoted 7 lines
Ralph Campbell (3):
mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftestsMAINTAINERS | 3 + include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h | 59 ++
Isn't UAPI folder supposed to be for user-visible interfaces that follow the rule of non-breaking user space and not for selftests?
Thanks
Quoted 32 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 31 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Changes v7 -> v8:
Rebased to Jason's rdma/hmm tree, plus Jason's 6 patch series
"Smallhmm_range_fault()cleanups".
Applied a number of changes from Jason's comments.Changes v6 -> v7:
Rebased to linux-5.6.0-rc6
Reverted back to just usingmmu_interval_notifier_insert()and making
this series only introduce HMM self tests.Changes v5 -> v6:
Rebased to linux-5.5.0-rc6
Refactored mmu interval notifier patches Converted nouveau to use the new mmu interval notifier APIChanges v4 -> v5:
Added mmu interval notifier insert/remove/update callable from the
invalidate()callback
Updated HMM tests to use the new core interval notifier APIChanges v1 -> v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]Ralph Campbell (3):
mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftests
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
MAINTAINERS | 3 + include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h | 59 ++Isn't UAPI folder supposed to be for user-visible interfaces that follow the rule of non-breaking user space and not for selftests?
Thanks
Most of the other kernel module tests seem to invoke the test as part of the module load/init. I'm open to moving it if there is a more appropriate location.
Quoted 37 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 35 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 33 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Changes v7 -> v8:
Rebased to Jason's rdma/hmm tree, plus Jason's 6 patch series
"Smallhmm_range_fault()cleanups".
Applied a number of changes from Jason's comments.Changes v6 -> v7:
Rebased to linux-5.6.0-rc6
Reverted back to just usingmmu_interval_notifier_insert()and making
this series only introduce HMM self tests.Changes v5 -> v6:
Rebased to linux-5.5.0-rc6
Refactored mmu interval notifier patches Converted nouveau to use the new mmu interval notifier APIChanges v4 -> v5:
Added mmu interval notifier insert/remove/update callable from the
invalidate()callback
Updated HMM tests to use the new core interval notifier APIChanges v1 -> v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]Ralph Campbell (3):
mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftestsMAINTAINERS | 3 + include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h | 59 ++
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Isn't UAPI folder supposed to be for user-visible interfaces that follow the rule of non-breaking user space and not for selftests?
Thanks
Most of the other kernel module tests seem to invoke the test as part of the module load/init. I'm open to moving it if there is a more appropriate location.
Is it even possible to create a user mm_struct and put crazy things in it soley from a kernel module?
Jason
Quoted 41 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 40 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 38 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 26 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Changes v7 -> v8:
Rebased to Jason's rdma/hmm tree, plus Jason's 6 patch series
"Smallhmm_range_fault()cleanups".
Applied a number of changes from Jason's comments.Changes v6 -> v7:
Rebased to linux-5.6.0-rc6
Reverted back to just usingmmu_interval_notifier_insert()and making
this series only introduce HMM self tests.Changes v5 -> v6:
Rebased to linux-5.5.0-rc6
Refactored mmu interval notifier patches Converted nouveau to use the new mmu interval notifier APIChanges v4 -> v5:
Added mmu interval notifier insert/remove/update callable from the
invalidate()callback
Updated HMM tests to use the new core interval notifier APIChanges v1 -> v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]Quoted 7 lines
Ralph Campbell (3):
mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftestsMAINTAINERS | 3 + include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h | 59 ++Isn't UAPI folder supposed to be for user-visible interfaces that follow the rule of non-breaking user space and not for selftests?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks
Most of the other kernel module tests seem to invoke the test as part of the module load/init. I'm open to moving it if there is a more appropriate location.
Is it even possible to create a user
mm_structand put crazy things in it soley from a kernel module?
I didn't look very closely of what Ralph did in his patchsets, but from what I know, if you want in-kernel interface, you use in-kernel module, if you want to test user visible uapi, you write application. You don't create new UAPI just to test something in the kernel.
Can kunit help here?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/index.html
Thanks
Quoted 3 lines
Jason
Quoted 56 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 41 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 40 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 38 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 26 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Changes v7 -> v8:
Rebased to Jason's rdma/hmm tree, plus Jason's 6 patch series
"Smallhmm_range_fault()cleanups".
Applied a number of changes from Jason's comments.Changes v6 -> v7:
Rebased to linux-5.6.0-rc6
Reverted back to just usingmmu_interval_notifier_insert()and making
this series only introduce HMM self tests.Changes v5 -> v6:
Rebased to linux-5.5.0-rc6
Refactored mmu interval notifier patches Converted nouveau to use the new mmu interval notifier APIChanges v4 -> v5:
Added mmu interval notifier insert/remove/update callable from the
invalidate()callback
Updated HMM tests to use the new core interval notifier APIChanges v1 -> v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]Quoted 7 lines
Ralph Campbell (3):
mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftestsMAINTAINERS | 3 + include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h | 59 ++Isn't UAPI folder supposed to be for user-visible interfaces that follow the rule of non-breaking user space and not for selftests?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks
Most of the other kernel module tests seem to invoke the test as part of the module load/init. I'm open to moving it if there is a more appropriate location.
Is it even possible to create a user
mm_structand put crazy things in it soley from a kernel module?I didn't look very closely of what Ralph did in his patchsets, but from what I know, if you want in-kernel interface, you use in-kernel module, if you want to test user visible uapi, you write application. You don't create new UAPI just to test something in the kernel.
Quoted 7 lines
Can kunit help here?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/index.htmlThanks
Quoted 2 lines
Jason
The tests are intended to cover hmm_range_fault() and the migrate_vma_setup(), migrate_vma_pages(), and migrate_vma_finalize() kernel functions that a device driver can call to initialize hardware that has its own page tables. An example is a GPU where the code on the GPU sees the same address space as code running on the host CPU. This means the test has to have a user process to create a user process address space and a device driver to simulate some real device driver. The UAPI is for the user level test program to tell the kernel module test driver what to do and return results.
The complexity is all around maintaining coherent copies of the user process page tables while hardware and CPUs are accessing the same physical addresses. The pages are not pinned as with most I/O so system activity like pagein/pageout, LRU page reclaim, compaction, and the process calling functions like mmap(), mprotect(), madvise(), fork(), etc. all update the CPU and device page tables and would be very hard to duplicate in a kernel level only KUNIT style of test.
Quoted 48 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 47 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 45 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 32 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 31 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Changes v7 -> v8:
Rebased to Jason's rdma/hmm tree, plus Jason's 6 patch series
"Smallhmm_range_fault()cleanups".
Applied a number of changes from Jason's comments.Changes v6 -> v7:
Rebased to linux-5.6.0-rc6
Reverted back to just usingmmu_interval_notifier_insert()and making
this series only introduce HMM self tests.Changes v5 -> v6:
Rebased to linux-5.5.0-rc6
Refactored mmu interval notifier patches Converted nouveau to use the new mmu interval notifier APIChanges v4 -> v5:
Added mmu interval notifier insert/remove/update callable from the
invalidate()callback
Updated HMM tests to use the new core interval notifier APIChanges v1 -> v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]Ralph Campbell (3):
mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftestsQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
MAINTAINERS | 3 + include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h | 59 ++Isn't UAPI folder supposed to be for user-visible interfaces that follow the rule of non-breaking user space and not for selftests?
Thanks
Most of the other kernel module tests seem to invoke the test as part of the module load/init. I'm open to moving it if there is a more appropriate location.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Is it even possible to create a user
mm_structand put crazy things in it soley from a kernel module?I didn't look very closely of what Ralph did in his patchsets, but from what I know, if you want in-kernel interface, you use in-kernel module, if you want to test user visible uapi, you write application. You don't create new UAPI just to test something in the kernel.
That works fine as long as the in-kernel interfaces don't require user created objects like mm_struct and vmas, which is the case here.
So there must be some special uAPI between the kerne/user to make it work.
Jason
Quoted 2 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
We are at v8 of this series and noboy from the selftests land has commented, can someone help?
Jason
Quoted 2 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Here are some hunks I noticed while testing this:
lib/Kconfig.debug +2 -1
@@ -2201,7 +2201,8 @@ config TEST_MEMINIT config TEST_HMM tristate "Test HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management)" - depends on DEVICE_PRIVATE + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE + select DEVICE_PRIVATE select HMM_MIRROR select MMU_NOTIFIER help
It fails testing if TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not on
@@ -1097,6 +1071,7 @@ static int dmirror_device_init(struct dmirror_device *mdevice, int id)
spin_lock_init(&mdevice->lock);
cdev_init(&mdevice->cdevice, &dmirror_fops);
+ mdevice->cdevice.owner = THIS_MODULE;
ret = cdev_add(&mdevice->cdevice, dev, 1); if (ret)
return ret;
The use of cdev without a struct device is super weird, but it still needs this
tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh +1 -1
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ run_smoke() echo "Running smoke test. Note, this test provides basic coverage." load_driver - ./hmm-tests + $(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/hmm-tests unload_driver }
Make it runnably reliably
Jason
Quoted 48 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 2 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Here are some hunks I noticed while testing this:
lib/Kconfig.debug +2
-1@@ -2201,7 +2201,8 @@ config TEST_MEMINIT config TEST_HMM tristate "Test HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management)" - depends on DEVICE_PRIVATE + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE + select DEVICE_PRIVATE select HMM_MIRROR select MMU_NOTIFIER helpIt fails testing if
TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGEis not onlib/Kconfig.debug +1
-0@@ -1097,6 +1071,7 @@ static int dmirror_device_init(struct dmirror_device *mdevice, int id) spin_lock_init(&mdevice->lock); cdev_init(&mdevice->cdevice, &dmirror_fops); + mdevice->cdevice.owner = THIS_MODULE; ret = cdev_add(&mdevice->cdevice, dev, 1); if (ret) return ret;The use of cdev without a struct device is super weird, but it still needs this
tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ run_smoke() echo "Running smoke test. Note, this test provides basic coverage." load_driver - ./hmm-tests + $(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/hmm-tests unload_driver }Make it runnably reliably
Quoted 1 line
Jason
Thanks for the fixes. I'll apply these and send a v9.
I will also add missing calls to release_mem_region() to free the reserved device private addresses.
Quoted 45 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 43 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 2 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Here are some hunks I noticed while testing this:
lib/Kconfig.debug +2
-1@@ -2201,7 +2201,8 @@ config TEST_MEMINIT config TEST_HMM tristate "Test HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management)" - depends on DEVICE_PRIVATE + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE + select DEVICE_PRIVATE select HMM_MIRROR select MMU_NOTIFIER helpIt fails testing if
TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGEis not onlib/Kconfig.debug +1
-0@@ -1097,6 +1071,7 @@ static int dmirror_device_init(struct dmirror_device *mdevice, int id) spin_lock_init(&mdevice->lock); cdev_init(&mdevice->cdevice, &dmirror_fops); + mdevice->cdevice.owner = THIS_MODULE; ret = cdev_add(&mdevice->cdevice, dev, 1); if (ret) return ret;The use of cdev without a struct device is super weird, but it still needs this
tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ run_smoke() echo "Running smoke test. Note, this test provides basic coverage." load_driver - ./hmm-tests + $(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/hmm-tests unload_driver }
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Make it runnably reliably
Jason
Thanks for the fixes. I'll apply these and send a v9.
I will also add missing calls torelease_mem_region()to free the reserved device private addresses.
If you decide to ignore my request to avoid addition of special header file to UAPI, at least don't copy and install that file without some special CONFIG option (TEST_HMM ???) requested by the users. It also will be good to get Acked-by on this change from HMM people.
However, I still think that include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h opens pandora box of having UAPI files without real promise to keep it backward compatible.
Thanks
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 52 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 43 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 41 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 2 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Here are some hunks I noticed while testing this:
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
lib/Kconfig.debug +2
-1@@ -2201,7 +2201,8 @@ config TEST_MEMINIT config TEST_HMM tristate "Test HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management)" - depends on DEVICE_PRIVATE + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE + select DEVICE_PRIVATE select HMM_MIRROR select MMU_NOTIFIER helpIt fails testing if
TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGEis not on(quoted diff) +1
-0@@ -1097,6 +1071,7 @@ static int dmirror_device_init(struct dmirror_device *mdevice, int id) spin_lock_init(&mdevice->lock); cdev_init(&mdevice->cdevice, &dmirror_fops); + mdevice->cdevice.owner = THIS_MODULE; ret = cdev_add(&mdevice->cdevice, dev, 1); if (ret) return ret;The use of cdev without a struct device is super weird, but it still needs this
tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh +2
-1+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ run_smoke() echo "Running smoke test. Note, this test provides basic coverage." load_driver - ./hmm-tests + $(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/hmm-tests unload_driver }Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Make it runnably reliably
Jason
Thanks for the fixes. I'll apply these and send a v9.
I will also add missing calls torelease_mem_region()to free the reserved device private addresses.
Quoted 8 lines
If you decide to ignore my request to avoid addition of special header file to UAPI, at least don't copy and install that file without some special CONFIG option (
TEST_HMM???) requested by the users. It also will be good to get Acked-by on this change from HMM people.However, I still think that
include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.hopens pandora box of having UAPI files without real promise to keep it backward compatible.
It would be nice if we could put the header outside the uapi directory and outside the install machinery
Maybe for now hackery some relative include like
#include "../../../lib/hmm_test_uapi.h"
?
I don't see any sane way to avoid the dedicate module and special ioctl though.
Jason
Quoted 59 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 45 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 43 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 2 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Here are some hunks I noticed while testing this:
lib/Kconfig.debug +2
-1@@ -2201,7 +2201,8 @@ config TEST_MEMINIT config TEST_HMM tristate "Test HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management)" - depends on DEVICE_PRIVATE + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE + select DEVICE_PRIVATE select HMM_MIRROR select MMU_NOTIFIER helpIt fails testing if
TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGEis not onlib/Kconfig.debug +1
-0@@ -1097,6 +1071,7 @@ static int dmirror_device_init(struct dmirror_device *mdevice, int id) spin_lock_init(&mdevice->lock); cdev_init(&mdevice->cdevice, &dmirror_fops); + mdevice->cdevice.owner = THIS_MODULE; ret = cdev_add(&mdevice->cdevice, dev, 1); if (ret) return ret;The use of cdev without a struct device is super weird, but it still needs this
tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ run_smoke() echo "Running smoke test. Note, this test provides basic coverage." load_driver - ./hmm-tests + $(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/hmm-tests unload_driver }Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Make it runnably reliably
Jason
Thanks for the fixes. I'll apply these and send a v9.
I will also add missing calls torelease_mem_region()to free the reserved device private addresses.If you decide to ignore my request to avoid addition of special header file to UAPI, at least don't copy and install that file without some special CONFIG option (
TEST_HMM???) requested by the users. It also will be good to get Acked-by on this change from HMM people.
Quoted 5 lines
However, I still think that
include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.hopens pandora box of having UAPI files without real promise to keep it backward compatible.Thanks
I think that is a valid point. I would expect the test<->driver UAPI to track the kernel version since the sources are "released" together. I suppose a version number could be included in the request structure to handle mismatch driver and test program but that may be overkill.
Are you suggesting that include/linux/test_hmm.h is a better location?
Quoted 65 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 63 lines · Leon Romanovsky
Quoted 45 lines · Ralph Campbell
Quoted 43 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 2 lines · Ralph Campbell
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.
Here are some hunks I noticed while testing this:
lib/Kconfig.debug +2
-1@@ -2201,7 +2201,8 @@ config TEST_MEMINIT config TEST_HMM tristate "Test HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management)" - depends on DEVICE_PRIVATE + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE + select DEVICE_PRIVATE select HMM_MIRROR select MMU_NOTIFIER helpIt fails testing if
TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGEis not onlib/Kconfig.debug +1
-0@@ -1097,6 +1071,7 @@ static int dmirror_device_init(struct dmirror_device *mdevice, int id) spin_lock_init(&mdevice->lock); cdev_init(&mdevice->cdevice, &dmirror_fops); + mdevice->cdevice.owner = THIS_MODULE; ret = cdev_add(&mdevice->cdevice, dev, 1); if (ret) return ret;The use of cdev without a struct device is super weird, but it still needs this
tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh +1
-1@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ run_smoke() echo "Running smoke test. Note, this test provides basic coverage." load_driver - ./hmm-tests + $(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/hmm-tests unload_driver }Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Make it runnably reliably
Jason
Thanks for the fixes. I'll apply these and send a v9.
I will also add missing calls torelease_mem_region()to free the reserved device private addresses.If you decide to ignore my request to avoid addition of special header file to UAPI, at least don't copy and install that file without some special CONFIG option (
TEST_HMM???) requested by the users. It also will be good to get Acked-by on this change from HMM people.However, I still think that
include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.hopens pandora box of having UAPI files without real promise to keep it backward compatible.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Thanks
I think that is a valid point. I would expect the test<->driver UAPI to track the kernel version since the sources are "released" together. I suppose a version number could be included in the request structure to handle mismatch driver and test program but that may be overkill.
Yes, it is really overkill.
Quoted 1 line
Are you suggesting that
include/linux/test_hmm.his a better location?
It is one of options, another option maybe similar to that is done in scripts/mod/modpost.c [1], where C file is generated on the fly.