devfreq: Use lockdep asserts instead of manual checks for locked mutex
PATCH 1/1 devfreq: Use lockdep asserts instead of manual checks for locked mutex
Instead of warning when mutex_is_locked(), just use the lockdep framework. The code is smaller and checks could be disabled for production environments (it is useful only during development).
Put asserts at beginning of function, even before validating arguments.
The behavior of update_devfreq() is now changed because lockdep assert will only print a warning, not return with EINVAL.
--- drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c +7 -10
@@ -60,12 +60,12 @@ static struct devfreq *find_device_devfreq(struct device *dev) {struct devfreq *tmp_devfreq; +lockdep_assert_held (&devfreq_list_lock); +if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (dev)) {pr_err ("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n" , __func__);return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); } -WARN (!mutex_is_locked (&devfreq_list_lock), -"devfreq_list_lock must be locked." );list_for_each_entry (tmp_devfreq, &devfreq_list, node) {if (tmp_devfreq->dev.parent == dev)
@@ -258,12 +258,12 @@ static struct devfreq_governor *find_devfreq_governor(const char *name) {struct devfreq_governor *tmp_governor; +lockdep_assert_held (&devfreq_list_lock); +if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (name)) {pr_err ("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n" , __func__);return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); } -WARN (!mutex_is_locked (&devfreq_list_lock), -"devfreq_list_lock must be locked." );list_for_each_entry (tmp_governor, &devfreq_governor_list, node) {if (!strncmp (tmp_governor->name, name,DEVFREQ_NAME_LEN ))
@@ -289,12 +289,12 @@ static struct devfreq_governor *try_then_request_governor(const char *name)struct devfreq_governor *governor;int err =0 ; +lockdep_assert_held (&devfreq_list_lock); +if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (name)) {pr_err ("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n" , __func__);return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); } -WARN (!mutex_is_locked (&devfreq_list_lock), -"devfreq_list_lock must be locked." ); governor =find_devfreq_governor (name);if (IS_ERR (governor)) {
@@ -392,10 +392,7 @@ int update_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq)int err =0 ;u32 flags =0 ; -if (!mutex_is_locked (&devfreq->lock)) { -WARN (true,"devfreq->lock must be locked by the caller.\n" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } +lockdep_assert_held (&devfreq->lock);if (!devfreq->governor)return -EINVAL ;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Chanwoo Choi
maintainerHi Krzysztof,
Quoted 66 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Instead of warning when
mutex_is_locked(), just use the lockdep framework. The code is smaller and checks could be disabled for production environments (it is useful only during development).Put asserts at beginning of function, even before validating arguments.
The behavior of
update_devfreq()is now changed because lockdep assert will only print a warning, not return with EINVAL.Signed-off-by Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>--- drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c +6
-6@@ -60,12 +60,12 @@ static struct devfreq *find_device_devfreq(struct device *dev) {struct devfreq *tmp_devfreq; +lockdep_assert_held (&devfreq_list_lock); +if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (dev)) {pr_err ("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n" , __func__);return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); } -WARN (!mutex_is_locked (&devfreq_list_lock), -"devfreq_list_lock must be locked." );list_for_each_entry (tmp_devfreq, &devfreq_list, node) {if (tmp_devfreq->dev.parent == dev)@@ -258,12 +258,12 @@ static struct devfreq_governor *find_devfreq_governor(const char *name) {struct devfreq_governor *tmp_governor; +lockdep_assert_held (&devfreq_list_lock); +if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (name)) {pr_err ("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n" , __func__);return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); } -WARN (!mutex_is_locked (&devfreq_list_lock), -"devfreq_list_lock must be locked." );list_for_each_entry (tmp_governor, &devfreq_governor_list, node) {if (!strncmp (tmp_governor->name, name,DEVFREQ_NAME_LEN ))@@ -289,12 +289,12 @@ static struct devfreq_governor *try_then_request_governor(const char *name)struct devfreq_governor *governor;int err =0 ; +lockdep_assert_held (&devfreq_list_lock); +if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (name)) {pr_err ("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n" , __func__);return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); } -WARN (!mutex_is_locked (&devfreq_list_lock), -"devfreq_list_lock must be locked." ); governor =find_devfreq_governor (name);if (IS_ERR (governor)) {@@ -392,10 +392,7 @@ int update_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq)int err =0 ;
drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c int update_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq) · line 398
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c +1
-4u32 flags =0 ; -if (!mutex_is_locked (&devfreq->lock)) { -WARN (true,"devfreq->lock must be locked by the caller.\n" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } +lockdep_assert_held (&devfreq->lock);if (!devfreq->governor)return -EINVAL ;
It is reasonable. It looks good.
Applied it. Thank
Signature · 3 lines
Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics