Patch "mm/mmu_notifier: fix mmget() assert in __mmu_interval_notifier_insert" has been added to the 5.8-stable tree
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 8 lines · Sasha Levin
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm/mmu_notifier: fixmmget()assert in__mmu_interval_notifier_insertto the 5.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
Quoted 6 lines
The filename of the patch is:
mm-mmu_notifier-fix-mmget-assert-in-__mmu_interval_n.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.8 subdirectory.If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
This patch has no reason to go into the stable trees. It just makes an assertion stricter (mm_users>0 implies mm_count>0). It only has an effect if your kernel is horrendously broken anyway.
Please take it out of the stable queue.
Sasha Levin
maintainerQuoted 13 lines · Jann Horn
Quoted 12 lines · Sasha Levin
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm/mmu_notifier: fixmmget()assert in__mmu_interval_notifier_insertto the 5.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summaryThe filename of the patch is:
mm-mmu_notifier-fix-mmget-assert-in-__mmu_interval_n.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.8 subdirectory.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
This patch has no reason to go into the stable trees. It just makes an assertion stricter (mm_users>0 implies mm_count>0). It only has an effect if your kernel is horrendously broken anyway.
Please take it out of the stable queue.
Will do.
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Sasha