bcache: explicitly make cache_set only have single cache
Hello Coly Li,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch 697e23495c94: "bcache: explicitly make cache_set only have single cache" from Oct 1, 2020, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
drivers/md/bcache/super.c:2157 register_cache_set()
error: we previously assumed 'c->cache' could be null (see line 2125)drivers/md/bcache/super.c
2124 if (!memcmp(c->set_uuid, ca->sb.set_uuid, 16)) {
2125 if (c->cache)
^^^^^^^^
2126 return "duplicate cache set member";
2127
2128 goto found;
^^^^^^^^^^"c->cache" is NULL on this path.
2129 }
2130
2131 c = bch_cache_set_alloc(&ca->sb);
2132 if (!c)
2133 return err;
2134
2135 err = "error creating kobject";
2136 if (kobject_add(&c->kobj, bcache_kobj, "%pU", c->set_uuid) ||
2137 kobject_add(&c->internal, &c->kobj, "internal"))
2138 goto err;
2139
2140 if (bch_cache_accounting_add_kobjs(&c->accounting, &c->kobj))
2141 goto err;
2142
2143 bch_debug_init_cache_set(c);
2144
2145 list_add(&c->list, &bch_cache_sets);
2146 found:
2147 sprintf(buf, "cache%i", ca->sb.nr_this_dev);
2148 if (sysfs_create_link(&ca->kobj, &c->kobj, "set") ||
2149 sysfs_create_link(&c->kobj, &ca->kobj, buf))
2150 goto err;
2151
2152 kobject_get(&ca->kobj);
2153 ca->set = c;
2154 ca->set->cache = ca;
2155
2156 err = "failed to run cache set";
2157 if (run_cache_set(c) < 0)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
c->cache gets dereferenced inside this function without checking when we do "c->nbuckets = ca->sb.nbuckets;".
2158 goto err;
2159
regards,
dan carpenter
Quoted 51 lines · Dan Carpenter
Hello Coly Li,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch
697e23495c94: "bcache: explicitly makecache_setonly have single cache" from Oct 1, 2020, leads to the following Smatch complaint:drivers/md/bcache/super.c:2157 register_cache_set() error: we previously assumed 'c->cache' could be null (see line 2125)
drivers/md/bcache/super.c
2124 if (!memcmp(c->set_uuid,ca->sb.set_uuid, 16)) {
2125 if (c->cache)^^^^^^^^2126 return "duplicate cache set member";
21272128 goto found; ^^^^^^^^^^"
c->cache" is NULL on this path.2129 }
2130
2131 c =bch_cache_set_alloc(&ca->sb);
2132 if (!c)
2133 return err;
2134
2135 err = "error creating kobject";
2136 if (kobject_add(&c->kobj, bcache_kobj, "%pU", c->set_uuid)||
2137kobject_add(&c->internal, &c->kobj, "internal"))
2138 goto err;
2139
2140 if (bch_cache_accounting_add_kobjs(&c->accounting, &c->kobj))
2141 goto err;
2142
2143bch_debug_init_cache_set(c);
2144
2145list_add(&c->list, &bch_cache_sets);
2146 found:
2147sprintf(buf, "cache%i", ca->sb.nr_this_dev);
2148 if (sysfs_create_link(&ca->kobj, &c->kobj, "set")||
2149sysfs_create_link(&c->kobj, &ca->kobj, buf))
2150 goto err;
2151
2152kobject_get(&ca->kobj);
2153ca->set= c;
2154ca->set->cache= ca;
2155
2156 err = "failed to run cache set";
2157 if (run_cache_set(c)< 0)
Quoted 6 lines
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
c->cachegets dereferenced inside this function without checking when we do "c->nbuckets=ca->sb.nbuckets;".2158 goto err;
2159
Hi Dan,
Hmm, let me check. It seems the trick is at line 2153 and 2154,
2153 ca->set = c;
2154 ca->set->cache = ca;
"ca->set->cache = ca" equals to "c->cache = ca", so c->cache is initialized and safe. Yes we can write line 2154 as "c->cache = ca", but my motivation was little, event for readability.
Thanks.
Coly Li
Quoted 62 lines · Coly Li
Quoted 51 lines · Dan Carpenter
Hello Coly Li,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch
697e23495c94: "bcache: explicitly makecache_setonly have single cache" from Oct 1, 2020, leads to the following Smatch complaint:drivers/md/bcache/super.c:2157 register_cache_set() error: we previously assumed 'c->cache' could be null (see line 2125)
drivers/md/bcache/super.c
2124 if (!memcmp(c->set_uuid,ca->sb.set_uuid, 16)) {
2125 if (c->cache)^^^^^^^^2126 return "duplicate cache set member";
21272128 goto found; ^^^^^^^^^^"
c->cache" is NULL on this path.2129 }
2130
2131 c =bch_cache_set_alloc(&ca->sb);
2132 if (!c)
2133 return err;
2134
2135 err = "error creating kobject";
2136 if (kobject_add(&c->kobj, bcache_kobj, "%pU", c->set_uuid)||
2137kobject_add(&c->internal, &c->kobj, "internal"))
2138 goto err;
2139
2140 if (bch_cache_accounting_add_kobjs(&c->accounting, &c->kobj))
2141 goto err;
2142
2143bch_debug_init_cache_set(c);
2144
2145list_add(&c->list, &bch_cache_sets);
2146 found:
2147sprintf(buf, "cache%i", ca->sb.nr_this_dev);
2148 if (sysfs_create_link(&ca->kobj, &c->kobj, "set")||
2149sysfs_create_link(&c->kobj, &ca->kobj, buf))
2150 goto err;
2151
2152kobject_get(&ca->kobj);
2153ca->set= c;
2154ca->set->cache= ca;
2155
2156 err = "failed to run cache set";
2157 if (run_cache_set(c)< 0)Quoted 6 lines
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
c->cachegets dereferenced inside this function without checking when we do "c->nbuckets=ca->sb.nbuckets;".2158 goto err;
2159Hi Dan,
Quoted 8 lines
Hmm, let me check. It seems the trick is at line 2153 and 2154,
2153
ca->set= c;
2154ca->set->cache= ca;"
ca->set->cache= ca" equals to "c->cache= ca", soc->cacheis initialized and safe. Yes we can write line 2154 as "c->cache= ca", but my motivation was little, event for readability.
Argh.... Of course. Sorry, for the noise. I feel like this must be a regression in Smatch which is why it didn't generate a warning earlier. I'll look into it.
regards,
dan carpenter