rtc: ds1307: Remove non-valid ACPI IDs
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/3 rtc: ds1307: Remove non-valid ACPI IDs
The commit 9c19b8930d2c ("rtc: ds1307: Add ACPI support") added non-valid ACPI IDs (all of them abusing ACPI specification). Moreover there is no even a single evidence that vendor registered any of such device.
Remove broken ACPI IDs from the driver. For prototyping one may use PRP0001 with device tree defined bindings. The following patches will add support of that to the driver.
--- drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 36 +----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c +1 -35
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@* Copyright (C) 2012 Bertrand Achard (nvram access fixes) */ -#include <linux/acpi.h> #include <linux/bcd.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/init.h>
@@ -1169,31 +1168,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id ds1307_of_match[] = {MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, ds1307_of_match);#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -static const struct acpi_device_id ds1307_acpi_ids[] = { - { .id ="DS1307" , .driver_data = ds_1307 }, - { .id ="DS1308" , .driver_data = ds_1308 }, - { .id ="DS1337" , .driver_data = ds_1337 }, - { .id ="DS1338" , .driver_data = ds_1338 }, - { .id ="DS1339" , .driver_data = ds_1339 }, - { .id ="DS1388" , .driver_data = ds_1388 }, - { .id ="DS1340" , .driver_data = ds_1340 }, - { .id ="DS1341" , .driver_data = ds_1341 }, - { .id ="DS3231" , .driver_data = ds_3231 }, - { .id ="M41T0" , .driver_data = m41t0 }, - { .id ="M41T00" , .driver_data = m41t00 }, - { .id ="M41T11" , .driver_data = m41t11 }, - { .id ="MCP7940X" , .driver_data = mcp794xx }, - { .id ="MCP7941X" , .driver_data = mcp794xx }, - { .id ="PT7C4338" , .driver_data = ds_1307 }, - { .id ="RX8025" , .driver_data = rx_8025 }, - { .id ="ISL12057" , .driver_data = ds_1337 }, - { .id ="RX8130" , .driver_data = rx_8130 }, - { } -}; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, ds1307_acpi_ids); -#endif -/* * The ds1337 and ds1339 both have two alarms, but we only use the first * one (with a "seconds" field). For ds1337 we expect nINTA is our alarm
@@ -1794,14 +1768,7 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client, chip = &chips[id->driver_data]; ds1307->type = id->driver_data; }else { -const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id; - - acpi_id =acpi_match_device (ACPI_PTR (ds1307_acpi_ids), - ds1307->dev); -if (!acpi_id) -return -ENODEV ; - chip = &chips[acpi_id->driver_data]; - ds1307->type = acpi_id->driver_data; +return -ENODEV ; } want_irq = client->irq >0 && chip->alarm;
@@ -2065,7 +2032,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ds1307_driver = { .driver = { .name = "rtc-ds1307", .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ds1307_of_match), - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ds1307_acpi_ids), }, .probe = ds1307_probe, .id_table = ds1307_id,
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH 2/3 rtc: ds1307: Make use of device properties
Device property API allows to gather device resources from different sources, such as ACPI. Convert the drivers to unleash the power of device property API.
--- drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c +21 -16
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@#include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/property.h> #include <linux/rtc/ds1307.h> #include <linux/rtc.h> #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -30,6 +31,7 @@* That's a natural job for a factory or repair bench. */ enum ds_type { + unknown_ds_type,/* always first and 0 */ ds_1307, ds_1308, ds_1337,
@@ -1613,8 +1615,11 @@ static struct clk_init_data ds3231_clks_init[] = {static int ds3231_clks_register (struct ds1307 *ds1307) { -struct device_node *node = ds1307->dev->of_node;struct clk_onecell_data *onecell; +const char *ds3231_clks_names[] = { + [DS3231_CLK_SQW ] = ds3231_clks_init[DS3231_CLK_SQW ].name, + [DS3231_CLK_32KHZ ] = ds3231_clks_init[DS3231_CLK_32KHZ ].name, + };int i; onecell =devm_kzalloc (ds1307->dev,sizeof (*onecell),GFP_KERNEL );
@@ -1627,6 +1632,11 @@ static int ds3231_clks_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)if (!onecell->clks)return -ENOMEM ; +/* optional override of the clockname */ +device_property_read_string_array (ds1307->dev,"clock-output-names" , + ds3231_clks_names, +ARRAY_SIZE (ds3231_clks_names)); +for (i =0 ; i <ARRAY_SIZE (ds3231_clks_init); i++) {struct clk_init_data init = ds3231_clks_init[i];
@@ -1637,9 +1647,7 @@ static int ds3231_clks_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)if (i ==DS3231_CLK_SQW &&test_bit (HAS_ALARM , &ds1307->flags))continue ; -/* optional override of the clockname */ -of_property_read_string_index (node,"clock-output-names" , i, - &init.name); + init.name = ds3231_clks_names[i]; ds1307->clks[i].init = &init; onecell->clks[i] = devm_clk_register(ds1307->dev,
@@ -1648,10 +1656,9 @@ static int ds3231_clks_register(struct ds1307 *ds1307)return PTR_ERR (onecell->clks[i]); } -if (!node) -return 0 ; - -of_clk_add_provider (node, of_clk_src_onecell_get, onecell); +if (ds1307->dev->of_node) +of_clk_add_provider (ds1307->dev->of_node, + of_clk_src_onecell_get, onecell);return 0 ; }
@@ -1735,6 +1742,7 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) {struct ds1307 *ds1307; +const void *match;int err = -ENODEV ;int tmp;const struct chip_desc *chip;
@@ -1760,9 +1768,9 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client,i2c_set_clientdata (client, ds1307); -if (client->dev.of_node) { - ds1307->type = (enum ds_type ) -of_device_get_match_data (&client->dev); + match =device_get_match_data (&client->dev); +if (match) { + ds1307->type = (enum ds_type )match; chip = &chips[ds1307->type]; }else if (id) { chip = &chips[id->driver_data];
@@ -1786,7 +1794,6 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client, trickle_charger_setup); } -#ifdef CONFIG_OF /* * For devices with no IRQ directly connected to the SoC, the RTC chip * can be forced as a wakeup source by stating that explicitly in
@@ -1795,10 +1802,8 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client,* This will guarantee the 'wakealarm' sysfs entry is available on the device, * if supported by the RTC. */ -if (chip->alarm &&of_property_read_bool (client->dev.of_node, -"wakeup-source" )) +if (chip->alarm &&device_property_read_bool (&client->dev,"wakeup-source" )) ds1307_can_wakeup_device = true; -#endif switch (ds1307->type) {case ds_1337:
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] rtc: ds1307: Make use of device properties
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c static struct clk_init_data ds3231_clks_init[] = { · line 1622
Quoted 7 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Device property API allows to gather device resources from different sources, such as ACPI. Convert the drivers to unleash the power of device property API.
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c +4
-0+const char *ds3231_clks_names[] = { + [DS3231_CLK_SQW ] = ds3231_clks_init[DS3231_CLK_SQW ].name, + [DS3231_CLK_32KHZ ] = ds3231_clks_init[DS3231_CLK_32KHZ ].name, + };
I realised I can do this slightly better, i.e. drop the names from the struct and move them here while declaring latter as static and moving outside of the function.
In any case I'll wait for comments for the rest and this patch before updating.
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
PATCH 3/3 rtc: ds1307: Drop of_match_ptr and CONFIG_OF protections
In reply to Andy ShevchenkoThese prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001. Drop them to remove this restriction.
Also added mod_devicetable.h include given use of struct of_device_id.
--- drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c +2 -4
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@#include <linux/bcd.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/property.h> #include <linux/rtc/ds1307.h> #include <linux/rtc.h>
@@ -1091,7 +1091,6 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id ds1307_id[] = { };MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (i2c, ds1307_id); -#ifdef CONFIG_OFstatic const struct of_device_id ds1307_of_match[] = { { .compatible ="dallas,ds1307" ,
@@ -1168,7 +1167,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id ds1307_of_match[] = { { } };MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, ds1307_of_match); -#endif /* * The ds1337 and ds1339 both have two alarms, but we only use the first
@@ -2036,7 +2034,7 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client,static struct i2c_driver ds1307_driver = { .driver = { .name ="rtc-ds1307" , - .of_match_table =of_match_ptr (ds1307_of_match), + .of_match_table = ds1307_of_match, }, .probe = ds1307_probe, .id_table = ds1307_id,
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Alexandre Belloni
maintainerHi,
Quoted 7 lines · Andy Shevchenko
The commit
9c19b8930d2c("rtc: ds1307: Add ACPI support") added non-valid ACPI IDs (all of them abusing ACPI specification). Moreover there is no even a single evidence that vendor registered any of such device.Remove broken ACPI IDs from the driver. For prototyping one may use PRP0001 with device tree defined bindings. The following patches will add support of that to the driver.
I'm intrigued, how does PRP0001 work? Where would the device tree come from?
You probably want to have a look at:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/[email protected]/T/#u
Signature · 3 lines
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Quoted 11 lines · Alexandre Belloni
Quoted 7 lines · Andy Shevchenko
The commit
9c19b8930d2c("rtc: ds1307: Add ACPI support") added non-valid ACPI IDs (all of them abusing ACPI specification). Moreover there is no even a single evidence that vendor registered any of such device.Remove broken ACPI IDs from the driver. For prototyping one may use PRP0001 with device tree defined bindings. The following patches will add support of that to the driver.
I'm intrigued, how does PRP0001 work? Where would the device tree come from?
From nowhere :-)
There is no device tree. The properties are coming from _DSD ACPI Method with compatible string provided. ACPI glue layer provides a mechanism to parse that and match against OF ID table (even when CONFIG_OF=n!).
More about PRP0001 is in documentation [1].
Quoted 2 lines
You probably want to have a look at:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/[email protected]/T/#u
Thanks for heads up!
I'll check that thread and answer there.
[1]: Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Rafael J. Wysocki
maintainerQuoted 2 lines · Andy Shevchenko
The commit
9c19b8930d2c("rtc: ds1307: Add ACPI support") added non-valid
s/non-valid/invalid/ ?
Quoted 2 lines
ACPI IDs (all of them abusing ACPI specification). Moreover there is no even a single evidence that vendor registered any of such device.
"not even" and "devices".
Quoted 2 lines
Remove broken ACPI IDs from the driver. For prototyping one may use PRP0001 with device tree defined bindings.
"with device properties adhering to a DT binding". ?
Quoted 80 lines
The following patches will add support of that to the driver.
Cc Tin Huynh <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 36 +----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c +1
-36@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@* Copyright (C) 2012 Bertrand Achard (nvram access fixes) */ -#include <linux/acpi.h> #include <linux/bcd.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/init.h> @@ -1169,31 +1168,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id ds1307_of_match[] = {MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, ds1307_of_match);#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -static const struct acpi_device_id ds1307_acpi_ids[] = { - { .id ="DS1307" , .driver_data = ds_1307 }, - { .id ="DS1308" , .driver_data = ds_1308 }, - { .id ="DS1337" , .driver_data = ds_1337 }, - { .id ="DS1338" , .driver_data = ds_1338 }, - { .id ="DS1339" , .driver_data = ds_1339 }, - { .id ="DS1388" , .driver_data = ds_1388 }, - { .id ="DS1340" , .driver_data = ds_1340 }, - { .id ="DS1341" , .driver_data = ds_1341 }, - { .id ="DS3231" , .driver_data = ds_3231 }, - { .id ="M41T0" , .driver_data = m41t0 }, - { .id ="M41T00" , .driver_data = m41t00 }, - { .id ="M41T11" , .driver_data = m41t11 }, - { .id ="MCP7940X" , .driver_data = mcp794xx }, - { .id ="MCP7941X" , .driver_data = mcp794xx }, - { .id ="PT7C4338" , .driver_data = ds_1307 }, - { .id ="RX8025" , .driver_data = rx_8025 }, - { .id ="ISL12057" , .driver_data = ds_1337 }, - { .id ="RX8130" , .driver_data = rx_8130 }, - { } -}; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, ds1307_acpi_ids); -#endif -/* * The ds1337 and ds1339 both have two alarms, but we only use the first * one (with a "seconds" field). For ds1337 we expect nINTA is our alarm @@ -1794,14 +1768,7 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client, chip = &chips[id->driver_data]; ds1307->type = id->driver_data; }else { -const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id; - - acpi_id =acpi_match_device (ACPI_PTR (ds1307_acpi_ids), - ds1307->dev); -if (!acpi_id) -return -ENODEV ; - chip = &chips[acpi_id->driver_data]; - ds1307->type = acpi_id->driver_data; +return -ENODEV ; } want_irq = client->irq >0 && chip->alarm;@@ -2065,7 +2032,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ds1307_driver = { .driver = { .name = "rtc-ds1307", .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ds1307_of_match), - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ds1307_acpi_ids), }, .probe = ds1307_probe, .id_table = ds1307_id, --2.28.0
Quoted 10 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 2 lines · Andy Shevchenko
The commit
9c19b8930d2c("rtc: ds1307: Add ACPI support") added non-valids/non-valid/invalid/ ?
Quoted 2 lines
ACPI IDs (all of them abusing ACPI specification). Moreover there is no even a single evidence that vendor registered any of such device.
Quoted 8 lines
"not even" and "devices".
Quoted 2 lines
Remove broken ACPI IDs from the driver. For prototyping one may use PRP0001 with device tree defined bindings.
"with device properties adhering to a DT binding". ?
Quoted 1 line
The following patches will add support of that to the driver.
Rafael, thanks for review, I will address them all in v2.
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko