powerpc/ptrace: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too
Subsystems (2)
Oleg Nesterov
maintainerv3 cover powerpc/ptrace: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too
Can we finally fix this problem? ;)
My previous attempt was ignored, see
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Now that gpr_get() was changed to use membuf API we can make a simpler fix.
Sorry, uncompiled/untested, I don't have a ppc machine.
Oleg.
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- include/linux/regset.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Oleg Nesterov
maintainerPATCH v3 1/2 powerpc/ptrace: simplify gpr_get/tm_cgpr_get
gpr_get() does membuf_write() twice to override pt_regs->msr in between. We can call membuf_write() once and change ->msr in the kernel buffer, this simplifies the code and the next fix.
The patch adds a new simple helper, membuf_at(offs), it returns the new membuf which can be safely used after membuf_write().
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c | 13 +++++-------- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 13 +++++-------- include/linux/regset.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +5 -8
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ int tm_cgpr_active(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset)int tm_cgpr_get (struct task_struct *target,const struct user_regset *regset,struct membuf to) { +struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); +if (!cpu_has_feature (CPU_FTR_TM ))return -ENODEV ;
@@ -97,17 +99,12 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,flush_altivec_to_thread (target);membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs, - offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); -membuf_store (&to,get_user_ckpt_msr (target)); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); -BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3) != - offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr) +sizeof (long )); +membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_ckpt_msr (target)); -membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs.orig_gpr3, -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3));return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) - -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); }/*
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +5 -8
@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ int ptrace_put_reg(struct task_struct *task, int regno, unsigned long data)static int gpr_get (struct task_struct *target,const struct user_regset *regset,struct membuf to) { +struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr));int i;if (target->thread.regs ==NULL )
@@ -228,17 +229,13 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, target->thread.regs->gpr[i] =NV_REG_POISON ; } -membuf_write (&to, target->thread.regs, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); -membuf_store (&to,get_user_msr (target)); +membuf_write (&to, target->thread.regs, +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); -BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3) != - offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr) +sizeof (long )); +membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_msr (target)); -membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3, -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3));return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) - -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); } static int gpr_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
include/linux/regset.h +12 -0
@@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ static inline int membuf_write(struct membuf *s, const void *v, size_t size)return s->left; } +static inline struct membuf membuf_at (const struct membuf *s,size_t offs) +{ +struct membuf n = *s; + +if (offs > n.left) + offs = n.left; + n.p += offs; + n.left -= offs; + +return n; +} +/* current s->p must be aligned for v; v must be a scalar */ #define membuf_store (s, v) \ ({ \
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
Oleg Nesterov
maintainerPATCH v3 2/2 powerpc/ptrace: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too
In reply to Oleg NesterovThe commit a8a4b03ab95f ("powerpc: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in ptrace & signals") changed ptrace_get_reg(PT_SOFTE) to report 0x1, but PTRACE_GETREGS still copies pt_regs->softe as is.
This is not consistent and this breaks the user-regs-peekpoke test from https://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests/
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c | 8 +++++++- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 8 +++++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +7 -1
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, struct membuf to) {struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +struct membuf to_softe =membuf_at (&to, + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe)); +#endif if (!cpu_has_feature (CPU_FTR_TM ))return -ENODEV ;
@@ -102,7 +106,9 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_ckpt_msr (target)); - +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +membuf_store (&to_softe,0x1ul ); +#endif return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); }
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +7 -1
@@ -218,6 +218,10 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, struct membuf to) {struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +struct membuf to_softe =membuf_at (&to, + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe)); +#endif int i;if (target->thread.regs ==NULL )
@@ -233,7 +237,9 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_msr (target)); - +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +membuf_store (&to_softe,0x1ul ); +#endif return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); }
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
Oleg Nesterov
maintainerQuoted 3 lines · Oleg Nesterov
This is not consistent and this breaks the user-regs-peekpoke test from https://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests/
See the test-case below.
Oleg.
/* Test case for PTRACE_SETREGS modifying the requested ragisters.
x86* counterpart of the s390* testcase `user-area-access.c'.
This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied warranty. In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages arising from the use of this software.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it freely. */
/* FIXME: EFLAGS should be tested restricted on the appropriate bits. */
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
#if defined __powerpc__ || defined __sparc__
# define user_regs_struct pt_regs #endif
#ifdef __ia64__
#define ia64_fpreg ia64_fpreg_DISABLE
#define pt_all_user_regs pt_all_user_regs_DISABLE
#endif /* __ia64__ */
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#ifdef __ia64__
#undef ia64_fpreg
#undef pt_all_user_regs
#endif /* __ia64__ */
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/user.h>
#if defined __i386__ || defined __x86_64__
#include <sys/debugreg.h>
#endif
#include <asm/unistd.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <error.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stddef.h>
/* ia64 has PTRACE_SETREGS but it has no USER_REGS_STRUCT. */ #if !defined PTRACE_SETREGS || defined __ia64__
int
main (void)
{
return 77;
}
#else /* PTRACE_SETREGS */
/* The minimal alignment we use for the random access ranges. */ #define REGALIGN (sizeof (long))
static pid_t child;
static void
cleanup (void)
{
if (child > 0)
kill (child, SIGKILL);
child = 0;
}
static voidhandler_fail (int signo)
{
cleanup ();
signal (SIGABRT, SIG_DFL);
abort ();
}
int
main (void)
{
long l;
int status, i;
pid_t pid;
union
{
struct user_regs_struct user;
unsigned char byte[sizeof (struct user_regs_struct)];
} u, u2;int start;
setbuf (stdout, NULL);
atexit (cleanup);
signal (SIGABRT, handler_fail);
signal (SIGALRM, handler_fail);
signal (SIGINT, handler_fail);
i = alarm (10);
assert (i == 0);
child = fork ();
switch (child)
{
case -1:
assert_perror (errno);
assert (0); case 0:
l = ptrace (PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL);
assert (l == 0);
// Prevent rt_sigprocmask() call called by glibc after raise().
syscall (__NR_tkill, getpid (), SIGSTOP);
assert (0);
default:
break;
}pid = waitpid (child, &status, 0); assert (pid == child); assert (WIFSTOPPED (status)); assert (WSTOPSIG (status) == SIGSTOP);
/* Fetch U2 from the inferior. */
errno = 0;
# ifdef __sparc__ l = ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, child, &u2.user, NULL); # else l = ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, child, NULL, &u2.user); # endif assert_perror (errno); assert (l == 0);
/* Initialize U with a pattern. */
for (i = 0; i < sizeof u.byte; i++)
u.byte[i] = i;
#ifdef __x86_64__
/* non-EFLAGS modifications fail with EIO, EFLAGS gets back different. */ u.user.eflags = u2.user.eflags;
u.user.cs = u2.user.cs;
u.user.ds = u2.user.ds;
u.user.es = u2.user.es;
u.user.fs = u2.user.fs;
u.user.gs = u2.user.gs;
u.user.ss = u2.user.ss;
u.user.fs_base = u2.user.fs_base;
u.user.gs_base = u2.user.gs_base;
/* RHEL-4 refuses to set too high (and invalid) PC values. */ u.user.rip = (unsigned long) handler_fail;
/* 2.6.25 always truncates and sign-extends orig_rax. */ u.user.orig_rax = (int) u.user.orig_rax;
#endif /* __x86_64__ */
#ifdef __i386__
/* These values get back different. */
u.user.xds = u2.user.xds;
u.user.xes = u2.user.xes;
u.user.xfs = u2.user.xfs;
u.user.xgs = u2.user.xgs;
u.user.xcs = u2.user.xcs;
u.user.eflags = u2.user.eflags;
u.user.xss = u2.user.xss;
/* RHEL-4 refuses to set too high (and invalid) PC values. */ u.user.eip = (unsigned long) handler_fail;
#endif /* __i386__ */
#ifdef __powerpc__
/* These fields are constrained. */
u.user.msr = u2.user.msr;
# ifdef __powerpc64__ u.user.softe = u2.user.softe; # else u.user.mq = u2.user.mq; # endif /* __powerpc64__ */ u.user.trap = u2.user.trap; u.user.dar = u2.user.dar; u.user.dsisr = u2.user.dsisr; u.user.result = u2.user.result; #endif /* __powerpc__ */
/* Poke U. */
# ifdef __sparc__ l = ptrace (PTRACE_SETREGS, child, &u.user, NULL); # else l = ptrace (PTRACE_SETREGS, child, NULL, &u.user); # endif assert (l == 0);
/* Peek into U2. */
# ifdef __sparc__ l = ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, child, &u2.user, NULL); # else l = ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, child, NULL, &u2.user); # endif assert (l == 0);
/* Verify it matches. */
if (memcmp (&u.user, &u2.user, sizeof u.byte) != 0)
{
for (start = 0; start + REGALIGN <= sizeof u.byte; start += REGALIGN)
if (*(unsigned long *) (u.byte + start)
!= *(unsigned long *) (u2.byte + start))
printf ("\
mismatch at offset %#x: SETREGS wrote %lx GETREGS read %lx\n",
start, *(unsigned long *) (u.byte + start),
*(unsigned long *) (u2.byte + start));
return 1;
} /* Reverse the pattern. */
for (i = 0; i < sizeof u.byte; i++)
u.byte[i] ^= -1;
#ifdef __x86_64__
/* non-EFLAGS modifications fail with EIO, EFLAGS gets back different. */ u.user.eflags = u2.user.eflags;
u.user.cs = u2.user.cs;
u.user.ds = u2.user.ds;
u.user.es = u2.user.es;
u.user.fs = u2.user.fs;
u.user.gs = u2.user.gs;
u.user.ss = u2.user.ss;
u.user.fs_base = u2.user.fs_base;
u.user.gs_base = u2.user.gs_base;
/* RHEL-4 refuses to set too high (and invalid) PC values. */ u.user.rip = (unsigned long) handler_fail;
/* 2.6.25 always truncates and sign-extends orig_rax. */ u.user.orig_rax = (int) u.user.orig_rax;
#endif /* __x86_64__ */
#ifdef __i386__
/* These values get back different. */
u.user.xds = u2.user.xds;
u.user.xes = u2.user.xes;
u.user.xfs = u2.user.xfs;
u.user.xgs = u2.user.xgs;
u.user.xcs = u2.user.xcs;
u.user.eflags = u2.user.eflags;
u.user.xss = u2.user.xss;
/* RHEL-4 refuses to set too high (and invalid) PC values. */ u.user.eip = (unsigned long) handler_fail;
#endif /* __i386__ */
#ifdef __powerpc__
/* These fields are constrained. */
u.user.msr = u2.user.msr;
# ifdef __powerpc64__ u.user.softe = u2.user.softe; # else u.user.mq = u2.user.mq; # endif /* __powerpc64__ */ u.user.trap = u2.user.trap; u.user.dar = u2.user.dar; u.user.dsisr = u2.user.dsisr; u.user.result = u2.user.result; #endif /* __powerpc__ */
/* Poke U. */
# ifdef __sparc__ l = ptrace (PTRACE_SETREGS, child, &u.user, NULL); # else l = ptrace (PTRACE_SETREGS, child, NULL, &u.user); # endif assert (l == 0);
/* Peek into U2. */
# ifdef __sparc__ l = ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, child, &u2.user, NULL); # else l = ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, child, NULL, &u2.user); # endif assert (l == 0);
/* Verify it matches. */
if (memcmp (&u.user, &u2.user, sizeof u.byte) != 0)
{
for (start = 0; start + REGALIGN <= sizeof u.byte; start += REGALIGN)
if (*(unsigned long *) (u.byte + start)
!= *(unsigned long *) (u2.byte + start))
printf ("\
mismatch at offset %#x: SETREGS wrote %lx GETREGS read %lx\n",
start, *(unsigned long *) (u.byte + start),
*(unsigned long *) (u2.byte + start));
return 1;
} /* Now try poking arbitrary ranges and verifying it reads back right.
We expect the U area is already a random enough pattern. */
for (start = 0; start + REGALIGN <= sizeof u.byte; start += REGALIGN)
{
for (i = start; i < start + REGALIGN; i++)
u.byte[i]++;
#ifdef __x86_64__
/* non-EFLAGS modifications fail with EIO, EFLAGS gets back different. */
u.user.eflags = u2.user.eflags;
u.user.cs = u2.user.cs;
u.user.ds = u2.user.ds;
u.user.es = u2.user.es;
u.user.fs = u2.user.fs;
u.user.gs = u2.user.gs;
u.user.ss = u2.user.ss;
u.user.fs_base = u2.user.fs_base;
u.user.gs_base = u2.user.gs_base;
/* RHEL-4 refuses to set too high (and invalid) PC values. */
u.user.rip = (unsigned long) handler_fail;
/* 2.6.25 always truncates and sign-extends orig_rax. */
u.user.orig_rax = (int) u.user.orig_rax;
#endif /* __x86_64__ */
#ifdef __i386__
/* These values get back different. */
u.user.xds = u2.user.xds;
u.user.xes = u2.user.xes;
u.user.xfs = u2.user.xfs;
u.user.xgs = u2.user.xgs;
u.user.xcs = u2.user.xcs;
u.user.eflags = u2.user.eflags;
u.user.xss = u2.user.xss;
/* RHEL-4 refuses to set too high (and invalid) PC values. */
u.user.eip = (unsigned long) handler_fail;
#endif /* __i386__ */
#ifdef __powerpc__
/* These fields are constrained. */
u.user.msr = u2.user.msr;
# ifdef __powerpc64__
u.user.softe = u2.user.softe;
# else
u.user.mq = u2.user.mq;
# endif /* __powerpc64__ */
u.user.trap = u2.user.trap;
u.user.dar = u2.user.dar;
u.user.dsisr = u2.user.dsisr;
u.user.result = u2.user.result;
if (start > offsetof (struct pt_regs, ccr))
break;
#endif /* __powerpc__ */ /* Poke U. */
l = ptrace (PTRACE_POKEUSER, child, (void *) (unsigned long) start,
(void *) *(unsigned long *) (u.byte + start));
if (l != 0)
error (1, errno, "PTRACE_POKEUSER at %x", start);
/* Peek into U2. */
# ifdef __sparc__
l = ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, child, &u2.user, NULL);
# else
l = ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, child, NULL, &u2.user);
# endif
assert (l == 0); /* Verify it matches. */
if (memcmp (&u.user, &u2.user, sizeof u.byte) != 0)
{
printf ("mismatch at offset %#x: poked %lx but GETREGS read %lx\n",
start, *(unsigned long *) (u.byte + start),
*(unsigned long *) (u2.byte + start));
return 1;
}
} /* Now try peeking arbitrary ranges and verifying it is the same.
We expect the U area is already a random enough pattern. */
for (start = 0; start + REGALIGN <= sizeof u.byte; start += REGALIGN)
{
/* Peek for the U comparation. */
errno = 0;
l = ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, child, (void *) (unsigned long) start,
NULL);
assert_perror (errno);
/* Verify it matches. */
if (*(unsigned long *) (u.byte + start) != l)
{
printf ("mismatch at offset %#x: poked %lx but peeked %lx\n",
start, *(unsigned long *) (u.byte + start), l);
return 1;
}
} return 0;
}
#endif /* PTRACE_SETREGS */
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/ptrace: simplify gpr_get/tm_cgpr_get
In reply to Oleg NesterovLe 19/11/2020 à 17:02, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
Quoted 1 line
gpr_get()doesmembuf_write()twice to overridept_regs->msrin between.
Is there anything wrong with that ?
Quoted 27 lines
We can call
membuf_write()once and change ->msr in the kernel buffer, this simplifies the code and the next fix.The patch adds a new simple helper,
membuf_at(offs), it returns the new membuf which can be safely used aftermembuf_write().Signed-off-by Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>--- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c | 13 +++++-------- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 13 +++++-------- include/linux/regset.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +2
-0@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ int tm_cgpr_active(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset)int tm_cgpr_get (struct task_struct *target,const struct user_regset *regset,struct membuf to) { +struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); +if (!cpu_has_feature (CPU_FTR_TM ))return -ENODEV ;
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 102
Quoted 6 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +1
-2@@ -97,17 +99,12 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,flush_altivec_to_thread (target);membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs, - offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); -membuf_store (&to,get_user_ckpt_msr (target)); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ));
This looks mis-aligned. But it should fit on a single line, now we allow up to 100 chars on a line.
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 107
Quoted 11 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +2
-6-BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3) != - offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr) +sizeof (long )); +membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_ckpt_msr (target)); -membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs.orig_gpr3, -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3));return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) - -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ));
I can't see any change here except the alignment. Can you leave it as is ?
Quoted 16 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +0
-0}/* arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +1
-0@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ int ptrace_put_reg(struct task_struct *task, int regno, unsigned long data)static int gpr_get (struct task_struct *target,const struct user_regset *regset,struct membuf to) { +struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr));int i;if (target->thread.regs ==NULL )
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 233
Quoted 7 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +2
-2@@ -228,17 +229,13 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, target->thread.regs->gpr[i] =NV_REG_POISON ; } -membuf_write (&to, target->thread.regs, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); -membuf_store (&to,get_user_msr (target)); +membuf_write (&to, target->thread.regs, +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ));
This should fit on a single line.
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 238
Quoted 11 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +2
-6-BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3) != - offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr) +sizeof (long )); +membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_msr (target)); -membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3, -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3));return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) - -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ));
This should not change, it's not part of the changes for this patch.
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +0
-0} static int gpr_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,include/linux/regset.h +0
-0
include/linux/regset.h static inline int membuf_write(struct membuf *s, const void *v, size_t size) · line 51
Quoted 6 lines
include/linux/regset.h +3
-0@@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ static inline int membuf_write(struct membuf *s, const void *v, size_t size)return s->left; } +static inline struct membuf membuf_at (const struct membuf *s,size_t offs) +{ +struct membuf n = *s;
Is there any point in using a struct membuf * instaed of a struct membuf as parameter ?
include/linux/regset.h static inline int membuf_write(struct membuf *s, const void *v, size_t size) · line 63
Quoted 13 lines
include/linux/regset.h +9
-0+ +if (offs > n.left) + offs = n.left; + n.p += offs; + n.left -= offs; + +return n; +} +/* current s->p must be aligned for v; v must be a scalar */ #define membuf_store (s, v) \ ({ \
Christophe
Le 19/11/2020 à 17:02, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
Quoted 19 lines
The commit
a8a4b03ab95f("powerpc: Hard wirePT_SOFTEvalue to 1 in ptrace & signals") changedptrace_get_reg(PT_SOFTE)to report0x1, butPTRACE_GETREGSstill copiespt_regs->softeas is.This is not consistent and this breaks the user-regs-peekpoke test from https://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests/
Reported-by Jan Kratochvil <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>--- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c | 8 +++++++- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 8 +++++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +0
-0
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 92
Quoted 6 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +3
-0@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, struct membuf to) {struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +struct membuf to_softe =membuf_at (&to, + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe));
Should fit on a single line I think.
Quoted 20 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +4
-1+#endif if (!cpu_has_feature (CPU_FTR_TM ))return -ENODEV ;@@ -102,7 +106,9 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_ckpt_msr (target)); - +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +membuf_store (&to_softe,0x1ul ); +#endif return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); }arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +0
-0
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 223
Quoted 6 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +3
-0@@ -218,6 +218,10 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, struct membuf to) {struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +struct membuf to_softe =membuf_at (&to, + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe));
Should fit on a single line I think.
Quoted 6 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +1
-0+#endif int i;if (target->thread.regs ==NULL )
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 245
Quoted 10 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +3
-1@@ -233,7 +237,9 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_msr (target)); - +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +membuf_store (&to_softe,0x1ul ); +#endif return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); }
Christophe
Le 19/11/2020 à 17:01, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
Quoted 3 lines
Can we finally fix this problem? ;)
My previous attempt was ignored, see
That doesn't seems right.
Michael made some suggestion it seems, can you respond to it ?
Quoted 6 lines
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/Now that
gpr_get()was changed to use membuf API we can make a simpler fix.Sorry, uncompiled/untested, I don't have a ppc machine.
I compiled with ppc64_defconfig, that seems ok. Still untested.
Christophe
Quoted 8 lines
Oleg.
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- include/linux/regset.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Oleg Nesterov
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/ptrace: simplify gpr_get/tm_cgpr_get
In reply to Christophe LeroyQuoted 6 lines · Christophe Leroy
Le 19/11/2020 à 17:02, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
Quoted 1 line
gpr_get()doesmembuf_write()twice to overridept_regs->msrin between.Is there anything wrong with that ?
Nothing wrong, but imo the code and 2/2 looks simpler after this patch. I tried to explain this in the changelog.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
int tm_cgpr_get(struct
task_struct*target, const structuser_regset*regset,arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +2
-0struct membuf to) { +struct membuf to_msr =membuf_at (&to, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); +if (!cpu_has_feature (CPU_FTR_TM ))return -ENODEV ;
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 101
Quoted 6 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +1
-2@@ -97,17 +99,12 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,flush_altivec_to_thread (target);membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs, - offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); -membuf_store (&to,get_user_ckpt_msr (target)); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ));This looks mis-aligned. But it should fit on a single line, now we allow up to 100 chars on a line.
OK, I can change this.
Quoted 11 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 107
Quoted 9 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +2
-6-BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3) != - offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr) +sizeof (long )); +membuf_store (&to_msr,get_user_ckpt_msr (target)); -membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs.orig_gpr3, -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3));return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) - -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ));I can't see any change here except the alignment. Can you leave it as is ?
I just tried to make tm_cgpr_get() and gpr_get() look similar.
Sure, I can leave it as is.
Better yet, could you please fix this problem somehow so that I could forget about the bug assigned to me?
I know nothing about powerpc, and personally I do not care about this (minor) bug, I agree with any changes.
Quoted 7 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 233
Quoted 4 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +2
-2-membuf_write (&to, target->thread.regs, offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr)); -membuf_store (&to,get_user_msr (target)); +membuf_write (&to, target->thread.regs, +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ));This should fit on a single line.
Quoted 5 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, · line 107
Quoted 3 lines
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +1
-1return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) - -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ));This should not change, it's not part of the changes for this patch.
See above, I can leave it as is.
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/regset.h static inline int membuf_write(struct membuf *s, const void *v, size_t size) · line 50
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/regset.h +3
-0@@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ static inline int membuf_write(struct membuf *s, const void *v, size_t size)return s->left; } +static inline struct membuf membuf_at (const struct membuf *s,size_t offs) +{ +struct membuf n = *s;Is there any point in using a struct membuf * instaed of a struct membuf as parameter ?
This matches other membuf_ helpers.
Oleg.
Oleg Nesterov
maintainerQuoted 10 lines · Christophe Leroy
Le 19/11/2020 à 17:01, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
Quoted 3 lines
Can we finally fix this problem? ;)
My previous attempt was ignored, see
That doesn't seems right.
Michael made some suggestion it seems, can you respond to it ?
I did, see https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Sorry, uncompiled/untested, I don't have a ppc machine.
I compiled with
ppc64_defconfig, that seems ok. Still untested.
Thanks.
Oleg.
Quoting Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
The commit
a8a4b03ab95f("powerpc: Hard wirePT_SOFTEvalue to 1 in ptrace & signals") changedptrace_get_reg(PT_SOFTE)to report0x1, butPTRACE_GETREGSstill copiespt_regs->softeas is.This is not consistent and this breaks the user-regs-peekpoke test from https://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests/
Quoted 7 lines
Reported-by Jan Kratochvil <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>--- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c | 8 +++++++- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c | 8 +++++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I think the following should work, and not require the first patch (compile tested only).
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-tm.c +8 -2
@@ -104,8 +104,14 @@ int tm_cgpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long));membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs.orig_gpr3, -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +membuf_store (&to,1UL ); + +BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap) != + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) +sizeof (long )); + +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.ckpt_regs.trap, +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap));return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); }
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +12 -0
@@ -234,9 +234,21 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3) != offsetof(struct pt_regs , msr) +sizeof (long )); +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3, + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +membuf_store (&to,1UL ); + +BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap) != + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) +sizeof (long )); + +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->trap, +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap)); +#else membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3,sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +#endif return membuf_zero (&to,ELF_NGREG *sizeof (unsigned long ) -sizeof (struct user_pt_regs )); }
---
Christophe
Oleg Nesterov
maintainerQuoted 28 lines · Christophe Leroy
I think the following should work, and not require the first patch (compile tested only).
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +12
-0@@ -234,9 +234,21 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, conststruct user_regset *regset, BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3) != offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long)); +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3, + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +membuf_store (&to,1UL ); + +BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap) != + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) +sizeof (long )); + +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->trap, +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap)); +#else membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3,sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +#endif return membuf_zero(&to, ELF_NGREG * sizeof(unsigned long) -
Quoted 2 lines
sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
}
Probably yes.
This mirrors the previous patch I sent (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/)
and this is exactly what I tried to avoid, we can make a simpler fix now.
But let me repeat, I agree with any fix even if imp my version simplifies the code, just commit this change and lets forget this problem.
Oleg.
Oleg Nesterov
maintainerChristophe, et al,
So what?
Are you going to push your change or should I re-send 1-2 without whitespace cleanups?
Quoted 42 lines · Oleg Nesterov
Quoted 28 lines · Christophe Leroy
I think the following should work, and not require the first patch (compile tested only).
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +12
-0@@ -234,9 +234,21 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, conststruct user_regset *regset, BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3) != offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long)); +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3, + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +membuf_store (&to,1UL ); + +BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap) != + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) +sizeof (long )); + +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->trap, +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap)); +#else membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3,sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +#endif return membuf_zero(&to, ELF_NGREG * sizeof(unsigned long) -Quoted 2 lines
sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
}Probably yes.
This mirrors the previous patch I sent (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/)
and this is exactly what I tried to avoid, we can make a simpler fix now.But let me repeat, I agree with any fix even if imp my version simplifies the code, just commit this change and lets forget this problem.
Oleg.
Michael Ellerman
reviewerQuoted 6 lines · Oleg Nesterov
Christophe, et al,
So what?
Are you going to push your change or should I re-send 1-2 without whitespace cleanups?
I'll take your 1 & 2 and fixup the whitespace issues when applying.
cheers
Quoted 43 lines · Oleg Nesterov
Quoted 42 lines · Christophe Leroy
Quoted 28 lines
I think the following should work, and not require the first patch (compile tested only).
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c +12
-0@@ -234,9 +234,21 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, conststruct user_regset *regset, BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3) != offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long)); +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3, + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +membuf_store (&to,1UL ); + +BUILD_BUG_ON (offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap) != + offsetof(struct pt_regs , softe) +sizeof (long )); + +membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->trap, +sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , trap)); +#else membuf_write (&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3,sizeof (struct user_pt_regs ) - offsetof(struct pt_regs , orig_gpr3)); +#endif return membuf_zero(&to, ELF_NGREG * sizeof(unsigned long) -Quoted 2 lines
sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
}Probably yes.
This mirrors the previous patch I sent (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/)
and this is exactly what I tried to avoid, we can make a simpler fix now.But let me repeat, I agree with any fix even if imp my version simplifies the code, just commit this change and lets forget this problem.
Oleg.
Michael Ellerman
AppliedQuoted 9 lines · Oleg Nesterov
Can we finally fix this problem? ;)
My previous attempt was ignored, see
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/Now that
gpr_get()was changed to use membuf API we can make a simpler fix.[...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/2] powerpc/ptrace: Simplify gpr_get()/tm_cgpr_get()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/640586f8af356096e084d69a9909d217852bde48 [2/2] powerpc/ptrace: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/324a69467f12652b21b17f9644faa967d3d8bbdf
cheers