usb: dwc3: Trigger a GCTL soft reset when switching modes in DRD
Subsystems (2)
PATCH v3 1/2 usb: dwc3: Trigger a GCTL soft reset when switching modes in DRD
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/
With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in __dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.
We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh Nguyen
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh Nguyen
--- drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +19 -0
@@ -114,10 +114,24 @@ void dwc3_set_prtcap(struct dwc3 *dwc, u32 mode) dwc->current_dr_role = mode; } +static void dwc3_gctl_core_soft_reset (struct dwc3 *dwc) +{ +int reg; + + reg =dwc3_readl (dwc->regs,DWC3_GCTL ); + reg |= (DWC3_GCTL_CORESOFTRESET ); +dwc3_writel (dwc->regs,DWC3_GCTL , reg); + + reg =dwc3_readl (dwc->regs,DWC3_GCTL ); + reg &= ~(DWC3_GCTL_CORESOFTRESET ); +dwc3_writel (dwc->regs,DWC3_GCTL , reg); +} +static void __dwc3_set_mode (struct work_struct *work) {struct dwc3 *dwc =work_to_dwc (work);unsigned long flags; +int hw_mode;int ret;u32 reg;
@@ -156,6 +170,11 @@ static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work)spin_lock_irqsave (&dwc->lock, flags); +/* Execute a GCTL Core Soft Reset when switch mode in DRD*/ + hw_mode =DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE (dwc->hwparams.hwparams0); +if (hw_mode ==DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE_DRD ) +dwc3_gctl_core_soft_reset (dwc); +dwc3_set_prtcap (dwc, dwc->desired_dr_role);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dwc->lock, flags);
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
PATCH v3 2/2 usb: dwc3: Fix DRD mode change sequence following programming guide
In reviewing the previous patch, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that the DRD mode change sequence should be like the following when switching from host -> device according to the programming guide (for all DRD IPs):
1. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset
2. Set GCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
3. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst
4. Then follow up with the initializing registers sequence
The current code does:
a. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst on driver probe
b. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset (added in previous
patch)
c. Set GCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
d. < missing DCTL.CSftRst >
e. Then follow up with initializing registers sequence
So this patch adds the DCTL.CSftRst soft reset that was currently missing from the dwc3 mode switching.
---
Feedback would be appreciated. I'm a little worried I should be conditionalizing the DCTL.CSftRst on DRD mode controllers, but I'm really not sure what the right thing to do is for non-DRD mode controllers.
--- drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +3 -0
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@#define DWC3_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 5000/* ms */ +static int dwc3_core_soft_reset (struct dwc3 *dwc); +/** * dwc3_get_dr_mode - Validates and sets dr_mode * @dwc: pointer to our context structure
@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work)dwc3_set_prtcap (dwc, dwc->desired_dr_role); +dwc3_core_soft_reset (dwc);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dwc->lock, flags);switch (dwc->desired_dr_role) {
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: dwc3: Fix DRD mode change sequence following programming guide
Quoted 54 lines · John Stultz
In reviewing the previous patch, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that the DRD mode change sequence should be like the following when switching from host -> device according to the programming guide (for all DRD IPs):
1. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset
2. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
3. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst
4. Then follow up with the initializing registers sequenceThe current code does:
a. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst on driver probe
b. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset (added in previous
patch)
c. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
d. < missing DCTL.CSftRst >
e. Then follow up with initializing registers sequenceSo this patch adds the DCTL.CSftRst soft reset that was currently missing from the dwc3 mode switching.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
Feedback would be appreciated. I'm a little worried I should be conditionalizing the DCTL.CSftRst on DRD mode controllers, but I'm really not sure what the right thing to do is for non-DRD mode controllers.--- drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +2
-0@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@#define DWC3_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 5000/* ms */ +static int dwc3_core_soft_reset (struct dwc3 *dwc); +/** * dwc3_get_dr_mode - Validates and sets dr_mode * @dwc: pointer to our context structure
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work) · line 182
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +1
-0@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work)dwc3_set_prtcap (dwc, dwc->desired_dr_role); +dwc3_core_soft_reset (dwc);
Hi John/Thinh/Felipe,
I actually added this change into my local branch, because we were seeing an issue when switching from host mode --> peripheral mode. What was happening was that the RXFIFO register did not update back to the expected value for peripheral mode by the time dwc3_gadget_init_out_endpoint() was executed. With the logic to calculate the EP max packet limit based on RXFIFO reg, this caused all EPs to be set with an EP max limit of 0.
With this change, it seemed to help with the above issue. However, can we consider moving the core soft reset outside the spinlock? At least with our PHY init routines, we have some msleep() calls for waiting for the PHYs to be ready, which will end up as a sleeping while atomic bug. (not sure if PHY init is required to be called in atomic context)
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Thinh Nguyen
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: dwc3: Fix DRD mode change sequence following programming guide
Quoted 70 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 54 lines · John Stultz
In reviewing the previous patch, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that the DRD mode change sequence should be like the following when switching from host -> device according to the programming guide (for all DRD IPs):
1. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset
2. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
3. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst
4. Then follow up with the initializing registers sequenceThe current code does:
a. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst on driver probe
b. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset (added in previous
patch)
c. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
d. < missing DCTL.CSftRst >
e. Then follow up with initializing registers sequenceSo this patch adds the DCTL.CSftRst soft reset that was currently missing from the dwc3 mode switching.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
Feedback would be appreciated. I'm a little worried I should be conditionalizing the DCTL.CSftRst on DRD mode controllers, but I'm really not sure what the right thing to do is for non-DRD mode controllers.--- drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +2
-0@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@#define DWC3_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 5000/* ms */ +static int dwc3_core_soft_reset (struct dwc3 *dwc); +/** * dwc3_get_dr_mode - Validates and sets dr_mode * @dwc: pointer to our context structure drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work) · line 182
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +1
-0@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work)dwc3_set_prtcap (dwc, dwc->desired_dr_role); +dwc3_core_soft_reset (dwc);Hi John/Thinh/Felipe,
I actually added this change into my local branch, because we were seeing an issue when switching from host mode --> peripheral mode. What was happening was that the RXFIFO register did not update back to the expected value for peripheral mode by the time
dwc3_gadget_init_out_endpoint()was executed. With the logic to calculate the EP max packet limit based on RXFIFO reg, this caused all EPs to be set with an EP max limit of 0.
Quoted 8 lines
With this change, it seemed to help with the above issue. However, can we consider moving the core soft reset outside the spinlock? At least with our PHY init routines, we have some
msleep()calls for waiting for the PHYs to be ready, which will end up as a sleeping while atomic bug. (not sure if PHY init is required to be called in atomic context)Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Hi Wesley,
Thanks for letting us know the issue you're having also.
Yes, you need to wait a certain amount of time to synchronize with the PHY (at least 50ms for dwc_usb32 and dwc_usb31 v1.80a and above, and less for older versions). When removing the spinlock to use msleep(), just make sure that there's no race issue. BTW, how long does your setup need to msleep()?
As we suggested and explained before, this change is required as part of the programming guide. It should be added to the driver. It's not a quirk.
BR,
Thinh
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: dwc3: Fix DRD mode change sequence following programming guide
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 70 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 54 lines · John Stultz
In reviewing the previous patch, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that the DRD mode change sequence should be like the following when switching from host -> device according to the programming guide (for all DRD IPs):
1. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset
2. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
3. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst
4. Then follow up with the initializing registers sequenceThe current code does:
a. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst on driver probe
b. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset (added in previous
patch)
c. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
d. < missing DCTL.CSftRst >
e. Then follow up with initializing registers sequenceSo this patch adds the DCTL.CSftRst soft reset that was currently missing from the dwc3 mode switching.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
Feedback would be appreciated. I'm a little worried I should be conditionalizing the DCTL.CSftRst on DRD mode controllers, but I'm really not sure what the right thing to do is for non-DRD mode controllers.--- drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +2
-0@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@#define DWC3_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 5000/* ms */ +static int dwc3_core_soft_reset (struct dwc3 *dwc); +/** * dwc3_get_dr_mode - Validates and sets dr_mode * @dwc: pointer to our context structure drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work) · line 182
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +1
-0@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work)dwc3_set_prtcap (dwc, dwc->desired_dr_role); +dwc3_core_soft_reset (dwc);Hi John/Thinh/Felipe,
I actually added this change into my local branch, because we were seeing an issue when switching from host mode --> peripheral mode. What was happening was that the RXFIFO register did not update back to the expected value for peripheral mode by the time
dwc3_gadget_init_out_endpoint()was executed. With the logic to calculate the EP max packet limit based on RXFIFO reg, this caused all EPs to be set with an EP max limit of 0.Quoted 8 lines
With this change, it seemed to help with the above issue. However, can we consider moving the core soft reset outside the spinlock? At least with our PHY init routines, we have some
msleep()calls for waiting for the PHYs to be ready, which will end up as a sleeping while atomic bug. (not sure if PHY init is required to be called in atomic context)Thanks
Wesley ChengHi Wesley,
Quoted 8 lines
Thanks for letting us know the issue you're having also.
Yes, you need to wait a certain amount of time to synchronize with the PHY (at least 50ms for
dwc_usb32anddwc_usb31v1.80a and above, and less for older versions). When removing the spinlock to usemsleep(), just make sure that there's no race issue. BTW, how long does your setup need tomsleep()?
Hi Thinh,
Sorry for the late response. My mistake, its actually just a usleep() for a less than 100uS (polling for a status bit change, so it will exit early if possible). For this change, can we just move the dwc3_core_soft_reset() outside of the spinlock?
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Thinh Nguyen
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: dwc3: Fix DRD mode change sequence following programming guide
Quoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 70 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 54 lines · John Stultz
In reviewing the previous patch, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that the DRD mode change sequence should be like the following when switching from host -> device according to the programming guide (for all DRD IPs):
1. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset
2. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
3. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst
4. Then follow up with the initializing registers sequenceThe current code does:
a. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst on driver probe
b. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset (added in previous
patch)
c. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
d. < missing DCTL.CSftRst >
e. Then follow up with initializing registers sequenceSo this patch adds the DCTL.CSftRst soft reset that was currently missing from the dwc3 mode switching.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
Feedback would be appreciated. I'm a little worried I should be conditionalizing the DCTL.CSftRst on DRD mode controllers, but I'm really not sure what the right thing to do is for non-DRD mode controllers.--- drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +2
-0@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@#define DWC3_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 5000/* ms */ +static int dwc3_core_soft_reset (struct dwc3 *dwc); +/** * dwc3_get_dr_mode - Validates and sets dr_mode * @dwc: pointer to our context structure drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work) · line 182
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +1
-0@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work)dwc3_set_prtcap (dwc, dwc->desired_dr_role); +dwc3_core_soft_reset (dwc);Hi John/Thinh/Felipe,
I actually added this change into my local branch, because we were seeing an issue when switching from host mode --> peripheral mode. What was happening was that the RXFIFO register did not update back to the expected value for peripheral mode by the time
dwc3_gadget_init_out_endpoint()was executed. With the logic to calculate the EP max packet limit based on RXFIFO reg, this caused all EPs to be set with an EP max limit of 0.Quoted 8 lines
With this change, it seemed to help with the above issue. However, can we consider moving the core soft reset outside the spinlock? At least with our PHY init routines, we have some
msleep()calls for waiting for the PHYs to be ready, which will end up as a sleeping while atomic bug. (not sure if PHY init is required to be called in atomic context)Thanks
Wesley ChengHi Wesley,
Quoted 8 lines
Thanks for letting us know the issue you're having also.
Yes, you need to wait a certain amount of time to synchronize with the PHY (at least 50ms for
dwc_usb32anddwc_usb31v1.80a and above, and less for older versions). When removing the spinlock to usemsleep(), just make sure that there's no race issue. BTW, how long does your setup need tomsleep()?Hi Thinh,
Quoted 8 lines
Sorry for the late response. My mistake, its actually just a
usleep()for a less than 100uS (polling for a status bit change, so it will exit early if possible). For this change, can we just move thedwc3_core_soft_reset()outside of the spinlock?Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Hi Wesley,
dwc3 can get notified at any time to queue a work to switch mode. So you need protect it from a potential race. I think you can use a mutex for this.
Also, what status are you polling? Note that there's no status bit for GCTL.coresoftreset. For DCTL.CSFTRST, different controller versions behave differently. Use dwc3_core_soft_reset() for DCTL.CSFTRST to get the logic from there.
1 more thing, make sure that this flow only applies for DRD mode controller and not OTG from older DWC_usb3 IP.
Thanks,
Thinh
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: dwc3: Fix DRD mode change sequence following programming guide
Quoted 106 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 70 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 54 lines · John Stultz
In reviewing the previous patch, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that the DRD mode change sequence should be like the following when switching from host -> device according to the programming guide (for all DRD IPs):
1. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset
2. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
3. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst
4. Then follow up with the initializing registers sequenceThe current code does:
a. Soft reset with DCTL.CSftRst on driver probe
b. Reset controller with GCTL.CoreSoftReset (added in previous
patch)
c. SetGCTL.PrtCapDir(device)
d. < missing DCTL.CSftRst >
e. Then follow up with initializing registers sequenceSo this patch adds the DCTL.CSftRst soft reset that was currently missing from the dwc3 mode switching.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
Feedback would be appreciated. I'm a little worried I should be conditionalizing the DCTL.CSftRst on DRD mode controllers, but I'm really not sure what the right thing to do is for non-DRD mode controllers.--- drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +2
-0@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@#define DWC3_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 5000/* ms */ +static int dwc3_core_soft_reset (struct dwc3 *dwc); +/** * dwc3_get_dr_mode - Validates and sets dr_mode * @dwc: pointer to our context structure drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work) · line 182
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +1
-0@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ static void __dwc3_set_mode(struct work_struct *work)dwc3_set_prtcap (dwc, dwc->desired_dr_role); +dwc3_core_soft_reset (dwc);Hi John/Thinh/Felipe,
I actually added this change into my local branch, because we were seeing an issue when switching from host mode --> peripheral mode. What was happening was that the RXFIFO register did not update back to the expected value for peripheral mode by the time
dwc3_gadget_init_out_endpoint()was executed. With the logic to calculate the EP max packet limit based on RXFIFO reg, this caused all EPs to be set with an EP max limit of 0.Quoted 8 lines
With this change, it seemed to help with the above issue. However, can we consider moving the core soft reset outside the spinlock? At least with our PHY init routines, we have some
msleep()calls for waiting for the PHYs to be ready, which will end up as a sleeping while atomic bug. (not sure if PHY init is required to be called in atomic context)Thanks
Wesley ChengHi Wesley,
Quoted 8 lines
Thanks for letting us know the issue you're having also.
Yes, you need to wait a certain amount of time to synchronize with the PHY (at least 50ms for
dwc_usb32anddwc_usb31v1.80a and above, and less for older versions). When removing the spinlock to usemsleep(), just make sure that there's no race issue. BTW, how long does your setup need tomsleep()?Hi Thinh,
Quoted 8 lines
Sorry for the late response. My mistake, its actually just a
usleep()for a less than 100uS (polling for a status bit change, so it will exit early if possible). For this change, can we just move thedwc3_core_soft_reset()outside of the spinlock?Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Quoted 5 lines
Hi Wesley,
dwc3 can get notified at any time to queue a work to switch mode. So you need protect it from a potential race. I think you can use a mutex for this.
Hi Thinh,
OK let me take a look a bit more.
Quoted 5 lines
Also, what status are you polling? Note that there's no status bit for GCTL.coresoftreset. For DCTL.CSFTRST, different controller versions behave differently. Use
dwc3_core_soft_reset()for DCTL.CSFTRST to get the logic from there.
During dwc3_core_soft_reset() we're also calling the PHY init for both HS and SS PHYs. Within our PHY init sequence, we have a status bit check to make sure our PHY has initialized correctly. There was no issue using the usleep() yet, as dwc3_core_soft_reset() is also used during dwc3_core_init() w/o any locking.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Quoted 6 lines
1 more thing, make sure that this flow only applies for DRD mode controller and not OTG from older
DWC_usb3IP.Thanks,
Thinh
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Hi,
Quoted 40 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh Nguyenv3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh Nguyen
Because this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
Signature · 1 line
balbi
Quoted 50 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-john
Thinh Nguyen
maintainerHi,
Quoted 61 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 49 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$
Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-john
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
Thinh
Quoted 72 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 61 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 49 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-john
Quoted 8 lines
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
Thinh
Hi All,
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Thinh Nguyen
maintainerQuoted 77 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 75 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnA quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
BR,
Thinh
Quoted 88 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 77 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 75 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnA quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Quoted 5 lines
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
Hi Thinh,
Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version?
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Thinh Nguyen
maintainerQuoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 81 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 70 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnQuoted 8 lines
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
Hi Thinh,
Quoted 9 lines
Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version?
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Hi Wesley,
Actually your IP version type may use the newer flow. Can you print your DWC3_VER_TYPE? I still need to verify internally to know which versions need the update if any.
Thanks,
Thinh
Quoted 106 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 81 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 70 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnQuoted 8 lines
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
Hi Thinh,
Quoted 9 lines
Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version?
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Quoted 9 lines
Hi Wesley,
Actually your IP version type may use the newer flow. Can you print your
DWC3_VER_TYPE? I still need to verify internally to know which versions need the update if any.Thanks,
Thinh
Hi Thinh,
Sure, my DWC3_VER_TYPE output = 0x67612A2A
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Quoted 118 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 106 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 81 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 70 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnQuoted 8 lines
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
Hi Thinh,
Quoted 9 lines
Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version?
Thanks
Wesley ChengQuoted 9 lines
Hi Wesley,
Actually your IP version type may use the newer flow. Can you print your
DWC3_VER_TYPE? I still need to verify internally to know which versions need the update if any.Thanks,
Thinh
Quoted 7 lines
Hi Thinh,
Sure, my
DWC3_VER_TYPEoutput =0x67612A2AThanks
Wesley Cheng
Hi Thinh,
Would you happen to have an update on the required sequence on the version shared? Sorry for pushing, but we just wanted to finalize on it, since it does cause some functional issues w/o the soft reset in place, and causes a crash if we have the GCTL.softreset.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Thinh Nguyen
maintainerQuoted 130 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 118 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 106 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 81 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 70 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnQuoted 8 lines
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
Hi Thinh,
Quoted 9 lines
Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version?
Thanks
Wesley ChengQuoted 9 lines
Hi Wesley,
Actually your IP version type may use the newer flow. Can you print your
DWC3_VER_TYPE? I still need to verify internally to know which versions need the update if any.Thanks,
ThinhQuoted 7 lines
Hi Thinh,
Sure, my
DWC3_VER_TYPEoutput =0x67612A2AThanks
Wesley ChengHi Thinh,
Quoted 8 lines
Would you happen to have an update on the required sequence on the version shared? Sorry for pushing, but we just wanted to finalize on it, since it does cause some functional issues w/o the soft reset in place, and causes a crash if we have the GCTL.softreset.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Hi Wesley,
I'm still trying to get that info for you. The versions without GCTL.softreset should be very new. The flow with GCTL.softreset should work for all versions and should not cause functional impact. We can create a change to optimize and remove GCTL.softreset for the newer controller versions at a later time.
Since you and John Stultz have the setup that can be verified in the real world. It would be great if John or you provide a tested patch(es) to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Thinh
Quoted 148 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 130 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 118 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 106 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 81 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 70 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnQuoted 8 lines
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
Hi Thinh,
Quoted 9 lines
Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version?
Thanks
Wesley ChengQuoted 9 lines
Hi Wesley,
Actually your IP version type may use the newer flow. Can you print your
DWC3_VER_TYPE? I still need to verify internally to know which versions need the update if any.Thanks,
ThinhQuoted 7 lines
Hi Thinh,
Sure, my
DWC3_VER_TYPEoutput =0x67612A2AThanks
Wesley ChengHi Thinh,
Quoted 8 lines
Would you happen to have an update on the required sequence on the version shared? Sorry for pushing, but we just wanted to finalize on it, since it does cause some functional issues w/o the soft reset in place, and causes a crash if we have the GCTL.softreset.
Thanks
Wesley ChengHi Wesley,
I'm still trying to get that info for you. The versions without GCTL.softreset should be very new. The flow with GCTL.softreset should work for all versions and should not cause functional impact. We can create a change to optimize and remove GCTL.softreset for the newer controller versions at a later time.
Quoted 7 lines
Since you and John Stultz have the setup that can be verified in the real world. It would be great if John or you provide a tested patch(es) to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Thinh
Hi Thinh,
Thanks for the input as always. I tested the GCTL.softreset change just now, and it is working fine at least on my set up.
Not sure if we'd need input from other vendors as well to get this change merged.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Quoted 159 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 148 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 130 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 118 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 106 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 81 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 70 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the COREIDLE flag get stuck off in
__dwc3_gadget_start(), which seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.
After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the programming guide that it should be done when switching modes in DRD.
So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the controller is in DRD mode.
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>Cc Yang Fei <[email protected]>Cc YongQin Liu <[email protected]>Cc Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>Cc Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Jun Li <[email protected]>Cc Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yu Chen <[email protected]>Signed-off-by John Stultz <[email protected]>---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnQuoted 8 lines
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
Hi Thinh,
Quoted 9 lines
Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version?
Thanks
Wesley ChengQuoted 9 lines
Hi Wesley,
Actually your IP version type may use the newer flow. Can you print your
DWC3_VER_TYPE? I still need to verify internally to know which versions need the update if any.Thanks,
ThinhQuoted 7 lines
Hi Thinh,
Sure, my
DWC3_VER_TYPEoutput =0x67612A2AThanks
Wesley ChengHi Thinh,
Quoted 8 lines
Would you happen to have an update on the required sequence on the version shared? Sorry for pushing, but we just wanted to finalize on it, since it does cause some functional issues w/o the soft reset in place, and causes a crash if we have the GCTL.softreset.
Thanks
Wesley ChengHi Wesley,
I'm still trying to get that info for you. The versions without GCTL.softreset should be very new. The flow with GCTL.softreset should work for all versions and should not cause functional impact. We can create a change to optimize and remove GCTL.softreset for the newer controller versions at a later time.
Quoted 7 lines
Since you and John Stultz have the setup that can be verified in the real world. It would be great if John or you provide a tested patch(es) to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Thinh
Quoted 7 lines
Hi Thinh,
Thanks for the input as always. I tested the GCTL.softreset change just now, and it is working fine at least on my set up.
Not sure if we'd need input from other vendors as well to get this change merged.
Did you test the original patch from this thread unchanged, or did you have any modifications? If the latter, feel free to send it out and I'll validate it on my side.
thanks
-john
Quoted 168 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 159 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 148 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 130 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 118 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 106 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 95 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 82 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Quoted 81 lines · Wesley Cheng
Quoted 70 lines · Thinh Nguyen
Hi,
Quoted 60 lines · John Stultz
Quoted 48 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 45 lines · John Stultz
From: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not
sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that
was requested last time around:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the
COREIDLE flag get stuck off in __dwc3_gadget_start(), which
seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to
fail to initialize.We had seen occasional initialization failures with older
kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming
much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and
realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming
as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't
seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong.After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it
shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the
programming guide that it should be done when switching modes
in DRD.So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this
patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the
controller is in DRD mode.Cc: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejas Joglekar <[email protected]>
Cc: Yang Fei <[email protected]>
Cc: YongQin Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc: Jun Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Yu Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]>
---
v2:
* Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode,
rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh NguyenQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
v3:
* Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by
Thinh NguyenBecause this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these two changes.
I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as originally proposed?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$Quoted 7 lines
That way folks can enable it for devices as they need?
Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work.
thanks
-johnQuoted 8 lines
A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 devicetree. :)
BR,
ThinhHi All,
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check?
Hi Wesley,
From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change.
Hi Thinh,
Quoted 9 lines
Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version?
Thanks
Wesley ChengQuoted 9 lines
Hi Wesley,
Actually your IP version type may use the newer flow. Can you print your
DWC3_VER_TYPE? I still need to verify internally to know which versions need the update if any.Thanks,
ThinhQuoted 7 lines
Hi Thinh,
Sure, my
DWC3_VER_TYPEoutput =0x67612A2AThanks
Wesley ChengHi Thinh,
Quoted 8 lines
Would you happen to have an update on the required sequence on the version shared? Sorry for pushing, but we just wanted to finalize on it, since it does cause some functional issues w/o the soft reset in place, and causes a crash if we have the GCTL.softreset.
Thanks
Wesley ChengHi Wesley,
I'm still trying to get that info for you. The versions without GCTL.softreset should be very new. The flow with GCTL.softreset should work for all versions and should not cause functional impact. We can create a change to optimize and remove GCTL.softreset for the newer controller versions at a later time.
Quoted 7 lines
Since you and John Stultz have the setup that can be verified in the real world. It would be great if John or you provide a tested patch(es) to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
ThinhQuoted 7 lines
Hi Thinh,
Thanks for the input as always. I tested the GCTL.softreset change just now, and it is working fine at least on my set up.
Not sure if we'd need input from other vendors as well to get this change merged.
Quoted 7 lines
Did you test the original patch from this thread unchanged, or did you have any modifications? If the latter, feel free to send it out and I'll validate it on my side.
thanks
-john
Hi John,
I'm using your change as is. Didn't make any modifications to it.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project