enetc: fix bitfields, we are clearing wrong bits
Subsystems (3)
Bitfield manipulation in enetc_mac_config() looks wrong. Fix it. Untested.
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c +1 -1
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void enetc_mac_config(struct enetc_hw *hw, phy_interface_t phy_mode)if (phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii (phy_mode)) { val =enetc_port_rd (hw,ENETC_PM0_IF_MODE ); val &= ~ENETC_PM0_IFM_EN_AUTO ; - val &=ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_MASK ; + val &= ~ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_MASK ; val |=ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_GMII |ENETC_PM0_IFM_RG ;enetc_port_wr (hw,ENETC_PM0_IF_MODE , val); }
Signature · 2 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Vladimir Oltean
Reviewed-byQuoted 22 lines · Pavel Machek
Bitfield manipulation in
enetc_mac_config()looks wrong. Fix it. Untested.Signed-off-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c +1
-1@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void enetc_mac_config(struct enetc_hw *hw, phy_interface_t phy_mode)if (phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii (phy_mode)) { val =enetc_port_rd (hw,ENETC_PM0_IF_MODE ); val &= ~ENETC_PM0_IFM_EN_AUTO ; - val &=ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_MASK ; + val &= ~ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_MASK ; val |=ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_GMII |ENETC_PM0_IFM_RG ;enetc_port_wr (hw,ENETC_PM0_IF_MODE , val); }Signature · 3 lines
-- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Note that for normal operation, the bug was inconsequential, due to the fact that we write the IF_MODE register in two stages, first in .phylink_mac_config (which incorrectly cleared out a bunch of stuff), then we update the speed and duplex to the correct values in .phylink_mac_link_up. Maybe loopback mode was broken.
Thanks!
Quoted 27 lines · Vladimir Oltean
Quoted 22 lines · Pavel Machek
Bitfield manipulation in
enetc_mac_config()looks wrong. Fix it. Untested.Signed-off-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c +1
-1@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void enetc_mac_config(struct enetc_hw *hw, phy_interface_t phy_mode)if (phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii (phy_mode)) { val =enetc_port_rd (hw,ENETC_PM0_IF_MODE ); val &= ~ENETC_PM0_IFM_EN_AUTO ; - val &=ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_MASK ; + val &= ~ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_MASK ; val |=ENETC_PM0_IFM_IFMODE_GMII |ENETC_PM0_IFM_RG ;enetc_port_wr (hw,ENETC_PM0_IF_MODE , val); }Signature · 3 lines
-- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, GermanyFixes c76a97218dcb ("net: enetc: force the RGMII speed and duplex instead of operating in inband mode")Reviewed-by Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Note that for normal operation, the bug was inconsequential, due to the fact that we write the
IF_MODEregister in two stages, first in .phylink_mac_config (which incorrectly cleared out a bunch of stuff), then we update the speed and duplex to the correct values in .phylink_mac_link_up. Maybe loopback mode was broken.Thanks!
I forgot to mention, target tree should be "net" and patch should be queued up for stable.