of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for remote-endpoint
PATCH 1/1 of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for remote-endpoint
remote-endpoint property seems to always come in pairs where two devices point to each other. So, we can't really tell from DT if there is a functional probe order dependency between these two devices.
However, there can be other dependencies between two devices that point to each other with remote-endpoint. This non-remote-endpoint dependency combined with one of the remote-endpoint dependency can lead to a cyclic dependency[1].
To avoid this cyclic dependency from incorrectly blocking probes, fw_devlink needs to be made aware of remote-endpoint dependencies even though remote-endpoint dependencies by themselves won't affect probe ordering (because fw_devlink will see the cyclic dependency between remote-endpoint devices and ignore the dependencies that cause the cycle).
Also, if a device ever needs to know if a non-probe-blocking remote-endpoint has finished probing, it can now use the sync_state() to figure it out.
[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGETcx9Snf23wrXqjDhJiTok9M3GcoVYDSyNYSMj9QnSRrA=cA@mail.gmail.com/#t
---
Rob/Greg,
This needs to go into driver-core due to the Fixes.
-Saravana
drivers/of/property.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/of/property.c +32 -16
@@ -1038,6 +1038,25 @@ static bool of_is_ancestor_of(struct device_node *test_ancestor,return false; } +static struct device_node *of_get_compat_node (struct device_node *np) +{ +of_node_get (np); + +while (np) { +if (!of_device_is_available (np)) { +of_node_put (np); + np =NULL ; + } + +if (of_find_property (np,"compatible" ,NULL )) +break ; + + np =of_get_next_parent (np); + } + +return np; +} +/** * of_link_to_phandle - Add fwnode link to supplier from supplier phandle * @con_np: consumer device tree node
@@ -1061,25 +1080,11 @@ static int of_link_to_phandle(struct device_node *con_np,struct device *sup_dev;struct device_node *tmp_np = sup_np; -of_node_get (sup_np);/* * Find the device node that contains the supplier phandle. It may be * @sup_np or it may be an ancestor of @sup_np. */ -while (sup_np) { - -/* Don't allow linking to a disabled supplier */ -if (!of_device_is_available (sup_np)) { -of_node_put (sup_np); - sup_np =NULL ; - } - -if (of_find_property (sup_np,"compatible" ,NULL )) -break ; - - sup_np =of_get_next_parent (sup_np); - } - + sup_np =of_get_compat_node (sup_np);if (!sup_np) {pr_debug ("Not linking %pOFP to %pOFP - No device\n" , con_np, tmp_np);
@@ -1225,6 +1230,8 @@ static struct device_node *parse_##fname(struct device_node *np, \* @parse_prop.prop_name: Name of property holding a phandle value * @parse_prop.index: For properties holding a list of phandles, this is the * index into the list +* @optional: The property can be an optional dependency. +* @node_not_dev: The consumer node containing the property is never a device. * * Returns: * parse_prop() return values are
@@ -1236,6 +1243,7 @@ struct supplier_bindings {struct device_node *(*parse_prop)(struct device_node *np,const char *prop_name,int index);bool optional; +bool node_not_dev; };DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP (clocks,"clocks" ,"#clock-cells" )
@@ -1260,6 +1268,7 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl5, "pinctrl-5", NULL) DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl6, "pinctrl-6", NULL) DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl7, "pinctrl-7", NULL) DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl8, "pinctrl-8", NULL) +DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(remote_endpoint, "remote-endpoint", NULL) DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(regulators, "-supply", NULL) DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpio, "-gpio", "#gpio-cells")DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP (gpios,"-gpios" ,"#gpio-cells" )
@@ -1334,6 +1343,7 @@ static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = { { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl6, }, { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl7, }, { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl8, }, + { .parse_prop = parse_remote_endpoint, .node_not_dev = true, }, { .parse_prop = parse_gpio_compat, }, { .parse_prop = parse_interrupts, }, { .parse_prop = parse_regulators, },
@@ -1378,10 +1388,16 @@ static int of_link_property(struct device_node *con_np, const char *prop_name) }while ((phandle = s->parse_prop (con_np, prop_name, i))) { +struct device_node *con_dev_np; + + con_dev_np = s->node_not_dev + ?of_get_compat_node (con_np) + :of_node_get (con_np); matched = true; i++; -of_link_to_phandle (con_np, phandle); +of_link_to_phandle (con_dev_np, phandle);of_node_put (phandle); +of_node_put (con_dev_np); } s++; }
Signature · 1 line
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog
Quoting Saravana Kannan (2021-03-30 11:50:55)
Quoted 20 lines
remote-endpoint property seems to always come in pairs where two devices point to each other. So, we can't really tell from DT if there is a functional probe order dependency between these two devices.
However, there can be other dependencies between two devices that point to each other with remote-endpoint. This non-remote-endpoint dependency combined with one of the remote-endpoint dependency can lead to a cyclic dependency[1].
To avoid this cyclic dependency from incorrectly blocking probes,
fw_devlinkneeds to be made aware of remote-endpoint dependencies even though remote-endpoint dependencies by themselves won't affect probe ordering (becausefw_devlinkwill see the cyclic dependency between remote-endpoint devices and ignore the dependencies that cause the cycle).Also, if a device ever needs to know if a non-probe-blocking remote-endpoint has finished probing, it can now use the
sync_state()to figure it out.
Quoted 5 lines
[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGETcx9Snf23wrXqjDhJiTok9M3GcoVYDSyNYSMj9QnSRrA=cA@mail.gmail.com/#t
Fixes ea718c699055 ("Revert "Revert "driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default""")Reported-by Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>---
drivers/of/property.c static struct device_node *parse_##fname(struct device_node *np, \ · line 1233
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/of/property.c +1
-0@@ -1225,6 +1230,8 @@ static struct device_node *parse_##fname(struct device_node *np, \* @parse_prop.prop_name: Name of property holding a phandle value * @parse_prop.index: For properties holding a list of phandles, this is the * index into the list +* @optional: The property can be an optional dependency.
This bit conflicted for me on linux-next today so I dropped it in favor of 3915fed92365 ("of: property: Provide missing member description and remove excess param").
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/of/property.c +1
-0+* @node_not_dev: The consumer node containing the property is never a device. * * Returns: * parse_prop() return values are
Quoted 22 lines · Stephen Boyd
Quoting Saravana Kannan (2021-03-30 11:50:55)
Quoted 20 lines
remote-endpoint property seems to always come in pairs where two devices point to each other. So, we can't really tell from DT if there is a functional probe order dependency between these two devices.
However, there can be other dependencies between two devices that point to each other with remote-endpoint. This non-remote-endpoint dependency combined with one of the remote-endpoint dependency can lead to a cyclic dependency[1].
To avoid this cyclic dependency from incorrectly blocking probes,
fw_devlinkneeds to be made aware of remote-endpoint dependencies even though remote-endpoint dependencies by themselves won't affect probe ordering (becausefw_devlinkwill see the cyclic dependency between remote-endpoint devices and ignore the dependencies that cause the cycle).Also, if a device ever needs to know if a non-probe-blocking remote-endpoint has finished probing, it can now use the
sync_state()to figure it out.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGETcx9Snf23wrXqjDhJiTok9M3GcoVYDSyNYSMj9QnSRrA=cA@mail.gmail.com/#t
Fixes ea718c699055 ("Revert "Revert "driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default""")Reported-by Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>---
Tested-by Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Quoted 14 lines
drivers/of/property.c static struct device_node *parse_##fname(struct device_node *np, \ · line 1233
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/of/property.c +1
-0@@ -1225,6 +1230,8 @@ static struct device_node *parse_##fname(struct device_node *np, \* @parse_prop.prop_name: Name of property holding a phandle value * @parse_prop.index: For properties holding a list of phandles, this is the * index into the list +* @optional: The property can be an optional dependency. This bit conflicted for me on linux-next today so I dropped it in favor of
3915fed92365("of: property: Provide missing member description and remove excess param").
Ah looks like a change went into DT git repo but not in driver-core yet. Yeah, dropping this bit is fine.
Rob/Greg,
I'll leave it to you to deal with the conflict? I can't send to DT because the fix needs to land in driver-core because of boot issues and I can't resolve the conflict in driver-core because the conflicting change isn't in driver-core yet.
Thanks,
Saravana
Quoted 20 lines · Saravana Kannan
remote-endpoint property seems to always come in pairs where two devices point to each other. So, we can't really tell from DT if there is a functional probe order dependency between these two devices.
However, there can be other dependencies between two devices that point to each other with remote-endpoint. This non-remote-endpoint dependency combined with one of the remote-endpoint dependency can lead to a cyclic dependency[1].
To avoid this cyclic dependency from incorrectly blocking probes,
fw_devlinkneeds to be made aware of remote-endpoint dependencies even though remote-endpoint dependencies by themselves won't affect probe ordering (becausefw_devlinkwill see the cyclic dependency between remote-endpoint devices and ignore the dependencies that cause the cycle).Also, if a device ever needs to know if a non-probe-blocking remote-endpoint has finished probing, it can now use the
sync_state()to figure it out.
Quoted 8 lines
[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGETcx9Snf23wrXqjDhJiTok9M3GcoVYDSyNYSMj9QnSRrA=cA@mail.gmail.com/#t
Fixes ea718c699055 ("Revert "Revert "driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default""")Reported-by Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>---
Rob/Greg,This needs to go into driver-core due to the Fixes.
Now picked up, thanks.
greg k-h