mm/sparse: clarify pgdat_to_phys
Subsystems (3)
PATCH RESEND v2 1/1 mm/sparse: clarify pgdat_to_phys
Clarify pgdat_to_phys() by testing if
pgdat == &contig_page_data when CONFIG_NUMA=n.
contig_page_data is only available when CONFIG_NUMA=n so we have to use #ifndef here.
No functional change intended.
Comment from Mark [1]:
"
... and I reckon it'd be clearer and more robust to define pgdat_to_phys() in the same ifdefs as contig_page_data so that these, stay in-sync. e.g. have:
| #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA | #define pgdat_to_phys(x) virt_to_phys(x) | #else /* CONFIG_NUMA */ | | extern struct pglist_data contig_page_data; | ... | #define pgdat_to_phys(x) __pa_symbol(&contig_page_data) | | #endif /* CONIFIG_NUMA */
"
Comment from Mike [2]:
"
I'm not sure a macro is better than a static inline.
Maybe we'd want to warn if pgdat passed to pgtat_to_phys() is not &contig_page_data, e.g something like
static inline phys_addr_t pgdat_to_phys(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
{
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)) {
if (pgdat == &contig_page_data)
return __pa_symbol(&contig_page_data);
else
pr_warn("Unexpected pglist_data pointer!\n");
}
return __pa(pgdat);
}"
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1452903/#1650759
---
Change since v1:
Thanks for Mike's comment, check if pgdat == &contig_page_data, so it is clearer that we only expect contig_page_data when CONFIG_NUMA=n.
--- mm/sparse.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
mm/sparse.c +4 -3
@@ -348,10 +348,11 @@ size_t mem_section_usage_size(void)static inline phys_addr_t pgdat_to_phys (struct pglist_data *pgdat) {#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA -return __pa_symbol (pgdat); -#else +if (pgdat == &contig_page_data) +return __pa_symbol (&contig_page_data); +pr_warn ("Unexpected pglist_data pointer!\n" ); +#endif /* !CONFIG_NUMA */ return __pa (pgdat); -#endif }#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
Quoted 67 lines · Miles Chen
Clarify
pgdat_to_phys()by testing if
pgdat ==&contig_page_datawhenCONFIG_NUMA=n.
contig_page_datais only available whenCONFIG_NUMA=nso we have to use #ifndef here.No functional change intended.
Comment from Mark [1]:
"
... and I reckon it'd be clearer and more robust to definepgdat_to_phys()in the same ifdefs ascontig_page_dataso that these, stay in-sync. e.g. have:| #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA | #define pgdat_to_phys(x) virt_to_phys(x) | #else /* CONFIG_NUMA */ | | extern struct pglist_data contig_page_data; | ... | #define pgdat_to_phys(x) __pa_symbol(&contig_page_data) | | #endif /* CONIFIG_NUMA */"
Comment from Mike [2]:
"
I'm not sure a macro is better than a static inline.Maybe we'd want to warn if pgdat passed to
pgtat_to_phys()is not&contig_page_data, e.g something likestatic inline
phys_addr_tpgdat_to_phys(struct pglist_data *pgdat){ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)) { if (pgdat == &contig_page_data) return __pa_symbol(&contig_page_data); else pr_warn("Unexpected pglist_data pointer!\n"); } return __pa(pgdat); }"
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1452903/#1650759Cc Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>Cc Mark Rutland <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Miles Chen <[email protected]>---
Change since v1:
Thanks for Mike's comment, check if pgdat ==&contig_page_data, so it is clearer that we only expectcontig_page_datawhenCONFIG_NUMA=n.--- mm/sparse.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)mm/sparse.c +0
-0
mm/sparse.c size_t mem_section_usage_size(void) · line 353
Quoted 8 lines
mm/sparse.c +3
-2@@ -348,10 +348,11 @@ size_t mem_section_usage_size(void)static inline phys_addr_t pgdat_to_phys (struct pglist_data *pgdat) {#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA -return __pa_symbol (pgdat); -#else +if (pgdat == &contig_page_data) +return __pa_symbol (&contig_page_data); +pr_warn ("Unexpected pglist_data pointer!\n" );
Shouldn't this rather be a VM_BUG_ON()?
Because it looks like something that should barely happen and we might not want to perform runtime checks on each and every system?
Signature · 3 lines
Thanks, David / dhildenb
Quoted 79 lines · David Hildenbrand
Quoted 67 lines · Miles Chen
Clarify
pgdat_to_phys()by testing if
pgdat ==&contig_page_datawhenCONFIG_NUMA=n.
contig_page_datais only available whenCONFIG_NUMA=nso we have to use #ifndef here.No functional change intended.
Comment from Mark [1]:
"
... and I reckon it'd be clearer and more robust to definepgdat_to_phys()in the same ifdefs ascontig_page_dataso that these, stay in-sync. e.g. have:| #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA | #define pgdat_to_phys(x) virt_to_phys(x) | #else /* CONFIG_NUMA */ | | extern struct pglist_data contig_page_data; | ... | #define pgdat_to_phys(x) __pa_symbol(&contig_page_data) | | #endif /* CONIFIG_NUMA */"
Comment from Mike [2]:
"
I'm not sure a macro is better than a static inline.Maybe we'd want to warn if pgdat passed to
pgtat_to_phys()is not&contig_page_data, e.g something likestatic inline
phys_addr_tpgdat_to_phys(struct pglist_data *pgdat){ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)) { if (pgdat == &contig_page_data) return __pa_symbol(&contig_page_data); else pr_warn("Unexpected pglist_data pointer!\n"); } return __pa(pgdat); }"
[1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!1bJTnH2gJ6QvsBKTXH8xOiKfHF-xq_1dok3cnETD4e4qjryntFm8K0XjtEmkHAxG6g$
[2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1452903/*1650759__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!1bJTnH2gJ6QvsBKTXH8xOiKfHF-xq_1dok3cnETD4e4qjryntFm8K0XjtEmbGXEkVg$Cc Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>Cc Mark Rutland <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Miles Chen <[email protected]>---
Change since v1:
Thanks for Mike's comment, check if pgdat ==&contig_page_data, so it is clearer that we only expectcontig_page_datawhenCONFIG_NUMA=n.--- mm/sparse.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)mm/sparse.c +0
-0mm/sparse.c size_t mem_section_usage_size(void) · line 353
Quoted 8 lines
mm/sparse.c +3
-2@@ -348,10 +348,11 @@ size_t mem_section_usage_size(void)static inline phys_addr_t pgdat_to_phys (struct pglist_data *pgdat) {#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA -return __pa_symbol (pgdat); -#else +if (pgdat == &contig_page_data) +return __pa_symbol (&contig_page_data); +pr_warn ("Unexpected pglist_data pointer!\n" );Shouldn't this rather be a
VM_BUG_ON()?
Quoted 2 lines
Because it looks like something that should barely happen and we might not want to perform runtime checks on each and every system?
thanks for your comment, I will use VM_BUG_ON() to check if pgdat == contig_page_data to avoid the runtime check.