Skip to contentSkip to conversation

staging: r8188eu: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

PATCH In review Gustavo A. R. Silva 2 participants 2 messages Aug 18, 2021 Staging

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 staging: r8188eu: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

Fix the following fallthrough warnings:

drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:1498:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1113:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1147:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1405:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]

This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.

---
 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c  | 1 +
 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c +1 -0
index 61b239651e1a..590a4572c23f 100644
@@ -1495,6 +1495,7 @@ unsigned int OnAssocRsp(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame
 			break;
 		case _ERPINFO_IE_:
 			ERP_IE_handler(padapter, pIE);
+			break;
 		default:
 			break;
 		}
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c +3 -0
index cddacf023fa6..e0ce2b796abe 100644
@@ -1110,6 +1110,7 @@ unsigned int is_ap_in_tkip(struct adapter *padapter)
 			case _RSN_IE_2_:
 				if (!memcmp((pIE->data + 8), RSN_TKIP_CIPHER, 4))
 					return true;
+				break;
 			default:
 				break;
 			}
@@ -1144,6 +1145,7 @@ unsigned int should_forbid_n_rate(struct adapter *padapter)
 				if  ((!memcmp((pIE->data + 8), RSN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP, 4))  ||
 				     (!memcmp((pIE->data + 12), RSN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP, 4)))
 					return false;
+				break;
 			default:
 				break;
 			}
@@ -1401,6 +1403,7 @@ unsigned char check_assoc_AP(u8 *pframe, uint len)
 			} else {
 				break;
 			}
+			break;
 
 		default:
 			break;
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

Fix the following fallthrough warnings:

drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:1498:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1113:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1147:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1405:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]

Quoted 5 lines

This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.

One small comment below.

Quoted 38 lines
---
  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c  | 1 +
  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c | 3 +++
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c +1 -0
index 61b239651e1a..590a4572c23f 100644
@@ -1495,6 +1495,7 @@ unsigned int OnAssocRsp(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame
  			break;
  		case _ERPINFO_IE_:
  			ERP_IE_handler(padapter, pIE);
+			break;
  		default:
  			break;
  		}
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c +2 -0
index cddacf023fa6..e0ce2b796abe 100644
@@ -1110,6 +1110,7 @@ unsigned int is_ap_in_tkip(struct adapter *padapter)
  			case _RSN_IE_2_:
  				if (!memcmp((pIE->data + 8), RSN_TKIP_CIPHER, 4))
  					return true;
+				break;
  			default:
  				break;
  			}
@@ -1144,6 +1145,7 @@ unsigned int should_forbid_n_rate(struct adapter *padapter)
  				if  ((!memcmp((pIE->data + 8), RSN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP, 4))  ||
  				     (!memcmp((pIE->data + 12), RSN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP, 4)))
  					return false;
+				break;
  			default:
  				break;
  			}

drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c unsigned char check_assoc_AP(u8 *pframe, uint len) · line 1406

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c +1 -0
@@ -1401,6 +1403,7 @@ unsigned char check_assoc_AP(u8 *pframe, uint len)
  			} else {
  				break;
  			}
+			break;

Would it be better to just remove the else branch at the same time? As far as I can tell, there is no reason to have it.

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c +0 -0
  		default:
  			break;