Skip to contentSkip to conversation

dmaengine: sprd: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE

PATCH New Sasha Levin 1 participant 12 messages Sep 13, 2021

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Sasha Levin

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/12 dmaengine: sprd: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE

From: Zou Wei <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 4faee8b65ec32346f8096e64c5fa1d5a73121742 ]

This patch adds missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE definition which generates correct modalias for automatic loading of this driver when it is built as an external module.

---
 drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c +1 -0
index 8546ad034720..b966115bfad1 100644
@@ -1230,6 +1230,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sprd_dma_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "sprd,sc9860-dma", },
 	{},
 };
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sprd_dma_match);
 
 static int __maybe_unused sprd_dma_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 2/12 dmaengine: ioat: depends on !UML

From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit bbac7a92a46f0876e588722ebe552ddfe6fd790f ]

Now that UML has PCI support, this driver must depend also on !UML since it pokes at X86_64 architecture internals that don't exist on ARCH=um.

---
 drivers/dma/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/dma/Kconfig +1 -1
index a32d0d715247..1322461f1f3c 100644
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ config INTEL_IDMA64
 
 config INTEL_IOATDMA
 	tristate "Intel I/OAT DMA support"
-	depends on PCI && X86_64
+	depends on PCI && X86_64 && !UML
 	select DMA_ENGINE
 	select DMA_ENGINE_RAID
 	select DCA
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#2 lore raw

PATCH 3/12 dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Set DMA mask for coherent APIs

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Radhey Shyam Pandey <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit aac6c0f90799d66b8989be1e056408f33fd99fe6 ]

The xilinx dma driver uses the consistent allocations, so for correct operation also set the DMA mask for coherent APIs. It fixes the below kernel crash with dmatest client when DMA IP is configured with 64-bit address width and linux is booted from high (>4GB) memory.

Call trace:
[  489.531257]  dma_alloc_from_pool+0x8c/0x1c0
[  489.535431]  dma_direct_alloc+0x284/0x330
[  489.539432]  dma_alloc_attrs+0x80/0xf0
[  489.543174]  dma_pool_alloc+0x160/0x2c0
[  489.547003]  xilinx_cdma_prep_memcpy+0xa4/0x180
[  489.551524]  dmatest_func+0x3cc/0x114c
[  489.555266]  kthread+0x124/0x130
[  489.558486]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x3c
[  489.562051] ---[ end trace 248625b2d596a90a ]---
---
 drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c +1 -1
index ce18bca45ff2..7729b8d22553 100644
@@ -2703,7 +2703,7 @@ static int xilinx_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		xdev->ext_addr = false;
 
 	/* Set the dma mask bits */
-	dma_set_mask(xdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(addr_width));
+	dma_set_mask_and_coherent(xdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(addr_width));
 
 	/* Initialize the DMA engine */
 	xdev->common.dev = &pdev->dev;
Signature · 7 lines
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
author maintainer
#3 lore raw

PATCH 4/12 ceph: request Fw caps before updating the mtime in ceph_write_iter

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b11ed50346683a749632ea664959b28d524d7395 ]

The current code will update the mtime and then try to get caps to handle the write. If we end up having to request caps from the MDS, then the mtime in the cap grant will clobber the updated mtime and it'll be lost.

This is most noticable when two clients are alternately writing to the same file. Fw caps are continually being granted and revoked, and the mtime ends up stuck because the updated mtimes are always being overwritten with the old one.

Fix this by changing the order of operations in ceph_write_iter to get the caps before updating the times. Also, make sure we check the pool full conditions before even getting any caps or uninlining.

URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46574

---
 fs/ceph/file.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
fs/ceph/file.c +17 -15
index a10711a6337a..34785a203461 100644
@@ -1469,32 +1469,26 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	err = file_remove_privs(file);
-	if (err)
+	down_read(&osdc->lock);
+	map_flags = osdc->osdmap->flags;
+	pool_flags = ceph_pg_pool_flags(osdc->osdmap, ci->i_layout.pool_id);
+	up_read(&osdc->lock);
+	if ((map_flags & CEPH_OSDMAP_FULL) ||
+	    (pool_flags & CEPH_POOL_FLAG_FULL)) {
+		err = -ENOSPC;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
-	err = file_update_time(file);
+	err = file_remove_privs(file);
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
 
-	inode_inc_iversion_raw(inode);
-
 	if (ci->i_inline_version != CEPH_INLINE_NONE) {
 		err = ceph_uninline_data(file, NULL);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	down_read(&osdc->lock);
-	map_flags = osdc->osdmap->flags;
-	pool_flags = ceph_pg_pool_flags(osdc->osdmap, ci->i_layout.pool_id);
-	up_read(&osdc->lock);
-	if ((map_flags & CEPH_OSDMAP_FULL) ||
-	    (pool_flags & CEPH_POOL_FLAG_FULL)) {
-		err = -ENOSPC;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
 	dout("aio_write %p %llx.%llx %llu~%zd getting caps. i_size %llu\n",
 	     inode, ceph_vinop(inode), pos, count, i_size_read(inode));
 	if (fi->fmode & CEPH_FILE_MODE_LAZY)
@@ -1507,6 +1501,12 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto out;
 
+	err = file_update_time(file);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_caps;
+
+	inode_inc_iversion_raw(inode);
+
 	dout("aio_write %p %llx.%llx %llu~%zd got cap refs on %s\n",
 	     inode, ceph_vinop(inode), pos, count, ceph_cap_string(got));
 
@@ -1590,6 +1590,8 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	}
 
 	goto out_unlocked;
+out_caps:
+	ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, got);
 out:
 	if (direct_lock)
 		ceph_end_io_direct(inode);
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#4 lore raw

PATCH 5/12 ceph: lockdep annotations for try_nonblocking_invalidate

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 3eaf5aa1cfa8c97c72f5824e2e9263d6cc977b03 ]

---
 fs/ceph/caps.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
fs/ceph/caps.c +2 -0
index a49bf1fbaea8..0fad044a5752 100644
@@ -1775,6 +1775,8 @@ static u64 __mark_caps_flushing(struct inode *inode,
  * try to invalidate mapping pages without blocking.
  */
 static int try_nonblocking_invalidate(struct inode *inode)
+	__releases(ci->i_ceph_lock)
+	__acquires(ci->i_ceph_lock)
 {
 	struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
 	u32 invalidating_gen = ci->i_rdcache_gen;
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#5 lore raw

PATCH 6/12 btrfs: fix lockdep warning while mounting sprout fs

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Anand Jain <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit c124706900c20dee70f921bb3a90492431561a0a ]

Following test case reproduces lockdep warning.

Test case:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f <dev1>
  $ btrfstune -S 1 <dev1>
  $ mount <dev1> <mnt>
  $ btrfs device add <dev2> <mnt> -f
  $ umount <mnt>
  $ mount <dev2> <mnt>
  $ umount <mnt>

The warning claims a possible ABBA deadlock between the threads initiated by [#1] btrfs device add and [#0] the mount.

  [ 540.743122] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  [ 540.743129] 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 Not tainted
  [ 540.743135] ------------------------------------------------------
  [ 540.743142] mount/2515 is trying to acquire lock:
  [ 540.743149] ffffa0c5544c2ce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743458] but task is already holding lock:
  [ 540.743461] ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743541] which lock already depends on the new lock.
  [ 540.743543] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
  [ 540.743546] -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}:
  [ 540.743566] down_read_nested+0x48/0x2b0
  [ 540.743585] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743650] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x70/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743733] btrfs_search_slot+0x6c6/0xe00 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743785] btrfs_update_device+0x83/0x260 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743849] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x13f/0x660 [btrfs] <--- device_list_mutex
  [ 540.743911] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x18d/0x3f0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743982] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x86/0x1260 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744037] btrfs_init_new_device+0x1600/0x1dd0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744101] btrfs_ioctl+0x1c77/0x24c0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744166] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x140
  [ 540.744170] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80
  [ 540.744174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [ 540.744180] -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
  [ 540.744184] __lock_acquire+0x155f/0x2360
  [ 540.744188] lock_acquire+0x10b/0x5c0
  [ 540.744190] __mutex_lock+0xb1/0xf80
  [ 540.744193] mutex_lock_nested+0x27/0x30
  [ 540.744196] clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744270] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3c7/0xbb0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744336] open_ctree+0xf6e/0x2074 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744406] btrfs_mount_root.cold.72+0x16/0x127 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744472] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90
  [ 540.744475] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140
  [ 540.744478] fc_mount+0x16/0x60
  [ 540.744482] vfs_kern_mount+0x91/0x100
  [ 540.744484] btrfs_mount+0x1e6/0x670 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744536] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90
  [ 540.744537] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140
  [ 540.744539] path_mount+0x8d8/0x1070
  [ 540.744541] do_mount+0x8d/0xc0
  [ 540.744543] __x64_sys_mount+0x125/0x160
  [ 540.744545] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80
  [ 540.744547] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [ 540.744551] other info that might help us debug this:
  [ 540.744552] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
  [ 540.744553] CPU0 				CPU1
  [ 540.744554] ---- 				----
  [ 540.744555] lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
  [ 540.744557] 					lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [ 540.744560] 					lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
  [ 540.744562] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [ 540.744564]
   *** DEADLOCK ***
  [ 540.744565] 3 locks held by mount/2515:
  [ 540.744567] #0: ffffa0c56bf7a0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.isra.16+0xdf/0x450
  [ 540.744574] #1: ffffffffc05a9628 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x63/0xbb0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744640] #2: ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744708]
   stack backtrace:
  [ 540.744712] CPU: 2 PID: 2515 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #5

But the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices() is redundant, as explained below. Two threads [1] and [2] (below) could lead to clone_fs_device().

[1]
open_ctree <== mount sprout fs
btrfs_read_chunk_tree()

    mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) <== global lock
    read_one_dev()
     open_seed_devices()
      clone_fs_devices() <== seed fs_devices
       mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex) <== seed fs_devices

[2]
btrfs_init_new_device() <== sprouting
mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); <== global lock
btrfs_prepare_sprout()

     lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex)
     clone_fs_devices(seed_fs_device) <== seed fs_devices

Both of these threads hold uuid_mutex which is sufficient to protect getting the seed device(s) freed while we are trying to clone it for sprouting [2] or mounting a sprout [1] (as above). A mounted seed device can not free/write/replace because it is read-only. An unmounted seed device can be freed by btrfs_free_stale_devices(), but it needs uuid_mutex. So this patch removes the unnecessary device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices(). And adds a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) in clone_fs_devices().

---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +4 -3
index e882c790292f..4851e1e7ea35 100644
@@ -742,6 +742,8 @@ static int btrfs_free_stale_devices(const char *path,
 	struct btrfs_device *device, *tmp_device;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
+
 	if (path)
 		ret = -ENOENT;
 
@@ -1181,11 +1183,12 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *clone_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *orig)
 	struct btrfs_device *orig_dev;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
+
 	fs_devices = alloc_fs_devices(orig->fsid, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(fs_devices))
 		return fs_devices;
 
-	mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex);
 	fs_devices->total_devices = orig->total_devices;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(orig_dev, &orig->devices, dev_list) {
@@ -1217,10 +1220,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *clone_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *orig)
 		device->fs_devices = fs_devices;
 		fs_devices->num_devices++;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&orig->device_list_mutex);
 	return fs_devices;
 error:
-	mutex_unlock(&orig->device_list_mutex);
 	free_fs_devices(fs_devices);
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#6 lore raw

PATCH 7/12 nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_create_device_group

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 5f5dec07aca7067216ed4c1342e464e7307a9197 ]

Patch series "nilfs2: fix incorrect usage of kobject".

This patchset from Nanyong Sun fixes memory leak issues and a NULL pointer dereference issue caused by incorrect usage of kboject in nilfs2 sysfs implementation.

This patch (of 6):

Reported by syzkaller:

  BUG: memory leak
  unreferenced object 0xffff888100ca8988 (size 8):
  comm "syz-executor.1", pid 1930, jiffies 4294745569 (age 18.052s)
  hex dump (first 8 bytes):
  6c 6f 6f 70 31 00 ff ff loop1...
  backtrace:
    kstrdup+0x36/0x70 mm/util.c:60
    kstrdup_const+0x35/0x60 mm/util.c:83
    kvasprintf_const+0xf1/0x180 lib/kasprintf.c:48
    kobject_set_name_vargs+0x56/0x150 lib/kobject.c:289
    kobject_add_varg lib/kobject.c:384 [inline]
    kobject_init_and_add+0xc9/0x150 lib/kobject.c:473
    nilfs_sysfs_create_device_group+0x150/0x7d0 fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c:986
    init_nilfs+0xa21/0xea0 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:637
    nilfs_fill_super fs/nilfs2/super.c:1046 [inline]
    nilfs_mount+0x7b4/0xe80 fs/nilfs2/super.c:1316
    legacy_get_tree+0x105/0x210 fs/fs_context.c:592
    vfs_get_tree+0x8e/0x2d0 fs/super.c:1498
    do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2905 [inline]
    path_mount+0xf9b/0x1990 fs/namespace.c:3235
    do_mount+0xea/0x100 fs/namespace.c:3248
    __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3456 [inline]
    __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3433 [inline]
    __x64_sys_mount+0x14b/0x1f0 fs/namespace.c:3433
    do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
    do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

If kobject_init_and_add return with error, then the cleanup of kobject is needed because memory may be allocated in kobject_init_and_add without freeing.

And the place of cleanup_dev_kobject should use kobject_put to free the memory associated with the kobject. As the section "Kobject removal" of "Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst" says, kobject_del() just makes the kobject "invisible", but it is not cleaned up. And no more cleanup will do after cleanup_dev_kobject, so kobject_put is needed here.

---
 fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c +2 -4
index c6c8a33c81d5..cbfc132206e8 100644
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ int nilfs_sysfs_create_device_group(struct super_block *sb)
 	err = kobject_init_and_add(&nilfs->ns_dev_kobj, &nilfs_dev_ktype, NULL,
 				    "%s", sb->s_id);
 	if (err)
-		goto free_dev_subgroups;
+		goto cleanup_dev_kobject;
 
 	err = nilfs_sysfs_create_mounted_snapshots_group(nilfs);
 	if (err)
@@ -1037,9 +1037,7 @@ int nilfs_sysfs_create_device_group(struct super_block *sb)
 	nilfs_sysfs_delete_mounted_snapshots_group(nilfs);
 
 cleanup_dev_kobject:
-	kobject_del(&nilfs->ns_dev_kobj);
-
-free_dev_subgroups:
+	kobject_put(&nilfs->ns_dev_kobj);
 	kfree(nilfs->ns_dev_subgroups);
 
 failed_create_device_group:
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#7 lore raw

PATCH 8/12 nilfs2: fix NULL pointer in nilfs_##name##_attr_release

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit dbc6e7d44a514f231a64d9d5676e001b660b6448 ]

In nilfs_##name##_attr_release, kobj->parent should not be referenced because it is a NULL pointer. The release() method of kobject is always called in kobject_put(kobj), in the implementation of kobject_put(), the kobj->parent will be assigned as NULL before call the release() method. So just use kobj to get the subgroups, which is more efficient and can fix a NULL pointer reference problem.

---
 fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c +3 -5
index cbfc132206e8..ca720d958315 100644
@@ -64,11 +64,9 @@ static const struct sysfs_ops nilfs_##name##_attr_ops = { \
 #define NILFS_DEV_INT_GROUP_TYPE(name, parent_name) \
 static void nilfs_##name##_attr_release(struct kobject *kobj) \
 { \
-	struct nilfs_sysfs_##parent_name##_subgroups *subgroups; \
-	struct the_nilfs *nilfs = container_of(kobj->parent, \
-						struct the_nilfs, \
-						ns_##parent_name##_kobj); \
-	subgroups = nilfs->ns_##parent_name##_subgroups; \
+	struct nilfs_sysfs_##parent_name##_subgroups *subgroups = container_of(kobj, \
+						struct nilfs_sysfs_##parent_name##_subgroups, \
+						sg_##name##_kobj); \
 	complete(&subgroups->sg_##name##_kobj_unregister); \
 } \
 static struct kobj_type nilfs_##name##_ktype = { \
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#8 lore raw

PATCH 9/12 nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_create_##name##_group

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 24f8cb1ed057c840728167dab33b32e44147c86f ]

If kobject_init_and_add return with error, kobject_put() is needed here to avoid memory leak, because kobject_init_and_add may return error without freeing the memory associated with the kobject it allocated.

---
 fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c +2 -2
index ca720d958315..31d640a87b59 100644
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ static int nilfs_sysfs_create_##name##_group(struct the_nilfs *nilfs) \
 	err = kobject_init_and_add(kobj, &nilfs_##name##_ktype, parent, \
 				    #name); \
 	if (err) \
-		return err; \
-	return 0; \
+		kobject_put(kobj); \
+	return err; \
 } \
 static void nilfs_sysfs_delete_##name##_group(struct the_nilfs *nilfs) \
 { \
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#9 lore raw

PATCH 10/12 nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_delete_##name##_group

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit a3e181259ddd61fd378390977a1e4e2316853afa ]

The kobject_put() should be used to cleanup the memory associated with the kobject instead of kobject_del. See the section "Kobject removal" of "Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst".

---
 fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c +1 -1
index 31d640a87b59..195f42192a15 100644
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int nilfs_sysfs_create_##name##_group(struct the_nilfs *nilfs) \
 } \
 static void nilfs_sysfs_delete_##name##_group(struct the_nilfs *nilfs) \
 { \
-	kobject_del(&nilfs->ns_##parent_name##_subgroups->sg_##name##_kobj); \
+	kobject_put(&nilfs->ns_##parent_name##_subgroups->sg_##name##_kobj); \
 }
 
 /************************************************************************
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#10 lore raw

PATCH 11/12 nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_create_snapshot_group

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b2fe39c248f3fa4bbb2a20759b4fdd83504190f7 ]

If kobject_init_and_add returns with error, kobject_put() is needed here to avoid memory leak, because kobject_init_and_add may return error without freeing the memory associated with the kobject it allocated.

---
 fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c +2 -2
index 195f42192a15..6c92ac314b06 100644
@@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ int nilfs_sysfs_create_snapshot_group(struct nilfs_root *root)
 	}
 
 	if (err)
-		return err;
+		kobject_put(&root->snapshot_kobj);
 
-	return 0;
+	return err;
 }
 
 void nilfs_sysfs_delete_snapshot_group(struct nilfs_root *root)
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
author maintainer
#11 lore raw

PATCH 12/12 nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_delete_snapshot_group

In reply to Sasha Levin

From: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 17243e1c3072b8417a5ebfc53065d0a87af7ca77 ]

kobject_put() should be used to cleanup the memory associated with the kobject instead of kobject_del(). See the section "Kobject removal" of "Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst".

---
 fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c +1 -1
index 6c92ac314b06..28a2db3b1787 100644
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ int nilfs_sysfs_create_snapshot_group(struct nilfs_root *root)
 
 void nilfs_sysfs_delete_snapshot_group(struct nilfs_root *root)
 {
-	kobject_del(&root->snapshot_kobj);
+	kobject_put(&root->snapshot_kobj);
 }
 
 /************************************************************************
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2