dm thin metadata: Fix use-after-free in dm_bm_set_read_only
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 dm thin metadata: Fix use-after-free in dm_bm_set_read_only
From: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
Hi Greg,
Ye Bin had ever fixed a use-after-free of dm-thin in v5.9, and the complete patchset contains three patches:
[1/3] d16ff19e69ab dm cache metadata: Avoid returning cmd->bm wild pointer on error [2/3] 219403d7e56f dm thin metadata: Avoid returning cmd->bm wild pointer on error [3/3] 3a653b205f29 dm thin metadata: Fix use-after-free in dm_bm_set_read_only
However, 4.19.y stable only picks the former two patches [1]:
[1/3] 67f03c3d6829 dm cache metadata: Avoid returning cmd->bm wild pointer on error [2/3] 2c00ee626ed4 dm thin metadata: Avoid returning cmd->bm wild pointer on error
We encountered a NULL crash and xiejingfeng found that the omitted patch 3 can fix that. I'm not sure why patch 3 is not picked then, and we need this patch to fix this issue.
[32402.449200] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 [32402.459553] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [32402.483982] RIP: 0010:dm_bm_set_read_only+0x5/0x10 [dm_persistent_data] [32402.588073] Call Trace: [32402.590522] dm_pool_metadata_read_only+0x22/0x30 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.596526] set_pool_mode+0x209/0x2e0 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.601579] metadata_operation_failed+0xd5/0xf0 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.607499] commit+0x91/0xf0 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.611771] pool_status+0x28a/0x700 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.616652] retrieve_status+0xa1/0x1c0 [dm_mod] [32402.627794] table_status+0x61/0xa0 [dm_mod] [32402.632068] ctl_ioctl+0x1b3/0x480 [dm_mod] [32402.636253] dm_ctl_ioctl+0xa/0x10 [dm_mod] [32402.640440] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f/0x610 [32402.653081] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [32402.656393] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [32402.660145] do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x200 [32402.663813] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
---
commit 3a653b205f29b3f9827a01a0c88bfbcb0d169494 upstream.
The following error ocurred when testing disk online/offline:
[ 301.798344] device-mapper: thin: 253:5: aborting current metadata transaction [ 301.848441] device-mapper: thin: 253:5: failed to abort metadata transaction [ 301.849206] Aborting journal on device dm-26-8. [ 301.850489] EXT4-fs error (device dm-26) in __ext4_new_inode:943: Journal has aborted [ 301.851095] EXT4-fs (dm-26): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 398742 at logical offset 181 with max blocks 19 with error 30 [ 301.854476] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in dm_bm_set_read_only+0x3a/0x40 [dm_persistent_data]
Reason is:
metadata_operation_failed
abort_transaction
dm_pool_abort_metadata
__create_persistent_data_objects
r = __open_or_format_metadata
if (r) --> If failed will free pmd->bm but pmd->bm not set NULL
dm_block_manager_destroy(pmd->bm);
set_pool_mode
dm_pool_metadata_read_only(pool->pmd);
dm_bm_set_read_only(pmd->bm); --> use-after-freeAdd checks to see if pmd->bm is NULL in dm_bm_set_read_only and dm_bm_set_read_write functions. If bm is NULL it means creating the bm failed and so dm_bm_is_read_only must return true.
--- drivers/md/dm-thin-metadata.c | 2 +- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c | 14 ++++++++------ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/md/dm-thin-metadata.c +1 -1
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ int dm_pool_metadata_close(struct dm_pool_metadata *pmd)return -EBUSY ; } -if (!dm_bm_is_read_only (pmd->bm) && !pmd->fail_io) { +if (!pmd->fail_io && !dm_bm_is_read_only (pmd->bm)) { r =__commit_transaction (pmd);if (r <0 ) DMWARN("%s: __commit_transaction() failed, error = %d",
drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c +8 -6
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ int dm_bm_write_lock(struct dm_block_manager *bm,void *p;int r; -if (bm->read_only) +if (dm_bm_is_read_only (bm))return -EPERM ; p =dm_bufio_read (bm->bufio, b, (struct dm_buffer **) result);
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int dm_bm_write_lock_zero(struct dm_block_manager *bm,struct buffer_aux *aux;void *p; -if (bm->read_only) +if (dm_bm_is_read_only (bm))return -EPERM ; p =dm_bufio_new (bm->bufio, b, (struct dm_buffer **) result);
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_bm_unlock);int dm_bm_flush (struct dm_block_manager *bm) { -if (bm->read_only) +if (dm_bm_is_read_only (bm))return -EPERM ;return dm_bufio_write_dirty_buffers (bm->bufio);
@@ -617,19 +617,21 @@ void dm_bm_prefetch(struct dm_block_manager *bm, dm_block_t b)bool dm_bm_is_read_only (struct dm_block_manager *bm) { -return bm->read_only; +return (bm ? bm->read_only : true); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dm_bm_is_read_only);void dm_bm_set_read_only (struct dm_block_manager *bm) { - bm->read_only = true; +if (bm) + bm->read_only = true; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dm_bm_set_read_only);void dm_bm_set_read_write (struct dm_block_manager *bm) { - bm->read_only = false; +if (bm) + bm->read_only = false; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dm_bm_set_read_write);
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Sorry, I misspelled the email address of Greg, please omit this email, and I had sent a new one.
Quoted 149 lines · Jeffle Xu
From: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
Hi Greg,
Ye Bin had ever fixed a use-after-free of dm-thin in v5.9, and the complete patchset contains three patches:
[1/3]
d16ff19e69abdm cache metadata: Avoid returningcmd->bmwild pointer on error [2/3]219403d7e56fdm thin metadata: Avoid returningcmd->bmwild pointer on error [3/3]3a653b205f29dm thin metadata: Fix use-after-free indm_bm_set_read_onlyHowever, 4.19.y stable only picks the former two patches [1]:
[1/3]67f03c3d6829dm cache metadata: Avoid returningcmd->bmwild pointer on error [2/3]2c00ee626ed4dm thin metadata: Avoid returningcmd->bmwild pointer on errorWe encountered a NULL crash and xiejingfeng found that the omitted patch 3 can fix that. I'm not sure why patch 3 is not picked then, and we need this patch to fix this issue.
[32402.449200] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 [32402.459553] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [32402.483982] RIP: 0010:dm_bm_set_read_only+0x5/0x10 [dm_persistent_data] [32402.588073] Call Trace: [32402.590522] dm_pool_metadata_read_only+0x22/0x30 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.596526] set_pool_mode+0x209/0x2e0 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.601579] metadata_operation_failed+0xd5/0xf0 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.607499] commit+0x91/0xf0 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.611771] pool_status+0x28a/0x700 [dm_thin_pool] [32402.616652] retrieve_status+0xa1/0x1c0 [dm_mod] [32402.627794] table_status+0x61/0xa0 [dm_mod] [32402.632068] ctl_ioctl+0x1b3/0x480 [dm_mod] [32402.636253] dm_ctl_ioctl+0xa/0x10 [dm_mod] [32402.640440] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f/0x610 [32402.653081] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [32402.656393] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [32402.660145] do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x200 [32402.663813] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
---
commit3a653b205f29b3f9827a01a0c88bfbcb0d169494upstream.The following error ocurred when testing disk online/offline:
[ 301.798344] device-mapper: thin: 253:5: aborting current metadata transaction [ 301.848441] device-mapper: thin: 253:5: failed to abort metadata transaction [ 301.849206] Aborting journal on device dm-26-8. [ 301.850489] EXT4-fs error (device dm-26) in __ext4_new_inode:943: Journal has aborted [ 301.851095] EXT4-fs (dm-26): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 398742 at logical offset 181 with max blocks 19 with error 30 [ 301.854476] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in dm_bm_set_read_only+0x3a/0x40 [dm_persistent_data]Reason is:
metadata_operation_failedabort_transaction dm_pool_abort_metadata __create_persistent_data_objects r = __open_or_format_metadata if (r) --> If failed will free pmd->bm but pmd->bm not set NULL dm_block_manager_destroy(pmd->bm); set_pool_mode dm_pool_metadata_read_only(pool->pmd); dm_bm_set_read_only(pmd->bm); --> use-after-freeAdd checks to see if
pmd->bmis NULL indm_bm_set_read_onlyanddm_bm_set_read_writefunctions. If bm is NULL it means creating the bm failed and sodm_bm_is_read_onlymust return true.Signed-off-by Ye Bin <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>Signed-off-by xiejingfeng <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>--- drivers/md/dm-thin-metadata.c | 2 +- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c | 14 ++++++++------ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/md/dm-thin-metadata.c +1
-1@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ int dm_pool_metadata_close(struct dm_pool_metadata *pmd)return -EBUSY ; } -if (!dm_bm_is_read_only (pmd->bm) && !pmd->fail_io) { +if (!pmd->fail_io && !dm_bm_is_read_only (pmd->bm)) { r =__commit_transaction (pmd);if (r <0 ) DMWARN("%s: __commit_transaction() failed, error = %d",drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c +8
-6@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ int dm_bm_write_lock(struct dm_block_manager *bm,void *p;int r; -if (bm->read_only) +if (dm_bm_is_read_only (bm))return -EPERM ; p =dm_bufio_read (bm->bufio, b, (struct dm_buffer **) result);@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int dm_bm_write_lock_zero(struct dm_block_manager *bm,struct buffer_aux *aux;void *p; -if (bm->read_only) +if (dm_bm_is_read_only (bm))return -EPERM ; p =dm_bufio_new (bm->bufio, b, (struct dm_buffer **) result);@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_bm_unlock);int dm_bm_flush (struct dm_block_manager *bm) { -if (bm->read_only) +if (dm_bm_is_read_only (bm))return -EPERM ;return dm_bufio_write_dirty_buffers (bm->bufio);@@ -617,19 +617,21 @@ void dm_bm_prefetch(struct dm_block_manager *bm, dm_block_t b)bool dm_bm_is_read_only (struct dm_block_manager *bm) { -return bm->read_only; +return (bm ? bm->read_only : true); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dm_bm_is_read_only);void dm_bm_set_read_only (struct dm_block_manager *bm) { - bm->read_only = true; +if (bm) + bm->read_only = true; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dm_bm_set_read_only);void dm_bm_set_read_write (struct dm_block_manager *bm) { - bm->read_only = false; +if (bm) + bm->read_only = false; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dm_bm_set_read_write);
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Jeffle