Skip to contentSkip to conversation

xen/gntdev: fix unmap notification order

PATCH Applied Oleksandr Andrushchenko 2 participants 3 messages Dec 10, 2021 – Dec 13, 2021

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xen/gntdev: fix unmap notification order

From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <[email protected]>

While working with Xen's libxenvchan library I have faced an issue with unmap notifications sent in wrong order if both UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT and UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE were requested: first we send an event channel notification and then clear the notification byte which renders in the below inconsistency (cli_live is the byte which was requested to be cleared on unmap):

[  444.514243] gntdev_put_map UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT map->notify.event 6
libxenvchan_is_open cli_live 1
[  444.515239] __unmap_grant_pages UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE at 14

Thus it is not possible to reliably implement the checks like
- wait for the notification (UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT)
- check the variable (UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE)
because it is possible that the variable gets checked before it is cleared by the kernel.

To fix that we need to re-order the notifications, so the variable is first gets cleared and then the event channel notification is sent. With this fix I can see the correct order of execution:

[   54.522611] __unmap_grant_pages UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE at 14
[   54.537966] gntdev_put_map UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT map->notify.event 6

libxenvchan_is_open cli_live 0

---
 drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/xen/gntdev.c +3 -3
index fec1b6537166..59ffea800079 100644
@@ -250,13 +250,13 @@ void gntdev_put_map(struct gntdev_priv *priv, struct gntdev_grant_map *map)
 	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&map->users))
 		return;
 
+	if (map->pages && !use_ptemod)
+		unmap_grant_pages(map, 0, map->count);
+
 	if (map->notify.flags & UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT) {
 		notify_remote_via_evtchn(map->notify.event);
 		evtchn_put(map->notify.event);
 	}
-
-	if (map->pages && !use_ptemod)
-		unmap_grant_pages(map, 0, map->count);
 	gntdev_free_map(map);
 }
 
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 22 lines · Oleksandr Andrushchenko

From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <[email protected]>

While working with Xen's libxenvchan library I have faced an issue with unmap notifications sent in wrong order if both UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT and UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE were requested: first we send an event channel notification and then clear the notification byte which renders in the below inconsistency (cli_live is the byte which was requested to be cleared on unmap):

[  444.514243] gntdev_put_map UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT map->notify.event 6
libxenvchan_is_open cli_live 1
[  444.515239] __unmap_grant_pages UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE at 14

Thus it is not possible to reliably implement the checks like
- wait for the notification (UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT)
- check the variable (UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE)
because it is possible that the variable gets checked before it is cleared by the kernel.

To fix that we need to re-order the notifications, so the variable is first gets cleared and then the event channel notification is sent. With this fix I can see the correct order of execution:

Quoted 6 lines
[   54.522611] __unmap_grant_pages UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE at 14
[   54.537966] gntdev_put_map UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT map->notify.event 6

libxenvchan_is_open cli_live 0

#2 lore raw
In reply to Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Quoted 22 lines · Oleksandr Andrushchenko

From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <[email protected]>

While working with Xen's libxenvchan library I have faced an issue with unmap notifications sent in wrong order if both UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT and UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE were requested: first we send an event channel notification and then clear the notification byte which renders in the below inconsistency (cli_live is the byte which was requested to be cleared on unmap):

[  444.514243] gntdev_put_map UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT map->notify.event 6
libxenvchan_is_open cli_live 1
[  444.515239] __unmap_grant_pages UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE at 14

Thus it is not possible to reliably implement the checks like
- wait for the notification (UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT)
- check the variable (UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE)
because it is possible that the variable gets checked before it is cleared by the kernel.

To fix that we need to re-order the notifications, so the variable is first gets cleared and then the event channel notification is sent. With this fix I can see the correct order of execution:

Quoted 6 lines
[   54.522611] __unmap_grant_pages UNMAP_NOTIFY_CLEAR_BYTE at 14
[   54.537966] gntdev_put_map UNMAP_NOTIFY_SEND_EVENT map->notify.event 6

libxenvchan_is_open cli_live 0

Applied to for-linus-5.16c

-boris