Fix warnings in blktrace
Subsystems (3)
cover Fix warnings in blktrace
These two patches fix wrong usage of lock primitives with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT in the blktrace code.
Wander Lairson Costa (2):
block: Avoid sleeping function called from invalid context bug
blktrace: switch trace spinlock to a raw spinlock
block/blk-cgroup.c | 4 ++-- kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH 1/2 block: Avoid sleeping function called from invalid context bug
This was caught during QA test:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:942 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 243401, name: sed INFO: lockdep is turned off. Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffff89b26268>] blk_cgroup_bio_start+0x28/0xd0 CPU: 2 PID: 243401 Comm: sed Kdump: loaded Not tainted 4.18.0-353.rt7.138.el8.x86_64+debug #1 Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9, BIOS P89 05/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5c/0x80 ___might_sleep.cold.89+0xf5/0x109 rt_spin_lock+0x3e/0xd0 ? __blk_add_trace+0x428/0x4b0 __blk_add_trace+0x428/0x4b0 blk_add_trace_bio+0x16e/0x1c0 generic_make_request_checks+0x7e8/0x8c0 generic_make_request+0x3c/0x420 ? membarrier_private_expedited+0xd0/0x2b0 ? lock_release+0x1ca/0x450 ? submit_bio+0x3c/0x160 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x80 submit_bio+0x3c/0x160 ? rt_mutex_futex_unlock+0x66/0xa0 iomap_submit_ioend.isra.36+0x4a/0x70 xfs_vm_writepages+0x65/0x90 [xfs] do_writepages+0x41/0xe0 ? rt_mutex_futex_unlock+0x66/0xa0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xce/0x110 xfs_release+0x11c/0x160 [xfs] __fput+0xd5/0x270 task_work_run+0xa1/0xd0 exit_to_usermode_loop+0x14d/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x23b/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf
We replace the get/put_cpu() call by get/put_cpu_light to avoid this bug.
--- block/blk-cgroup.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
block/blk-cgroup.c +2 -2
@@ -1911,7 +1911,7 @@ void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio)struct blkg_iostat_set *bis;unsigned long flags; - cpu =get_cpu (); + cpu =get_cpu_light (); bis =per_cpu_ptr (bio->bi_blkg->iostat_cpu, cpu); flags =u64_stats_update_begin_irqsave (&bis->sync);
@@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@ void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio)u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore (&bis->sync, flags);if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl (io_cgrp_subsys))cgroup_rstat_updated (bio->bi_blkg->blkcg->css.cgroup, cpu); -put_cpu (); +put_cpu_light (); }static int __init blkcg_init (void )
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
kernel test robot
build botRe: [PREEMPT_RT PATCH 1/2] block: Avoid sleeping function called from invalid context bug
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
Hi Wander,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linux/master linus/master v5.16-rc4] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Wander-Lairson-Costa/Fix-warnings-in-blktrace/20211211-044405 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next config: i386-randconfig-a016-20211210 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211211/202112111300.2jYSEVK1-lkp(a)intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 097a1cb1d5ebb3a0ec4bcaed8ba3ff6a8e33c00a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/37b10b13961fb1af60139789717a018f788f714e
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Wander-Lairson-Costa/Fix-warnings-in-blktrace/20211211-044405 git checkout 37b10b13961fb1af60139789717a018f788f714e
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> block/blk-cgroup.c:1915:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_cpu_light' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cpu = get_cpu_light();
^
>> block/blk-cgroup.c:1932:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_cpu_light' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
put_cpu_light();
^
block/blk-cgroup.c:1932:2: note: did you mean 'get_cpu_light'?
block/blk-cgroup.c:1915:8: note: 'get_cpu_light' declared here
cpu = get_cpu_light();
^2 errors generated.
vim +/get_cpu_light +1915 block/blk-cgroup.c
1908
1909 void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio)
1910 {
1911 int rwd = blk_cgroup_io_type(bio), cpu;
1912 struct blkg_iostat_set *bis;
1913 unsigned long flags;
1914
> 1915 cpu = get_cpu_light();
1916 bis = per_cpu_ptr(bio->bi_blkg->iostat_cpu, cpu);
1917 flags = u64_stats_update_begin_irqsave(&bis->sync);
1918
1919 /*
1920 * If the bio is flagged with BIO_CGROUP_ACCT it means this is a split
1921 * bio and we would have already accounted for the size of the bio.
1922 */
1923 if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CGROUP_ACCT)) {
1924 bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_CGROUP_ACCT);
1925 bis->cur.bytes[rwd] += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
1926 }
1927 bis->cur.ios[rwd]++;
1928
1929 u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&bis->sync, flags);
1930 if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(io_cgrp_subsys))
1931 cgroup_rstat_updated(bio->bi_blkg->blkcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
> 1932 put_cpu_light(); 1933 }
1934
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
PATCH 2/2 blktrace: switch trace spinlock to a raw spinlock
In reply to Wander Lairson CostaTRACE_EVENT disables preemption before calling the callback. Because of that blktrace triggers the following bug under PREEMPT_RT:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:35
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 119, name: kworker/u2:2
5 locks held by kworker/u2:2/119:
#0: ffff8c2e4a88f538 ((wq_completion)xfs-cil/dm-0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x200/0x450
#1: ffffab3840ac7e68 ((work_completion)(&cil->xc_push_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x200/0x450
#2: ffff8c2e4a887128 (&cil->xc_ctx_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: xlog_cil_push_work+0xb7/0x670 [xfs]
#3: ffffffffa6a63780 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: blk_add_trace_bio+0x0/0x1f0
#4: ffffffffa6610620 (running_trace_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __blk_add_trace+0x3ef/0x480
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffffffffa4d35c05>] migrate_enable+0x45/0x140
CPU: 0 PID: 119 Comm: kworker/u2:2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-25.rt21.25.light.el9.x86_64+debug #1
Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
Workqueue: xfs-cil/dm-0 xlog_cil_push_work [xfs]
Call Trace:
? migrate_enable+0x45/0x140
dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d
___might_sleep.cold+0xe3/0xf7
rt_spin_lock+0x3a/0xd0
? __blk_add_trace+0x3ef/0x480
__blk_add_trace+0x3ef/0x480
blk_add_trace_bio+0x18d/0x1f0
trace_block_bio_queue+0xb5/0x150
submit_bio_checks+0x1f0/0x520
? sched_clock_cpu+0xb/0x100
submit_bio_noacct+0x30/0x1d0
? bio_associate_blkg+0x66/0x190
xlog_cil_push_work+0x1b6/0x670 [xfs]
? register_lock_class+0x43/0x4f0
? xfs_swap_extents+0x5f0/0x5f0 [xfs]
process_one_work+0x275/0x450
? process_one_work+0x200/0x450
worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
? process_one_work+0x450/0x450
kthread+0x188/0x1a0
? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30To avoid this bug, we switch the trace lock to a raw spinlock.
--- kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
kernel/trace/blktrace.c +7 -7
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static struct trace_array *blk_tr;static bool blk_tracer_enabled__read_mostly ;static LIST_HEAD (running_trace_list); -static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK (running_trace_lock ); +static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK (running_trace_lock );/* Select an alternative, minimalistic output than the original one */ #define TRACE_BLK_OPT_CLASSIC 0x1
@@ -121,12 +121,12 @@ static void trace_note_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk)struct blk_trace *bt; tsk->btrace_seq = blktrace_seq; -spin_lock_irqsave (&running_trace_lock, flags); +raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&running_trace_lock, flags);list_for_each_entry (bt, &running_trace_list, running_list) {trace_note (bt, tsk->pid,BLK_TN_PROCESS , tsk->comm,sizeof (tsk->comm),0 ); } -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&running_trace_lock, flags); +raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&running_trace_lock, flags); }static void trace_note_time (struct blk_trace *bt)
@@ -666,9 +666,9 @@ static int __blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int start) blktrace_seq++;smp_mb (); bt->trace_state = Blktrace_running; -spin_lock_irq (&running_trace_lock); +raw_spin_lock_irq (&running_trace_lock);list_add (&bt->running_list, &running_trace_list); -spin_unlock_irq (&running_trace_lock); +raw_spin_unlock_irq (&running_trace_lock);trace_note_time (bt); ret =0 ;
@@ -676,9 +676,9 @@ static int __blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int start) }else {if (bt->trace_state == Blktrace_running) { bt->trace_state = Blktrace_stopped; -spin_lock_irq (&running_trace_lock); +raw_spin_lock_irq (&running_trace_lock);list_del_init (&bt->running_list); -spin_unlock_irq (&running_trace_lock); +raw_spin_unlock_irq (&running_trace_lock);relay_flush (bt->rchan); ret =0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
kernel test robot
build botRe: [PREEMPT_RT PATCH 2/2] blktrace: switch trace spinlock to a raw spinlock
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
Hi Wander,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linux/master linus/master v5.16-rc4] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Wander-Lairson-Costa/Fix-warnings-in-blktrace/20211211-044405 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next config: nds32-randconfig-r012-20211210 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211211/202112111053.CFUB5OjZ-lkp(a)intel.com/config) compiler: nds32le-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/78ab0023d3b1ba3f3dc5703b4d4fac1dd24aa0c2
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Wander-Lairson-Costa/Fix-warnings-in-blktrace/20211211-044405
git checkout 78ab0023d3b1ba3f3dc5703b4d4fac1dd24aa0c2
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=nds32 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/vfio/ kernel/trace/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/trace/blktrace.c: In function '__trace_note_message':
kernel/trace/blktrace.c:148:63: warning: parameter 'blkcg' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
148 | void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, struct blkcg *blkcg,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
kernel/trace/blktrace.c: In function 'blk_trace_remove_queue':
>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1611:31: error: passing argument 1 of 'spin_lock_irq' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
1611 | spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| raw_spinlock_t * {aka struct raw_spinlock *}
In file included from include/linux/wait.h:9,
from include/linux/pid.h:6,
from include/linux/sched.h:14,
from include/linux/blkdev.h:5,
from kernel/trace/blktrace.c:10:
include/linux/spinlock.h:372:55: note: expected 'spinlock_t *' {aka 'struct spinlock *'} but argument is of type 'raw_spinlock_t *' {aka 'struct raw_spinlock *'}
372 | static __always_inline void spin_lock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1613:33: error: passing argument 1 of 'spin_unlock_irq' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
1613 | spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| raw_spinlock_t * {aka struct raw_spinlock *} In file included from include/linux/wait.h:9,
from include/linux/pid.h:6,
from include/linux/sched.h:14,
from include/linux/blkdev.h:5,
from kernel/trace/blktrace.c:10:
include/linux/spinlock.h:397:57: note: expected 'spinlock_t *' {aka 'struct spinlock *'} but argument is of type 'raw_spinlock_t *' {aka 'struct raw_spinlock *'}
397 | static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/spin_lock_irq +1611 kernel/trace/blktrace.c
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1599
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1600 static int blk_trace_remove_queue(struct request_queue *q)
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1601 {
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1602 struct blk_trace *bt;
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1603
c3dbe541ef7775 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Jan Kara 2020-06-05 1604 bt = rcu_replace_pointer(q->blk_trace, NULL,
85e0cbbb8a7953 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-19 1605 lockdep_is_held(&q->debugfs_mutex));
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1606 if (bt == NULL)
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1607 return -EINVAL;
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1608
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1609 if (bt->trace_state == Blktrace_running) {
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1610 bt->trace_state = Blktrace_stopped;
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 @1611 spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1612 list_del_init(&bt->running_list);
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 @1613 spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1614 relay_flush(bt->rchan);
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1615 }
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1616
a6da0024ffc19e kernel/trace/blktrace.c Jens Axboe 2017-11-05 1617 put_probe_ref();
c780e86dd48ef6 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Jan Kara 2020-02-06 1618 synchronize_rcu();
ad5dd5493a55e4 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Li Zefan 2009-03-27 1619 blk_trace_free(bt);
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1620 return 0;
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1621 }
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1622 ---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
kernel test robot
build botRe: [PREEMPT_RT PATCH 2/2] blktrace: switch trace spinlock to a raw spinlock
In reply to Wander Lairson CostaThank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
Hi Wander,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linux/master linus/master v5.16-rc4] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Wander-Lairson-Costa/Fix-warnings-in-blktrace/20211211-044405 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next config: arm64-randconfig-r014-20211210 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211211/202112111754.ivCXr0cu-lkp(a)intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 097a1cb1d5ebb3a0ec4bcaed8ba3ff6a8e33c00a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/78ab0023d3b1ba3f3dc5703b4d4fac1dd24aa0c2
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Wander-Lairson-Costa/Fix-warnings-in-blktrace/20211211-044405 git checkout 78ab0023d3b1ba3f3dc5703b4d4fac1dd24aa0c2
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/trace/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1611:17: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:372:55: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline void spin_lock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
^
kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1613:19: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/spinlock.h:397:57: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
^2 errors generated.
vim +1611 kernel/trace/blktrace.c
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1599
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1600 static int blk_trace_remove_queue(struct request_queue *q)
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1601 {
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1602 struct blk_trace *bt;
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1603
c3dbe541ef7775 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Jan Kara 2020-06-05 1604 bt = rcu_replace_pointer(q->blk_trace, NULL,
85e0cbbb8a7953 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-19 1605 lockdep_is_held(&q->debugfs_mutex));
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1606 if (bt == NULL)
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1607 return -EINVAL;
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1608
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1609 if (bt->trace_state == Blktrace_running) {
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1610 bt->trace_state = Blktrace_stopped;
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 @1611 spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1612 list_del_init(&bt->running_list);
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1613 spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1614 relay_flush(bt->rchan);
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1615 }
5afedf670caf30 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Zhihao Cheng 2021-09-23 1616
a6da0024ffc19e kernel/trace/blktrace.c Jens Axboe 2017-11-05 1617 put_probe_ref();
c780e86dd48ef6 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Jan Kara 2020-02-06 1618 synchronize_rcu();
ad5dd5493a55e4 kernel/trace/blktrace.c Li Zefan 2009-03-27 1619 blk_trace_free(bt);
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1620 return 0;
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1621 }
c71a896154119f block/blktrace.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-01-23 1622 ---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org