USB: serial: ti_usb_3410_5052: Use struct_size() helper in ti_write_byte()
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 USB: serial: ti_usb_3410_5052: Use struct_size() helper in ti_write_byte()
Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version, in order to avoid any potential type mistakes or integer overflows that, in the worst scenario, could lead to heap overflows.
Also, address the following sparse warnings:drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c:1521:16: warning: using sizeof on a flexible structure
--- drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c +2 -2
@@ -1512,13 +1512,13 @@ static int ti_write_byte(struct usb_serial_port *port, u8 mask, u8 byte) { int status; -unsigned int size; +size_t size;struct ti_write_data_bytes *data;dev_dbg (&port->dev,"%s - addr 0x%08lX, mask 0x%02X, byte 0x%02X\n" , __func__, addr, mask, byte); - size =sizeof (struct ti_write_data_bytes ) +2 ; + size =struct_size (data, bData,2 ); data =kmalloc (size,GFP_KERNEL );if (!data)return -ENOMEM ;
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Quoted 9 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
Make use of the
struct_size()helper instead of an open-coded version, in order to avoid any potential type mistakes or integer overflows that, in the worst scenario, could lead to heap overflows.Also, address the following sparse warnings:
drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c:1521:16: warning: using sizeof on a flexible structure
Looks good.
Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
Johan Hovold
maintainerQuoted 3 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva
Make use of the
struct_size()helper instead of an open-coded version, in order to avoid any potential type mistakes or integer overflows that, in the worst scenario, could lead to heap overflows.
This boiler-plate motivation doesn't apply here since the "variable" size is in fact constant.
Quoted 2 lines
Also, address the following sparse warnings:
drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c:1521:16: warning: using sizeof on a flexible structure
And this bit is again bogus, since this off-by-default warning would still be there with this patch applied.
Quoted 13 lines
--- drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c +0
-0@@ -1512,13 +1512,13 @@ static int ti_write_byte(struct usb_serial_port *port, u8 mask, u8 byte) {
drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c static int ti_write_byte(struct usb_serial_port *port, · line 1521
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c +2
-2int status; -unsigned int size; +size_t size;struct ti_write_data_bytes *data;dev_dbg (&port->dev,"%s - addr 0x%08lX, mask 0x%02X, byte 0x%02X\n" , __func__, addr, mask, byte); - size =sizeof (struct ti_write_data_bytes ) +2 ; + size =struct_size (data, bData,2 );
I guess the change itself is fine otherwise and could be motivated as documenting the constant.
At least as long as the compiler is smart enough to not generate any additional code for this, there wouldn't be any downsides.
drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c static int ti_write_byte(struct usb_serial_port *port, · line 1524
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c +0
-0data =kmalloc (size,GFP_KERNEL );if (!data)return -ENOMEM ;
Johan