linux-next: build failure after merge of the kspp tree
Subsystems (3)
Hi all,
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function 'ibmvscsis_send_messages':drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1934:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1934 | crq->valid = VALID_CMD_RESP_EL;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'
1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0;
| ^~~~~~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1935:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1935 | crq->format = cmd->rsp.format;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'
1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0;
| ^~~~~~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1938:52: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1938 | crq->status = VIOSRP_ADAPTER_FAIL;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'
1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0;
| ^~~~~~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1940:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1940 | crq->IU_length = cpu_to_be16(cmd->rsp.len);
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'
1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0;
| ^~~~~~Exposed by commit
4ba545781e20 ("Makefile: Enable -Warray-bounds")
Probably introduced by commit
88a678bbc34c ("ibmvscsis: Initial commit of IBM VSCSI Tgt Driver")
I applied the following hack for now:
From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:18:36 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: hack for building with -Warray-bounds
--- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c +3 -3
@@ -1872,11 +1872,11 @@ static void srp_snd_msg_failed(struct scsi_info *vscsi, long rc)*/ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages (struct scsi_info *vscsi) { -u64 msg_hi =0 ; +u64 msg_hi[2 ] = { };/* note do not attempt to access the IU_data_ptr with this pointer * it is not valid */ -struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)&msg_hi; +struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)msg_hi;struct ibmvscsis_cmd *cmd, *nxt;long rc =ADAPT_SUCCESS ;bool retry = false;
@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi) crq->IU_length =cpu_to_be16 (cmd->rsp.len); rc =h_send_crq (vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address, -be64_to_cpu (msg_hi), +be64_to_cpu (msg_hi[0 ]),be64_to_cpu (cmd->rsp.tag)); dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "send_messages: cmd %p, tag 0x%llx, rc %ld\n",
Signature · 5 lines
2.34.1 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Quoted 70 lines · Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function 'ibmvscsis_send_messages':drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1934:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1934 |crq->valid=VALID_CMD_RESP_EL;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1935:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1935 |crq->format=cmd->rsp.format;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1938:52: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1938 |crq->status=VIOSRP_ADAPTER_FAIL;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1940:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1940 |crq->IU_length=cpu_to_be16(cmd->rsp.len);
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~Exposed by commit
4ba545781e20("Makefile: Enable -Warray-bounds")Probably introduced by commit
88a678bbc34c("ibmvscsis: Initial commit of IBM VSCSI Tgt Driver")I applied the following hack for now:
From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:18:36 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: hack for building with -Warray-boundsSigned-off-by Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>--- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c +2
-2@@ -1872,11 +1872,11 @@ static void srp_snd_msg_failed(struct scsi_info *vscsi, long rc)*/ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages (struct scsi_info *vscsi) { -u64 msg_hi =0 ; +u64 msg_hi[2 ] = { };/* note do not attempt to access the IU_data_ptr with this pointer * it is not valid */ -struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)&msg_hi; +struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)msg_hi;struct ibmvscsis_cmd *cmd, *nxt;long rc =ADAPT_SUCCESS ;bool retry = false;
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi) · line 1946
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c +1
-1@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi) crq->IU_length =cpu_to_be16 (cmd->rsp.len); rc =h_send_crq (vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address, -be64_to_cpu (msg_hi), +be64_to_cpu (msg_hi[0 ]),be64_to_cpu (cmd->rsp.tag)); dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "send_messages: cmd %p, tag 0x%llx, rc %ld\n",
This looks correct to me. struct viosrp_crq is 16 bytes wide. The only suggestion I might make would be either avoid the bare '2':
u64 msg_hi[sizeof(struct viosrp_crq) / sizeof(u64)] = { };or adjust struct viosrp_crq so the casting isn't needed at all:
truct viosrp_crq {
union {
u64 hi;
struct {
u8 valid; /* used by RPA */
u8 format; /* SCSI vs out-of-band */
u8 reserved;
u8 status; /* non-scsi failure? (e.g. DMA failure) */
__be16 timeout; /* in seconds */
__be16 IU_length; /* in bytes */
};
};
__be64 IU_data_ptr; /* the TCE for transferring data */
}; struct viosrp_crq crq = { };
...
rc = h_send_crq(vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address,
be64_to_cpu(crq.hi),
be64_to_cpu(cmd->rsp.tag));Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
Hi all,
[Cc'ing the scsi maintainers. Sorry I should have done that sooner]
Quoted 103 lines · On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:43:44 -0800 Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 69 lines · Stephen Rothwell
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function 'ibmvscsis_send_messages':drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1934:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1934 |crq->valid=VALID_CMD_RESP_EL;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1935:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1935 |crq->format=cmd->rsp.format;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1938:52: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1938 |crq->status=VIOSRP_ADAPTER_FAIL;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1940:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1940 |crq->IU_length=cpu_to_be16(cmd->rsp.len);
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~Exposed by commit
4ba545781e20("Makefile: Enable -Warray-bounds")Probably introduced by commit
88a678bbc34c("ibmvscsis: Initial commit of IBM VSCSI Tgt Driver")I applied the following hack for now:
From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:18:36 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: hack for building with -Warray-boundsSigned-off-by Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>--- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c +2
-2@@ -1872,11 +1872,11 @@ static void srp_snd_msg_failed(struct scsi_info *vscsi, long rc)*/ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages (struct scsi_info *vscsi) { -u64 msg_hi =0 ; +u64 msg_hi[2 ] = { };/* note do not attempt to access the IU_data_ptr with this pointer * it is not valid */ -struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)&msg_hi; +struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)msg_hi;struct ibmvscsis_cmd *cmd, *nxt;long rc =ADAPT_SUCCESS ;bool retry = false;drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi) · line 1946
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c +1
-1@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi) crq->IU_length =cpu_to_be16 (cmd->rsp.len); rc =h_send_crq (vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address, -be64_to_cpu (msg_hi), +be64_to_cpu (msg_hi[0 ]),be64_to_cpu (cmd->rsp.tag)); dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "send_messages: cmd %p, tag 0x%llx, rc %ld\n",This looks correct to me. struct
viosrp_crqis 16 bytes wide. The only suggestion I might make would be either avoid the bare '2':u64 msg_hi[sizeof(struct viosrp_crq) / sizeof(u64)] = { };or adjust struct
viosrp_crqso the casting isn't needed at all:truct viosrp_crq { union { u64 hi; struct { u8 valid; /* used by RPA */ u8 format; /* SCSI vs out-of-band */ u8 reserved; u8 status; /* non-scsi failure? (e.g. DMA failure) */ __be16 timeout; /* in seconds */ __be16 IU_length; /* in bytes */ }; }; __be64 IU_data_ptr; /* the TCE for transferring data */ };
Quoted 8 lines
struct viosrp_crq crq = { };
...
rc = h_send_crq(vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address,
be64_to_cpu(crq.hi),
be64_to_cpu(cmd->rsp.tag));Has there been any progress on this?
Commit 88a678bbc34c mentioned above was merged in v4.8-rc1.
Signature · 2 lines
Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Quoted 117 lines · Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
[Cc'ing the scsi maintainers. Sorry I should have done that sooner]
Quoted 103 lines · On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:43:44 -0800 Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 69 lines · Stephen Rothwell
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function 'ibmvscsis_send_messages':drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1934:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1934 |crq->valid=VALID_CMD_RESP_EL;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1935:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1935 |crq->format=cmd->rsp.format;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1938:52: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1938 |crq->status=VIOSRP_ADAPTER_FAIL;
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1940:44: error: array subscript 'struct viosrp_crq[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u64[1]' {aka 'long long unsigned int[1]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
1940 |crq->IU_length=cpu_to_be16(cmd->rsp.len);
| ^~drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:1875:13: note: while referencing 'msg_hi'1875 | u64 msg_hi = 0; | ^~~~~~Exposed by commit
4ba545781e20("Makefile: Enable -Warray-bounds")Probably introduced by commit
88a678bbc34c("ibmvscsis: Initial commit of IBM VSCSI Tgt Driver")I applied the following hack for now:
From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:18:36 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: hack for building with -Warray-boundsSigned-off-by Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>--- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c +2
-2@@ -1872,11 +1872,11 @@ static void srp_snd_msg_failed(struct scsi_info *vscsi, long rc)*/ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages (struct scsi_info *vscsi) { -u64 msg_hi =0 ; +u64 msg_hi[2 ] = { };/* note do not attempt to access the IU_data_ptr with this pointer * it is not valid */ -struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)&msg_hi; +struct viosrp_crq *crq = (struct viosrp_crq *)msg_hi;struct ibmvscsis_cmd *cmd, *nxt;long rc =ADAPT_SUCCESS ;bool retry = false;drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi) · line 1946
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c +1
-1@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi) crq->IU_length =cpu_to_be16 (cmd->rsp.len); rc =h_send_crq (vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address, -be64_to_cpu (msg_hi), +be64_to_cpu (msg_hi[0 ]),be64_to_cpu (cmd->rsp.tag)); dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "send_messages: cmd %p, tag 0x%llx, rc %ld\n",This looks correct to me. struct
viosrp_crqis 16 bytes wide. The only suggestion I might make would be either avoid the bare '2':u64 msg_hi[sizeof(struct viosrp_crq) / sizeof(u64)] = { };or adjust struct
viosrp_crqso the casting isn't needed at all:truct viosrp_crq { union { u64 hi; struct { u8 valid; /* used by RPA */ u8 format; /* SCSI vs out-of-band */ u8 reserved; u8 status; /* non-scsi failure? (e.g. DMA failure) */ __be16 timeout; /* in seconds */ __be16 IU_length; /* in bytes */ }; }; __be64 IU_data_ptr; /* the TCE for transferring data */ };Quoted 8 lines
struct viosrp_crq crq = { }; ... rc = h_send_crq(vscsi->dma_dev->unit_address, be64_to_cpu(crq.hi), be64_to_cpu(cmd->rsp.tag));
Quoted 3 lines
Has there been any progress on this?
Commit
88a678bbc34cmentioned above was merged in v4.8-rc1.
Thanks for the reminder! I've sent this now:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook