dt-bindings: regulator: maxim,max8973: Drop Tegra specifics from example
Subsystems (2)
Rob Herring
maintainerPATCH 1/1 dt-bindings: regulator: maxim,max8973: Drop Tegra specifics from example
There's no need to complicate examples with a platform specific macro. It also complicates example parsing to figure out the number of interrupt cells in examples (based on the bracketing).
--- .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/maxim,max8973.yaml | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/maxim,max8973.yaml +2 -3
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ examples: }; - | - #include <dt-bindings/gpio/tegra-gpio.h> + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> i2c {
@@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ examples: regulator@1b { compatible = "maxim,max77621"; reg = <0x1b>; - interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; - interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(Y, 1) IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; regulator-always-on; regulator-boot-on;
Signature · 1 line
2.32.0
Quoted 9 lines · Rob Herring
There's no need to complicate examples with a platform specific macro. It also complicates example parsing to figure out the number of interrupt cells in examples (based on the bracketing).
Signed-off-by Rob Herring <[email protected]>--- .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/maxim,max8973.yaml | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 5 lines · Rob Herring
There's no need to complicate examples with a platform specific macro. It also complicates example parsing to figure out the number of interrupt cells in examples (based on the bracketing).
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] dt-bindings: regulator: maxim,max8973: Drop Tegra specifics from example
commit: fa183433bf53ee092323005f05cb3491e4aaaa8b
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark